Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 10:43 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 10:43
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
655-705 Level|   Humanities|   Short Passage|                           
User avatar
AbdurRakib
Joined: 11 May 2014
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 465
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 220
Status:I don't stop when I'm Tired,I stop when I'm done
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GPA: 2.81
WE:Business Development (Real Estate)
Posts: 465
Kudos: 42,848
 [244]
47
Kudos
Add Kudos
196
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
alpham
Joined: 13 Jun 2016
Last visit: 13 Jul 2025
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
496
 [34]
Given Kudos: 425
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GRE 1: Q168 V167
GPA: 3.8
GRE 1: Q168 V167
Posts: 71
Kudos: 496
 [34]
30
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Anmolgupta824
Joined: 09 Feb 2017
Last visit: 11 Dec 2019
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
13
 [7]
Given Kudos: 49
Posts: 8
Kudos: 13
 [7]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
NaeemHasan
Joined: 06 Oct 2015
Last visit: 04 Feb 2019
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
129
 [2]
Given Kudos: 73
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Accounting, Leadership
Posts: 64
Kudos: 129
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can anyone explain the question 5 which is
It can be inferred from the passage that the author would agree with which of the following statements about the fur trade between Native Americans and Europeans in the early modern era?
A. This trade may have begun as early as the 1480s.
B. This trade probably did not continue much beyond the 1530s.
C. This trade was most likely at its peak in the mid-1520s.
D. This trade probably did not begin prior to 1500.
E. There is no written evidence of this trade prior to the seventeenth century.

Why not E? And why A?
avatar
neelambhavnani
Joined: 04 Jul 2017
Last visit: 29 Sep 2017
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
6
 [4]
Posts: 2
Kudos: 6
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NaeemHasan
Can anyone explain the question 5 which is
It can be inferred from the passage that the author would agree with which of the following statements about the fur trade between Native Americans and Europeans in the early modern era?
A. This trade may have begun as early as the 1480s.
B. This trade probably did not continue much beyond the 1530s.
C. This trade was most likely at its peak in the mid-1520s.
D. This trade probably did not begin prior to 1500.
E. There is no written evidence of this trade prior to the seventeenth century.

Why not E? And why A?


The question asks you to infer and inference is something that will not be stated explicitly in the passage. since E is stated explicitly hence E is incorrect.
User avatar
Dkingdom
Joined: 13 Apr 2017
Last visit: 12 Mar 2021
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
66
 [4]
Given Kudos: 30
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT 1: 660 Q40 V41
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Energy)
GMAT 1: 660 Q40 V41
Posts: 67
Kudos: 66
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vrindachopra
Can someone explain question 3 ??

Hello vrindachopra ,

This is the statement the question is pointing to.
By the time Europeans sailing the Atlantic coast of North America first documented the fur trade, it was apparently well underway.

We have to find which out of the five statements strengthens the assertion author has made in the above statement.

Assertion : The trade was already on-going between Europeans and Americans, before the first documentation of the fur trade was done.

In strengthen questions you have to consider the statements given in the answer choices to be true.
Hence if choice D - Europeans and Native Americans had established trade protocols, such as body language assuring one another of their peaceful intentions, that antedate the earliest records of trade - is true, then we can infer that Europeans and Americans were in contact with each before any sort of documentation was done, since they had already discussed and established trade protocols.
Why would they otherwise set up trade protocols ?

I hope I have answered your question.

Regards
Dkingdom
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,786
 [5]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,786
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NaeemHasan
Can anyone explain the question 5 which is
It can be inferred from the passage that the author would agree with which of the following statements about the fur trade between Native Americans and Europeans in the early modern era?
A. This trade may have begun as early as the 1480s.
B. This trade probably did not continue much beyond the 1530s.
C. This trade was most likely at its peak in the mid-1520s.
D. This trade probably did not begin prior to 1500.
E. There is no written evidence of this trade prior to the seventeenth century.

Why not E? And why A?
The author claims that the fur trade was well underway by the time it was first recorded in 1501. Furthermore, the author says that by the time Cartier sailed the St. Lawrence (ten years after 1524, so 1534), Europeans may have been trading with Native Americans for a half century (50 years before 1534, so 1484). Thus, the author would agree that the trade may have begun as early as the 1480s, and choice (A) is correct.
avatar
JasmineShyu
Joined: 04 Jun 2017
Last visit: 08 Apr 2018
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
2
 [2]
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 2
Kudos: 2
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The passage supports which of the following statements about sixteenth-century European fishing crews working the waters off Newfoundland?

A)They wrote no accounts of their fishing voyages.
Not mentioned: Even though there's no evidence or record found in the early stage, the author did not assert no one wrote accounts of the voyages.

B)They primarily sailed under the flag of Portugal.
Not mentioned: The author didn't mention anything about the flag.

C)They exchanged ship parts with Native Americans for furs.
Correct: The last line in the first passage directly support this one.

