GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 20 May 2019, 00:07

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1334
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User
Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 May 2017, 17:35
9
35
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

74% (01:39) correct 26% (01:55) wrong based on 2801 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The Official Guide for GMAT Review 2018

Practice Question
Question No.: CR599
ID - CR11639


Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drastically. Supplies in local freshwater reservoirs have been declining for years because water is being used faster than it can be replenished. Since the price of tap water has been low, few users have bothered to adopt even easy conservation measure.

The two sections in boldface play which of the following roles in the economist's argument?

(A) The first is a conclusion for which support is provided, and which in turn supports the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.
(B) The first is an observation for which the second provides an explanation; the second is the main conclusion but not the only conclusion.
(C) The first is a premise supporting the argument's main conclusion; so is the second.
(D) The first is the only conclusion; the second provides an explanation for the first.
(E) The first is the main conclusion; the second is a conclusion for which support is provided, and which in turn supports the first.

_________________
"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advanced-search/
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 16 Apr 2017
Posts: 45
Re: Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 May 2017, 02:37
1
E
Many users are still not bothered to adopt any conservation measure and are using water faster than it can be replenished, as its price is low.

Therefore the price of water should be raised to make them atleast use it economically.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
_________________
KUDOS please, if you like the post or if it helps :-)
Director
Director
avatar
P
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Posts: 623
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
Re: Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 May 2017, 07:53
1
hazelnut wrote:
The Official Guide for GMAT Review 2018

Practice Question
Question No.: CR599
Page:

Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drastically. Supplies in local freshwater reservoirs have been declining for years because water is being used faster than it can be replenished. Since the price of tap water has been low, few users have bothered to adopt even easy conservation measure.

The two sections in boldface play which of the following roles in the economist's argument?

(A) The first is a conclusion for which support is provided, and which in turn supports the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.
(B) The first is an observation for which the second provides an explanation; the second is the main conclusion but not the only conclusion.
(C) The first is a premise supporting the argument's main conclusion; so is the second.
(D) The first is the only conclusion; the second provides an explanation for the first.
(E) The first is the main conclusion; the second is a conclusion for which support is provided, and which in turn supports the first.


The first bold part is a premise / observation - it is not a conclusion for sure .
So A,D ,E easily eliminated
between B and C
now the second part is not the main conclusion , the main conclusion is "The price of tap water in our region should be raised drastically"
So eliminate B ..
C is only choice left.
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 16 Apr 2017
Posts: 45
Re: Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 May 2017, 09:12
Supermaverick wrote:
E
Many users are still not bothered to adopt any conservation measure and are using water faster than it can be replenished, as its price is low.

Therefore the price of water should be raised to make them atleast use it economically.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app



My bad did not pay attention and considered first sentence as a bold part or was I sleeping, don't know.But for sure if the bold face is "Supplies in local freshwater reservoirs have been declining for years" then it is a premise supporting main conclusion."few users have bothered to adopt even easy conservation measure" is a Premise\Sub-conclusion of the argument supporting the main conclusion.
_________________
KUDOS please, if you like the post or if it helps :-)
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2289
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 May 2017, 11:04
1
Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drastically. Supplies in local freshwater reservoirs have been declining for years because water is being used faster than it can be replenished. Since the price of tap water has been low, few users have bothered to adopt even easy conservation measure.

The two sections in boldface play which of the following roles in the economist's argument?
Main Conclusion - The price of tap water in our region should be raised drastically
BF1 - is an observation that supports the main conclusion
BF2- Premise that supports the main conclusion
(A) The first is a conclusion for which support is provided, and which in turn supports the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion. - BF 2 is not the main conclusion
(B) The first is an observation for which the second provides an explanation; the second is the main conclusion but not the only conclusion. - BF 2 is not the main conclusion
(C) The first is a premise supporting the argument's main conclusion; so is the second. - Correct
(D) The first is the only conclusion; the second provides an explanation for the first. - BF1 is not the main conclusion
(E) The first is the main conclusion; the second is a conclusion for which support is provided, and which in turn supports the first. -BF1 is not the main conclusion

Answer C
_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful
Director
Director
avatar
S
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 787
Re: Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jun 2017, 05:00
for bold phrase questions, alway find the conclusion of the argument first ,and then find out the relation of each bold phrase to the conclusion. doing so before going to answer choices for a match.

conclusion is: should raise price
relations is: both are evidence.

with above fact in mind, go to answer choice for match. choice C.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Apr 2017
Posts: 15
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GRE 1: Q164 V146
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2017, 19:27
C for me

conclusion- price of water should be raised drastically.

