GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 18 Aug 2018, 18:39

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 52
A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2012, 15:38
11
41
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

76% (00:52) correct 24% (01:04) wrong based on 3349 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will typically invest that money in hundreds of companies, rarely holding more than one percent of the shares of any particular corporation.

(A) companies, rarely holding more than one percent
(B) companies, and it is rare to hold at least one percent or more
(C) companies and rarely do they hold more than one percent
(D) companies, so that they rarely hold more than one percent
(E) companies; rarely do they hold one percent or more
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 304
Re: A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2012, 18:34
24
11
A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will typically invest that money in hundreds of companies, rarely holding more than one percent of the shares of any particular corporation.

(A) companies, rarely holding more than one percent

The clause 'rarely holding...' correctly modifies the subjet 'mutual fund.'

(B) companies, and it is rare to hold at least one percent or more

Here the 'it' is vague and unnecessary.

(C) companies and rarely do they hold more than one percent

Who is the 'they'? If we are referring to the companies than doing so is misleading. The original sentence makes it clear the mutual fund is doing the holding.

(D) companies, so that they rarely hold more than one percent

Same as (C).

(E) companies; rarely do they hold one percent or more

_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep

##### General Discussion
Senior Manager
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 487
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Re: A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2012, 20:06
1
betterscore wrote:
A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will typically invest that money in hundreds of companies, rarely holding more than one percent of the shares of any particular corporation.

(A) companies, rarely holding more than one percent
(B) companies, and it is rare to hold at least one percent or more
(C) companies and rarely do they hold more than one percent
(D) companies, so that they rarely hold more than one percent
(E) companies; rarely do they hold one percent or more

Very good question,

Meaning,

A big MF company invests money | in many corporations | so that its investment remains around 1% in each corporations.

Structure,

A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will typically invest that money in hundreds of companies, rarely holding more than one percent of the shares of any particular corporation.

,rarely holding is for Mutual fund NOT companies
having billions of dollars - holding (verb+ing) modifier is showing an action of the subject MUTUAL FUND
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Intern
Joined: 10 May 2012
Posts: 47
GMAT Date: 09-10-2012
Re: A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2012, 11:19
1
1
betterscore wrote:
A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will typically invest that money in hundreds of companies, rarely holding more than one percent of the shares of any particular corporation.

(A) companies, rarely holding more than one percent
(B) companies, and it is rare to hold at least one percent or more
(C) companies and rarely do they hold more than one percent
(D) companies, so that they rarely hold more than one percent
(E) companies; rarely do they hold one percent or more

Subject is " A mutual fund"............."holding more than............." modifies subject ' A mutual fund'

C, D & E straight out as it uses plural "they"
B uses wrong idiom " at least or more" and "it is rare....." construction is awkward.

A is correctly using verb-ing modifier.

Am
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4525
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2012, 08:13
5
A simple open and shut case. ‘A mutual fund’ is singular and the use of ‘they’ is subject –pronoun mismatch. Therefore, C, D, and E are gone. Between A and B, the word 'at least' distorts the meaning in B. 'Rarely holding more than one percent' is not the same 'rarely holding at least one percent'. So A
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Joined: 19 Jul 2012
Posts: 160
Location: India
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V28
GPA: 3.3
Re: A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2012, 02:11
Archit143 wrote:
Pls help me to get my logic clear.
I read in one of the posts of dagh or vipps dont remem exactly that we should look for a conjunction after a comma.

Though i got A as correct answer, which is also the OA.
Pls help me to get my logic cleared on this topic.

Also pls correct me if i am wrong is the above mentioned error considered "run on"

Hi Archit!! Above is not a run on sentence, later part of the sentences is a modifier modifying the subject of the clause. We use conjunction after a comma to join two clauses.

http://www.writingcentre.uottawa.ca/hyp ... junct.html

Hope this helps.
VP
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1016
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Re: A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Dec 2012, 12:57
1
After referring to various prep materials and getting myself clear on logic.
Here is my take on the above question.

Meaning:- A mutual fund investing company will invest in hundreds of companies but does not holds more than !% share of any one company.

Now since i analyzed the meaning A, seems to be lucid and clear as the phrase after the comma starting with rarely is an adverbial phrase and is modifier, modifying Companies. is correct.

