Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 01:56 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 01:56
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
fskilnik
Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Jan 2025
Posts: 883
Own Kudos:
1,877
 [11]
Given Kudos: 57
Status:GMATH founder
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 883
Kudos: 1,877
 [11]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
fskilnik
Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Jan 2025
Posts: 883
Own Kudos:
1,877
 [6]
Given Kudos: 57
Status:GMATH founder
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 883
Kudos: 1,877
 [6]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
ocelot22
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Last visit: 24 Sep 2025
Posts: 166
Own Kudos:
137
 [4]
Given Kudos: 545
GMAT 1: 640 Q38 V40
GMAT 2: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 3: 570 Q31 V38
GMAT 4: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.75
Products:
GMAT 4: 720 Q49 V40
Posts: 166
Kudos: 137
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
fskilnik
Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Jan 2025
Posts: 883
Own Kudos:
1,877
 [2]
Given Kudos: 57
Status:GMATH founder
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 883
Kudos: 1,877
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ocelot22

(1) and (2) x>3 and 0<y<1. Then 0<XY<3, which gives us a definite NO
Hi ocelot22 !

Thanks for joining!

The two inequalities you mentioned (repeated above) are enough for your conclusion (in red)?

Another thing: I guarantee (1+2) is enough for a definite YES!!

My solution is short but very instructive. Think a bit more before I present it!

Regards,
Fabio.
User avatar
ocelot22
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Last visit: 24 Sep 2025
Posts: 166
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 545
GMAT 1: 640 Q38 V40
GMAT 2: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 3: 570 Q31 V38
GMAT 4: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.75
Products:
GMAT 4: 720 Q49 V40
Posts: 166
Kudos: 137
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fskilnik
ocelot22

(1) and (2) x>3 and 0<y<1. Then 0<XY<3, which gives us a definite NO
Hi ocelot22 !

Thanks for joining!

The two inequalities you mentioned (repeated above) are enough for your conclusion (in red)?

Another thing: I guarantee (1+2) is enough for a definite YES!!

My solution is short but very instructive. Think a bit more before I present it!

Regards,
Fabio.

You are right. I use potentially inappropriate interval techniques for this problem, and have corrected my mistakes from before. Can you please however, look over my edited post, which points out some concerns I have pointed out about this problem
User avatar
fskilnik
Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Jan 2025
Posts: 883
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Status:GMATH founder
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 883
Kudos: 1,877
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ocelot22
You are right. I use potentially inappropriate interval techniques for this problem, and have corrected my mistakes from before. Can you please however, look over my edited post, which points out some concerns I have pointed out about this problem
I am glad your interest in my problem continues, ocelot22 .

ocelot22

The problem I have with this question, is it requires us to estimate exponential relationships to a level of precision that is unrealistic on this test. For example, what if the test taker estimated x to be 3.1, and y to be .9. That would give us xy= approx 2.6, which would be A NO answer to the question.
This would be true only if you had no choice but to insist on your approach... higher-level problems are harder (also) because a proper way of dealing with them are not always seen at first!

Regards,
Fabio.
User avatar
fskilnik
Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Jan 2025
Posts: 883
Own Kudos:
1,877
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Status:GMATH founder
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 883
Kudos: 1,877
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ocelot22
If YOU FIND MY SOLUTION HELPFUL, PLEASE GIVE ME KUDOS

This question is testing, among other things, our ability to estimate

(1) Notice, that powers of 7 give us 7, 49, 353, 2479 Now 729? 353, therefore 3<x<4, (although we should estimate that x is closer to 3 than 4). Lets say x = a little more than 3. Y can still = ANYTHING NS

(2) 9^Y = 7. Notice that 9^0 =1 and 9^1 =9,therefore y is a little less than 1, however X can = ANYTHING NS
(1) and (2) x is between 3 and 4, and y is a little less than 1. Assuming the numbers picked for estimation are accurate enough (y is very close to 3.4), we will get an unequivocal YES as 3.4(.9) = 3.06> 3

The problem I have with this question, is it requires us to estimate exponential relationships to a level of precision that is unrealistic on this test. For example, what if the test taker estimated x to be 3.1, and y to be .9. That would give us xy> approx 2.6, which could give the reader a potential YES and NO.

Overall this is a high quality question as far as the skills the question tests, however.
Thanks for the comment in blue. I guess you will find the question much more interesting after analysing my solution. I will post it below right now!
User avatar
ocelot22
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Last visit: 24 Sep 2025
Posts: 166
Own Kudos:
137
 [1]
Given Kudos: 545
GMAT 1: 640 Q38 V40
GMAT 2: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 3: 570 Q31 V38
GMAT 4: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.75
Products:
GMAT 4: 720 Q49 V40
Posts: 166
Kudos: 137
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fskilnik
fskilnik
GMATH practice exercise (Quant Class 14)

Is \(xy >3\) ?

