GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

It is currently 11 Jul 2020, 18:55

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The international team of scientists, whose research was conducted und

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Manager
Manager
avatar
P
Status: To infinity and beyond
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 236
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
GPA: 3.31
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
The international team of scientists, whose research was conducted und  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 30 Sep 2019, 03:37
1
5
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 252 sessions

45% (02:51) correct 55% (02:46) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 248 sessions

65% (01:15) correct 35% (01:34) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 234 sessions

63% (01:12) correct 38% (01:21) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 232 sessions

55% (01:18) correct 45% (01:20) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

New Project RC Butler 2019 - Practice 2 RC Passages Everyday
Passage # 237, Date : 30-Jul-2019
This post is a part of New Project RC Butler 2019. Click here for Details


The international team of scientists, whose research was conducted under the European Commission-funded CARBO-Extreme Project, contends that extreme climate events, such as droughts, heat waves and storms, weaken the buffer effect that terrestrial ecosystems have on the climate system. The researchers discovered that drought has a particular capacity to reduce the amount of carbon that is absorbed by forests, meadows and agricultural land. Their findings suggest that by diminishing the natural environment’s ability to absorb carbon, extreme weather simultaneously results from, and perpetuates, climate change. During the course of their study, the CARBO-Extreme team, headed by Dr Reichstein, examined how extreme weather affects forests, bogs, grassy landscapes and arable areas across the planet.

The team, whose findings have been published in the latest issue of the journal “Nature”, enlisted the help of complex computer models to calculate the global effect of extreme climate events on the carbon balance. They discovered that drought, as opposed to heat, has the most pronounced effect on an ecosystem’s ability to remove carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. As climate change continues to gather pace, many experts believe that extreme weather events will occur more frequently than they do at present. If the CARBO-Extreme team is correct and extreme weather is a significant driver of climate change, this relationship could turn out to be a self-fulfilling prophesy. Unfortunately, it is very difficult for scientists to categorically state whether or not extreme weather is becoming more frequent. Whilst there is a great deal of evidence to suggest that heat waves and droughts will increase in frequency over the course of the next century, data pertaining to other extreme climate events remains inconclusive.

Question: 1: The author of this passage is primarily concerned with

a) providing a list of evidences that suggests a correlation between drought and climate change
b) resolving a contention between two schools of thought regarding a perceived natural occurrence
c) arguing for a change in National policies to incorporate a more ecologically conscientious view to the use of natural resources
d) evaluating a theory put forth by a team of scientists regarding a possible phenomenon
e) detailing the research findings of the CARBO-Extreme team


Question: 2: Which of the following can be best inferred from the passage?

a) Increase in droughts is the cause for extreme climate changes.
b) Extreme climate changes are the sole causative factors for drought and other extreme climate events
c) Accumulation of carbon-dioxide in the environment can cause climatic changes that are deleterious
d) Apart from droughts, other extreme climate events have no apparent connection with climatic change.
e) Aquatic ecosystems have a less pronounced mitigatory effect on climate change than do terrestrial ecosystems


Question: 3: The journal “Nature” is introduced in the 2nd paragraph primarily to

a) cite the source used by the CARBO-extreme team to substantiate their hypotheses.
b) forestall potential criticisms that might call into question the authenticity of the teams findings
c) provide a recorded instance of the teams work from which information about the teams findings could be obtained.
d) show the magnitude to which the teams research findings have had an impact.
e) highlight the fact that - extreme climate change is an issue that even the common-man has become concerned about.


Question: 4: Which of the following best describes the organization of the passage

a) An opinion is discussed; evidences suggesting the fallaciousness of the opinion are then provided.
b) A phenomenon is discussed, this phenomenon is then compared to another to understand the similarities shared.
c) A teams perspective about a natural occurrence is discussed; some evidence suggesting the validity of the theory are provided.
d) An explanation to a phenomenon is provided; evidences provided to substantiate this explanation are evaluated.
e) An assumption is put forth and the validity of this assumption is analyzed in light of new scientific findings.




