GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 25 Sep 2018, 16:08

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining compan

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Mar 2011
Posts: 71
The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 02 Sep 2018, 02:57
6
17
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

46% (02:05) correct 54% (02:22) wrong based on 731 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining companies to extract coal quickly from deeply-buried seams, destroys forests. Experts therefore recommend that coal be extracted using time-consuming deep bore techniques.

Because public opinion opposes coal mining, some states now allow mining companies to extract coal from any particular site for only a short period of time.

The statements above, if true, best support which of the following conclusions?


A. Mining companies will continue to be able to extract coal using deep bore techniques but not by removing hillsides or mountaintops.

B. The only way to preserve forests on hillsides and mountaintops is to stop coal mining.

C. New mining techniques will be developed to make it possible to extract coal quickly without removing hillsides or mountaintops.

D. Public opinion regarding coal mining works against forest preservation efforts.

E. Allowing mining companies to extract coal from any particular site for only a short period of time is unlikely to be a successful response to public opinion.

Originally posted by jagdeepsingh1983 on 21 Aug 2011, 00:08.
Last edited by Bunuel on 02 Sep 2018, 02:57, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2011
Posts: 54
Re: The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Aug 2011, 00:35
1
D

Only short-time allowed -> green technique takes time -> not possible -> use faster (hillside removal) -> bad -> against efforts
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 May 2011
Posts: 195
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GMAT Date: 12-27-2011
WE: Law (Law)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Aug 2011, 04:17
1
The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining companies to extract coal quickly from deeply-buried seams, destroys forests(QUICK METHOD=DESTROY FORESTS=BAD). Experts therefore recommend that coal be extracted using time-consuming deep bore techniques.(DEEP BORE=LONG METHOD=NOT BAD)

Because public opinion opposes coal mining, some states now allow mining companies to extract coal from any particular site for only a short period of time(PUBLIC OPINION DIRECTS SOME STATES TO LET ONLY SHORT METHOD=BAD METHOD=DESTROYS FOREST").

The statements above, if true, best support which of the following conclusions?

Mining companies will continue to be able to extract coal using deep bore techniques but not by removing hillsides or mountaintops.NOT TRUE. IF STATES LET MINING COMPANIES SHORT METHOD=BAD METHOD THAN COMPANIES PROBABLY REMOVE MOUINTAINTOPS.

The only way to preserve forests on hillsides and mountaintops is to stop coal mining.NOT TRUE. (LONG METHOD=DEEP BORE=NOT BAD=NOT DESTROY FOREST)
New mining techniques will be developed to make it possible to extract coal quickly without removing hillsides or mountaintops.WE KNOW NOTHING ABOUT NEW TECHNIQUES AND CAN CONCLUDE.

Public opinion regarding coal mining works against forest preservation efforts.HENCE THE ANSWER. PUBLIC OPINION BY NEGATING MININGS MAKE STATES LET ONLY SHORT METHOD=BAD METHOD=DESTROYS FOREST)

Allowing mining companies to extract coal from any particular site for only a short period of time is unlikely to be a successful response to public opinion.WE DID NOT TOLD THAT.IT COULD BE TRUE IF WE KNOW THAT PUBLIC OPINION NEGATE ANY COAL MININGS BUT IT DOES NOT STATE IF THE STATE DECISION IS SUCCESFUL OR NOT.


BY THE WAY, most of the time I feel that Knewton CR is much different from that on OG.do you fell the same?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 385
Re: The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2014, 09:35
I'm sorry but I don't see any reference to forest preservation in the stem.
Why are we even considering it?
What if after every mining session, the company was obligated to restore it to perfect condition and to plant new trees?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 May 2014
Posts: 83
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Schools: HKUST '15, ISB '15
GMAT Date: 12-26-2014
GPA: 3
Re: The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2014, 11:14
1
jagdeepsingh1983 wrote:
The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining companies to extract coal quickly from deeply-buried seams, destroys forests. Experts therefore recommend that coal be extracted using time-consuming deep bore techniques.

Because public opinion opposes coal mining, some states now allow mining companies to extract coal from any particular site for only a short period of time.

The statements above, if true, best support which of the following conclusions?




Premise 1 : quickly Extracting coal destroys forest.Experts suggest some time consuming technique which will prevent forests.
Premise 2: Because of public opinion poll, some State allow to extract for short period of time

Clearly, There is a deadlock situation and both the parties cannot be happy at the same time.

