GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 19 Oct 2019, 05:48

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
V
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9706
Location: Pune, India
Re: Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Dec 2018, 20:47
vanam52923 wrote:
Hello Mam
I have douubt in OG question
Q1)https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-kinds-of-hand-and-wrist-injuries-that-result-from-extended-242144.html
Here if i draw parallel with this question of OG:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/although-the ... 02757.html
in this question we eliminated option D considering we are concerned with effects of schools cafeteria having machine,what they bring from outside was not relevant.
In Q1,we are also concerned with reducing injuries in school,so how come option C be correct.
Can you please draw parallel reasoning for me for these qsns.
Though i understood the qsn but suddenly vending machine qsn struck me so i marked wrong answer.


vanam52923,

Note that the question stem is different in the two cases.

Vending machine - looking for the assumption - The assumption is an internal part of the argument. Something that the conclusion has assumed to be true. It is a missing link. The argument coaxes us to not install vending machines because if students drink more soft drinks, they will be less healthy. We are assuming that installing vending machines will lead to more consumption of soft drinks. Note that whether students will bring soft drinks from home is not relevant to our argument.

Hand and wrist injuries - looking for useful to evaluate - This is an external part of the argument. Something outside the argument that will better help us figure out whether our plan will succeed. The plan is to bring a sharp decrease in the number of injuries. If students spend too much time outside school in incorrect posture, the sharp decrease we are looking for may not come. Hence it is relevant to our plan.

Now, if you change the vending machine question and look for something "useful to evaluate" e.g.
Which of the following will be most useful to evaluate whether school's plan of improving the health of students work?
Now, whether they bring soft drinks from home will become relevant.
_________________
Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 17 Jul 2017
Posts: 194
CAT Tests
Re: Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Dec 2018, 20:57
VeritasKarishma wrote:
vanam52923 wrote:
Hello Mam
I have douubt in OG question
Q1)https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-kinds-of-hand-and-wrist-injuries-that-result-from-extended-242144.html
Here if i draw parallel with this question of OG:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/although-the ... 02757.html
in this question we eliminated option D considering we are concerned with effects of schools cafeteria having machine,what they bring from outside was not relevant.
In Q1,we are also concerned with reducing injuries in school,so how come option C be correct.
Can you please draw parallel reasoning for me for these qsns.
Though i understood the qsn but suddenly vending machine qsn struck me so i marked wrong answer.


vanam52923,

Note that the question stem is different in the two cases.

Vending machine - looking for the assumption - The assumption is an internal part of the argument. Something that the conclusion has assumed to be true. It is a missing link. The argument coaxes us to not install vending machines because if students drink more soft drinks, they will be less healthy. We are assuming that installing vending machines will lead to more consumption of soft drinks. Note that whether students will bring soft drinks from home is not relevant to our argument.

Hand and wrist injuries - looking for useful to evaluate - This is an external part of the argument. Something outside the argument that will better help us figure out whether our plan will succeed. The plan is to bring a sharp decrease in the number of injuries. If students spend too much time outside school in incorrect posture, the sharp decrease we are looking for may not come. Hence it is relevant to our plan.

Now, if you change the vending machine question and look for something "useful to evaluate" e.g.
Which of the following will be most useful to evaluate whether school's plan of improving the health of students work?
Now, whether they bring soft drinks from home will become relevant.

Thank you so much
Current Student
avatar
S
Joined: 04 Jun 2018
Posts: 156
GMAT 1: 610 Q48 V25
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V32
GMAT 3: 710 Q50 V36
Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Dec 2018, 01:08
1
VeritasKarishma wrote:
nitesh50 wrote:
nitesh50 wrote:
In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, all of which must compete to enter the brain. Subsequent ingestion of sugars leads to the production of insulin, a hormone that breaks down the sugars and also rids the bloodstream of residual amino acids, except for tryptophan, Tryptophan then slips into the brain uncontested and is transformed into the chemical serotonin, increasing the brain's serotonin level. Thus sugars can play a major role in mood elevation, helping one to feel relaxed and anxiety-free.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Elevation of mood and freedom from anxiety require increasing the level of serotonin the brain.
(B) Failure to consume foods rich in sugars results in anxiety and a lowering of mood.
(C) Serotonin can be produced naturally only if tryptophan is presented in the bloodstream.
(D) Increasing the level of serotonin in the brain promotes relaxation and freedom from anxiety.
(E) The consumption of protein-rich foods results in anxiety and a lowering of mood.



