Hi
redfield, thanks for your question! As someone who has been on the admissions side for 15 yrs, I may be able to provide some insight here. Yes- in general it is not that helpful to have all perfects for ratings but at the same time, I'd rather see all perfects than a really low rating on something. I think offering some ranking within the rankings is a good idea but truly better high than low. The comments carry more weight than the rankings generally so I would focus more on making sure your recommender can provide specific examples of your contributions rather than worrying too much about the rankings part.
We have hourly consulting rates to help navigate how to approach your recommenders and even to help review what you send to them as background material. If you want to look into this option, please go to
https://stratusprep.com/free-consult/Hi this might be an odd question but my volunteer work supervisor agreed to write my recommendation letters but by his tone and off-hand remarks it seems as if he is planning on just essentially saying 10/10 across the board or wherever applicable.
So I'm wondering if I need to ask him to be less charitable? For example if a school sees a recommendation letter with the stories and all that but maybe 5 or so ranking questions (1 to 5, 1 being bad 5 being best possible) and all of them are a 5 does it maybe reduce the value the school places on the letter versus if there are some blemishes?
Basically does a perfect/10 out of 10 across the board recommendation letter lose credibility and is actually worth a bit less than say a near perfect rating?