Mining companies will continue to be able to extract coal using deep bore techniques but not by removing hillsides or mountaintops.
Incorrect.The question stem just provided the fact and didn't gave any opinion/result of the debate so this information cant be inferred.
The only way to preserve forests on hillsides and mountaintops is to stop coal mining.
Incorrect. Stopping coal mining could be a way but definitely not the ONLY way.
New mining techniques will be developed to make it possible to extract coal quickly without removing hillsides or mountaintops.
Incorrect.There is no hint about new tech in the argument so rejected.
Public opinion regarding coal mining works against forest preservation efforts.
Correct. Experts oppose technique which destroy forests so they are putting effort for forest preservation.However, Public opinion poll opposes experts technique.
Allowing mining companies to extract coal from any particular site for only a short period of time is unlikely to be a successful response to public opinion.
Incorrect.The ques stem only suggests that Public opinion poll opposes but the above statement is too strong that it suggests that Public wants to completely ban coal mining to be successful.
_________________

Success has been and continues to be defined as Getting up one more time than you have been knocked down.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 May 2014
Posts: 83
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Schools: HKUST '15, ISB '15
GMAT Date: 12-26-2014
GPA: 3
Re: The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2014, 11:26
1
ronr34 wrote:
I'm sorry but I don't see any reference to forest preservation in the stem.

As per the question stem, Coal mining companies do X....which destroys forests. Experts therefore recommend
Clearly, Experts oppose technique which destroy forests in other words they are putting effort for forest preservation.
Quote:
Why are we even considering it?

Quote:
What if after every mining session, the company was obligated to restore it to perfect condition and to plant new trees?

You are a very positive person who consider coal companies envro friendly :) You are assuming too much.There is nothing in the question stem that says/hints about this.
Please let me know if i am not able to explain.
_________________

Success has been and continues to be defined as Getting up one more time than you have been knocked down.

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1058
Location: United States
Premium Member
Re: The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2014, 15:02
2
ronr34 wrote:
I'm sorry but I don't see any reference to forest preservation in the stem.
Why are we even considering it?
What if after every mining session, the company was obligated to restore it to perfect condition and to plant new trees?


Hello ron34.

Premise 1: To protect forests, experts recommend that coal be extracted using time-consuming deep bore techniques. --> It means techniques extracting coal in short period of time are not favorable in protecting forests.

Premise 2: Because public opinion opposes coal mining, some states now allow mining companies to extract coal from any particular site for only a short period of time. --> It means if companies can use techniques that can extract coal in a short period of time, public opinion will agree.

Clearly, the public opinion works against the forest preservation efforts. (time-consuming >< short period of time).

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 385
Re: The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Sep 2014, 00:39
pqhai wrote:
ronr34 wrote:
I'm sorry but I don't see any reference to forest preservation in the stem.
Why are we even considering it?
What if after every mining session, the company was obligated to restore it to perfect condition and to plant new trees?


Hello ron34.

Premise 1: To protect forests, experts recommend that coal be extracted using time-consuming deep bore techniques. --> It means techniques extracting coal in short period of time are not favorable in protecting forests.

Premise 2: Because public opinion opposes coal mining, some states now allow mining companies to extract coal from any particular site for only a short period of time. --> It means if companies can use techniques that can extract coal in a short period of time, public opinion will agree.

Clearly, the public opinion works against the forest preservation efforts. (time-consuming >< short period of time).

Hope it helps.

So why not choose option (e)?
"Allowing mining companies to extract coal from any particular site for only a short period of time is unlikely to be a successful response to public opinion."
Since only allowed to mine for a short period of time, there will be much more damage, and this will have a negative effect on public opinion... No?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2011
Posts: 11
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GPA: 3.8
Re: The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2014, 03:45
I feel that the OA is incorrect or the argument is not well formed

public opinion opposes coal mining (i.e. in favor of forest preservation). But states took the decision to allow coal mining for a short period only..

so if public opinion opposes coal mining then there is no risk against forest preservation hence the official answer is incorrect and hard to digest for me.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 06 Aug 2013
Posts: 83
Re: The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2014, 09:20
pqhai wrote:
ronr34 wrote:
I'm sorry but I don't see any reference to forest preservation in the stem.
Why are we even considering it?
What if after every mining session, the company was obligated to restore it to perfect condition and to plant new trees?


Hello ron34.

Premise 1: To protect forests, experts recommend that coal be extracted using time-consuming deep bore techniques. --> It means techniques extracting coal in short period of time are not favorable in protecting forests.