Hi VeritasKarishma.
Can you please help me with this question.
I was confused between option A and option D.

After going through some basics, I came up with a reason to eliminate Option A and a reason to not eliminate A.(BIG CONFUSION)


ELIMINATION:
If
A causes B.

The main assumption of the argument is the A ONLY causes B.

it means that If A happens, B has to happen.


Now option A:
B requires A to happen.
This will imply that that the occurrence of of B depends on A happening i.e A is a necessary condition for B to happen.
This implies that B might still not occur.(if other conditions are not met)
The author by stating a causation never assumes this concept.

Am I right in thinking along this line of reasoning?


ON the other hand if my statement would have been:
Only A causes B.
Then this statement would have been an appropriate assumption.

NOT ELIMINATE:

Q.Also can we eliminate option A using negation technique?


For eg: A is not needed for B to happen.
This means that B can happen without the occurrence of A.
B happens without A happening.

Confusion: wouldn't this then break the argument?


I would love to hear your thoughts on why Is option A incorrect.

Looking forward to your reply

Regards
Nitesh





Hi VeritasKarishma

I think you might have missed this doubt.
Please do discuss this.

Regards
Nitesh


Oddly enough, I remember working on this question but cannot find my reply anywhere so certainly missed it somehow.
Here you go: https://gmatclub.com/forum/in-humans-in ... l#p2188392

Thr assumption of the argument is that A causes B (serotonin cause mood elevation etc). It is not that A ONLY causes B. Many things could lead to mood elevation etc but serotonin is one of those things that do lead to mood elevation etc. This assumption is the missing link between premises and conclusion. Note that the premises don't even have "mood elevation etc". Only the conclusion talks about it.

Negating (A) does not break the argument.

Negate (A) Elevation of mood and freedom from anxiety do not require increasing the level of serotonin in the brain.

This does not break our conclusion. Our conclusion is that (sugars) serotonin lead to mood elevation etc. It is not that serotonin is required for mood elevation etc. Serotonin is not necessary. It is one of the ways of getting mood elevation.






Hi Karishma.


SO I have been struggling with causation for a long time now. I often get confused when we have decide whether an alternate cause can actually become a weakner or not.

1.Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles reporting the results of experiments involving particle accelerators was lower last year than it had been in previous years. Several of the particle accelerators at major research institutions were out of service the year before last for repairs, so it is likely that the low number of articles was due to the decline in availability of particle accelerators.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the journalist’s argument?

Recent changes in the editorial policies of several physics journals have decreased the likelihood that articles concerning particle-accelerator research will be accepted for publication.

2. A study of marital relationships in which one partner's sleeping and waking cycles differ from those of other partner reveals that such couples share fewer activities with each other and have more violent arguments than do couples in a relationship in which both partners follow the same sleeping and waking patterns . Thus, mismatched sleeping and waking cycles can seriously jeopardize a marriage.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

Married couples in which both spouses follow the same sleeping and waking patterns also have arguments that can jeopardize the couple's marriage.

3. 12 years ago and again 5 years ago, there were extended periods when the Darfir Republic's currency, the pundra, was weak: its value was unusually low relative to the world's most stable currencies. Both times a weak pundra made Darfir's manufactured products a bargain on world markets, and Darfir's exports were up substantially. Now some politicians are saying that, in order to cause another similarly sized increase in exports, the government should allow the pundra to become weak again.

Which of the following, if true, provides the government with the strongest grounds to doubt that the politicians' recommendation, if followed, will achieve its aim?

A sharp improvement in the efficiency of Darfir's manufacturing plants would make Darfir's product a bargain on world markets even without any weakening of the pundra relative to other currencies.




In case 1 the causation implies a past event.
Hence the alternate cause is actually a weakner.



Thus, mismatched sleeping and waking cycles can seriously jeopardize a marriage.

In case 2 the causation is more like a characteristic,
Hence the alternate cause is not a weakner.

Also, we can say that the argument says that
A and B occur together and then assumes that A causes B.
Hence the alternate cause will not be a weakner.



The government should allow the pundra to become weak again.

In case 3 the causation relates to a future event
Hence the alternate cause is not a weakner.




Now in the mood elevation question:

Conclusion:
sugars can play a major role in mood elevation.

Can we say that this option is more like case 2. Since it says "can", the alternate cause is not a weakner.
But, if we were to drop can and say that
Sugars play a major role in mood elevation,
in this case Only A causes B will be an assumption.


Looking forward to your analysis.


Regards
Nitesh
Current Student
avatar
S
Joined: 04 Jun 2018
Posts: 156
GMAT 1: 610 Q48 V25
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V32
GMAT 3: 710 Q50 V36
Re: Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Dec 2018, 09:30
The retinas of premature babies are not fully developed at birth. Because their retinas are so delicate, premature babies sometimes lose their sight. Methods for preventing this syndrome, which is called retinopathy of prematurity, have improved, but the proportion of premature babies who lose their sight because of this syndrome has increased.

Which of the following, if true, best reconciles the apparent discrepancy described above?

A. When premature babies are born, their retinas are developmentally unprepared to deal with light and air in the environment outside the womb.
B. The oxygen that must be administered to premature babies at birth can sometimes have a damaging effect on the babies’ retinas, but the oxygen is now administered in less damaging concentrations than it used to be.
C. The effects of retinopathy of prematurity can be reduced by controlling the exposure of premature babies to light and oxygen, but this method cannot completely prevent the syndrome.
D. The improvement of methods to prevent retinopathy of prematurity has been a gradual process, and there is still a need for further knowledge.
E. Improved medical technology is saving the lives of premature babies who would previously have died, but these babies have even more delicate retinas than do other premature babies and are more apt to lose their sight.


HI VeritasKarishma
The OA for this question is B.
But I cannot understand how does it resolve the paradox.
Paradox according to me:
THe methods have improved----which should have led to the fall in the incidence of premature babies losing their sight

But the proportion of premature babies who lost sight has increased.

I pre thought:
What if the number of premature babies has reduced. IN this case both of the facts can be true.


But the answer option B only addressed the aspect that the methods have improved and not how the proportion has increased.


Looking forward to your reply!

Regards
Nitesh
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
V
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9706
Location: Pune, India
Re: Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Dec 2018, 03:29
2
2
The answer is not (B) here. It is (E). What is the source of this question?

Paradox: Retinopathy methods have improved but the proportion of premature babies who lose their sight has increased.

This is certainly a paradox. If methods have improved, the proportion of babies losing their sight should have decreased.

How do we reconcile it?

Look at option (E)

E. Improved medical technology is saving the lives of premature babies who would previously have died, but these babies have even more delicate retinas than do other premature babies and are more apt to lose their sight.

Better technology is saving lives of babies who would have died (say extremely premature born in 5th-6th month). Their retinas are even more delicate so even with better methods, it is difficult to save their sight. These babies would have died earlier so they would not have been counted in the "proportion who lose their sight". Now, since they are saved, but their retinas are extremely delicate, they end up getting counted in the total but their sight is lost. So overall, the proportion of those who lose their sight is increasing. This explains why despite better retinotherapy, proportion of babies losing sight is increasing. Now it all makes sense.

(B) does not explain the paradox.
B. The oxygen that must be administered to premature babies at birth can sometimes have a damaging effect on the babies’ retinas, but the oxygen is now administered in less damaging concentrations than it used to be.

