Last visit was: 18 Jan 2025, 22:36 It is currently 18 Jan 2025, 22:36
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Jan 2025
Posts: 14,591
Own Kudos:
42,371
 [7]
Given Kudos: 5,935
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 14,591
Kudos: 42,371
 [7]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
blowice27
Joined: 16 Apr 2019
Last visit: 29 Jun 2021
Posts: 200
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 48
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Sustainability
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Saharsh95
Joined: 21 May 2018
Last visit: 14 Apr 2024
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 109
Posts: 12
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
thinkvision
Joined: 26 Jul 2018
Last visit: 23 Sep 2024
Posts: 125
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 244
Status:Risk or die!
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V32
WE:Consulting (Finance: Investment Banking)
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V32
Posts: 125
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Context:
To weaken the argument, we must find an answer which, either
--> provides for the fall in quantity of trucks sold, yet justify the increase in price, or
--> provides any other reason for increase in total revenue (apart from the rise in quantity sold for trucks).


A. The number of other vehicle types sold did not increase. - (S) if the number of other vehicles sold did not increase, implies the increase in total quantity is because of increase in number of trucks sold.

B. The percentage of trucks sold increased after prices were raised. - (S) Exactly the opposite of what we want, doesn't weaken

C. The overall profits from all vehicles sold since prices were raised have increased. (-) Doesn't justify the fall in quantity sold of trucks

D. The number of customers buying cars from the automobile dealership increased when the only other car dealership moved to another part of town. (W) Does the job. Explains the second scenario we discussed in the context [provides any other reason for increase in total revenue (apart from the rise in quantity sold for trucks)]. Correct Answer.

E. The cost of running the dealership has more than doubled since the price increase, and the number of trucks sold has increased (-) Irrelevant.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7212 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts