It is currently 24 Feb 2018, 08:14

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Acting on the recommendation of a British government

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 53
Acting on the recommendation of a British government [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2012, 13:41
3
KUDOS
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Question 1
00:00

Question Stats:

62% (02:03) correct 38% (01:45) wrong based on 1331

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00

Question Stats:

82% (00:45) correct 18% (00:53) wrong based on 1271

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00

Question Stats:

49% (00:51) correct 51% (00:51) wrong based on 1305

### HideShow timer Statistics

84. The passage suggests that WIDC differed from WTUL in which of the following ways?

(A) WIDC believed that the existing safety regulations were adequate to protect women's health, whereas WTUL believed that such regulations needed to be strengthened.
(B) WI DC believed that unions could not succeed in pressuring employers to comply with such regulations, whereas WTUL believed that unions could succeed in doing so.
(C) WIDC believed that lead poisoning in white lead factories could be avoided by controlling conditions there, whereas WTUL believed that lead poisoning in such factories could not be avoided no matter how stringently safety regulations were enforced.
(D) At the time that the legislation concerning white lead factories was proposed, WIDC was primarily concerned with addressing health conditions in white lead factories, whereas WTUL was concerned with improving working conditions in all types of factories.
(E) At the time that WIDC was opposing legislative attempts to restrict women's labor, WTUL had already ceased to do so.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
E

85. Which of the following, if true, would most clearly support the contention attributed to SPEW in lines 17-20(bold)?

(A) Those white lead factories that most strongly enforced regulations concerning worker safety and hygiene had the lowest incidences of lead poisoning among employees.
(B) The incidence of lead poisoning was much higher among women who worked in white lead factories than among women who worked in other types of factories.
(C) There were many household sources of lead that could have contributed to the incidence of lead poisoning among women who also worked outside the home in the late nineteenth century.
(D) White lead factories were more stringent than were certain other types of factories in their enforcement of workplace safety regulations.
(E) Even brief exposure to the conditions typically found in white lead factories could cause lead poisoning among factory workers.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

86. The passage is primarily concerned with

(A) presenting various groups' views of the motives of those proposing certain legislation
(B) contrasting the reasoning of various groups concerning their positions on certain proposed legislation
(C) tracing the process whereby certain proposed legislation was eventually enacted
(D) assessing the success of tactics adopted by various groups with respect to certain proposed legislation
(E) evaluating the arguments of various groups concerning certain proposed legislation

[Reveal] Spoiler:
B

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OAs:
84. E
85. A
86. B
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #1 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #2 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #3 OA

Last edited by HKD1710 on 15 Sep 2016, 08:05, edited 2 times in total.
Formatted
Manager
Joined: 17 Apr 2012
Posts: 71
GMAT Date: 11-02-2012
Re: Acting on the recommendation of a British government [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2012, 08:50
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Can someone explain why option B is correct in 3rd question. What do we mean by "contrasting the reasoning"
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2011
Posts: 383
Re: Acting on the recommendation of a British government [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2012, 05:10
How E in question 84?

can anyone plz explain...
_________________

Bole So Nehal.. Sat Siri Akal.. Waheguru ji help me to get 700+ score !

Manager
Status: Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Posts: 131
Location: Philippines
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GPA: 3.22
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Re: Acting on the recommendation of a British government [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2012, 07:05
7
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
sanjoo wrote:
How E in question 84?

can anyone plz explain...

Hi, sanjoo,

Let me take a shot on it.

My strategy on verbal is to use process of elimination (POE) and use splits (usually the answer choices almost always boil down to a 3-2 split). So here we go.

Oh by the way, here is when note taking is very essential. You should note the differences among WIDC, SPEV and WTUL.

84. The passage suggests that WIDC differed from WTUL in which of the following ways?

(A) WIDC believed that the existing safety regulations were adequate to protect women's health, whereas WTUL believed that such regulations needed to be strengthened.

This is wrong. WTUL says that there are already regulations. They don't need to be strengthened. Factories should just implement them in order to make the workplace safer. So this is wrong.

(B) WI DC believed that unions could not succeed in pressuring employers to comply with such regulations, whereas WTUL believed that unions could succeed in doing so.

Again, the effectiveness of unions wasn't discussed in the passage. So this is automatic.

(C) WIDC believed that lead poisoning in white lead factories could be avoided by controlling conditions there, whereas WTUL believed that lead poisoning in such factories could not be avoided no matter how stringently safety regulations were enforced.

See, WTUL believed that leas poisoning in such factories COULD BE AVOIDED if and only if safety regulations were enforced. So eliminate this.