If less damaging doses of oxygen are administered now, proportion of babies whose sight is saved should have increased. This doesn't help us resolve why the proportion has decreased.



nitesh50 wrote:
The retinas of premature babies are not fully developed at birth. Because their retinas are so delicate, premature babies sometimes lose their sight. Methods for preventing this syndrome, which is called retinopathy of prematurity, have improved, but the proportion of premature babies who lose their sight because of this syndrome has increased.

Which of the following, if true, best reconciles the apparent discrepancy described above?

A. When premature babies are born, their retinas are developmentally unprepared to deal with light and air in the environment outside the womb.
B. The oxygen that must be administered to premature babies at birth can sometimes have a damaging effect on the babies’ retinas, but the oxygen is now administered in less damaging concentrations than it used to be.
C. The effects of retinopathy of prematurity can be reduced by controlling the exposure of premature babies to light and oxygen, but this method cannot completely prevent the syndrome.
D. The improvement of methods to prevent retinopathy of prematurity has been a gradual process, and there is still a need for further knowledge.
E. Improved medical technology is saving the lives of premature babies who would previously have died, but these babies have even more delicate retinas than do other premature babies and are more apt to lose their sight.


HI VeritasKarishma
The OA for this question is B.
But I cannot understand how does it resolve the paradox.
Paradox according to me:
THe methods have improved----which should have led to the fall in the incidence of premature babies losing their sight

But the proportion of premature babies who lost sight has increased.

I pre thought:
What if the number of premature babies has reduced. IN this case both of the facts can be true.


But the answer option B only addressed the aspect that the methods have improved and not how the proportion has increased.


Looking forward to your reply!

Regards
Nitesh

_________________
Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >
Senior PS Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done.
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Posts: 737
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Dec 2018, 04:28
Dear VeritasKarishma,

Can you please take a look at this question. - https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-water-te ... 03369.html. I could arrive at the OA by elimination and also the logic that since the temperature of water in the ocean does not fluctuate much and "Most animals can tolerate only a limited range of all the various conditions that exist in an estuary" hence the oceans are more favorable at least in terms of constant temp. However, this seems like a very weak reasoning for an inference type question.

Please help.

Thanks as always. :-)

Best,
Gladi

Q for reference:
Quote:
The water temperature in an estuary is influenced by fluctuations in air temperature to a much greater extent than is the case in the ocean. If the estuary is shallow, and the fresh and saline components are well mixed, temperature and salinity are usually the same from top to bottom, although temperatures in the shallow waters over mud flats may rise considerably in the summer. Oxygen and carbon dioxide levels in the water vary with photosynthesis, respiration, and decomposition of organic materials. Most animals can tolerate only a limited range of all the various conditions that exist in an estuary; thus each species selects that portion of an estuary where the normal changes in temperature, salinity, and the like fall within its range.


The most logical conclusion to draw from this paragraph is that

oxygen and carbon dioxide levels in an estuary change significantly depending on the latitude of the wetlands
the life forms found in the ocean are probably greater in number as compared to those found in an estuary
water temperature in an estuary compared to a stagnate water mass—a pond, for example— would have a profound impact on the ecological surroundings
photosynthesis, respiration, and decomposition of organic materials are common to all waterrelated habitats
evidence demonstrates that species of animals found in an estuary probably evolved from the ocean

_________________
Regards,
Gladi



“Do. Or do not. There is no try.” - Yoda (The Empire Strikes Back)
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
V
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9706
Location: Pune, India
Re: Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Dec 2018, 05:33
1
nitesh50 wrote:

Hi Karishma.


SO I have been struggling with causation for a long time now. I often get confused when we have decide whether an alternate cause can actually become a weakner or not.

1.Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles reporting the results of experiments involving particle accelerators was lower last year than it had been in previous years. Several of the particle accelerators at major research institutions were out of service the year before last for repairs, so it is likely that the low number of articles was due to the decline in availability of particle accelerators.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the journalist’s argument?

Recent changes in the editorial policies of several physics journals have decreased the likelihood that articles concerning particle-accelerator research will be accepted for publication.