(1) \(7^x > 729\)
(2) \(9^y = 7\)
\(xy\,\,\mathop > \limits^? \,\,3\)

\(\left( 1 \right)\,\,{7^x} > 729\,\,\,\left\{ \matrix{\\
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {x,y} \right) = \left( {4,0} \right)\,\,\,\,\,\left[ {{7^4} = {{49}^2}} \right]\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{NO}}} \right\rangle \,\, \hfill \cr \\
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {x,y} \right) = \left( {4,1} \right)\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\, \hfill \cr} \right.\)

\(\left( 2 \right)\,\,{9^y} = 7\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,y = {y_p}\,\,\,{\rm{unique}}\,\,{\rm{,}}\,\,\,{1 \over 2}\,\,{\rm{ < }}\,\,{y_p} < 1\,\,\,\,\left\{ \matrix{\\
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {x,y} \right) = \left( {0,{y_p}} \right)\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{NO}}} \right\rangle \,\, \hfill \cr \\
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {x,y} \right) = \left( {6,{y_p}} \right)\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\, \hfill \cr} \right.\)

\(\left( {1 + 2} \right)\,\,\,{3^6} = 729\,\,\,\mathop < \limits^{\left( 1 \right)} \,\,\,{7^x}\,\,\mathop = \limits^{\left( 2 \right)} \,\,\,{\left( {{9^y}} \right)^x} = {3^{2xy}}\,\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{3\,\, > \,\,1} \,\,\,2xy > 6\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{YES}}} \right\rangle\)


The correct answer is (C).


We follow the notations and rationale taught in the GMATH method.

Regards,
Fabio.

This is a very succinct solution. I Appreciate the compact notation used. This of course avoids the estimation pitfall that I ran into in my solution. I am guessing that you teach this kind of notation in your course?
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,733
Own Kudos:
36,438
 [4]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,733
Kudos: 36,438
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fskilnik
Is \(xy >3\) ?

(1) \(7^x > 729\)
(2) \(9^y = 7\)

Target question: Is xy > 3 ?

Statement 1: (7^x) > 729
Since there's no information about y, we cannot answer the target question with certainty.
Statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: (9^y) = 7
Since there's no information about x, we cannot answer the target question with certainty.
Statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
Statement 1 tells us that (7^x) > 729
Statement 2 tells us that (9^y) = 7

Take the inequality (7^x) > 729, and replace 7 with 9^y to get: (9^y)^x > 729
Simplify to get: 9^xy > 729
Rewrite 729 as 9^3 to get: 9^xy > 9^3
From this, we can conclude that xy > 3
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer: C

Cheers,
Brent
User avatar
fskilnik
Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Jan 2025
Posts: 883
Own Kudos:
1,877
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Status:GMATH founder
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 883
Kudos: 1,877
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ocelot22

This is a very succinct solution. I Appreciate the compact notation used. This of course avoids the estimation pitfall that I ran into in my solution. I am guessing that you teach this kind of notation in your course?
Hi, ocelot22 !

First of all, thanks for the kudos (both in the question stem and also in my solution)!

I am glad you liked our notation/solution.

YES, the precision and brevity of our exclusive notation is an IMPORTANT part of our method, especially in Data Sufficiency! I will not come into details here, due to respect for all companies, teachers, and students who have their own (probably different) opinions on the matter (or never thought about it).

In our "test drive" you will earn two credits for questions. Feel free to use one of them to ask me about this at your free trial! (*)

Regards,
Fabio.

(*) P.S.: although the number of question credits is limited per student (to avoid someone asking me, say, 10 questions a day "to avoid" thinking by himself/herself beforehand), I usually reimburse each credit used. (I am the sole creator of the method and the only person who answers questions in our preparation.)
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fskilnik
fskilnik
GMATH practice exercise (Quant Class 14)

Is \(xy >3\) ?

(1) \(7^x > 729\)
(2) \(9^y = 7\)
\(xy\,\,\mathop > \limits^? \,\,3\)

\(\left( 1 \right)\,\,{7^x} > 729\,\,\,\left\{ \matrix{\\
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {x,y} \right) = \left( {4,0} \right)\,\,\,\,\,\left[ {{7^4} = {{49}^2}} \right]\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{NO}}} \right\rangle \,\, \hfill \cr \\
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {x,y} \right) = \left( {4,1} \right)\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\, \hfill \cr} \right.\)