B distorts the meaning as it says it is rare to hold more than 1% or more.......It means the company has got share of few companies that is more than 1% , its not the intended meaning.

I read Chris lee mentioned It is vague absolutely not. It appears at the starting of independent clause. it is farely correct to mention It at the beginning of sentence.

In C , D and E they refers to Companies whose share the Mutual investment company holds. It is wrong, In fact it should refer to A mutual fund...

---------------------------------------------------
Consider Kudos, if my post helped!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Manager
Affiliations: IIBA
Joined: 04 Sep 2010
Posts: 52
Location: India
Schools: HBS, Stanford, Stern, Insead, ISB, Wharton, Columbia
WE 1: Information Technology (Banking and Financial Services)
Re: A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jan 2013, 11:02
1
ChrisLele wrote:
A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will typically invest that money in hundreds of companies, rarely holding more than one percent of the shares of any particular corporation.

(A) companies, rarely holding more than one percent

The clause 'rarely holding...' correctly modifies the subjet 'mutual fund.'

(B) companies, and it is rare to hold at least one percent or more

Here the 'it' is vague and unnecessary.

(C) companies and rarely do they hold more than one percent

Who is the 'they'? If we are referring to the companies than doing so is misleading. The original sentence makes it clear the mutual fund is doing the holding.

(D) companies, so that they rarely hold more than one percent

Same as (C).

(E) companies; rarely do they hold one percent or more

ChrisLele,

Can you please clarify your explanation for Option B ? How the 'it' is vague ?
I ruled out B more on the meaning prospective than what you have explained.
_________________

~soaringAlone
~Live fast, die young and leave a marketable corpse behind !!

Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 822
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2013, 21:59
Hi folks,

Just a small query.

I know that option (D) looses its significance when it uses plural 'THEY' instead of singular pronoun to refer back to the 'MUTUAL FUND'.

So if I make option (D) as below

(D).companies, so that IT rarely hold more than one percent.
(A). companies, rarely holding more than one percent.

Which option would be the best => A or D

Furthermore , while (A) has VERBING 'holding' modifier with an adverb 'rarely', (D) has a 'SO THAT' effect and then the main clause again.

And the meaning of both are not same.

(A). means => Rarely holding blah blah blah, mutual fund invests.......
(D). means => MF invests in....., and as a result it rarely holds blah blah blah

_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1075
Location: United States
Re: A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2013, 23:43
TGC wrote:
Hi folks,

Just a small query.

I know that option (D) looses its significance when it uses plural 'THEY' instead of singular pronoun to refer back to the 'MUTUAL FUND'.

So if I make option (D) as below

(D).companies, so that IT rarely hold more than one percent.
(A). companies, rarely holding more than one percent.

Which option would be the best => A or D

Furthermore , while (A) has VERBING 'holding' modifier with an adverb 'rarely', (D) has a 'SO THAT' effect and then the main clause again.

And the meaning of both are not same.

(A). means => Rarely holding blah blah blah, mutual fund invests.......
(D). means => MF invests in....., and as a result it rarely holds blah blah blah

Hi TGC.

(1) Because of a "comma" the usage of "so that" is incorrect. The intended meaning is that the second part is just the modifier. If you put so that (I assume there is no comma), you will change the modifier part to the main part of sentence. Thus, even though you change plural pronoun "they" to singular pronoun "it", D is still incorrect.

(2) Verb-ing modifier with a comma --> modifies a preceding clause --> the modifier can tell you the result of the preceding clause-- OR --- provide more information. In this case, the modifier should tell the result of the action "investing in hundreds of companies" --> the result is the fund rarely holds more than 1% in of the shares of any particular corporation.
There is no reason to replace the modifier at the beginning as in your example. Thus, your "new" A and D are pretty the same in meaning.

Best regards.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 822
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2013, 00:35
pqhai wrote:
TGC wrote:
Hi folks,

Just a small query.

I know that option (D) looses its significance when it uses plural 'THEY' instead of singular pronoun to refer back to the 'MUTUAL FUND'.

So if I make option (D) as below

(D).companies, so that IT rarely hold more than one percent.
(A). companies, rarely holding more than one percent.