2. A study of marital relationships in which one partner's sleeping and waking cycles differ from those of other partner reveals that such couples share fewer activities with each other and have more violent arguments than do couples in a relationship in which both partners follow the same sleeping and waking patterns . Thus, mismatched sleeping and waking cycles can seriously jeopardize a marriage.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

Married couples in which both spouses follow the same sleeping and waking patterns also have arguments that can jeopardize the couple's marriage.

3. 12 years ago and again 5 years ago, there were extended periods when the Darfir Republic's currency, the pundra, was weak: its value was unusually low relative to the world's most stable currencies. Both times a weak pundra made Darfir's manufactured products a bargain on world markets, and Darfir's exports were up substantially. Now some politicians are saying that, in order to cause another similarly sized increase in exports, the government should allow the pundra to become weak again.

Which of the following, if true, provides the government with the strongest grounds to doubt that the politicians' recommendation, if followed, will achieve its aim?

A sharp improvement in the efficiency of Darfir's manufacturing plants would make Darfir's product a bargain on world markets even without any weakening of the pundra relative to other currencies.




In case 1 the causation implies a past event.
Hence the alternate cause is actually a weakner.



Thus, mismatched sleeping and waking cycles can seriously jeopardize a marriage.

In case 2 the causation is more like a characteristic,
Hence the alternate cause is not a weakner.

Also, we can say that the argument says that
A and B occur together and then assumes that A causes B.
Hence the alternate cause will not be a weakner.



The government should allow the pundra to become weak again.

In case 3 the causation relates to a future event
Hence the alternate cause is not a weakner.




Now in the mood elevation question:

Conclusion:
sugars can play a major role in mood elevation.

Can we say that this option is more like case 2. Since it says "can", the alternate cause is not a weakner.
But, if we were to drop can and say that
Sugars play a major role in mood elevation,
in this case Only A causes B will be an assumption.


Looking forward to your analysis.


Regards
Nitesh


I don't understand your logic of past vs future. It doesn't have anything to do with it. Consider each case to be a discussion between two people.

Case 1:

A: Number of articles reporting the results of experiments involving particle accelerators was lower last year than it had been in previous years. It is because many were out of service.
B: Not necessary. Recent changes in the editorial policies of several physics journals have decreased the likelihood that articles concerning particle-accelerator research will be accepted for publication.
B has given an alternative reason for lower number of articles. Perhaps, the accelerators being out of service didn't have much to do with it. Perhaps they were still available when needed. But since magazines are printing fewer such articles, we saw fewer. It makes sense. It weakens the claim of A that the reason was X. There was another factor Y which could have been responsible.

Case 2:
A: Couples with different sleeping patterns share fewer activities with each other and have more violent arguments than do couples in which both partners follow the same sleeping and waking patterns. Thus, mismatched sleeping and waking cycles can seriously jeopardize a marriage.
B: Couples with same patterns also have arguments that can jeopardise marriage.

A already says that couples with different sleeping patterns have MORE violent arguments than do those in which both partners have same routine. A doesn't say that couples with same sleeping patterns don't have arguments. Hence, it doesn't weaken A's argument.

Case 3:
A's plan: In order to cause another similarly sized increase in exports, the government should allow the pundra to become weak again

We need to find a reason the plan won't work. So a reason why even if we let tundra become weak, we will not see similarly sized increase in exports.
Now here, does it help to say that a similar increase can be obtained in another way? No. We need to find a reason why our plan won't work. The fact that another plan will work is not relevant.

In the mood elevation question, we are looking for an assumption. We are not looking for a weakener. An assumption is what connects the premises to the conclusion. Hence I am not sure how you are applying this concept to the mood elevation question.
_________________
Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
V
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9706
Location: Pune, India
Re: Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Dec 2018, 05:45
2
Gladiator59 wrote:
Dear VeritasKarishma,

Can you please take a look at this question. - https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-water-te ... 03369.html. I could arrive at the OA by elimination and also the logic that since the temperature of water in the ocean does not fluctuate much and "Most animals can tolerate only a limited range of all the various conditions that exist in an estuary" hence the oceans are more favorable at least in terms of constant temp. However, this seems like a very weak reasoning for an inference type question.

