Here’s a reasoning-based approach.
We have to calculate the fraction: [Total time taken under 'this' scenario] / [Time it would have taken if they had painted all the houses at the original rate]
What does ‘this scenario’ mean?
The scenario in which additional painters joined somewhere in the middle.
Numerator: Time taken to paint 80 houses such that a certain number of painters started and some additional painters joined them somewhere in the middle.
Denominator: Time taken to paint 80 houses such that the initial number of painters painted all the houses (no additional painters ever joined).
No matter when they join, as long as additional painters join in, the time taken would be less than the time taken in the situation if additional painters never joined.
i.e.,
Numerator < DenominatorSo, the value of the fraction needs to be less than 1 no matter when the additional painters joined. i.e., for all values of y (between 1 and 79), the fraction will be less than 1.
We can use this understanding to eliminate answer choices.
If I can make the value of an answer choice greater than 1 for 0 < y < 80, the answer would be wrong. (Remember: as long as additional workers join anywhere in the middle, the time taken will be less than if additional workers never join.)
Now,
(A) 0.8(80 – y) --> For a low value of y, e.g. 10, this answer choice will result in a value greater than 1. Rejected.
(B) 0.8 + 0.0025y --> As long as y is less than 80, this fraction will remain less than 1. Looks good. Hold it.
(C) 80/y – 1.25 --> Again, if y = 10, we get a value greater than 1. Rejected.
(D) 80/1.25y --> If y = 10, we get a value greater than 1. Rejected.
(E) 80 – 0.25y --> If y = 10, we get a value greater than 1. Rejected.
Therefore, B is the answer.
1. Why did I choose y = 10? In each answer choice I noticed that in order to make the overall value greater than 1, I needed to keep the value of y small. I could have tried 1 as well. Just that I felt 10 was easier to deal with.
2. Also, I did not calculate the exact values. As soon as I realized the overall value was greater than 1, I had enough to reject the answer.
In fact, we can extend this logic.
What if additional workers came right at the beginning (i.e. at y = 0)?
In that case, the time taken to paint the houses would be 80/1.25x
The fraction would become: (80/1.25x)/(80/x) = x/1.25x = 1/1.25 = 4/5
So, we can plug in y = 0 and reject all answer choices that do not yield the value 4/5.
For y = 0,
(A) 0.8(80 – y) --> Greater than 4/5. Rejected.
(B) 0.8 + 0.0025y --> = 4/5. Hold it.
(C) 80/y – 1.25 --> 80/0?? This one is not defined. We need 4/5. Rejected.
(D) 80/1.25y --> Again not defined. We need 4/5. Rejected.
(E) 80 – 0.25y --> 80. Rejected.
By the same logic, what if additional workers never joined? i.e., all the houses were painted by the initial number of workers in both cases. In this case, y = 80.
In that case, the time taken would be the same in both cases. i.e., the fraction's value would be 1.
So, we can plug in y = 80 and reject all answer choices that do not yield the value 1.
For y = 80,
(A) 0.8(80 – y) --> 0. Rejected.
(B) 0.8 + 0.0025y --> 1. Hold it.
(C) 80/y – 1.25 --> Negative. Rejected.
(D) 80/1.25y --> Less than 1. Rejected.
(E) 80 – 0.25y --> Greater than 1. Rejected.