(D) At the time that the legislation concerning white lead factories was proposed, WIDC was primarily concerned with addressing health conditions in white lead factories, whereas WTUL was concerned with improving working conditions in all types of factories.

Again, if you check the passage, there wasn't any discussion with regards to WTUL's concern with improving working conditions in ALL TYPES OF FACTORIES. This is out of scope. Automatic elimination.

(E) At the time that WIDC was opposing legislative attempts to restrict women's labor, WTUL had already ceased to do so.

Of course I can't say that since 4 choices have already been eliminated then we should choose this. That is not learning. We have to prove that this answer choice is true. Now, this answer choice all boils down to chronology. WTUL ceased in 1880 whereas WIDC was founded in 1892. Isn't this the answer choice?

How about some Kudos Puhhhhlease? :D
_________________

Far better is it to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure... than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much, because they live in a gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat.
- T. Roosevelt

Current Student
Joined: 05 May 2011
Posts: 70
Re: Acting on the recommendation of a British government [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2012, 07:08
3
KUDOS
vivekdixit07 wrote:
Can someone explain why option B is correct in 3rd question. What do we mean by "contrasting the reasoning"

I was stuck on the same question and after re-reading the answer choices I concur that B is correct.

The passage mainly deals with the stance that each group, namely SPEW, WIDC and WTUL, has taken regarding the proposed legislation. However, even though all three groups contend that the unsafe conditions in the factories cause White lead poisoning, as to why each of these groups oppose the proposal varies. For example, WIDC is opposing the aforementioned proposal because it aims to restrict employment for women, SPEW is opposing it from their stance that the factories cause the lead poisoning and finally, WTUL's approach is that unions aren't strong enough at the Lead factories in order to pressure the factories from maintaining safe standards. Therefore, all three organizations approach the same problem but from different angles.

Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 186
Concentration: General Management, Operations
Schools: HBS '19 (S)
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Re: Acting on the recommendation of a British government [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2013, 02:57
nmehta3 wrote:
vivekdixit07 wrote:
Can someone explain why option B is correct in 3rd question. What do we mean by "contrasting the reasoning"

I was stuck on the same question and after re-reading the answer choices I concur that B is correct.

The passage mainly deals with the stance that each group, namely SPEW, WIDC and WTUL, has taken regarding the proposed legislation. However, even though all three groups contend that the unsafe conditions in the factories cause White lead poisoning, as to why each of these groups oppose the proposal varies. For example, WIDC is opposing the aforementioned proposal because it aims to restrict employment for women, SPEW is opposing it from their stance that the factories cause the lead poisoning and finally, WTUL's approach is that unions aren't strong enough at the Lead factories in order to pressure the factories from maintaining safe standards. Therefore, all three organizations approach the same problem but from different angles.

Can you explain what was wrong with E for this question??
Manager
Status: How easy it is?
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 119
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V27
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Operations (Other)
Re: Acting on the recommendation of a British government [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2013, 12:13
2
KUDOS
roopika2990 wrote:
nmehta3 wrote:
vivekdixit07 wrote:
Can someone explain why option B is correct in 3rd question. What do we mean by "contrasting the reasoning"

I was stuck on the same question and after re-reading the answer choices I concur that B is correct.

The passage mainly deals with the stance that each group, namely SPEW, WIDC and WTUL, has taken regarding the proposed legislation. However, even though all three groups contend that the unsafe conditions in the factories cause White lead poisoning, as to why each of these groups oppose the proposal varies. For example, WIDC is opposing the aforementioned proposal because it aims to restrict employment for women, SPEW is opposing it from their stance that the factories cause the lead poisoning and finally, WTUL's approach is that unions aren't strong enough at the Lead factories in order to pressure the factories from maintaining safe standards. Therefore, all three organizations approach the same problem but from different angles.

Can you explain what was wrong with E for this question??

Option E talks about evaluating the arguements, but if you see there is no arguement going on here. Two groups concur on their decision to go against the ban. Its actually one problem with different ways to look at it. Hope this makes sense.

Kudos please if it helped you in any way!
VP
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 1377
Re: Acting on the recommendation of a British government [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2013, 23:32
easy passage
however the last question is not easy. it take me a long time to see the difference between b and e.
anyone has exerience on answering this king of question. pls explain.
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 456
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GPA: 3.23
Re: Acting on the recommendation of a British government [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2013, 21:03
1
KUDOS
84. The passage suggests that WIDC differed from WTUL in which of the following ways?

(A) WIDC believed that regulations were inadequate. False.
(B) WIDC is concerned about pressuring factories to improve regulations not unions. False.
(C) WTUL believed in improving conditions which is opposite the passage. False.
(E) Correct.