Please help.

Thanks as always. :-)

Best,
Gladi


Here you go Gladi: https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-water-te ... l#p2192112
_________________
Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >
Senior PS Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done.
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Posts: 737
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Dec 2018, 09:27
Dear VeritasKarishma,

Can you please look at this one - https://gmatclub.com/forum/u-s-environm ... 01438.html

I was not able to choose between B and E. Also some expert opinions seem to be divided. Your take on it would be valuable to the community.

Thanks as always.

Regards,
Gladi

Posted from my mobile device
_________________
Regards,
Gladi



“Do. Or do not. There is no try.” - Yoda (The Empire Strikes Back)
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
V
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9706
Location: Pune, India
Re: Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Dec 2018, 05:19
1
Gladiator59 wrote:
Dear VeritasKarishma,

Can you please look at this one - https://gmatclub.com/forum/u-s-environm ... 01438.html

I was not able to choose between B and E. Also some expert opinions seem to be divided. Your take on it would be valuable to the community.

Thanks as always.

Regards,
Gladi

Posted from my mobile device


Gladi,

See if this helps: https://gmatclub.com/forum/u-s-environm ... l#p2193472
_________________
Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 21 Jun 2017
Posts: 230
Concentration: Finance, Economics
WE: Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Re: Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2018, 09:08
https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-people-m ... 11268.html

Hi VeritasKarishma

Got torn between B and D.
Rejected B : People not watching TV debates are out of the scope of passage.
Chose D : Unpredictable behaviour will effect the likelihood of a win (Improve or Decrease) and thus, this is the correct weakener.


Another issue i am facing is that I am not able to recognize the patterns in a CR question. For example this was a causal pattern and in haste or maybe in anxiety I can never figure out if it is a causal pattern or a sampling pattern etc. Any pointers ?



Regards
_________________
Even if it takes me 30 attempts, I am determined enough to score 740+ in my 31st attempt. This is it, this is what I have been waiting for, now is the time to get up and fight, for my life is 100% my responsibility.

Dil ye Ziddi hai !!!

GMAT 1 - 620 .... Disappointed for 6 months. Im back Im back. Bhai dera tera COMEBACK !!!
Senior PS Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done.
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Posts: 737
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2018, 22:09
Dear VeritasKarishma,

Whenever I run into CR trouble I turn to you. :-)

Can you please comment on this one - https://gmatclub.com/forum/in-a-recent- ... l#p2194617 . I am in a dilemma between option C vs. D

As always, you're the best. Thank you.

Regards,
Gladi
_________________
Regards,
Gladi



“Do. Or do not. There is no try.” - Yoda (The Empire Strikes Back)
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 17 Jul 2017
Posts: 194
CAT Tests
Re: Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2018, 23:44
Mam ,please evaluate my ESR.I donot know how to improve .
https://gmatclub.com/forum/request-to-e ... l#p2194651
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
V
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9706
Location: Pune, India
Re: Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2018, 04:23
ShankSouljaBoi wrote:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-people-most-likely-to-watch-a-televised-debate-between-political-111268.html

Hi VeritasKarishma

Got torn between B and D.
Rejected B : People not watching TV debates are out of the scope of passage.
Chose D : Unpredictable behaviour will effect the likelihood of a win (Improve or Decrease) and thus, this is the correct weakener.


Another issue i am facing is that I am not able to recognize the patterns in a CR question. For example this was a causal pattern and in haste or maybe in anxiety I can never figure out if it is a causal pattern or a sampling pattern etc. Any pointers ?