1st BF not a conclusion- A D E eliminate
2nd BF not a conclusion- c eliminate
_________________
princeton-1: 470
princeton-2: 590
princeton-3: 460
princeton-4: 610
gmat club cat: 620
manhatten-1: 680
veritas: 650
princeton-5: 700
princeton-6: 610
manhatten-2: 740
kaplan: 750
princeton-7: 700
manhatten-3: 780
gmat prep 1: 770
princeton-8: 680
manhatten-4: 780
princeton-9: 710
gmat prep 2: 740
manhatten-5: 780
princeton-10: 710
IIMA, IIMC School Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1332
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Other)
CAT Tests
Re: Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jul 2017, 21:54
Hi VeritasPrepKarishma
technically speaking BF2 is an intermediate conclusion since statement 1 is main
conclusion of argument. However intermediate conclusion can very well acts as premise
if it supports main conclusion.
Am I correct?
WR,
Arpit
_________________
It's the journey that brings us happiness not the destination.

Feeling stressed, you are not alone!!
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3629
Reviews Badge
Re: Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jul 2017, 00:01
1
adkikani wrote:
Hi VeritasPrepKarishma
technically speaking BF2 is an intermediate conclusion since statement 1 is main
conclusion of argument. However intermediate conclusion can very well acts as premise
if it supports main conclusion.
Am I correct?
WR,
Arpit


Hi adkikani ,

2nd is actually not an intermediate conclusion. The author stated a fact in the 2nd boldface and has used "Since the price of tap water has been low" to strengthen his point.

So, calling 2nd boldface an intermediate conclusion would not be the right point.
_________________
My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place
Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog
GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.
New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!
Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free
Check our new About Us Page here.
VP
VP
User avatar
D
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1014
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jul 2017, 00:37
2
Imo C
Supplies in local freshwater reservoirs have been declining for years
This statement is a premise that is used to us the conclusion that The price of tap water in our region should be raised drastically.
The statement itself is not the conclusion of the argument .
few users have bothered to adopt even easy conservation measure.
A conclusion is an opinion or judgement which can be debated but facts can not be debated they are actually true.

Similarly this statement is also used to support the conclusion of the argument that the price of the tap water should be raised drastically.
Hope it helps
_________________
Please give kudos if you found my answers useful
Retired Moderator
avatar
P
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 484
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Re: Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Sep 2017, 00:16
The conclusion is "The price of tap water in our region should be raised drastically."

All options that list out BF1/2 as main conclusion can be easily eliminated.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 16 Sep 2017
Posts: 9
Re: Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Sep 2017, 11:38
guptalavi24 wrote:
C for me

conclusion- price of water should be raised drastically.

1st BF not a conclusion- A D E eliminate
2nd BF not a conclusion- c eliminate



Hey, just buzzed you on another post

Our here if you use "ask why" logic, then statement A becomes conclusion I do struggle with bf so trying to understand it better
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 65
Re: Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Sep 2017, 15:08
C. They are both premises. The Economist's conclusion is: the price of tap water should be raised.

The rest of the argument shows is evidence to support this.
_________________
Give me kudos and see what happens to your GMAT score :-)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 26 Dec 2015
Posts: 253
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
WE: Investment Banking (Venture Capital)
Re: Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2017, 10:59
Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drastically. Supplies in local freshwater reservoirs have been declining for years because water is being used faster than it can be replenished. Since the price of tap water has been low, few users have bothered to adopt even easy conservation measure.

* SINCE THIS IS A BOLDFACE QUESTION, MOST IMPORTANT THING TO DO IS FIND THE CONCLUSION: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drastically.
> BF 1 SUPPORTS the Conclusion
> BF 2 SUPPORTS the Conclusion


The two sections in boldface play which of the following roles in the economist's argument?

(A) The first is a conclusion for which support is provided, and which in turn supports the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.
- BF1 IS NOT A CONCLUSION

(B) The first is an observation for which the second provides an explanation; the second is the main conclusion but not the only conclusion.
- BF2 is NOT A CONCLUSION

(C) The first is a premise supporting the argument's main conclusion; so is the second.
- CORRECT AS IS

(D) The first is the only conclusion; the second provides an explanation for the first.
- BF1 IS NOT A CONCLUSION

(E) The first is the main conclusion; the second is a conclusion for which support is provided, and which in turn supports the first.
- BF1 IS NOT A CONCLUSION

See what I did there? See how easy it is to use POE to give yourself good odds to even guess? If you correctly categorize BF1 not even as a Premise but just as NOT A CONCLUSION, you've got a 50/50 chance of guessing between B&C. Sweet, huh?

Kudos please if you find this helpful :)
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 05 Oct 2014
Posts: 52
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 580 Q41 V28
GPA: 3.8
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Dec 2017, 22:36
hazelnut wrote:
The Official Guide for GMAT Review 2018

Practice Question
Question No.: CR599
Page:

Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drastically. Supplies in local freshwater reservoirs have been declining for years because water is being used faster than it can be replenished. Since the price of tap water has been low, few users have bothered to adopt even easy conservation measure.