Which option would be the best => A or D

Furthermore , while (A) has VERBING 'holding' modifier with an adverb 'rarely', (D) has a 'SO THAT' effect and then the main clause again.

And the meaning of both are not same.

(A). means => Rarely holding blah blah blah, mutual fund invests.......
(D). means => MF invests in....., and as a result it rarely holds blah blah blah

Hi TGC.

(1) Because of a "comma" the usage of "so that" is incorrect. The intended meaning is that the second part is just the modifier. If you put so that (I assume there is no comma), you will change the modifier part to the main part of sentence. Thus, even though you change plural pronoun "they" to singular pronoun "it", D is still incorrect.

(2) Verb-ing modifier with a comma --> modifies a preceding clause --> the modifier can tell you the result of the preceding clause-- OR --- provide more information. In this case, the modifier should tell the result of the action "investing in hundreds of companies" --> the result is the fund rarely holds more than 1% in of the shares of any particular corporation.
There is no reason to replace the modifier at the beginning as in your example. Thus, your "new" A and D are pretty the same in meaning.

Best regards.

Hi there,

,so that independent clause (Is correct usage which shows a result)

True: Verb-Ing modifies preceding clause or presents a result of a preceding clause. However , per the meaning of sentence it is correct to say

Rarely holding more than 1%, MF will invest...... (How MF will invest in companies...).....

, so that shows the result of the main clause here is what should be the intended meaning

_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Director
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 976
Location: Bangalore, India
Re: A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2013, 02:50
1
TGC wrote:
, so that shows the result of the main clause here is what should be the intended meaning

This is not the intended meaning. so that would convey that mutual funds intentionally do not hold more than one percent of the shares of any particular corporation.

But the only intention of mutual funds is actually to invest money in hundreds of companies. The outcome (consequence) of this strategy is that mutual funds end up holding not more than one percent of the shares of any particular corporation.

In other words, holding not more than one percent of the shares of any particular corporation is just a consequence; so that would not convey consequence.

In fact, so that would reverse the intended meaning. The intended meaning is:

1. Mutual funds invest in hundreds of companies.

2. As a result, mutual funds end up holding not more than one percent of the shares of any particular corporation.

so that depicts:

1. The intention of mutual funds is to hold not more than one percent of the shares of any particular corporation.

2. To accomplish this, mutual funds invest money in hundreds of companies
_________________

Thanks,
Ashish
EducationAisle, Bangalore

Sentence Correction Nirvana available on Amazon.in and Flipkart

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi.com

Manager
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 185
Re: A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2014, 10:02
betterscore wrote:
A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will typically invest that money in hundreds of companies, rarely holding more than one percent of the shares of any particular corporation.

(A) companies, rarely holding more than one percent
(B) companies, and it is rare to hold at least one percent or more
(C) companies and rarely do they hold more than one percent
(D) companies, so that they rarely hold more than one percent
(E) companies; rarely do they hold one percent or more

Subject is mutual fund, and its antecedent needs to be singular, C/D/E gone since they use "they". "it" in B is ambiguous and may refer to "companies", so A is the best option.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2619
Re: A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 May 2014, 23:44
honchos wrote:
ChrisLele wrote:
A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will typically invest that money in hundreds of companies, rarely holding more than one percent of the shares of any particular corporation.

(A) companies, rarely holding more than one percent

The clause 'rarely holding...' correctly modifies the subjet 'mutual fund.'

(B) companies, and it is rare to hold at least one percent or more

Here the 'it' is vague and unnecessary.

(C) companies and rarely do they hold more than one percent

Who is the 'they'? If we are referring to the companies than doing so is misleading. The original sentence makes it clear the mutual fund is doing the holding.

(D) companies, so that they rarely hold more than one percent

Same as (C).

(E) companies; rarely do they hold one percent or more

Sir Can you explain Option A little bit more. Thanks!

Hi,

Choice A correctly uses the comma + verb- ing modifier to modify the preceding clause. The comma + verb –ing modifier presents either additional information about the preceding clause or the result of that clause. Here it presents the result of the preceding clause. So, essentially it means that the author is trying to say that because a mutual fund with a lot of money generally invests in a number of companies, it rarely holds more than one percent of the shares of any particular company.

Now typically, the information given in the comma+ verb –ing modifier should make sense with the subject of the modified clause. Let’s check the same here:

A mutual fund (with a particular feature) rarely holds more than one percent of the shares of any particular corporation.

As you can see, the information given in the modifier (holding…corporation) does make sense with the subject of the modified clause (a mutual fund).

To understand the concept and various uses of comma + verb –ing modifier more, please refer to our in depth article on the subject here :

https://e-gmat.com/blogs/?p=3465

Hope the above discussion helps!

Regards,
Neeti.
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2013
Posts: 268
Re: A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 May 2014, 19:53
egmat wrote:
honchos wrote:
ChrisLele wrote:
A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will typically invest that money in hundreds of companies, rarely holding more than one percent of the shares of any particular corporation.

(A) companies, rarely holding more than one percent

The clause 'rarely holding...' correctly modifies the subjet 'mutual fund.'

(B) companies, and it is rare to hold at least one percent or more

Here the 'it' is vague and unnecessary.

(C) companies and rarely do they hold more than one percent

Who is the 'they'? If we are referring to the companies than doing so is misleading. The original sentence makes it clear the mutual fund is doing the holding.

(D) companies, so that they rarely hold more than one percent

Same as (C).

(E) companies; rarely do they hold one percent or more

Sir Can you explain Option A little bit more. Thanks!

Hi,

Choice A correctly uses the comma + verb- ing modifier to modify the preceding clause. The comma + verb –ing modifier presents either additional information about the preceding clause or the result of that clause. Here it presents the result of the preceding clause. So, essentially it means that the author is trying to say that because a mutual fund with a lot of money generally invests in a number of companies, it rarely holds more than one percent of the shares of any particular company.

Now typically, the information given in the comma+ verb –ing modifier should make sense with the subject of the modified clause. Let’s check the same here:

A mutual fund (with a particular feature) rarely holds more than one percent of the shares of any particular corporation.

As you can see, the information given in the modifier (holding…corporation) does make sense with the subject of the modified clause (a mutual fund).

To understand the concept and various uses of comma + verb –ing modifier more, please refer to our in depth article on the subject here :

https://e-gmat.com/blogs/?p=3465

Hope the above discussion helps!

Regards,
Neeti.

Hello Neeti & egmat,

Thanks for the detailed explanation, it's very helpful. Through POE I landed on the correct answer but i'm a little concerned with a gap in my knowledge -- can you please help clear it up?

- I know that Semi-Colon's are used to join two independent clauses. We don't need a coordinating conjunction when it's a semi-colon. Correct?
- If it's just a common and -ing modifier, the second pat will modify the first part and it DOESN't need to touch. Correct? Does the second half need to be an independent clause or can the subject and the verb be split over the comma?
- if there is a comma and a coordinating conjunction after the comma, what exactly does that imply? do they both need to be independent or can they have the S-V split over the two clauses.

e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2619
Re: A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 May 2014, 01:59
1
1
russ9 wrote:
Hello Neeti & egmat,

Thanks for the detailed explanation, it's very helpful. Through POE I landed on the correct answer but i'm a little concerned with a gap in my knowledge -- can you please help clear it up?

- I know that Semi-Colon's are used to join two independent clauses. We don't need a coordinating conjunction when it's a semi-colon. Correct?
- If it's just a common and -ing modifier, the second pat will modify the first part and it DOESN't need to touch. Correct? Does the second half need to be an independent clause or can the subject and the verb be split over the comma?
- if there is a comma and a coordinating conjunction after the comma, what exactly does that imply? do they both need to be independent or can they have the S-V split over the two clauses.

Hi russ9,
Thank you for the post.

Let’s discuss your questions one by one.

1. I know that Semi-Colon's are used to join two independent clauses. We don't need a coordinating conjunction when it's a semi-colon. Correct?

Yes, you are absolutely correct. A semi-colon is sufficient to join two independent clauses. So, we don’t need to use any coordinating conjunction with a semi-colon. Let’s take these official questions as examples:

OFFICIAL QUESTION
• A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discourage poachers;
• the question is whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see rhinoceroses once the animal’s horns have been trimmed.