85. Which of the following, if true, would most clearly support the contention attributed to SPEW in lines 17-20(bold)?

SPEW believed in improving work conditions through regulations.

(A) Correct.
(B) We need something's about having or not having regulations.
(C) outside of scope.
(D) if the factories were already more stringent, this tends to weaken the claim.
(E) This shows the need for regulations but not support regulations could decrease illness incidents.

86. The passage is primarily concerned with

(A) motives were not tackled....
(B) the passage simply described reasoning . correct.
(C) process of enactment not tackled....
(D) their view were discussed but not tactics....
(E) arguments were mentioned but not evaluated
_________________

Impossible is nothing to God.

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10333
Re: Acting on the recommendation of a British government [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2014, 02:17
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Joined: 18 Jul 2014
Posts: 1
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Acting on the recommendation of a British government [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2014, 02:18
vivekdixit07 wrote:
Can someone explain why option B is correct in 3rd question. What do we mean by "contrasting the reasoning"

Same question here. And why it is not Option A
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 529
Concentration: Technology, Other
Re: Acting on the recommendation of a British government [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2014, 20:55
OG13- 84-86. Time taken 8 mins.
Q3 Why not A?
(A) presenting various groups' views of the motives of those proposing certain legislation.
>> Involved parties are not sharing their views on the proposed legislation but not on the motives of the HS.
(B) contrasting the reasoning of various groups concerning their positions on certain proposed legislation
>> Yes All the 2 views of the involved parties WIDC and SPEW, and WTUL are compared in the argument.

BTW, even i selected A in rush but when i reread A and B , i found my mistake.A is only partly true not completely. Its pure game of words in A which i missed ,while answering the Q in rush.
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------
Regards

Chat Moderator
Joined: 19 Apr 2013
Posts: 683
Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
Schools: Sloan '18 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Acting on the recommendation of a British government [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Mar 2015, 00:40
Answered the last one incorrectly. Did not notice the word evaluating.
_________________

If my post was helpful, press Kudos. If not, then just press Kudos !!!

Intern
Joined: 31 Jul 2016
Posts: 5
Re: Acting on the recommendation of a British government [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2016, 13:37
Done within 7:10, all correct (´ε｀ )♡
It is my first time posting explanation. Hope this explanation helps.

84. The passage suggests that WIDC differed from WTUL in which of the following ways?

(A) WIDC believed that the existing safety regulations were adequate to protect women's health, whereas WTUL believed that such regulations needed to be strengthened.- Not mentioned.
(B) WI DC believed that unions could not succeed in pressuring employers to comply with such regulations, whereas WTUL believed that unions could succeed in doing so.-Not mentioned.
(C) WIDC believed that lead poisoning in white lead factories could be avoided by controlling conditions there, whereas WTUL believed that lead poisoning in such factories could not be avoided no matter how stringently safety regulations were enforced. SPEW believed that lead poisoning in white lead factories could be avoided.
(D) At the time that the legislation concerning white lead factories was proposed, WIDC was primarily concerned with addressing health conditions in white lead factories, whereas WTUL was concerned with improving working conditions in all types of factories. -Not mentioned about improving working conditions.
(E) Correct At the time that WIDC was opposing legislative attempts to restrict women's labor, WTUL had already ceased to do so.

If we look into the passage again, it says that: " which attempted to challenge it by investigating the causes of illness in white lead factories. SPEW contended, and WIDC concurred, that controllable conditions in such factories were responsible for the development of lead poisoning. However, the Women's Trade Union League (WTUL), which had ceased in the late 1880s to oppose restrictions on women's labor, supported the eventually enacted proposal, in part because safety regulations were generally not being enforced in white lead factories, where there were no unions (and little prospect of any) to pressure employers to comply with safety regulations. - Means WIDC was still taking an action opposing legislative attempts to restrict women's labor while WTUL stopped/ceased to do so.

85. Which of the following, if true, would most clearly support the contention attributed to SPEW in lines 17-20(bold)?

(A) Correct. Those white lead factories that most strongly enforced regulations concerning worker safety and hygiene had the lowest incidences of lead poisoning among employees.
Passage: "SPEW provided convincing evidence that lead poisoning could be avoided if workers were careful and clean and if already extant workplace safety regulations were stringently enforced."- They provided evidence to contend against legislation attempt.
(B) The incidence of lead poisoning was much higher among women who worked in white lead factories than among women who worked in other types of factories.
(C) There were many household sources of lead that could have contributed to the incidence of lead poisoning among women who also worked outside the home in the late nineteenth century.
(D) White lead factories were more stringent than were certain other types of factories in their enforcement of workplace safety regulations.
(E) Even brief exposure to the conditions typically found in white lead factories could cause lead poisoning among factory workers.