Source: Crack Verbal
Difficulty Level: 700

Originally posted by devikeerthansr on 05 Oct 2017, 10:47.
Last edited by SajjadAhmad on 30 Sep 2019, 03:37, edited 4 times in total.
Updated - Complete topic (735).
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 25 Nov 2017
Posts: 77
Location: India
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GPA: 3.56
Re: The international team of scientists, whose research was conducted und  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2018, 06:31
Question: 4

Which of the following best describes the organization of the passage
a) An opinion is discussed; evidences suggesting the fallaciousness of the opinion are then provided. : No evidence discussed to prove fallaciousness.

b) A phenomenon is discussed, this phenomenon is then compared to another to understand the similarities shared.: No comparison of two phenomenons.

c) A teams perspective about a natural occurrence is discussed; some evidence suggesting the validity of the theory are provided. Correct

d) An explanation to a phenomenon is provided; evidences provided to substantiate this explanation are evaluated. :Evidences are provided to substantiate the perspective and this perspective is evaluated to some extent.But the evidences are not at all evaluated.

e) An assumption is put forth and the validity of this assumption is analyzed in light of new scientific findings.: No assumption is mentioned.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 21 Jun 2017
Posts: 436
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: IIM
GMAT 1: 620 Q47 V30
GPA: 3
WE: Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Re: The international team of scientists, whose research was conducted und  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Oct 2018, 08:27
Why D is wrong in q 4 ?

1. It is not a phenomenon , it is a possible phenomenon.
2 Evidences are not evaluated. No where it is mentioned in the passage that the research has been evaluated or the findings have been evaluated.
The organization is Theory> Possible Phenomenon> Research> Findings> Final conclusion of the author .
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 20 Jul 2018
Posts: 88
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
WE: Consulting (Manufacturing)
Re: The international team of scientists, whose research was conducted und  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2019, 10:14
2
1) d) evaluating a theory put forth by a team of scientists regarding a possible phenomenon
in 1st paragraph the author explains the theory, which team learned and in 2nd paragraph by using the artical about another team with better equipment
the auther evaluates the theory

2) c) Accumulation of carbon-dioxide in the environment can cause climatic changes that are deleterious
In this passage we don't see such words but all meaning is about preventing accumulation of carbon-dioxide

3) c) provide a recorded instance of the teams work from which information about the teams findings could be obtained.
in the article we find the information about computer, which helps to obtain additional information about team's research

4) c) A teams perspective about a natural occurrence is discussed; some evidence suggesting the validity of the theory are provided.
in firsh paragraph the author says about the research of team (natural accurrence) and brings evidence in the second (computer)
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Jun 2018
Posts: 26
Re: The international team of scientists, whose research was conducted und  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2019, 22:27
Question: 4: Which of the following best describes the organization of the passage

a) An opinion is discussed; evidences suggesting the fallaciousness of the opinion are then provided.
b) A phenomenon is discussed, this phenomenon is then compared to another to understand the similarities shared.
c) A teams perspective about a natural occurrence is discussed; some evidence suggesting the validity of the theory are provided.
d) An explanation to a phenomenon is provided; evidences provided to substantiate this explanation are evaluated.
e) An assumption is put forth and the validity of this assumption is analyzed in light of new scientific findings.[/box_in][/box_out][/align]

lets see what te first para is all about..

the team contends something( weakening of the buffer effect that terrestrial ecosystems have on the climate system) then they talk about drought and then how weakening of the buffer perpetuates climate change. lets look at the options-
a. wrong . no opinion is discussed and the second part is totally wrong.
b wrong. no phenomemom is discussed and certainly not compared
c.maybe true. hold onto it.
d. para 1 doesnt explain a phenomenon it just conteds based on findings.
e. no assumption is put forward.para 1 just just conteds based on findings.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The international team of scientists, whose research was conducted und   [#permalink] 02 Aug 2019, 22:27

The international team of scientists, whose research was conducted und

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne