dcummins
All the winners of the Great Indian Derby in the past 60 years have been horses that have been in the racing circuit for at least two years. While nobody knows for sure what the correlation between the two is, it remains beyond doubt that the winner of the Great Indian Derby will always be a horse that has been competing in races for at least two years.
Which of the following can be inferred from the above statements?
(A) If a horse has been competing in races for two years or more, it will definitely win the Great Indian Derby.
(B) The Great Indian Derby is more competitive than other horse races in the country.
(C) The experience that comes as part of being active in the racing circuit for at least two years plays a valuable role in making a horse victorious in the Great Indian Derby.
(D) It is possible, on the off chance, for a horse to win the Great Indian Derby even if it has not been active in the racing circuit for at least two years.
(E) If a horse has not been part of the racing circuit for at least two years, it will not win the Great Indian Derby.
Official Explanation
Answer: E
The stimulus clearly states that a horse has no chance of winning the Derby if it has not been active in the racing circuit for at least two years. Thus, E can be best inferred from this. Do not let A confuse you. To be active in the racing circuit for two years is a necessary criterion to win the Great Indian Derby but not a sufficient one. It could be possible for a horse to lose even after satisfying this criterion; however, if a horse does not satisfy this criterion, then it will definitely lose.
(B) The stimulus does not provide us information about any other horse race.
(C) The stimulus never tells us whether it is the experience or something else. For all you know, it could be the strength and endurance that comes as part of being active in the racing circuit for two years that is the reason for the success of these horses.
(D) The stimulus says no such thing. In fact, it quite clearly says that such a possibility is very unlikely