Last visit was: 23 Jul 2024, 10:46 It is currently 23 Jul 2024, 10:46
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

# There are currently 50 percent more taxpayers in Sleepy Valley

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Intern
Joined: 31 Jan 2018
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 165 [19]
Given Kudos: 41
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 85
Own Kudos [?]: 110 [0]
Given Kudos: 105
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 85
Own Kudos [?]: 110 [0]
Given Kudos: 105
Intern
Joined: 24 Feb 2018
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [2]
Given Kudos: 20
There are currently 50 percent more taxpayers in Sleepy Valley [#permalink]
2
Bookmarks
Here is my explanation:-

Correlation is between high voter turn and total taxable income. Mayor proposed to increase minimum wage, thinking it will increase total taxable income and in turn more voter turn out.

But think of some scenario in which this doesn't hold true. Scenarios in which increasing a minimum wage, will not in turn increase total taxable income. Some scenarios are mentioned below :-

1. What if increased wage will have an effect on employment rate. Increasing wage will reduce the employed people , in turn can bring down or same as per current level of total taxable income.

2. What if all the employed people is earning way above the minimum wage, this will not have any effect on total taxable income.

Scenarios like these will weaken the argument, hence we need to find just opposite of these scenarios.

for 1. The employment rate in Sleepy Valley will not decrease.
2. There are some people who will benefit from increase in minimum wage, while rest will not be affected by this minimum wage increase.

So and choice C suits and seems correct ans to me.

(A) The proportion of registered voters to taxpayers in Sleepy Valley is greater than the proportion of registered voters to taxpayers nationally.
Out of Scope as we don't care about the comparison between sleepy valley and nation wide.

(B) Almost all registered voters are taxpayers.
Doesn't matter as the correlation will still hold.

(D) Most taxpayers in Sleepy Valley have little or no earned income.
But how increase in minimum wage will effect to people who has some income. Will that increase overall taxable income? we dont know.

(E) Most of the taxpayers who are not registered voters in Sleepy Valley earn more than minimum wage.
This option only talks about taxpayers who are not registered, lets say this group as A and another group B i.e. Taxpayers who are registered. So clearly Group A will not affect the total taxable income, but what about group B, we dont know. Will that increase total taxable income or reduce, we dont know. It depends how the group is affected. Hence E is also out.
VP
Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Posts: 1197
Own Kudos [?]: 1752 [2]
Given Kudos: 67
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
Schools: ISB '18 (D)
GPA: 3.97
WE:Project Management (Investment Banking)
Re: There are currently 50 percent more taxpayers in Sleepy Valley [#permalink]
2
Bookmarks
the mayor has proposed an increase in the minimum wage in order to increase voter turnout.
If the mayor is demanding the minimum he should be assured that there will not be a reduction in tax payers and it should not have negative effect.(his assumptions should be these atleast)

(A) The proportion of registered voters to taxpayers in Sleepy Valley is greater than the proportion of registered voters to taxpayers nationally."No comparison of nation. Straight out"
(B) Almost all registered voters are taxpayers. I was not sure if all tax payers are registered voters than how will increasing min page increase voters. keep it aside
(C) The employment rate in Sleepy Valley will not decrease. Now if employment rate decrease, there will be less number of tax payers hence it will have a negative effect. Seemed like a good option so i kept it aside.
(D) Most taxpayers in Sleepy Valley have little or no earned income. If tax payers have little income, increasing min wage will have no effect.
(E) Most of the taxpayers who are not registered voters in Sleepy Valley earn more than minimum wage. again increasing min wage will actually reduce number of tax payers. So assumption goes wrong

Out of all options I found C most viable
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Jan 2019
Posts: 402
Own Kudos [?]: 221 [0]
Given Kudos: 372
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
Re: There are currently 50 percent more taxpayers in Sleepy Valley [#permalink]
Manang wrote:
There are currently 50 percent more taxpayers in Sleepy Valley than registered voters. A national study has shown a high correlation between voter turnout and total taxable income within an election district. Therefore, the mayor has proposed an increase in the minimum wage in order to increase voter turnout.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the mayor’s proposal depends?

(A) The proportion of registered voters to taxpayers in Sleepy Valley is greater than the proportion of registered voters to taxpayers nationally.
(B) Almost all registered voters are taxpayers.
(C) The employment rate in Sleepy Valley will not decrease.
(D) Most taxpayers in Sleepy Valley have little or no earned income.
(E) Most of the taxpayers who are not registered voters in Sleepy Valley earn more than minimum wage.

Statement tells that taxpayers' income and no. Of voters have high correlation, but it doesn't tells about if they are correlated with direct relation or inverse relation, ie whether we no. Of voters increase with higher wages or lower wager.

So talking about option C, no one can tell it the assumption was as given in option or just opposite..

Hence, option C is WRONG

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2020
Posts: 67
Own Kudos [?]: 23 [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT 1: 590 Q48 V24
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.4
WE:Operations (Energy and Utilities)
Re: There are currently 50 percent more taxpayers in Sleepy Valley [#permalink]
My approach:-

It's a goal plan based question. The goal is to inc Voters and plan is inc min wages.

In goal plan based question- goal is the conclusion and plan is the premise.

Author must have assumed that there is no side effect of the plan or nothing wrong can occur if plan is implemented, and this thought is valid for all question types that have a goal plan type argument.

only C fits in- where the opportunity to weaken the plan is eliminated.
Intern
Joined: 13 Oct 2021
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Re: There are currently 50 percent more taxpayers in Sleepy Valley [#permalink]
why will the answer be c isn't b or e more probable. if not why?
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Aug 2021
Posts: 372
Own Kudos [?]: 39 [0]
Given Kudos: 226
Re: There are currently 50 percent more taxpayers in Sleepy Valley [#permalink]
udaypratapsingh99 wrote:
Manang wrote:
There are currently 50 percent more taxpayers in Sleepy Valley than registered voters. A national study has shown a high correlation between voter turnout and total taxable income within an election district. Therefore, the mayor has proposed an increase in the minimum wage in order to increase voter turnout.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the mayor’s proposal depends?

(A) The proportion of registered voters to taxpayers in Sleepy Valley is greater than the proportion of registered voters to taxpayers nationally.
(B) Almost all registered voters are taxpayers.
(C) The employment rate in Sleepy Valley will not decrease.
(D) Most taxpayers in Sleepy Valley have little or no earned income.
(E) Most of the taxpayers who are not registered voters in Sleepy Valley earn more than minimum wage.

Statement tells that taxpayers' income and no. Of voters have high correlation, but it doesn't tells about if they are correlated with direct relation or inverse relation, ie whether we no. Of voters increase with higher wages or lower wager.

So talking about option C, no one can tell it the assumption was as given in option or just opposite..

Hence, option C is WRONG

Posted from my mobile device

Yes I think the same. But even If we assume voter turnout and total taxable income are in direct relation, I think D is better than C cuz D is more direct.
D: if improving the minimum wage, then most taxpayer can improve income as they are paid below the minimum wage previously, then total taxable income can be increased, then voter turnout can be increased.
Anybody like to discuss?
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17525
Own Kudos [?]: 869 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Re: There are currently 50 percent more taxpayers in Sleepy Valley [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: There are currently 50 percent more taxpayers in Sleepy Valley [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6991 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts
CR Forum Moderator
824 posts