OFFICIAL QUESTION
• Cajuns speak a dialect brought to southern Louisiana by the 4,000 Acadians who migrated there in 1755;
• their language is basically seventeenth-century French to which English, Spanish, and Italian words have been added.
Each of the above examples has two independent clauses connected with a semi-colon.

2. If it's just a common and -ing modifier, the second pat will modify the first part and it DOESN't need to touch. Correct? Does the second half need to be an independent clause or can the subject and the verb be split over the comma?

In my understanding, your question is regarding the usage of the verb-ing modifier. I’ll suggest that you go through the following articles on the verb-ing modifiers:
usage-of-verb-ing-modifiers-135220.html#p1101074
verb-ing-modifiers-part-2-in-our-first-article-on-verb-ing-135567.html#p1102952
If you any more questions once you have finished the article, please post them here. We’ll take the discussion forward from there.

3. if there is a comma and a coordinating conjunction after the comma, what exactly does that imply? do they both need to be independent or can they have the S-V split over the two clauses.

If a ‘comma + coordinating conjunction’ combination is used to split two independent clauses then there must be a separate subject-verb pair for each of the clauses. Two independent clauses cannot have S-V split over the two clauses.

OFFICIAL QUESTION
• Long before it was fashionable to be an expatriate, Josephine Baker made Paris her home,
• and she remained in France during the Second World War as a performer and an intelligence agent for the Resistance.
In the above sentence, two independent clauses are connected using ‘comma + and’.

Note that, ‘comma + the coordinating conjunction’ is also used to connect parallel lists. That is a different usage and there we won’t find any S-V pairs.

Hope the above discussion helps!
Regards,

Deepak
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Intern
Joined: 05 Feb 2014
Posts: 27
GMAT 1: 700 Q45 V40
Re: A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2014, 13:56
Hi e-gmat,

Thanks for your insight on this, it was totally useful.

However, I have 1 question regarding the last option E. I understand it has a pronoun problem, but would it be correct had the pronoun problem been resolved

companies; rarely does it hold one percent or more shares.

The semicolon rule says, the part following the semicolon should be able to stand alone as a sentence.

I intend to ask, can "does it hold one percent or more shares" stand alone as a sentence (please excuse the pronoun thing here.)
or
something like this would be better, Rarely it holds one percent or more shares. (does removed.)

Thanks.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2619
Re: A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 May 2014, 11:17
Hi e-gmat,

Thanks for your insight on this, it was totally useful.

However, I have 1 question regarding the last option E. I understand it has a pronoun problem, but would it be correct had the pronoun problem been resolved

companies; rarely does it hold one percent or more shares.

The semicolon rule says, the part following the semicolon should be able to stand alone as a sentence.

I intend to ask, can "does it hold one percent or more shares" stand alone as a sentence (please excuse the pronoun thing here.)
or
something like this would be better, Rarely it holds one percent or more shares. (does removed.)

Thanks.

I'm happy to hear that our response helped.

"More than one percent of shares" is a better construction than "one percent or more shares," since "more" requires "than". But leaving that issue aside, yes, "rarely does it hold one percent or more shares" can stand on its own. "Rarely" is required at the beginning for this construction to hold. "Does" at the beginning would make it a question.

"Rarely it holds one percent or more shares" is incorrect. "It rarely holds one percent or more shares" would be correct. This construction is more about usage than grammar; a fluent speaker of English would be able to differentiate between the two constructions, but the GMAT doesn't test constructions in which you need to 'hear' the correct answer. So I wouldn't worry about this particular issue.

I hope this helps.

Regards,
Meghna
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Affiliations: Oracle certified java programmer , adobe certified developer
Joined: 14 Jul 2013
Posts: 93
GMAT Date: 02-12-2015
GPA: 3.87
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Re: A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2014, 08:09
A is right as the correct modification
b,c,d - use of they - wrong
e- use of semicolon for 1 independent and dependent clause - wrong
hope it helps
_________________

IF IT IS TO BE , IT IS UP TO ME

Intern
Joined: 27 Nov 2013
Posts: 13
Re: A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Mar 2015, 02:17
Just one word for the explanation is enough, PARALLELISM.

A mutual fund having....holding....
Re: A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will &nbs [#permalink] 11 Mar 2015, 02:17

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 44 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.