Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 21:34 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 21:34
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
nitesh50
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Jun 2018
Last visit: 09 Aug 2021
Posts: 139
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 139
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V32
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 3: 610 Q48 V25
GMAT 3: 610 Q48 V25
Posts: 139
Kudos: 69
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Staphyk
Joined: 20 Mar 2018
Last visit: 30 Jan 2022
Posts: 467
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 149
Location: Ghana
Concentration: Finance, Statistics
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
Products:
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
Posts: 467
Kudos: 374
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
warrior1991
Joined: 03 Mar 2017
Last visit: 03 Feb 2022
Posts: 573
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 596
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
Products:
Posts: 573
Kudos: 437
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
warrior1991
Hi VeritasKarishma,

Thanks a lot for addressing all the previous queries of mine.

Please help me to understand why option A is correct.

https://gmatclub.com/forum/last-august- ... 60887.html

Regards,
Prerak

Hi VeritasKarishma

I hope you did not miss this one. Please help
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey Guys,

I am travelling this week hence the responses might be a bit slow. Will try to keep up as much as possible.
Things will settle down next week onwards.

Best,
Karishma
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Staphyk
Hello Karishma,
Please is it a good idea to start reading the question stem before reading the stimuli or argument or vice versa or is there any strategy which will make you answer very fast and accurate?

Thank you


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

Hey Staphyk,

Different strategies work for different people. For some, reading the question stem first works. It helps them evaluate the argument as required. For others, it doesn't add a lot of value. You will need to figure out what works best for you but both strategies seem to work for different people so it is not a big distinction. Either is fine.
No matter what the question is, you should figure out what the conclusion/plan/proposal etc of the argument is. Then depending on what the question stem asks for, figure out your next step.
User avatar
Staphyk
Joined: 20 Mar 2018
Last visit: 30 Jan 2022
Posts: 467
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 149
Location: Ghana
Concentration: Finance, Statistics
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
Products:
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
Posts: 467
Kudos: 374
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma
Staphyk
Hello Karishma,
Please is it a good idea to start reading the question stem before reading the stimuli or argument or vice versa or is there any strategy which will make you answer very fast and accurate?

Thank you


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

Hey Staphyk,

Different strategies work for different people. For some, reading the question stem first works. It helps them evaluate the argument as required. For others, it doesn't add a lot of value. You will need to figure out what works best for you but both strategies seem to work for different people so it is not a big distinction. Either is fine.
No matter what the question is, you should figure out what the conclusion/plan/proposal etc of the argument is. Then depending on what the question stem asks for, figure out your next step.
Very well Karishma ,Thanks you


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [1]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rish2708
Gladiator59
Dear VeritasKarishma,

Whenever I run into CR trouble I turn to you. :-)

Can you please comment on this one - https://gmatclub.com/forum/in-a-recent- ... l#p2194617 . I am in a dilemma between option C vs. D

As always, you're the best. Thank you.

Regards,
Gladi

Hello VeritasKarishma Ma'am,

I have posted a small query to the same question on above forum after reviewing your answer. Thanks for the detail. I still had a small inch of doubt between C and D and hence I turned to you.
If you get time, will it be possible for you to review the same and let me know if the line-of-thinking what I have followed is proper?

Link: https://gmatclub.com/forum/in-a-recent- ... l#p2195011

The answer was correct, but I need to see if I got it correct for the right reasons.




Thanks & Regards,
Rishav

Here you go: https://gmatclub.com/forum/in-a-recent- ... l#p2197006
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
warrior1991
Hi VeritasKarishma,

Thanks a lot for addressing all the previous queries of mine.

Please help me to understand why option A is correct.

https://gmatclub.com/forum/last-august- ... 60887.html

Regards,
Prerak

Hey Prerak,

Hope this helps: https://gmatclub.com/forum/last-august- ... l#p2197034
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nitesh50
Hi VeritasKarishma


https://gmatclub.com/forum/an-automotiv ... l#p2196110


IN this question:
why is option E incorrect?
If the sport cars involved in warranty claims require another warranty claim, can't we say it strengthens the conclusion that SC are more susceptible to manufacturing defects than LT.


Also would the following Assumption be a valid one:

Passage : nearly three times as many warranty claims were performed on sport-utility vehicles than were performed on light trucks.

We are only talking about claims that were performed and then we are concluding about manufacturing defect susceptibility.

What if the manufacturing defects in light trucks are not reported for claims as they cheaper to repair or the claims lead to loss of their final bonus.

So assumption: The manufacturing defect damage in light trucks does not cause any loss when reported for warranty claims.