Premise 2: Because public opinion opposes coal mining, some states now allow mining companies to extract coal from any particular site for only a short period of time. --> It means if companies can use techniques that can extract coal in a short period of time, public opinion will agree.

Clearly, the public opinion works against the forest preservation efforts. (time-consuming >< short period of time).

Hope it helps.



this is where i am confused, if public opinion is against coal mining, but government allows companies to mine for a short period of time, then that should have been explicitly mentioned in option D.

option D says that pubic opinion is against forest conservation, this makes it applicable for both short term as well as long term. But the stem talks only about short term.
isnt option D to general to comment about the public opinion ??
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 14 Jul 2014
Posts: 182
Location: United States
Schools: Duke '20 (D)
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V27
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.2
Reviews Badge
Re: The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Nov 2015, 11:41
kunal227 wrote:
I feel that the OA is incorrect or the argument is not well formed

public opinion opposes coal mining (i.e. in favor of forest preservation). But states took the decision to allow coal mining for a short period only..

so if public opinion opposes coal mining then there is no risk against forest preservation hence the official answer is incorrect and hard to digest for me.


Be careful. It's not stated that the public is in favor of forest preservation.
The public does not favor mining. It does not mean that forest preservation is the reason behind the public's disapproval of mining.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 01 Nov 2015
Posts: 36
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Premium Member
Re: The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Dec 2015, 22:10
2
Ignore the first part and concentrate on the second

Public does not like coal mining at all. So, Government compromises by allowing the company's to mine only for a short period of time and not more than that

But, if the mining companies are allowed to extract only for a short period of time, they cannot implement the deep bore technique as it is time consuming. So, they have to use the faster techniques which cause deforestation

This is what option D restates

As for option E, there are a couple of questionable facts

For one, public is opposed to all kinds of mining right? And even in amidst of it, Government is allowing the mining. Here, why are they not giving permission to deep bore techniques which is not as damaging to environment?

The answer is that public is discriminant against all kinds of mining. That is, public already has a negative opinion of mining. The only way to keep the public happy is not to implement the mining at all. If Government implements mining, no matter what they do, public will not be happy with it
So, its not that that the public might be unhappy, the public will be unhappy. There is no unambiguity there.

Hence by comparison, D is clearer than E
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2016
Posts: 53
Re: The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2016, 22:35
Quickly and short time period are both relative terms and can be or cannot be equal.

Quickly in terms of mining companies can be 3 months and for public short time period could be 3 yrs compared to other coal mines which run for 25 to 40 yrs.

So Option D cannot be concluded just based on relative terms.

Option A clearly says, mining companies can take coal using other longer method that could take longer but lesser than short period mentioned by public.


Am I missing some thing? Please help.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 04 Jun 2018
Posts: 238
Location: Germany
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GPA: 3.6
WE: Analyst (Transportation)
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Aug 2018, 14:53
I would consider option D via PoE.

However, the formatting on this question seem to be a little off.

Maybe one of the mods is able to adjust this accordingly.
_________________

A couple of things that helped me in verbal:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/verbal-strategies-268700.html#p2082192

Gmat Prep CAT #1: V42, Q34, 630
Gmat Prep CAT #2: V46, Q35, 660
Gmat Prep CAT #3: V41, Q42, 680

On the mission to improve my quant score, all help is appreciated! :)

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 16 Apr 2018
Posts: 73
Re: The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Aug 2018, 21:36
jagdeepsingh1983 wrote:
The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining companies to extract coal quickly from deeply-buried seams, destroys forests. Experts therefore recommend that coal be extracted using time-consuming deep bore techniques.

Because public opinion opposes coal mining, some states now allow mining companies to extract coal from any particular site for only a short period of time.

The statements above, if true, best support which of the following conclusions?


Mining companies will continue to be able to extract coal using deep bore techniques but not by removing hillsides or mountaintops.

The only way to preserve forests on hillsides and mountaintops is to stop coal mining.

New mining techniques will be developed to make it possible to extract coal quickly without removing hillsides or mountaintops.

Public opinion regarding coal mining works against forest preservation efforts.

Allowing mining companies to extract coal from any particular site for only a short period of time is unlikely to be a successful response to public opinion.

I found it good to practice this Question for everyone



I would rather pick E.

Public in just against mining, and it is the state's decision to allow coal quickly.

Option D states Public opinion is against forest preservation efforts, and in correctly compares the two things. It would have been the correct answer if it were 'State Govt. action works against forest preservation efforts'.

Let me know if my understanding is incorrect.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining compan &nbs [#permalink] 31 Aug 2018, 21:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining compan

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.