Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 05:27 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 05:27
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
nightblade354
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,781
Own Kudos:
6,821
 [36]
Given Kudos: 3,304
Status:He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Going to Business School -- Corruptus in Extremis
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,781
Kudos: 6,821
 [36]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
33
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
udaypratapsingh99
Joined: 12 Jan 2019
Last visit: 11 Nov 2025
Posts: 399
Own Kudos:
235
 [9]
Given Kudos: 372
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
Products:
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
8,945
 [5]
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
anud33p
Joined: 23 Jul 2014
Last visit: 31 Jul 2023
Posts: 82
Own Kudos:
74
 [1]
Given Kudos: 522
Location: India
Posts: 82
Kudos: 74
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nightblade354
An editorial in the Grandburg Daily Herald claims that Grandburg's voters would generally welcome the defeat of the political party now in control of the Grandburg City Council. The editorial bases its claim on a recent survey that found that 59 percent of Grandburg's registered voters think that the party will definitely be out of power after next year's city council elections.

Which one of the following is a principle that, if established, would provide the strongest justification for the editorial's conclusion?

(A) The way voters feel about a political party at a given time can reasonably be considered a reliable indicator of the way they will continue to feel about that party, barring unforeseeable political developments

(B) The results of surveys that gauge current voter sentiment toward a given political party can legitimately be used as the basis for making claims about the likely future prospects of that political party

(C) An increase in ill-feeling toward a political party that is in power can reasonably be expected to result in a corresponding increase in support for rival political parties

(D) The proportion of voters who expect a given political possibility to be realized can legitimately be assumed to approximate the proportion of voters who are in favor of that possibility being realized.

(E) It can reasonably be assumed that registered voters who respond to a survey regarding the outcome of a future election will exercise their right to vote in that election

I narrowed it down to A, D & E. The trick is to understand the crux - what people think = what people feel.

(A) The way voters feel about a political party at a given time can reasonably be considered a reliable indicator of the way they will continue to feel about that party, barring unforeseeable political developments
Slightly irrelevant because how they feel about a party in the future doesn't affect the argument.

(D) The proportion of voters who expect a given political possibility to be realized can legitimately be assumed to approximate the proportion of voters who are in favor of that possibility being realized.
This bridges that gap. It says the proportion of people who expect (or think which is reflected by the vote) = proportion of people who are actually in favour of it.

(E) It can reasonably be assumed that registered voters who respond to a survey regarding the outcome of a future election will exercise their right to vote in that election
Another trap answer. The focus is not on whether the political party will come to power, rather on whether people will actually welcome it.
User avatar
Arro44
Joined: 04 Jun 2018
Last visit: 14 Aug 2022
Posts: 659
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 362
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q47 V44
GPA: 3.4
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q47 V44
Posts: 659
Kudos: 749
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
While most statements sound fairly reasonable at first glance, the devil is in the detail.

We are looking for a justification that voters would judge a loss of the ruling party as favorable.
However, apart from "D" & "C" the statements address the likelihood of the respective outcome and do not give any indication as to the emotions of the voter base towards the given scenario.

"C" goes overboard in the conclusions presented, hence we are left with D.

Hope this helps.

Best regards,
Chris
User avatar
auradediligodo
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 18 Nov 2021
Posts: 364
Own Kudos:
835
 [1]
Given Kudos: 67
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: General Management
GPA: 3.9
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
An editorial in the Grandburg Daily Herald claims that Grandburg's voters would generally welcome the defeat of the political party now in control of the Grandburg City Council. The editorial bases its claim on a recent survey that found that 59 percent of Grandburg's registered voters think that the party will definitely be out of power after next year's city council elections.

Which one of the following is a principle that, if established, would provide the strongest justification for the editorial's conclusion?



Strengthen question

Pre-thinking

The author conclusion is that voters in general would like to see the current party defeated.

The reasoning used to draw such conclusion is that registered voters for the majority would not vote for the current party during the next elections.

Now, the evidence talks about registered voters. But what if there are other voters that could change the outcome? An assumption made by the argument is that such voters are representative and significant in the poll of ALL voters.

Coming to the answer choices. They are all quite tricky because they give us the impression of strengthening the argument but actually 4 of them are strengthening the wrong claim.
Let's see.

(A) The way voters feel about a political party at a given time can reasonably be considered a reliable indicator of the way they will continue to feel about that party, barring unforeseeable political developments
we care only for the present situation, not the for the future

(B) The results of surveys that gauge current voter sentiment toward a given political party can legitimately be used as the basis for making claims about the likely future prospects of that political party
prospects of political parties are irrelevant

(C) An increase in ill-feeling toward a political party that is in power can reasonably be expected to result in a corresponding increase in support for rival political parties
rival parties are outside of the picture

(D) The proportion of voters who expect a given political possibility to be realized can legitimately be assumed to approximate the proportion of voters who are in favor of that possibility being realized
Here we are. We know now that the voters considered by the argument are representative.

(E) It can reasonably be assumed that registered voters who respond to a survey regarding the outcome of a future election will exercise their right to vote in that election
irrelevant again
avatar
GMAT0010
Joined: 17 Sep 2019
Last visit: 08 Dec 2022
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
55
 [1]
Given Kudos: 516
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
Posts: 106
Kudos: 55
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,
I don't understand: If people feel that the party won't win, why would they welcome it? Does that mean that, the people really want to see that party win, and therefore express sentiments?
Is my logic correct? This is a really confusing question, it took me time to understand the options too :D
User avatar
akshaypratap278
Joined: 16 May 2023
Last visit: 30 Oct 2025
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
Schools: ISB '25 (D)
GMAT Focus 1: 665 Q83 V84 DI82
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V30
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V37
GPA: 4
WE:Supply Chain Management (Consulting)
Schools: ISB '25 (D)
GMAT Focus 1: 665 Q83 V84 DI82
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V37
Posts: 17
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) The way voters feel about a political party at a given time can reasonably be considered a reliable indicator of the way they will continue to feel about that party, barring unforeseeable political developments
I can say that Barca will not make to finals but Barca can still be my favorite team and deep down I want them to win. So, incorrect.

(B) The results of surveys that gauge current voter sentiment toward a given political party can legitimately be used as the basis for making claims about the likely future prospects of that political party
Sentiments can be different, votes can be different. Incorrect

(C) An increase in ill-feeling toward a political party that is in power can reasonably be expected to result in a corresponding increase in support for rival political parties
We don't know about rival political party

(D) The proportion of voters who expect a given political possibility to be realized can legitimately be assumed to approximate the proportion of voters who are in favor of that possibility being realized
Correct. If we assume this, the conclusion can hold true. Political Possibility: Barca out, Voting out of favor= same

(E) It can reasonably be assumed that registered voters who respond to a survey regarding the outcome of a future election will exercise their right to vote in that election
What if they exercise their vote against their sentiment? Incorrect­
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
188 posts