GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Sep 2018, 10:03

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Baker-Perez Engineering specilizes in microelectronics. The company

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
User avatar
S
Joined: 05 Aug 2017
Posts: 30
Location: Viet Nam
Annie: Nguyen
Concentration: International Business, Other
GPA: 3.33
WE: Supply Chain Management (Transportation)
Baker-Perez Engineering specilizes in microelectronics. The company  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Dec 2017, 01:53
2
1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

65% (01:33) correct 35% (01:35) wrong based on 232 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Baker-Perez Engineering specilizes in microelectronics. The company has traditionally focused on printed circuit board designs, but is hoping to expand into sensor networks and embedded systems. Baker-Perez is cutting its staff of engineers by 10 percent. To ensure that the company’s ability to produce high-quality products is impacted as little as possible by the staff cuts, consultants recommend that Baker-Perez lay off the most recent hires, who are the least familiar with the company’s products.
Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt upon the consultants’ rationale for selecting staff to lay off?

A. Other companies that focus on printed circuit board designs have already begun to move into sensor networks and embedded systems.
B. If Baker-Perez has to invest significant resources into employee training, it could fall behind on new trends in technology.
C. Colleges and universities only recently began to offer embedded systems as an area of focus
D. At Baker-Perez, employees must work for at least three years before they are fully vested
E. Baker-Perez currently allocates no more funds to research and development than other microelectronics companies do.

_________________

Kindly hit kudos if my post help.
Thanks a lot!

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 539
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Baker-Perez Engineering specilizes in microelectronics. The company  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Dec 2017, 03:25
Annie28 wrote:
Baker-Perez Engineering specilizes in microelectronics. The company has traditionally focused on printed circuit board designs, but is hoping to expand into sensor networks and embedded systems. Baker-Perez is cutting its staff of engineers by 10 percent. To ensure that the company’s ability to produce high-quality products is impacted as little as possible by the staff cuts, consultants recommend that Baker-Perez lay off the most recent hires, who are the least familiar with the company’s products.
Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt upon the consultants’ rationale for selecting staff to lay off?

A. Other companies that focus on printed circuit board designs have already begun to move into sensor networks and embedded systems.
B. If Baker-Perez has to invest significant resources into employee training, it could fall behind on new trends in technology.
C. Colleges and universities only recently began to offer embedded systems as an area of focus
D. At Baker-Perez, employees must work for at least three years before they are fully vested
E. Baker-Perez currently allocates no more funds to research and development than other microelectronics companies do.


Clear C.
We need to weaken that firing the recent hires is not a good idea in light of the expansion that the company desires. C gives the reason why recent hires will actually be helpful asset at this point of time.
_________________

------------------------------
"Trust the timing of your life"
Hit Kudus if this has helped you get closer to your goal, and also to assist others save time. Tq :)

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 14 Aug 2017
Posts: 42
Concentration: Operations, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Baker-Perez Engineering specilizes in microelectronics. The company  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2018, 04:15
GMATNinjaTwo mikemcgarry

Can you please intervene here and clarify how is Option C weakening the conclusion?

I was able to eliminate all the options as they were not weakening the conclusion, which is "laying off the new employees is a good start".

Please can you help in identifying how is Option C worst of all?

Prethinking - Something which can give us an reason not to fire the new employees as they can be an asset to the firm if they could turn in some profit or are excellent in their field?

Option C - If the colleges have recently introduced this field, this means they are still in the learning phase and they are expendable.

Thanking in advance.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4664
Re: Baker-Perez Engineering specilizes in microelectronics. The company  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2018, 13:40
2
siddyj94 wrote:
GMATNinjaTwo mikemcgarry

Can you please intervene here and clarify how is Option C weakening the conclusion?

I was able to eliminate all the options as they were not weakening the conclusion, which is "laying off the new employees is a good start".

Please can you help in identifying how is Option C worst of all?

Prethinking - Something which can give us an reason not to fire the new employees as they can be an asset to the firm if they could turn in some profit or are excellent in their field?