A. Warranty claims on sport-utility vehicles are, on average, more expensive to perform than are those on light trucks.
This was slightly on the lines of my Pre-Thinking.
But I eliminated this option because we don't whether light trucks are very cheap or just cheaper in relation to light trucks.
Am I correct in my reasoning for this option elimination.


Looking forward to your reply.
Regards
Nitesh

Here you go Nitesh: https://gmatclub.com/forum/an-automotiv ... l#p2197128
User avatar
rish2708
Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Last visit: 15 Sep 2022
Posts: 187
Own Kudos:
241
 [1]
Given Kudos: 442
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 1: 570 Q43 V26
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.8
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V32
Posts: 187
Kudos: 241
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello VeritasKarishma Ma'am,
Thanks a lot for answering my previous query.

I was confused between few questions on strengthening where an option of comparison was given:
For example,
Consider the following set of questions ( MGMAT and OG ) :

1) https://gmatclub.com/forum/officials-of ... 12027.html

2) https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-heavy-tr ... 42147.html


Now if we consider the #1 question, we see that option E and option D both seem to strengthen and I was somewhat able tending to E, which eventually came out as right answer

Consider #2, we see that the correct answer Option C, ( since the other options do not come close and easy to draw conclusion)


Generally, it takes a bit time for me to rule out an option which compares the scenario/plan to another city/situation and this is a delta which usually takes time to choose the one of the prospective answers.

Is there a way or methodical logic that we can apply to rule out options which are based on comparison as in both the above cases, we saw that the answer differences were subtle.

I hope I am clear in my query, thanks in advance!!

Regards,
Rishav
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [2]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rish2708
Hello VeritasKarishma Ma'am,
Thanks a lot for answering my previous query.

I was confused between few questions on strengthening where an option of comparison was given:
For example,
Consider the following set of questions ( MGMAT and OG ) :

1) https://gmatclub.com/forum/officials-of ... 12027.html

2) https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-heavy-tr ... 42147.html


Now if we consider the #1 question, we see that option E and option D both seem to strengthen and I was somewhat able tending to E, which eventually came out as right answer

Consider #2, we see that the correct answer Option C, ( since the other options do not come close and easy to draw conclusion)


Generally, it takes a bit time for me to rule out an option which compares the scenario/plan to another city/situation and this is a delta which usually takes time to choose the one of the prospective answers.

Is there a way or methodical logic that we can apply to rule out options which are based on comparison as in both the above cases, we saw that the answer differences were subtle.

I hope I am clear in my query, thanks in advance!!

Regards,
Rishav

Hey Rishav,

The distinction between the two questions is very clear - In the first one, the causation is not established.
A causation in a similar setting does strengthen the argument.

Say, city A is planning to establish plan X to achieve Y.
Other cities, which are similar to city A, did establish X to achieve Y and did achieve Y with it.
This does strengthen the possibility that establishing X will achieve Y in city A too.

This is what happens in the second question.

In the first question, the causation is not established. Did implementing suspension cause a decrease in the number of flagrant fouls in the similar league? We don't know. Perhaps the similar league has less aggressive players and hence lower incidence of flagrant fouls than the Youth Hockey League.
Since the causation is not established in option (D), it doesn't strengthen our argument.
User avatar
rish2708
Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Last visit: 15 Sep 2022
Posts: 187
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 442
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 1: 570 Q43 V26
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.8
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V32
Posts: 187
Kudos: 241
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma
rish2708
Hello VeritasKarishma Ma'am,
Thanks a lot for answering my previous query.

I was confused between few questions on strengthening where an option of comparison was given:
For example,
Consider the following set of questions ( MGMAT and OG ) :

1) https://gmatclub.com/forum/officials-of ... 12027.html

2) https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-heavy-tr ... 42147.html


Now if we consider the #1 question, we see that option E and option D both seem to strengthen and I was somewhat able tending to E, which eventually came out as right answer

Consider #2, we see that the correct answer Option C, ( since the other options do not come close and easy to draw conclusion)


Generally, it takes a bit time for me to rule out an option which compares the scenario/plan to another city/situation and this is a delta which usually takes time to choose the one of the prospective answers.

Is there a way or methodical logic that we can apply to rule out options which are based on comparison as in both the above cases, we saw that the answer differences were subtle.

I hope I am clear in my query, thanks in advance!!

Regards,
Rishav

Hey Rishav,

The distinction between the two questions is very clear - In the first one, the causation is not established.
A causation in a similar setting does strengthen the argument.

Say, city A is planning to establish plan X to achieve Y.
Other cities, which are similar to city A, did establish X to achieve Y and did achieve Y with it.
This does strengthen the possibility that establishing X will achieve Y in city A too.

This is what happens in the second question.

