It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 07:07

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# According to some economists, the July decrease in

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 628

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

According to some economists, the July decrease in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 01:33
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:35) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 7 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

According to some economists, the July decrease in umemployment so that it was the lowest in two years suggests that the gradual improvement in job market is continuing.

(A) as underlined
(b) so that it was the lowest two-year rate
(c) to what would be the lowest in two years
(d) to a two-year low level
(e) to the lowest level in two years

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

 Economist GMAT Tutor Discount Codes Manhattan GMAT Discount Codes e-GMAT Discount Codes
Intern
Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 48

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 01:57
This would have been a tough one for me on the actual GMAT.....took me a while to figure out.....
I would go with Choice (D) because this seems like the best fit...

(A) and (B) start with 'so that' does'nt fit the sentence right.
(C) Is wordy and in the future tense.
(E) the word 'lowest' is a lil extreme.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1728

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 02:20
Will go with D.
A/B/C are awkward.

E - lowest is incorrect as only two years are being compared not all the years .

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1115

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Location: India

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 02:31
Going to pick E.
A and B are out b'coz of ' so that it '.Also 'it' seems ambigous.
In C 'would be' makes the construction awkward.
In D , ' to a two year low ' would have been right.

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Director
Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 621

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 02:37
^ E ^

Beyond700 wrote:
According to some economists, the July decrease in umemployment so that it was the lowest in two years suggests that the gradual improvement in job market is continuing.

(A) as underlined
(b) so that it was the lowest two-year rate
(c) to what would be the lowest in two years
(d) to a two-year low level
(e) to the lowest level in two years

A) Out because "so that" and ambigious "it"
B) Same with A
C) "would" is not appropriate here - future ???
D) a two-year low level is a general term. we are looking for a specific expression here !!

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 16 Aug 2005
Posts: 937

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Location: France

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 06:22
Beyond700 wrote:
According to some economists, the July decrease in umemployment so that it was the lowest in two years suggests that the gradual improvement in job market is continuing.

(A) as underlined
(b) so that it was the lowest two-year rate
(c) to what would be the lowest in two years
(d) to a two-year low level
(e) to the lowest level in two years

A - use of was incorrect
B - same as A
C - 'what would be' -awkward
D - two-year low level ??? what else can I say
E - should be it

So, my bet is on E
_________________

I believe its yogurt!

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 628

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 18:52
OA indeed is 'E'

But OE is bit different than the ones shared in this thread..

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1115

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Location: India

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 21:19
Beyond700 wrote:
OA indeed is 'E'

But OE is bit different than the ones shared in this thread..

Can you please post the OE

.

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

VP
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Posts: 1257

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2006, 10:51
E... continuing improvement would imply current. to the lowest level implies current.

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 270

Kudos [?]: 241 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2006, 07:01
To me D also looked correct as it's more concise. But OA is E.

Kudos [?]: 241 [0], given: 2

Director
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 628

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2006, 23:53
buzzgaurav wrote:
Beyond700 wrote:
OA indeed is 'E'

But OE is bit different than the ones shared in this thread..

Can you please post the OE

.

There you go with OE..

E, the best choice,employs idiomatic construction and uses the precise decrease...
to the lowest level.

Choices A and B are faulty construction. The adverbial so that can modify verbs(eg:-
decreased) but not nouns (eg: the decrease). The meaning of lowest two-year rate in B
is unclear;in any event the phrase distorts the intended meaning of lowest in two years.

In A and B, the referent of it is unclear, as the pronoun could refer to either
unemployment or decrease.

Choice 'C' improperly uses would be to describe a situation that is presented as a current
and known fact. Also, there is no noun for lowest to modify;clearly "the lowest decrease"
is not intended.

In D, the phrase two-year low level is unidiomatic, as well as unclear in its intended meaning

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1115

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Location: India

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2006, 01:30
Beyond700 wrote:
buzzgaurav wrote:
Beyond700 wrote:
OA indeed is 'E'

But OE is bit different than the ones shared in this thread..

Can you please post the OE

.

There you go with OE..

E, the best choice,employs idiomatic construction and uses the precise decrease...
to the lowest level.

Choices A and B are faulty construction. The adverbial so that can modify verbs(eg:-
decreased) but not nouns (eg: the decrease). The meaning of lowest two-year rate in B
is unclear;in any event the phrase distorts the intended meaning of lowest in two years.

In A and B, the referent of it is unclear, as the pronoun could refer to either
unemployment or decrease.

Choice 'C' improperly uses would be to describe a situation that is presented as a current
and known fact. Also, there is no noun for lowest to modify;clearly "the lowest decrease"
is not intended.

In D, the phrase two-year low level is unidiomatic, as well as unclear in its intended meaning

Just as I thought ...Thanks for the OE.

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10127

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: According to some economists, the July decrease in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2016, 05:35
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: According to some economists, the July decrease in   [#permalink] 10 Jan 2016, 05:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by