Nahid078
Can someone please explains the use of "as" in option A and the use of "that" in option D
mikemcgarry, can you please help. Thanks in advance
Dear
Nahid078,
I'm happy to respond, my friend.
The structure "
same as" is fine for comparing two similar things. For "
same year as," we would need another year; furthermore, this structure calls for a noun following the word "as," whereas (A) makes the mistake of having a clause following (A). We could say
. . .
issued in the same year as that of the celebration of the bicentennial of Lewis and Clark's expedition . . .
That's a grammatically correct but rhetorically clunky.
. . .
issued in the same year as that when the bicentennial of Lewis and Clark's expedition was celebrated . . .
That's a little better.
Since we have so much information to include in the second half of the comparison, rather than use
"same as" + [noun] + [noun modifier], a structure in which we have to stick all the information into the noun modifying clause, it makes more sense to use the "
same year that" structure (we could also use "
same year when"). With this structure, we get to the clause right away, with no interruption: thus, this structure makes the sentence smoother.
The magic of the word "
same" is that we are saying two things are identical. We don't need a demonstrative pronoun (e.g. "
that," "
this") precisely because the second item in the comparison is the same thing!
I think (D) would be a little better with "
the same year when," rather than "
the same year that." There is something a little awkward about (D) that would be corrected by this substitution.
Does all this make sense?
Mike