GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Aug 2018, 11:37

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Veritas Prep 10 Year Anniversary Promo Question #2

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Founder
Founder
User avatar
V
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 17231
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Veritas Prep 10 Year Anniversary Promo Question #2  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Sep 2012, 09:43
Thank you - it got you a victory, so congratulations and good luck with your prep!
_________________

Founder of GMAT Club

Just starting out with GMAT? Start here...
OG2019 Directory is here! - New!
Verbal OG2019 Directory is here! - New!

Co-author of the GMAT Club tests

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Aug 2014
Posts: 81
Veritas Prep 10 Year Anniversary Promo Question #2  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jun 2015, 05:54
bb wrote:

Winner:

Patthetuck

Official Explanation:

Answer is C

Each of these options features an introduction phrase concerning its modern-day status, and our pronoun check reveals that its means lobotomy’s: good. So lobotomy has a modern-day status, and it also had an initial status, and it would be legitimate, i.e. logical, to compare those two statuses (or, if we preferred, to compare a modern-day lobotomy to an early one or to some other procedure – perfectly valid to compare a procedure to a procedure). What would be illegitimate is what would be illogical: comparing lobotomy’s modern-day status to lobotomy itself – which is exactly the mistake answer choice (A) makes. Choice (D) arguably “tries” to remedy this problem by comparing status to that (where that is a pronoun representing status), but it soon runs up against another problem, as it winds up saying then that the status was hailed as a revolutionary technique – illogical in a new way, since a status could never be a revolutionary technique; it’s lobotomy that’s the technique. Choice (E) commits the same error. By employing the Despite... construction, choices (B) and (C) deftly avoid the comparison quagmire, but (B) later bombs with its improper use of a semicolon and its implication that lobotomy itself won the Nobel Prize (would make for a lame acceptance speech). (C) it is – proper semicolon usage and no comparison blunders.


Hey BB

Got a problem with C. It uses a semi colon and you will notice no mention of lobotomy but only the word "procedure". We use semi colon only when both parts are completely sufficient in information. Here which procedure we are talking about is not mentioned. So how can C be correct?
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1162
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Veritas Prep 10 Year Anniversary Promo Question #2  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Feb 2016, 10:48
I agree with the OE but still not convinced regarding one aspect.
Here were comparing status of lobotomy in past and present highlighting its contrast.
If we say

Unlike/In contrast to its present status its past status was something different. This is our context right?

but if we say Despite its present status, its past status was sth different. Does it properly makes sense?
How does its present status affect its past status.
I really feel that word despite is not preferred compared to unlike/in contrast to or something else.

See definition in Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary

Quote:
despite:
Without being affected by; in spite of:
he remains a great leader despite age and infirmity

MORE EXAMPLE SENTENCES
[MASS NOUN] archaic Back to top
1Contemptuous treatment or behaviour; outrage:
the despite done by him to the holy relics

MORE EXAMPLE SENTENCES
2Contempt; disdain:
the theatre only earns my despite

_________________

The only time you can lose is when you give up. Try hard and you will suceed.
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-in-verbal-gmat-forum-134642.html
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources.


My posts
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beauty-of-coordinate-geometry-213760.html#p1649924
http://gmatclub.com/forum/calling-all-march-april-gmat-takers-who-want-to-cross-213154.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/possessive-pronouns-200496.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/double-negatives-206717.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-greatest-integer-function-223595.html#p1721773
https://gmatclub.com/forum/improve-reading-habit-233410.html#p1802265

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Posts: 27
Re: Veritas Prep 10 Year Anniversary Promo Question #2  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jul 2017, 19:15
Despite and in contrast to are used as comparisons...but are there specific situations where either would be used? In this question, it feels like either would be right - is this correct?
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Posts: 969
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.5
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Veritas Prep 10 Year Anniversary Promo Question #2  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jul 2017, 06:50
2
Unlike its modern-day status as bioethically impermissible, lobotomy was initially hailed as a revolutionary therapeutic technique so much that the Portuguese neurologist Egas Moniz who introduced the procedure was in fact awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1949 for his contribution.

(A) Unlike its modern-day status as bioethically impermissible, lobotomy was initially hailed as a revolutionary therapeutic technique so much that the Portuguese neurologist Egas Moniz who introduced the procedure was

- "Lobotomy's modern day status" is compared to "Lobotomy" - This is an illogical comparison. You can compare "Lobotomy's modern day status" Vs. "Lobotomy's initial status" or "Lobotomy" as a process vs some other process to make this as a logical comparison. Hence, A is out

(B) Despite its modern-day status as bioethically impermissible, lobotomy was initially hailed as a revolutionary therapeutic technique; and along with the Portuguese neurologist Egas Moniz who introduced the procedure was

- This option resolves the illogical comparison issue, however, there are other two errors in this. First is incorrect usage of "semicolon" and the second part of the sentence where it says Lobotomy got the Nobel price, which again does not makes sense. Hence. B is Out.