In the first question, the causation is not established. Did implementing suspension cause a decrease in the number of flagrant fouls in the similar league? We don't know. Perhaps the similar league has less aggressive players and hence lower incidence of flagrant fouls than the Youth Hockey League.
Since the causation is not established in option (D), it doesn't strengthen our argument.


Oh!! I did not get this in my first attempt!! Many thanks.

Just to re-iterate:
A similar league suspends players for committing flagrant fouls; this league has a relatively low incidence of flagrant fouls when compared with the Youth Hockey League.

So the bold part means that the incidence of fouls are low but the suspension might not be the cause of it.

Thanks, I was earlier seeing that as a causation!!
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [2]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rish2708
VeritasKarishma
rish2708
Hello VeritasKarishma Ma'am,
Thanks a lot for answering my previous query.

I was confused between few questions on strengthening where an option of comparison was given:
For example,
Consider the following set of questions ( MGMAT and OG ) :

1) https://gmatclub.com/forum/officials-of ... 12027.html

2) https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-heavy-tr ... 42147.html


Now if we consider the #1 question, we see that option E and option D both seem to strengthen and I was somewhat able tending to E, which eventually came out as right answer

Consider #2, we see that the correct answer Option C, ( since the other options do not come close and easy to draw conclusion)


Generally, it takes a bit time for me to rule out an option which compares the scenario/plan to another city/situation and this is a delta which usually takes time to choose the one of the prospective answers.

Is there a way or methodical logic that we can apply to rule out options which are based on comparison as in both the above cases, we saw that the answer differences were subtle.

I hope I am clear in my query, thanks in advance!!

Regards,
Rishav

Hey Rishav,

The distinction between the two questions is very clear - In the first one, the causation is not established.
A causation in a similar setting does strengthen the argument.

Say, city A is planning to establish plan X to achieve Y.
Other cities, which are similar to city A, did establish X to achieve Y and did achieve Y with it.
This does strengthen the possibility that establishing X will achieve Y in city A too.

This is what happens in the second question.

In the first question, the causation is not established. Did implementing suspension cause a decrease in the number of flagrant fouls in the similar league? We don't know. Perhaps the similar league has less aggressive players and hence lower incidence of flagrant fouls than the Youth Hockey League.
Since the causation is not established in option (D), it doesn't strengthen our argument.


Oh!! I did not get this in my first attempt!! Many thanks.

Just to re-iterate:
A similar league suspends players for committing flagrant fouls; this league has a relatively low incidence of flagrant fouls when compared with the Youth Hockey League.

So the bold part means that the incidence of fouls are low but the suspension might not be the cause of it.

Thanks, I was earlier seeing that as a causation!!

Yes, our minds tend to automatically assume a causation here even though it isn't mentioned. We need to be wary of this during the test.
User avatar
Gladiator59
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 839
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 260
Status:It always seems impossible until it's done.
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Products:
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Posts: 839
Kudos: 2,613
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi VeritasKarishma,

Can you please take a look at this - https://gmatclub.com/forum/necessity-fo ... 69128.html

Kindly let me know if E seems to you as a weakener based on CPA chick's reasoning quoted herein -
Yeah I agree with E 100%. If low performers can find other ways to climb the ladder (sycophancy, etc), then high performance resulting from a need for personal growth is NOT necessary for a successful career. But if low performers are weeded out then the only way to climb the ladder is to be a high performer.

What is the source for this question??? This is clearly the argument: "Need for personal growth is therefore an essential part of one’s career." Option "D" is completely out of scope for this argument. Even if D were true, so what? What does charity have to do with one's career?

I had similar reasoning and went ahead with E. Even though I know this is not an official question I am curious to know your thoughts on this one.

Thanks as always.

Regards,
Gladi
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Gladiator59
Hi VeritasKarishma,

Can you please take a look at this - https://gmatclub.com/forum/necessity-fo ... 69128.html

Kindly let me know if E seems to you as a weakener based on CPA chick's reasoning quoted herein -
Yeah I agree with E 100%. If low performers can find other ways to climb the ladder (sycophancy, etc), then high performance resulting from a need for personal growth is NOT necessary for a successful career. But if low performers are weeded out then the only way to climb the ladder is to be a high performer.

What is the source for this question??? This is clearly the argument: "Need for personal growth is therefore an essential part of one’s career." Option "D" is completely out of scope for this argument. Even if D were true, so what? What does charity have to do with one's career?

I had similar reasoning and went ahead with E. Even though I know this is not an official question I am curious to know your thoughts on this one.

Thanks as always.