Regards


Note what option (D) says: Comments affect the behaviour (not "winning" affects the behaviour). Also, whether they increase likelihood of winning, we don't know.
Hence (D) is not correct.

https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-people-m ... l#p2194802
_________________
Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
V
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9706
Location: Pune, India
Re: Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2018, 04:50
2
1
ShankSouljaBoi wrote:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-people-most-likely-to-watch-a-televised-debate-between-political-111268.html

Hi VeritasKarishma

Got torn between B and D.
Rejected B : People not watching TV debates are out of the scope of passage.
Chose D : Unpredictable behaviour will effect the likelihood of a win (Improve or Decrease) and thus, this is the correct weakener.


Another issue i am facing is that I am not able to recognize the patterns in a CR question. For example this was a causal pattern and in haste or maybe in anxiety I can never figure out if it is a causal pattern or a sampling pattern etc. Any pointers ?



Regards


ShankSouljaBoi,

As for recognising patterns - don't try to fit everything in one template or another. All I ever do is identify the type of question (weaken here) and then focus on conclusion and try to weaken that. The more complicated you make it, higher the chances of error. Just use logic. I don't believe in methodologies that make you dissect the reasoning followed in every argument. It wastes a lot of time, is unnecessary (until and unless it is a "method of reasoning" question) and doesn't necessarily lead to correct answer. What is to be gained?
_________________
Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 01 May 2018
Posts: 64
Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2018, 05:40
Hello VeritasKarishma
Thank you for all these initiatives for helping us out. I wanted your assistance in evaluate questions. My current approach to Evaluate question is that the correct choice when true would strengthen and when not true would weaken the argument. But I have encountered questions in which the correct choice just strengthens the argument but the negation doesnt weaken.
https://gmatclub.com/forum/truesave-is- ... 72955.html is an example. In this question, my instincts said C must be the answer but following the process, I wasnt able to reach the answer. In addition, A also seemed a strong contender. Request your help on this.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 20 Mar 2018
Posts: 375
Location: Ghana
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
Re: Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2018, 10:26
Hello Karishma,
Please is it a good idea to start reading the question stem before reading the stimuli or argument or vice versa or is there any strategy which will make you answer very fast and accurate?

Thank you


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Posts: 207
GMAT 1: 570 Q43 V26
GMAT 2: 660 Q48 V34
Re: Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2018, 12:08
Gladiator59 wrote:
Dear VeritasKarishma,

Whenever I run into CR trouble I turn to you. :-)

Can you please comment on this one - https://gmatclub.com/forum/in-a-recent- ... l#p2194617 . I am in a dilemma between option C vs. D

As always, you're the best. Thank you.

Regards,
Gladi


Hello VeritasKarishma Ma'am,

I have posted a small query to the same question on above forum after reviewing your answer. Thanks for the detail. I still had a small inch of doubt between C and D and hence I turned to you.
If you get time, will it be possible for you to review the same and let me know if the line-of-thinking what I have followed is proper?

Link: https://gmatclub.com/forum/in-a-recent- ... l#p2195011

The answer was correct, but I need to see if I got it correct for the right reasons.




Thanks & Regards,
Rishav
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
V
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9706
Location: Pune, India
Re: Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2018, 18:15
Gladiator59 wrote:
Dear VeritasKarishma,

Whenever I run into CR trouble I turn to you. :-)

Can you please comment on this one - https://gmatclub.com/forum/in-a-recent- ... l#p2194617 . I am in a dilemma between option C vs. D

As always, you're the best. Thank you.

Regards,
Gladi


Gladi, you are most welcome to send me your queries. Here is the answer to this one:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/in-a-recent- ... l#p2194821
_________________
Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 03 Mar 2017
Posts: 367
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Dec 2018, 22:27
Hi VeritasKarishma,

Thanks a lot for addressing all the previous queries of mine.

Please help me to understand why option A is correct.

https://gmatclub.com/forum/last-august- ... 60887.html

Regards,
Prerak
_________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the Gods, All the Heavens, and All the Hells lie within you.
GMAT Club Bot
Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR   [#permalink] 22 Dec 2018, 22:27

Go to page   Previous    1  ...  5   6   7   8   9   10   11  ...  18    Next  [ 344 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Veritas Prep CR Forum Expert - Karishma - Ask Me Anything about CR

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne