GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 25 Sep 2018, 22:33

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

When astronomers observed the comet Steinman-Arnet 3 becoming 1,000

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1146
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
When astronomers observed the comet Steinman-Arnet 3 becoming 1,000  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Sep 2015, 11:45
1
5
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

75% (01:56) correct 25% (02:02) wrong based on 333 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

When astronomers observed the comet Steinman-Arnet 3 becoming 1,000 times brighter in September 1995, they correctly hypothesized that its increased brightness was a result of the comet’s breaking up. When comets break up, they emit large amounts of gas and dust, becoming visibly brighter as a result. However, their observations did not reveal comet Steinman-Arnet 3 actually breaking into pieces until November 1995, even though telescopes were trained on it throughout the entire period.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent conflict in the situation above?

(A) Comets often do not emit gas and dust until several weeks after they have begun to break up.
(B) The reason comets become brighter when they break up is that the gas and dust that they emit refract light.
(C) Gas and dust can be released by fissures in a comet, even if the comet is not broken all the way through.
(D) The amount of gas and dust emitted steadily increased during the period from September through November.
(E) The comet passed close to the sun during this period and the gravitational strain caused it to break up.

_________________

The only time you can lose is when you give up. Try hard and you will suceed.
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-in-verbal-gmat-forum-134642.html
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources.


My posts
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beauty-of-coordinate-geometry-213760.html#p1649924
http://gmatclub.com/forum/calling-all-march-april-gmat-takers-who-want-to-cross-213154.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/possessive-pronouns-200496.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/double-negatives-206717.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-greatest-integer-function-223595.html#p1721773
https://gmatclub.com/forum/improve-reading-habit-233410.html#p1802265

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2015
Posts: 20
Re: When astronomers observed the comet Steinman-Arnet 3 becoming 1,000  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Sep 2015, 12:33
Mechmeera wrote:
When astronomers observed the comet Steinman-Arnet 3 becoming 1,000 times brighter in September 1995, they correctly hypothesized that its increased brightness was a result of the comet’s breaking up. When comets break up, they emit large amounts of gas and dust, becoming visibly brighter as a result. However, their observations did not reveal comet Steinman-Arnet 3 actually breaking into pieces until November 1995, even though telescopes were trained on it throughout the entire period.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent conflict in the situation above?

(A) Comets often do not emit gas and dust until several weeks after they have begun to break up.
(B) The reason comets become brighter when they break up is that the gas and dust that they emit refract light.
(C) Gas and dust can be released by fissures in a comet, even if the comet is not broken all the way through.
(D) The amount of gas and dust emitted steadily increased during the period from September through November.
(E) The comet passed close to the sun during this period and the gravitational strain caused it to break up.


a. Out of scope
b. Suggests the same as the premise. Not helpful to resolve conflict.
c. Helps answer the question: How comets could break, emit gas and dust and still be hidden from telescope.
d. Nope.
e. Not enough information to falsify or pass.
_________________

Thanks,

Manas

------------------------------
Big Ideas, Small Steps

Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1146
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: When astronomers observed the comet Steinman-Arnet 3 becoming 1,000  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Feb 2016, 10:50
2
When astronomers observed the comet Steinman-Arnet 3 becoming 1,000 times brighter in September 1995,
they correctly hypothesized that its increased brightness was a result of the comet’s breaking up.

When comets break up, they emit large amounts of gas and dust, becoming visibly brighter as a result.

However, their observations did not reveal comet Steinman-Arnet 3 actually breaking into pieces until November 1995,
even though telescopes were trained on it throughout the entire period.

In Simple words: Symptoms were shown way before but even happened much later.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent conflict in the situation above?..............Paradox qn

(A) Comets often do not emit gas and dust until several weeks after they have begun to break up...........this is reverse of what happened in this case. Does not help to address the paradox.

(B) The reason comets become brighter when they break up is that the gas and dust that they emit refract light...........this explains why they are brightened not why the comet broke later.