Regards,
Gladi

I am not convinced with this CR question at all. It doesn't make a lot of sense to me. What is the source?
User avatar
rish2708
Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Last visit: 15 Sep 2022
Posts: 187
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 442
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 1: 570 Q43 V26
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.8
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V32
Posts: 187
Kudos: 241
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello @VeritasPrepKarishma ma'am,

Regarding the question:

https://gmatclub.com/forum/psychologist ... 46659.html


I get why other options are strengtheners that is they really show that photographic memory is not a virtue that scientists show and with this thinking I came up with option D.

Though as per the discussions of the forum, they say it's a mild strengthener but I dont think so.

I believe it is a mild weakener.

The author says that due to media reports and " ill informed scientists" and based on this logic, the author say that photographic memory is kind of overhyped.

Don't we need to assume that the scientists thesis have to have sound credibility on the thesis of photogenic memory

I think this assumption is needed so that author counters this.

Option D thus falls short as it says it is already discredited and hence the author's reasoning is unnecessary or less relevant.

Am I correct with this line of reasoning? Please help.

Regards,
Rishav

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
rish2708
Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Last visit: 15 Sep 2022
Posts: 187
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 442
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 1: 570 Q43 V26
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.8
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V32
Posts: 187
Kudos: 241
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello VeritasKarishma Ma'am,

Regarding this question: https://gmatclub.com/forum/many-athlete ... 20390.html

I have a small doubt.

Could you please explain:
"Measured continuously after exercise, however, the blood lactate levels of athletes who inhale pure oxygen are practically identical, on average, to those of athletes who breathe normal air."

The statement in the passage says on an average. Now
Let's call lactate level as BL and respective averages as:

Average with Oxygen = (BL1 + BL2+ BL3)/ 3

Average w/o Oxygen = ( BL1' + BL2') / 2
( Considering different sampling space)

Now considering above, we might come up with numbers such that the blood lactate levels on average looks same but they are not same as the sample itself is different as in take BL1 = BL2 = BL3 = 4 and BL1' = BL2' = 6, we get same numbers as lactate levels on average but the levels differ, then how we say A is an answer?

Based on the above reasoning, what am I missing here? Please help, thanks in advance!

Regards,
Rishav
User avatar
nitesh50
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Jun 2018
Last visit: 09 Aug 2021
Posts: 139
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 139
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V32
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 3: 610 Q48 V25
GMAT 3: 610 Q48 V25
Posts: 139
Kudos: 69
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi VeritasKarishma

https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-newly-disc ... 32998.html

IN this question, I have a slight doubt in option B.
When we negate an assumption, the conclusion should completely be destroyed.
We are not looking to weaken the conclusion after negating the option.

The conclusion: The painting must have been completed between 1507 and 1509.

Premise: Coin not minted before 1507
Painting material not used after 1509

Option B: Michelangelo did not work on the painting over the course of several years.

Negated: Michelangelo did work on the painting over the course of several years.
Several years can be from 2 to many years. So can't we say that there is a possibility that the painting may have been completed by 1509. After all 1507 to 1509 (2years is also several years)
I totally agree that the negated statement weakens the conclusion.
But does it break it? I don't think so.

Would love to hear your opinion on this issue.

Thank you !

Regards
Nitesh
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [1]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rish2708
Hello VeritasKarishma Ma'am,

Regarding this question: https://gmatclub.com/forum/many-athlete ... 20390.html

I have a small doubt.

Could you please explain:
"Measured continuously after exercise, however, the blood lactate levels of athletes who inhale pure oxygen are practically identical, on average, to those of athletes who breathe normal air."

The statement in the passage says on an average. Now
Let's call lactate level as BL and respective averages as:

Average with Oxygen = (BL1 + BL2+ BL3)/ 3

Average w/o Oxygen = ( BL1' + BL2') / 2
( Considering different sampling space)

Now considering above, we might come up with numbers such that the blood lactate levels on average looks same but they are not same as the sample itself is different as in take BL1 = BL2 = BL3 = 4 and BL1' = BL2' = 6, we get same numbers as lactate levels on average but the levels differ, then how we say A is an answer?

Based on the above reasoning, what am I missing here? Please help, thanks in advance!

Regards,
Rishav

Hey Rishav,

All biological measurements will vary from one person to another. When we say the temperature of human body is 98.6, it is an average number. The normal body temperature for people may vary from 98 to 99 or even more.
The blood lactate level will also be an average. So BL1 will be different from BL2 which will be different from BL3. Similarly, BL1' will be different from BL2'.
If the averages in the two cases are the same, it means there is no statistical difference when pure oxygen is inhaled in the blood lactate level.
   1  ...  7   8   9   10   11  ...  34   
Moderators:
188 posts
Current Student
710 posts
Current Student
275 posts