The two sections in boldface play which of the following roles in the economist's argument?

(A) The first is a conclusion for which support is provided, and which in turn supports the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.
(B) The first is an observation for which the second provides an explanation; the second is the main conclusion but not the only conclusion.
(C) The first is a premise supporting the argument's main conclusion; so is the second.
(D) The first is the only conclusion; the second provides an explanation for the first.
(E) The first is the main conclusion; the second is a conclusion for which support is provided, and which in turn supports the first.


Main Conclusion - The price of tap water in our region should be raised drastically.

Fact/ Observation - Supplies in local freshwater reservoirs have been declining for years because water is being used faster than it can be replenished.

Reasoning - Since the price of tap water has been low,

Conclusion Supporting Fact & Reasoning - few users have bothered to adopt even easy conservation measure.

The two sections in boldface play which of the following roles in the economist's argument?

(A) The first is a conclusion for which support is provided, and which in turn supports the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.
(B) The first is an observation for which the second provides an explanation; the second is the main conclusion but not the only conclusion.
(C) The first is a premise supporting the argument's main conclusion; so is the second.
(D) The first is the only conclusion[/s]; the second provides an explanation for the first.
(E) The first is the [s]main conclusion; the second is a conclusion for which support is provided, and which in turn supports the first.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 28 Jan 2018
Posts: 155
Location: Taiwan
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
GPA: 3.34
Re: Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 10 Feb 2018, 22:35
Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drastically. Supplies in local freshwater reservoirs have been declining for years because water is being used faster than it can be replenished. Since the price of tap water has been low, few users have bothered to adopt even easy conservation measure.

The two sections in boldface play which of the following roles in the economist's argument?

(A) The first is a conclusion for which support is provided, and which in turn supports the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.
(B) The first is an observation for which the second provides an explanation; the second is the main conclusion but not the only conclusion.
(C) The first is a premise supporting the argument's main conclusion; so is the second.
(D) The first is the only conclusion; the second provides an explanation for the first.
(E) The first is the main conclusion; the second is a conclusion for which support is provided, and which in turn supports the first.

Clearly, "The price of tap water in our region should be raised drastically." is the argument, the main conclusion by the economist. Therefore, (A), (D), & (E) are out immediately. (B) is also out because it says "the second is the main conclusion" and that statement is also false.

Originally posted by lary301254M7 on 01 Feb 2018, 07:19.
Last edited by lary301254M7 on 10 Feb 2018, 22:35, edited 1 time in total.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1211
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2018, 09:41
Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drastically. Supplies in local freshwater reservoirs have been declining for years because water is being used faster than it can be replenished. Since the price of tap water has been low, few users have bothered to adopt even easy conservation measure.

The two sections in boldface play which of the following roles in the economist's argument?

(A) The first is a conclusion for which support is provided, and which in turn supports the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.
Second is not the main conclusion

(B) The first is an observation for which the second provides an explanation; the second is the main conclusion but not the only conclusion.
Second is not the main conclusion

(C) The first is a premise supporting the argument's main conclusion; so is the second.
Correct

(D) The first is the only conclusion; the second provides an explanation for the first.
First is not the only conclusion. It can be excepted as an intermediary conclusion

(E) The first is the main conclusion; the second is a conclusion for which support is provided, and which in turn supports the first.
First is not the main conclusion
_________________
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 15 Nov 2016
Posts: 142
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
Re: Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Apr 2018, 06:37
Because (Premise) “supplies in local freshwater reservoirs have been declining for years ” therefore (conclusion)“the price of tap water in our region should be raised drastically”
(Premise) Since the price of tap water has been low, few users have bothered to adopt even easy conservation measure.

Both BF1 and BF2 support the main conclusion of the argument.

A, D and E are out as BF1 is not the conclusion.
BF2 is not the conclusion but rather a premise which supports the main conclusion of the argument.
B is out and C is correct.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 28 May 2018
Posts: 75
Re: Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2018, 00:44
1
Hi ,
For conclusion , we need support.
BF1 can be the conclusion because we have support for it.
BF2 can be conclusion because it also has support.
So can u help me to figure out why BF1 or BF2 can't be the conclusion of the argument.
need help in this.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Posts: 277
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
Re: Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2018, 04:53
guptakashish02

For BF please watch Rons video dated June 9,2016.

He decimates the heck out of this category. If, hypothetically, we show that video to any BF question, that question after watching the video will be like "What the heck is my purpose in life, I just do not know.."

Back to this question...

We are bothered about the main conclusion.The main conclusion is THE CONCLUSION of the argument.The rest of the conclusion are premises.

The main conclusion here is quite clearly the first statement.The other 2 BFs support it.

Cheers.Pls thank Ron
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast   [#permalink] 22 Sep 2018, 04:53

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 23 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Economist: The price of tap water in our region should be raised drast

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.