jagdeepsingh1983
The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining companies to extract coal quickly from deeply-buried seams, destroys forests. Experts therefore recommend that coal be extracted using time-consuming deep bore techniques.
Because public opinion opposes coal mining, some states now allow mining companies to extract coal from any particular site for only a short period of time.
The statements above, if true, best support which of the following conclusions?
Premise 1 : quickly Extracting coal destroys forest.Experts suggest some
time consuming technique which will prevent forests.
Premise 2: Because of public opinion poll, some State allow to extract for
short period of timeClearly, There is a deadlock situation and both the parties cannot be happy at the same time.
Mining companies will continue to be able to extract coal using deep bore techniques but not by removing hillsides or mountaintops.
Incorrect.The question stem just provided the fact and didn't gave any opinion/result of the debate so this information cant be inferred.The only way to preserve forests on hillsides and mountaintops is to stop coal mining.
Incorrect. Stopping coal mining could be a way but definitely not the ONLY way.New mining techniques will be developed to make it possible to extract coal quickly without removing hillsides or mountaintops.
Incorrect.There is no hint about new tech in the argument so rejected.Public opinion regarding coal mining works against forest preservation efforts.
Correct. Experts oppose technique which destroy forests so they are putting effort for forest preservation.However, Public opinion poll opposes experts technique.
Allowing mining companies to extract coal from any particular site for only a short period of time is unlikely to be a successful response to public opinion.
Incorrect.The ques stem only suggests that Public opinion poll opposes but the above statement is too strong that it suggests that Public wants to completely ban coal mining to be successful.