completingDear Moon Kim,
First of all, my apologies (again) for
1. Not reading your post in the thread that contained 17 responses.
2. Including your publicly available information in the screenshot.
I should have read your comments on the post. Had I read that, I would have realized that unlike the other 16 individuals who had posted on the thread, you were not trying to purchase the pirated content
Your information in the screenshot
I want to let you know that the information that I posted was information that was publicly available through your Facebook profile, which any of the 20,000 members of GMAT Avengers could have gotten. All I had to do was google “Linkedin + your name + your city” to get it.
Now this
does not undo the wrong on my part. Having said that, I recommend that you hide portions of your LinkedIn profile if you don’t want people to look you up through Google.
Your comments about our course and technology platformYou have mentioned your opinion about our course and our technology platform. While I may disagree with them,
you are entitled to your opinion and I completely respect that. It is very possible that our course, our teaching methodology, and/ or our platform are not the best fit for you. This does happen with 4-5 (out of approximately 800) students every month and we happily refund their money.
This is why we provide a very exhaustive free trial as well as offer a refund policy within 7 days of your purchase.
I very strongly believe that you should use the course material that best suits your studying habits. Hence, I would be
happy to refund the money you paid (even though it is way past the 7-day money back policy) so that you can invest in a more suitable resource. You may just write to our support team.
Your claims about e-GMAT reviews, Your course usage, and e-GMAT customer serviceYou have made three other claims about
e-GMAT – reviews, course access and customer service. Those claims (rather accusations) are inconsistent with the facts I have. So, can you please substantiate those claims with data?
Claim 1 – Most e-GMAT reviews are fake.
You have made a very audacious claim:
Quote:
“I think most reviews for
egmat is fake. if you read some of them, they have the exactly same wording or some format. most of the reviews are posted by a new user.”
Every review on GMAT Club goes through a
very thorough validation process as outlined
here. A good number of success stories posted on GMAT Club have some sort of validation as well in the form of an ESR.
While you are entitled to your opinion about our content and technology platform,
a claim about reviews being false is a very serious accusation and needs to be appropriately backed up with data.
You have mentioned that most reviews are “fake”. Most is greater than 50%. Over the last 2 years, more than 400 reviews for
e-GMAT have been posted on GMAT Club.
So, please point out 40 reviews (note: I am just asking you to find 10%, way less than your claim for > 50%) that in your opinion are fake. Note, for you to label a review as fake, you need to prove why you think the review is fake despite the validation that it has gone through.
Claim 2: I stopped using the course.You have made this comment:
Quote:
“Stopped using it after paying money for it because the website is terrible and the content is mediocre at best.”
You have spent ~50+ hours on the platform.
In fact, even after writing this post, you continued your preparation using e-GMAT Verbal Online Course. We have data for course access on Aug 27. Currently, you are learning about idioms after completing all the previous modules including parallelism and modifiers.
Here is your course completion data:
1. Master Comprehension course:
100%2. Your Study Plan course:
100%3. Sentence Correction course:
87%4. Critical Reasoning course:
2%5. Reading Comprehension course:
34%In addition, you have also attempted
93 questions on Scholaranium.
While I am glad that you are going through the course diligently, please do explain
how this course usage ultimately translates to “stopped using the course after paying money for it”.Claim 3: Your comment about our customer service being unresponsiveYou have made this comment:
Quote:
“-there is no support when website crashes. they reply to your email days later and all you get is "oh it works now. bye"”
Here is the data about your email communication with us. (Note that timings are in Pacific Time Zone)
Email 1 – Underlying Issue - Website crash => Time of email sent by you: 8/15 – 12:08 a.m.
=> Time of response from
e-GMAT: 8/15 - 1:30 a.m.
Email 2 – Underlying Issue – Browser refresh was needed.
=> Time of email sent by you: 8/15- 10:04 p.m.
=> Time of response from
e-GMAT: 8/16 - 2:40 a.m.
Note, the first email was on Aug 15th – Independence Day in India (equivalent of July 4th in the USA), yet the issue was
resolved in fewer than 90 minutes. The response time for the second email w
as less than 3 hours. In both cases, the issue was resolved.
In the light of these facts, please do explain your claim about
Quote:
“
e-GMAT support responding days days later
”. Furthermore, I would just like to add that both the emails started with the statement “Apologies for the inconvenience caused”.
completing - Moon Kim - you should study using the GMAT material that helps you achieve the highest possible score on the GMAT. Hence, do consider my offer to refund your purchase. At the same time – please substantiate the three claims that I have mentioned above with data. I will look forward to your response.
Regards,
Rajat Sadana