\(\left( 2 \right)\,\,{9^y} = 7\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,y = {y_p}\,\,\,{\rm{unique}}\,\,{\rm{,}}\,\,\,{1 \over 2}\,\,{\rm{ < }}\,\,{y_p} < 1\,\,\,\,\left\{ \matrix{\\
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {x,y} \right) = \left( {0,{y_p}} \right)\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{NO}}} \right\rangle \,\, \hfill \cr \\
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {x,y} \right) = \left( {6,{y_p}} \right)\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\, \hfill \cr} \right.\)

\(\left( {1 + 2} \right)\,\,\,{3^6} = 729\,\,\,\mathop < \limits^{\left( 1 \right)} \,\,\,{7^x}\,\,\mathop = \limits^{\left( 2 \right)} \,\,\,{\left( {{9^y}} \right)^x} = {3^{2xy}}\,\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{3\,\, > \,\,1} \,\,\,2xy > 6\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{YES}}} \right\rangle\)


The correct answer is (C).


We follow the notations and rationale taught in the GMATH method.

Regards,
Fabio.
fskilnik,
Sir, do you want to mean 2>1 (talking about statement) in the red part?
Regards,
Asad
Attachments

solution.PNG
solution.PNG [ 57.29 KiB | Viewed 3535 times ]

User avatar
fskilnik
Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Jan 2025
Posts: 883
Own Kudos:
1,877
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Status:GMATH founder
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 883
Kudos: 1,877
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
@AsadAbu

fskilnik,
Sir, do you want to mean 2>1 (talking about statement) in the red part?
Regards,
Asad
Hi, Asad (@AsadAbu)!

Sorry for the delay (very busy)!

Thank you for your REAL interest in my solution. :)

Answering your (important) question: I said \({3^6} < {3^{2xy}}\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{3\, > \,1} \,\,\,6 < 2xy\)

Meaning: from the fact that the exponential function \(y = 3^x\) has a base that is greater than 1 (=3), it is an (strictly) increasing function:

\(x < y\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,{3^x} < {3^y}\)

From this fact, please note that: \(6 \ge 2xy\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{3\, > \,1} \,\,\,{3^6} \ge {3^{2xy}}\,\,\,\left( {{\rm{impossible,}}\,\,{\rm{because}}\,\,{3^6} < {3^{2xy}}} \right)\)

That´s (finally!) the reason for the validity of the implication \({3^6} < {3^{2xy}}\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{3\, > \,1} \,\,\,6 < 2xy\) ...

Best Regards,
Fabio.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank you so much...
User avatar
fskilnik
Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Jan 2025
Posts: 883
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Status:GMATH founder
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 883
Kudos: 1,877
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AsadAbu
Thank you so much...
Our pleasure, AsadAbu.

If you (and other readers) liked our approach and explanations, we invite you to try our test drive ("Free Trial"), so that you will have a MUCH better understanding of our METHOD, that is, our systematic (and very deep!) way of looking into the GMAT´s contents with all objectivity, subtleness and "venom" that characterizes high-level performances in the quant section of the test.

We create and post new questions there (such as this one) on an almost daily basis, by the way.

Regards and success in your studies,
Fabio.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fskilnik
AsadAbu
Thank you so much...
Our pleasure, AsadAbu.

If you (and other readers) liked our approach and explanations, we invite you to try our test drive ("Free Trial"), so that you will have a MUCH better understanding of our METHOD, that is, our systematic (and very deep!) way of looking into the GMAT´s contents with all objectivity, subtleness and "venom" that characterizes high-level performances in the quant section of the test.

We create and post new questions there (such as this one) on an almost daily basis, by the way.

Regards and success in your studies,
Fabio.
I'm going to try ""Free Trial"" from tomorrow. Thanks__
avatar
Render
Joined: 10 Apr 2019
Last visit: 20 Jun 2020
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 60
Posts: 15
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATPrepNow
fskilnik
Is \(xy >3\) ?

(1) \(7^x > 729\)
(2) \(9^y = 7\)

Target question: Is xy > 3 ?

Statement 1: (7^x) > 729
Since there's no information about y, we cannot answer the target question with certainty.
Statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: (9^y) = 7
Since there's no information about x, we cannot answer the target question with certainty.
Statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
Statement 1 tells us that (7^x) > 729
Statement 2 tells us that (9^y) = 7

Take the inequality (7^x) > 729, and replace 7 with 9^y to get: (9^y)^x > 729
Simplify to get: 9^xy > 729
Rewrite 729 as 9^3 to get: 9^xy > 9^3
From this, we can conclude that xy > 3
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer: C

Cheers,
Brent

Hi Brent,

Could you please clarify if it is always possible to replace one part of the inequality completely, just like you are doing in your solution

Quote:
Take the inequality (7^x) > 729, and replace 7 with 9^y to get: (9^y)^x > 729
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,942
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,942
Kudos: 1,116
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109715 posts
498 posts
210 posts