Option C - If the colleges have recently introduced this field, this means they are still in the learning phase and they are expendable.

Thanking in advance.

Dear siddyj94,

Thank you for asking a thoughtful question. I'm happy to respond. :-)

Here's (C).
C. Colleges and universities only recently began to offer embedded systems as an area of focus.

Think about this carefully. First of all, this is an "area of focus," not a side course, so the recent graduates had the option to learn this material in a deep way. Think about anything that was an "area of focus" in your undergrad: by the time you graduated, presumably it was something you knew well. The fact the "area of focus" might have been introduced, say, the year before you started to focus on it has no bearing on how well you would learn it.

The "recently" refers when the colleges & universities started offering this possibility of studying embedded systems in depth. Recent grads had the option to study embedded systems in depth, but before this, the folks who graduated, say, 10+ years ago might have learned little or nothing about embedded systems in their undergraduate education. We don't know about the details here in the prompt, but in general, the tech world is a fast moving world, and what is the hot technology today might be something that was unknown 5-10 years ago, so someone who graduated last year might have been able to study this new stuff, but not someone who graduated 10 year ago, because the new technology didn't exist them. It's perennially true in the tech world that to be younger is to have an edge of some kind.

Thus, the recent grads may well have learned the most up-to-date stuff about embedded systems in their undergraduate coursework, so it's not necessarily true that they would be the most expendable.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 14 Aug 2017
Posts: 42
Concentration: Operations, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Baker-Perez Engineering specilizes in microelectronics. The company  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2018, 13:55
mikemcgarry - As usual your explanations are crystal clear and crisp.
Now i can see that C is the best of all.

Thank you


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum
SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1789
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Baker-Perez Engineering specilizes in microelectronics. The company  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Feb 2018, 12:24
this question is from ready4gmat, a reliable source.
the pattern is common and important.
boil down to C and D.
C gives the reason why such lay-off is impossible, D just tells about a fact in which employees become protected by the new proposal.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 18
Location: India
GPA: 4
Re: Baker-Perez Engineering specilizes in microelectronics. The company  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Feb 2018, 23:51
For C to weaken the conclusion, we must assume that all recently hired employees are fresh graduates. However, it is nowhere mentioned . A recently hired employee may not be a fresh graduate from such college/uni.. In that way it will not matter to the company even if the company lay them off.. Could someone please explain.
BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 07 Jan 2016
Posts: 747
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V36
Reviews Badge
Re: Baker-Perez Engineering specilizes in microelectronics. The company  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2018, 00:26
Annie28 wrote:
Baker-Perez Engineering specilizes in microelectronics. The company has traditionally focused on printed circuit board designs, but is hoping to expand into sensor networks and embedded systems. Baker-Perez is cutting its staff of engineers by 10 percent. To ensure that the company’s ability to produce high-quality products is impacted as little as possible by the staff cuts, consultants recommend that Baker-Perez lay off the most recent hires, who are the least familiar with the company’s products.
Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt upon the consultants’ rationale for selecting staff to lay off?

A. Other companies that focus on printed circuit board designs have already begun to move into sensor networks and embedded systems.
B. If Baker-Perez has to invest significant resources into employee training, it could fall behind on new trends in technology.
C. Colleges and universities only recently began to offer embedded systems as an area of focus
D. At Baker-Perez, employees must work for at least three years before they are fully vested
E. Baker-Perez currently allocates no more funds to research and development than other microelectronics companies do.


Consultant recommend that Baker-Perez lay off the most recent hires, who are the least familiar with the company’s products.

Now to cast doubt, we must select an option, which says that the new hires are actually beneficial

A - no effect
B - this does the opposite. It strengthens the rationale
C - if this is true then laying off the new hires is weakened
D - this is similar to B
E - no effect

C
Re: Baker-Perez Engineering specilizes in microelectronics. The company &nbs [#permalink] 10 Feb 2018, 00:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Baker-Perez Engineering specilizes in microelectronics. The company

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.