86. The passage is primarily concerned with

(A) presenting various groups' views of the motives of those proposing certain legislation
(B) Correct. contrasting the reasoning of various groups concerning their positions on certain proposed legislation
(C) tracing the process whereby certain proposed legislation was eventually enacted
(D) assessing the success of tactics adopted by various groups with respect to certain proposed legislation
(E) evaluating the arguments of various groups concerning certain proposed legislation
Study Buddy Forum Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 694
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Other)
Re: Acting on the recommendation of a British government [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2017, 02:19
Hi Gmatninja, Gmatninja2,
I have a query regarding understanding of words - contend and concur in this passage.
Contend means to argue and concur means to be in harmony with.
My query is regarding part in bold, if SPEW opposes initial proposal of home secretary that women should be stopped from working in lead factories due to high chance of illness,
How can concur we place another contrasting word concur so adjacent to WIDC which in fact also opposes home secretary's proposal?
_________________

It's the journey that brings us happiness not the destination.

GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1449
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Re: Acting on the recommendation of a British government [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2017, 18:08
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
Hi Gmatninja, Gmatninja2,
I have a query regarding understanding of words - contend and concur in this passage.
Contend means to argue and concur means to be in harmony with.
My query is regarding part in bold, if SPEW opposes initial proposal of home secretary that women should be stopped from working in lead factories due to high chance of illness,
How can concur we place another contrasting word concur so adjacent to WIDC which in fact also opposes home secretary's proposal?

Quote:
SPEW contended, and WIDC concurred, that controllable conditions in such factories were responsible for the development of lead poisoning.

In this context, "concur" means to "agree" and "content" means to "argue" or "assert" (as in, to assert something as a position in an argument).

For example, Mike contends that going to the gym is a waste of time, and Charles concurs. In other words, Mike argues that going to the gym is a waste of time, and Charles agrees with Mike (i.e. Charles would also contend that going to the gym is a waste of time).

Referring to the part in bold, SPEW argues that controllable conditions were responsible for the development of lead poisoning, and WIDC agrees with SPEW (i.e. WIDC would also contend that controllable conditions were responsible).

I hope that helps!
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset -- starts February 14!

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99... in any section order

Manager
Joined: 24 Jan 2017
Posts: 58
Location: Philippines
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V41
GPA: 3.53
WE: Sales (Manufacturing)
Re: Acting on the recommendation of a British government [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2017, 20:40
Regarding Q3 (Book #86), I was also stuck between B and D, but eventually chose B.
Here is my reasoning:
In E, when you say "evaluate," you present the positive and negative points of a certain topic.
However, the article did not present the positive and negative points of the arguments of each of the 3 groups.
Only WIDC's argument was evaluated (the article stated a negative point: it did not discount the white lead trade's potential health dangers), not the arguments of the 2 or more groups.
Thus, the correct answer is B.
SC Moderator
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1590
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
WE: Analyst (Retail)
Acting on the recommendation of a British government [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2017, 01:05
Hi GMATNinja,

Why is B better than E for Q3. Can you please provide your explanation?

What's the meaning of contrast here?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1449
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Re: Acting on the recommendation of a British government [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2017, 11:13
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
Vyshak wrote:
Hi GMATNinja,

Why is B better than E for Q3. Can you please provide your explanation?

What's the meaning of contrast here?

Quote:
86. The passage is primarily concerned with

(A) presenting various groups' views of the motives of those proposing certain legislation
(B) contrasting the reasoning of various groups concerning their positions on certain proposed legislation
(C) tracing the process whereby certain proposed legislation was eventually enacted
(D) assessing the success of tactics adopted by various groups with respect to certain proposed legislation
(E) evaluating the arguments of various groups concerning certain proposed legislation

The problem with (E) is that the author does not evaluate the arguments of the various groups. The author simply explains those arguments and the reasoning behind them, without assessing (or "evaluating") their validity.

The author contrasts the reasoning behind those arguments by comparing them and explaining their differences. Thus, choice (B) is the best answer.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset -- starts February 14!

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99... in any section order

Director
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 511
GMAT 1: 570 Q49 V19
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Re: Acting on the recommendation of a British government [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2017, 00:10
84) E is correct
eliminated all ABCD
85) A is correct
If more strictly following regulations => lowest evidences => SPEW contention was accurate
86) B is correct
A) grps not proposing motives
C) no tracing involved
D) no tactics were accessed
E) No arguments were evaluated rather reasoning were given by groups for their position ( judgement/ belief) on proposed legislation.
_________________

Give Kudos for correct answer and/or if you like the solution.

Re: Acting on the recommendation of a British government   [#permalink] 13 Sep 2017, 00:10

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 22 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by