That is a great summary. Don't have anything particular to add tbh here.
My only value add would be on 2 points already mentioned in the discussion -
1.) "Let's assume MBB + Deloitte, Accenture, EY, ATK" - There is quite a bit of difference b/w MBB and the other firms you mentioned. When you say 25% of Johnson's class is going to consulting, it is to the EY/PwC/Deloitte/Accentures of the world. Very few make it to M/B/B vs. M7 schools. I would also say that Fuqua/Ross/Tuck have a much better conversion rate than Johnson.
2.) "Outside of M7, the gap becomes greater and people tend to choose scholarship over rankings. But for M7, prestige and networking capabilities of being at say, H/S/W will outweigh a full ride at Fuqua etc all else being equal"
Agree with this in theory, but for H/S/W only. Once you move to Kellogg/Sloan etc. the full ride at Fuqua/Tuck/Ross looks more lucrative. Would still pick M7 over Johnson full ride though if you want to pursue MBB consulting.
You can take this point in conjugation with your big fish small pond theory - In reality it is very difficult to judge whether you will stand out amongst your classmates, who will all have solid backgrounds themselves. For consulting recruiting, I would say big pond is a better bet because you have all the resources to network with the firms. Subsequently, you need to crack the case and personal interviews. The bar for selection doesn't change materially across schools, so you place yourself at a disadvantage when you don't go to a core consulting school.
Source: Also work for M/B/B
ENGRTOMBA2018
Very open ended but great questions nonetheless! As it’s very difficult to generalize the answers, I’ll stick to answering my questions for MBB+ Deloitte/Oliver Wyman/LEK only.
I’ll provide my view of having gone to M7, recruited into consulting as experienced hire (5 months post-MBA as I didn’t feel challenged enough in my role right after MBA). Caveat here is that post MBA roles are also dependent on how rigorously do you network.
1. M7 def has a leg up on recruiting here. Yes, by numbers if you analyze, it’s the same number of students every year but if you look closely, M7 sends more students into major consulting hubs (NYC, Chicago, SF, Dallas etc). For other locations, you need to network crazily! You need to understand that it’s not just getting into MBB. It’s also thinking about what’s your plan B of say consulting doesn’t work out for you or if personal reasons dictate that toh leave consulting. M7 will def provide those additional exit opportunities into corporate strategy or management roles that some of the other schools might not be able to provide.
2. Didn’t get your second question but I’ll explain it from the lens of OCR and the importance of having your school listed as a ‘target school’. It’s very difficult to get an internship if your school isn’t a target school or outside of OCR. These companies are very competitive and highly sought after. So not going to target school will only make it difficult (not impossible) to land an internship let alone a FT offer.
3. For consulting, you’ll always have competition at top 15. That’s the very nature of the industry. This shouldn’t be a consideration as MBB already know what top candidates do or look like and hence irrespective of where you go, you must be a top candidate for them to even invite you for interviews. More people around you will help you with casing, IMO.
4. Outside of M7, the gap becomes greater and people tend to choose scholarship over rankings. But for M7, prestige and networking capabilities of being at say, H/S/W will outweigh a full ride at Fuqua etc all else being equal.
I hope these answer your questions. Feel free to ask additional questions.
Posted from my mobile device