(C) Gas and dust can be released by fissures in a comet, even if the comet is not broken all the way through............fissures mean cracks or narrow opening. Thus this explains why it brightened before it broke up into pieces.

(D) The amount of gas and dust emitted steadily increased during the period from September through November............This explains why it brightened from September to November but does not explain why it broke up later and why not earlier.

(E) The comet passed close to the sun during this period and the gravitational strain caused it to break up..........I believe this is a wonderful trap but explaining why the comet broke up is not the same as explaining why the scientists observed the brightness before the actual disintegration.
_________________

The only time you can lose is when you give up. Try hard and you will suceed.
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-in-verbal-gmat-forum-134642.html
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources.


My posts
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beauty-of-coordinate-geometry-213760.html#p1649924
http://gmatclub.com/forum/calling-all-march-april-gmat-takers-who-want-to-cross-213154.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/possessive-pronouns-200496.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/double-negatives-206717.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-greatest-integer-function-223595.html#p1721773
https://gmatclub.com/forum/improve-reading-habit-233410.html#p1802265

Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1321
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: When astronomers observed the comet Steinman-Arnet 3 becoming 1,000  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2017, 02:54
Nevernevergiveup wrote:
When astronomers observed the comet Steinman-Arnet 3 becoming 1,000 times brighter in September 1995, they correctly hypothesized that its increased brightness was a result of the comet’s breaking up. When comets break up, they emit large amounts of gas and dust, becoming visibly brighter as a result. However, their observations did not reveal comet Steinman-Arnet 3 actually breaking into pieces until November 1995, even though telescopes were trained on it throughout the entire period.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent conflict in the situation above?

(A) Comets often do not emit gas and dust until several weeks after they have begun to break up.
(B) The reason comets become brighter when they break up is that the gas and dust that they emit refract light.
(C) Gas and dust can be released by fissures in a comet, even if the comet is not broken all the way through.
(D) The amount of gas and dust emitted steadily increased during the period from September through November.
(E) The comet passed close to the sun during this period and the gravitational strain caused it to break up.


OFFICIAL EXPLANATION


Solution: C

As evidenced by the phrase, “most helps to resolve the apparent conflict”, this is an “Explain the Paradox” question, a subtype of the Strengthen category. Our mission is strategically similar to traditional Strengthen questions, but instead of minding the logical gap between a conclusion and its supporting premises, we must focus on the logical gap separating two contradictory statements. With this particular problem, we understand that gas and dust caused increased brightness, and when comets break up they emit gas and dust. The paradox lies in the fact that the scientists observed the increased brightness – caused by gas and dust – but didn’t observe the comet’s breakup until later. The paradox hinges on the timing of the observations. (Notice that the problem explicitly states the scientists “correctly hypothesized that its increased brightness was a result of the comet’s breaking up” – we can rule out any answers which imply the brightness was caused by something else.)

Answer choice “A” actually intensifies the paradox, not fixes it. (Be careful of Weaken answers in Strengthen question types!) If the comet broke up first, then emitted gasses later, the increase in brightness caused by the gas and dust would actually come after the breakup, not before. The problem clearly states that the increased brightness preceded the observed breakup.

Answer choice “B” provides new information, but does nothing to bridge the gap between the two contradictory observations. While it explains the scientific mechanism behind why a disintegrating comet is brighter, it doesn’t explain why the Steinman-Arnett 3 comet was brighter before it was visibly breaking up.

Answer choice “C” bridges the gap and explains how gas and dust – which cause increased brightness – can be emitted before a comet completely disintegrates. This explains the timing of the contradictory observations and shows how scientists could note increased brightness before observing the comet’s complete dissolution. “C” is the correct answer.

Answer choice “D” seems to imply that more and more gas and dust were emitted by the comet throughout the timeframe in question, but it fails to resolve why the scientists observed a 1,000 times increase in brightness in September, but didn’t observe the breakup until November. The gap in timing is not explained.