(C) Despite its modern-day status as bioethically impermissible, lobotomy was initially hailed as a revolutionary therapeutic technique; Egas Moniz, the Portuguese neurologist who introduced the procedure, was

- CORRECT - This option resolves the illogical comparison issue and other errors mentioned in other options.


(D) Unlike its modern-day status as bioethically impermissible, that of lobotomy initially was hailed as a revolutionary technique, such that Egas Moniz, the Portuguese neurologist who introduced the procedure, was

- In this option, the illogical comparison problem is fixed by comparing "Lobotomy's modern day status" Vs. "Lobotomy's initial status". However, now there is another error in this, wherein the "Lobotomy's initial status" was hailed as a revolutionary technique, which does not make sense, it should be Lobotomy which was hailed as a revolutionary technique and not its status. So D is Out

(E) In contrast to its modern-day status as bioethically impermissible, the initial status of lobotomy was hailed as a revolutionary technique; Egas Moniz, the Portuguese neurologist who introduced the procedure, was

- Same problem as D - In this option, the illogical comparison problem is fixed by comparing "Lobotomy's modern day status" Vs. "Lobotomy's initial status". However, now there is another error in this, wherein the "Lobotomy's initial status" was hailed as a revolutionary technique, which does not make sense, it should be Lobotomy which was hailed as a revolutionary technique and not its status. So E is Out

Hence, Answer is C

Did you like the answer? Hit Kudos :good
_________________

"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not: nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not: the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent."

Best AWA Template: https://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-get-6-0-awa-my-guide-64327.html#p470475

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 15 Jan 2017
Posts: 367
CAT Tests
Re: Veritas Prep 10 Year Anniversary Promo Question #2  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Mar 2018, 01:05
1
Unlike its modern-day status as bioethically impermissible, lobotomy was initially hailed as a revolutionary therapeutic technique so much that the Portuguese neurologist Egas Moniz who introduced the procedure was in fact awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1949 for his contribution.

(A) Unlike its modern-day status as bioethically impermissible, lobotomy was initially hailed as a revolutionary therapeutic technique so much that the Portuguese neurologist Egas Moniz who introduced the procedure was - problem : Unlike X, Y; but here Y is not comparable to X; for instance lobotomy is compared to its status not another procedure. So, wrong

(B) Despite its modern-day status as bioethically impermissible, lobotomy was initially hailed as a revolutionary therapeutic technique; and along with the Portuguese neurologist Egas Moniz who introduced the procedure was - problem : /eGs Moniz along with lobotomy was not the issue. Garbled meaning. Wrong.

(C) Despite its modern-day status as bioethically impermissible, lobotomy was initially hailed as a revolutionary therapeutic technique; Egas Moniz, the Portuguese neurologist who introduced the procedure, was - CORRECT: lobotomy = ITS; semi colon (for changing the sentence) followed by Egaz Moniz's achievement whcih fits back into the sentence

(D) Unlike its modern-day status as bioethically impermissible, that of lobotomy initially was hailed as a revolutionary technique, such that Egas Moniz, the Portuguese neurologist who introduced the procedure, was : problem - Unlike...that of (what of?)...such that..so much awkwardness in the sentence. Not correct, obviously

(E) In contrast to its modern-day status as bioethically impermissible, the initial status of lobotomy was hailed as a revolutionary technique; Egas Moniz, the Portuguese neurologist who introduced the procedure, was - roblem - 'status of...change' --> how is this even possible? Comparison is wrong. So, incorrect
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 09 Mar 2018
Posts: 19
Re: Veritas Prep 10 Year Anniversary Promo Question #2  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 May 2018, 02:20
In contrast to ..... As ... Wrong

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 16 Nov 2017
Posts: 7
Veritas Prep 10 Year Anniversary Promo Question #2  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 May 2018, 13:04
Unlike its modern-day status as bioethically impermissible, lobotomy was initially hailed as a revolutionary therapeutic technique so much that the Portuguese neurologist Egas Moniz who introduced the procedure was in fact awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1949 for his contribution.

(C) Despite its modern-day status as bioethically impermissible, lobotomy was initially hailed as a revolutionary therapeutic technique; Egas Moniz, the Portuguese neurologist who introduced the procedure, was


I think this question is inaccurate and wouldn't ever be on the GMAT.

The OA (c) Implies illogically that the lobotomy was initially hailed as a revolutionary technique DESPITE its modern-day status. This is only possible if you assume that time travel exists. The GMAT dosent.

Am I the only one seeing this? can somebody please shed some light on how this is, nevertheless, correct?
Veritas Prep 10 Year Anniversary Promo Question #2 &nbs [#permalink] 02 May 2018, 13:04

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 28 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Veritas Prep 10 Year Anniversary Promo Question #2

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.