svrider
They advanced R1 deadline so that more people could be interviewed, had additional time to review more files and finally, placed a lot more people on waitlist than last year. It just seems so counter intuitive.
Actually, this is REALLY interesting and I think it works in Ross' favor.
Scenario 1:
Accept ~40% in R1 (waitlist 10%).
Accept ~40% in R2 (waitlist 10%).
Accept ~20% in R3 (waitlist 20%).
Scenario 2:
Accept ~30% in R1 (waitlist 20%).
Accept ~50% in R2 (draw from the top of R2 and waitlist).
Accept ~20% in R3 (draw from the top of R3 and waitlist).
The benefit is that you get a better look at the total applicant pool. The other MAJOR benefit is that people who are still actively on the waitlist by the time R2 decisions are released are probably VERY likely to accept at Ross (otherwise they would have accepted somewhere else by then). The result is a very high yield.
Of course it's a double-edged sword. A lot of people may bail on Ross if they don't hear until March or so (R2 decision date).
It will be VERY interesting to see how many people get off the waitlist compared to years past.
RF