Answer choice “E” is another answer that provides new background information without bridging the gap between the two contradictory observations. Explaining why the comet broke up is not the same as explaining why the scientists observed the brightness before the actual disintegration. With questions like these, we must focus on connecting both paradoxical pieces.
_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advanced-search/

Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1321
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
When astronomers observed the comet Steinman-Arnet 3 becoming 1,000  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2017, 17:24
Nevernevergiveup wrote:
When astronomers observed the comet Steinman-Arnet 3 becoming 1,000 times brighter in September 1995, they correctly hypothesized that its increased brightness was a result of the comet’s breaking up. When comets break up, they emit large amounts of gas and dust, becoming visibly brighter as a result. However, their observations did not reveal comet Steinman-Arnet 3 actually breaking into pieces until November 1995, even though telescopes were trained on it throughout the entire period.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent conflict in the situation above?

(A) Comets often do not emit gas and dust until several weeks after they have begun to break up.
(B) The reason comets become brighter when they break up is that the gas and dust that they emit refract light.
(C) Gas and dust can be released by fissures in a comet, even if the comet is not broken all the way through.
(D) The amount of gas and dust emitted steadily increased during the period from September through November.
(E) The comet passed close to the sun during this period and the gravitational strain caused it to break up.


Source : LSAT PrepTest 36 Q13

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION FROM KAPLAN


Mentally rephrasing a “conflict” or paradox can reveal its resolution.

A simple rephrasing: How can astronomers in September have “correctly” attributed the comet’s greater brightness to its breakup, when the breakup wasn’t observed until two months later? If the breakup had begun earlier and unobserved, that’s how. (C) explains how the brightness could have increased PRIOR to the observation of the comet’s breakup, and removes all conflicts among the statements.

(A) is a 180 in that it deepens the mystery of how the brightness could have begun in advance of the November sighting.

(D), too, if anything deepens the paradox, since it describes brightness-creating activity prior to November.

Two choices relate to irrelevant causes of brightness (B) and comet breakup (D).

Neither speaks to the dis-junction between the September hypothesis and November observations.
_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advanced-search/

Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 08 Jan 2018
Posts: 247
Location: United States (ID)
GPA: 3.33
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
GMAT ToolKit User
When astronomers observed the comet Steinman-Arnet 3 becoming 1,000  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Feb 2018, 14:04
I initially choose C, but I still cannot get rid of A. It is because the question is not clear what "telescopes were trained on it" means. In other words, I cannot tell whether scientists discover the break up, or the telescope spot the break up.

To me, the most piece that convince me why A is incorrect is "have begun", then A does not resolve the paradox at all.
Also, the question actually means there is no break up in 1985 because the brighter of the comet is caused by sth else.
It takes 10 min to understand this question. So crazy.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 15 Oct 2017
Posts: 306
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: When astronomers observed the comet Steinman-Arnet 3 becoming 1,000  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Feb 2018, 15:15
The apparent paradox is- even the increased brightness of a comet can be attributed to its breaking up, astronomers waited till November to confirm the same. Why? Maybe the increased brightness first observed could possibly be attributed to some other reason and astronomers confirmed the same in November after observing the star for three months.
A. Our conclusion is about comets who do emit gases and dust and therefore appear bright. Out of scope. Incorrect.
B. We are not concerned about the technical reasons of why they appear brighter. Incorrect.
C. Another possible reason for the comets to appear brighter. Could be the reason why astronomers confirmed in November the reason for the comet appearing brighter. Hold.
D. This should have made the star brighter in November. But conclusion is not about more or less bright but about stating the reason behind the brightness. Incorrect.
E. Irrelevant information. Incorrect.

Hence, C.


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum
GMAT Club Bot
Re: When astronomers observed the comet Steinman-Arnet 3 becoming 1,000 &nbs [#permalink] 27 Feb 2018, 15:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

When astronomers observed the comet Steinman-Arnet 3 becoming 1,000

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.