Last visit was: 27 Apr 2026, 09:56 It is currently 27 Apr 2026, 09:56
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,262
Own Kudos:
42,465
 [1]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,262
Kudos: 42,465
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,262
Own Kudos:
42,465
 [1]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,262
Kudos: 42,465
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
iMyself

The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word "natural" to foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or anything that has been synthesized.

iThe meaning of the sentence is “You can call a food as natural if the food does not contain any single one of the three factors namely,
1. Color/ flavor additives (or)
2 chemical preservatives (or)
3. Any synthetic material, --- meaning that if the food contains even if any one of the proscribed items, then it cannot be called natural.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
iMyself

The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word "natural" to foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or anything that has been synthesized.

iThe meaning of the sentence is “You can call a food as natural if the food does not contain any single one of the three factors namely,
1. Color/ flavor additives (or)
2 chemical preservatives (or)
3. Any synthetic material, --- meaning that if the food contains even if any one of the proscribed items, then it cannot be called natural.
That means: the word "natural" is LIMITED. If the food contains color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or anything that has been synthesized, we can't use "natural" in those foods, right?
But, the main sentence says another meaning. 'Natural' is restricted to those foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical blah blah blah..... .That means: if my food contains color or flavor, chemical preservatives, blah blah blah then 'natural' is NOT restricted-I'm allowed to use 'natural' in those foods. What do you think. Am I right?

Also, why or is used here. If someone used and here, will there be any problem in meaning?
Thanks...
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,262
Own Kudos:
42,465
 [1]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,262
Kudos: 42,465
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word "natural" to foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or anything that has been synthesized.

I am afraid that you are misinterpreting the meaning of the word ‘restricted. Restricted means ‘allowed limitedly’ to those that contain no artificial things. If you try to negate the sentence on both sides, the meaning will be absurd. It will mean that, ‘The commission has directed advertisers not to restrict the use of the word "natural" to foods that do it contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or anything that has been synthesized. If you interpret it that way, now you can merrily use the word natural to those food that have has artificial things, but then why will you need restrictions at all anyway ?Do you see your problem? Take away is that if you fail to grasp the intention in its perspective, then you would be vulnerable squander valuable time in the exam.
User avatar
ccooley
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Last visit: 06 Jun 2020
Posts: 931
Own Kudos:
1,658
 [1]
Given Kudos: 115
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 931
Kudos: 1,658
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
iMyself
daagh
iMyself

The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word "natural" to foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or anything that has been synthesized.

iThe meaning of the sentence is “You can call a food as natural if the food does not contain any single one of the three factors namely,
1. Color/ flavor additives (or)
2 chemical preservatives (or)
3. Any synthetic material, --- meaning that if the food contains even if any one of the proscribed items, then it cannot be called natural.
That means: the word "natural" is LIMITED. If the food contains color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or anything that has been synthesized, we can't use "natural" in those foods, right?
But, the main sentence says another meaning. 'Natural' is restricted to those foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical blah blah blah..... .That means: if my food contains color or flavor, chemical preservatives, blah blah blah then 'natural' is NOT restricted-I'm allowed to use 'natural' in those foods. What do you think. Am I right?

Also, why or is used here. If someone used and here, will there be any problem in meaning?
Thanks...

Think about this simpler example:

I don't eat fruit or vegetables.

This is grammatical - you could argue about why it makes logical sense, but I think it's easier just to memorize it. You use 'or' if you're saying that nothing on a list is true. For example, here, you don't eat fruit, and you also don't eat vegetables. Because you don't eat any of the things on the list, you use 'or'. The following sentences are also grammatical, for the same reason:

You can't call a food natural if it contains artificial preservatives or flavors.
Nobody likes bad drivers or rude people.

For what it's worth, the GMAT is much more likely to test 'and/or' in the context of another idiom, rather than testing it like this. For example, you might have to choose between the following two sentences:

She likes both pasta and pizza.
She likes both pasta or pizza.

It looks like they're testing 'and' versus 'or', but they're actually testing whether you know the idiom 'both X and Y'.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,419
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,419
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
507 posts
361 posts