D)They commonly traded jewelry with Native Americans for furs.
Not mentioned: The author didn't mention anything about the jewelry trading. Though the earrings were mentioned, that is not explicitly enough.

E)They carried surplus metal implements to trade with Native Americans for furs.
Not mentioned: The author never said the metal implements are "surplus".

Please correct me if my understanding is wrong..;)
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,230
Own Kudos:
5,890
 [6]
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,230
Kudos: 5,890
 [6]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Main point - trades of fur started at what time is not clear. writtn evidences given but it started way before that. How is also given.

(Book Question: 46)
The author of the passage draws conclusions about the fur trade in North America from all of the following sources EXCEPT

A. Cartier’s accounts of trading with Native Americans- Cartier’s accounts is not defined. Cartier’s voyage is.
B. a seventeenth-century account of European settlements - y
C. a sixteenth-century account written by a sailing vessel captain - y
D. archaeological observations of sixteenth-century Native American sites - y
E. a sixteenth-century account of Native Americans in what is now New England - y

--------------------------------------

(Book Question: 47)
The passage suggests that which of the following is partially responsible for the difficulty in establishing the precise date when the fur trade in North America began?
lack of any written doc.

B. A lack of written documentation before 1501 -
------------------------------------------
(Book Question: 48)
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the author’s assertion in the first sentence of the second paragraph?
assertion - By the time Europeans sailing the Atlantic coast of North America first documented the fur trade, it was apparently well underway.
PT - Clearly trade was going on for some time. as this one is strengthening question, outside information is allowed. Something on the lines that trade was well established, will be good .
A. When Europeans retraced Cartier’s voyage in the first years of the seventeenth century, they frequently traded with Native Americans. --- we are talking about a different period. this time line is quiet later.
B. Furs from beavers, which were plentiful in North America but nearly extinct in Europe, became extremely fashionable in Europe in the final decades of the sixteenth century. ----- again time line is quiet later. we are talking around 1501 period.
C. Firing arms were rarely found on sixteenth-century Native American sites or on European lists of trading goods since such arms required frequent maintenance and repair. ----- Soemthing does not found>>> this will not explain the established trade.
D. Europeans and Native Americans had established trade protocols, such as body language assuring one another of their peaceful intentions, that antedate the earliest records of trade. ----- this make sense. rules of trade were defind by this time make a solid stand for established trade.
E. During the first quarter of the sixteenth century, an Italian explorer recorded seeing many Native Americans with what appeared to be copper beads, though they may have been made of indigenous copper. ----- makes a stand but time line a littile bit later, we can not say for sure any conclusion around 1501, almost a quarter century early.

-------------------------------------------------

(Book Question: 49)
Which of the following best describes the primary function of lines 11–16?

sites were strewn with iron bolts and metal
pins. Only later, upon reading Nicolas Denys’s
1672 account of seventeenth-century European
settlements in North America, did archaeologists
realize that sixteenth-century European fishing
(15)
crews had dismantled and exchanged parts of their
ships for furs.

how trade happens for fur ?
B. It reveals how archaeologists arrived at an interpretation of the evidence mentioned in the preceding sentence. - y

------------------------------------------------

(Book Question: 50)
It can be inferred from the passage that the author would agree with which of the following statements about the fur trade between Native Americans and Europeans in the early modern era?
anchor - fur trade between Native Americans and Europeans in the early modern era

A. This trade may have begun as early as the 1480s. - best of the lot.

------------------------------------------------
(Book Question: 51)
Which of the following can be inferred from the passage about the Native Americans mentioned in line 25?
Another early chronicler noted in 1524 that
Native Americans living along the coast of what is now
(25)
New England had become selective about European
trade goods: they accepted only knives, fishhooks,
and sharp metal.
PT - what is the observation from first record.

E. The selectivity of their trading choices indicates that they had been trading with Europeans for a significant period of time prior to 1524. - best of the lot.
-------------------------------------------------

(Book Question: 52)
The passage supports which of the following statements about sixteenth-century European fishing crews working the waters off Newfoundland?
anchor - sixteenth-century European fishing crews

What is fairly certain is that the first Europeans to conduct such trade during the modern period were fishing crews working the waters around Newfoundland.

European fishing crews had dismantled and exchanged parts of their ships for furs.

A. They wrote no accounts of their fishing voyages. - no, wrote ans written by some one has diff.
B. They primarily sailed under the flag of Portugal. - no
C. They exchanged ship parts with Native Americans for furs. - yes
D. They commonly traded jewelry with Native Americans for furs. - no
E. They carried surplus metal implements to trade with Native Americans for furs. - no; surplus is not mentioned.

-----------------------------------------------------

(Book Question: 53)
Which of the following can be inferred from the passage about evidence pertaining to the fur trade between Native Americans and Europeans in the early modern era?
anchor - evidence pertaining to the fur trade between Native Americans and Europeans in the early modern era?

A. A lack of written evidence has made it difficult to establish which Europeans first participated in this trade. - no
B. In general, the physical evidence pertaining to this trade has been more useful than the written evidence has been. - no comparison given.
C. There is more written evidence pertaining to this trade from the early part of the sixteenth century than from later in that century - comparison is not given.
D. The earliest written evidence pertaining to this trade dates from a time when the trade was already well established. - yes
E. Some important pieces of evidence pertaining to this trade, such as Denys’s 1672 account, were long overlooked by archaeologists. - no

-------------------------------------------------------

(Book Question: 54)
The passage suggests which of the following about the sixteenth-century Native Americans who traded with Europeans on the coast of what is now called New England?

A. By 1524 they had become accustomed to exchanging goods with Europeans. - by POE seems the best
avatar
Diya52
Joined: 21 Nov 2018
Last visit: 26 May 2025
Posts: 138
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 123
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Products:
Posts: 138
Kudos: 128
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone explain why Q48, option E is wrong?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,786
 [4]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,786
 [4]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DiyaDutta
Can someone explain why Q48, option E is wrong?
Quote:
(Book Question: 48)
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the author’s assertion in the first sentence of the second paragraph?
The assertion in question is that "by the time Europeans sailing the Atlantic coast of North America first documented the fur trade, it was apparently well underway."

To answer the question we need to strengthen the assertion that the fur trade was well established BEFORE Europeans actually documented that trade activity. The earliest documentation of the fur trade was in 1501 -- so we are looking for additional evidence showing that the fur trade was already "well underway" by that time.

Take another look at (E):
Quote:
E. During the first quarter of the sixteenth century, an Italian explorer recorded seeing many Native Americans with what appeared to be copper beads, though they may have been made of indigenous copper.
"Many Native Americans" had copper beads in the early 16th century -- IF those beads came from trade with Europeans, maybe they would provide evidence that trade was already well underway by that time.

However, the answer choice makes it clear that this is NOT necessarily the case: the beads "may have been made of indigenous copper." So, the beads may have nothing to do with the fur trade -- perhaps Native Americans used indigenous copper and made the beads themselves. For this reason, (E) does not provide evidence to strengthen the author's assertion.

Compare that with (D):
Quote:
D. Europeans and Native Americans had established trade protocols, such as body language assuring one another of their peaceful intentions, that antedate the earliest records of trade.
(D) tells us that there were "established trade protocols" in place BEFORE the earliest records of trade. If trade protocols were already in place, then we can infer that the fur trade itself must also have been in place. This directly supports the author's assertion that trade was well underway before the first records of trade.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
Shef08
Joined: 01 Jan 2019
Last visit: 01 Apr 2025
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111
Location: Canada
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.24
Posts: 84
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I don't know option C is correct for this one. Can someone explain:


I marked D, but couldn't understand why C is correct.

The passage supports which of the following statements about sixteenth-century European fishing crews working the waters off Newfoundland?

A. They wrote no accounts of their fishing voyages.
B. They primarily sailed under the flag of Portugal.
C. They exchanged ship parts with Native Americans for furs.
D. They commonly traded jewelry with Native Americans for furs.
E. They carried surplus metal implements to trade with Native Americans for furs.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,786
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,786
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Shef08
I don't know option C is correct for this one. Can someone explain:


I marked D, but couldn't understand why C is correct.

The passage supports which of the following statements about sixteenth-century European fishing crews working the waters off Newfoundland?

A. They wrote no accounts of their fishing voyages.
B. They primarily sailed under the flag of Portugal.
C. They exchanged ship parts with Native Americans for furs.
D. They commonly traded jewelry with Native Americans for furs.
E. They carried surplus metal implements to trade with Native Americans for furs.
To answer this question, we need to know precisely what the passage says about sixteenth-century European fishing crews working the waters off Newfoundland.

Lines 4-9 tell us that "fishing crews working the waters around Newfoundland" were the first Europeans to trade European-made goods with modern era Native Americans. Lines 9-16 elaborate on this trading, by telling us:

    ...Archaeologists had
    noticed that sixteenth-century Native American
    (10)
    sites were strewn with iron bolts and metal
    pins. Only later, upon reading Nicolas Denys’s
    1672 account of seventeenth-century European
    settlements in North America, did archaeologists
    realize that sixteenth-century European fishing
    (15)
    crews had dismantled and exchanged parts of their
    ships for furs.

This is all the information we need to keep choice (C). Lines 14-16 explicitly matches what is stated by choice (C), while reading the paragraph as a whole confirms that that the "fishing crews" mentioned at the end of this paragraph are in fact the same ones that were mentioned "working the waters around Newfoundland" and trading with Native Americans.

Now let's take a look at choice (D):

Quote:
D. They commonly traded jewelry with Native Americans for furs.
Jewelry trading is never associated with the sixteenth-century European fishing crews that the question is asking us about. In fact, jewelry is not mentioned in the passage at all.

Choice (D) is not supported by anything in the passage, while (C) is explicitly supported by the passage.

I hope this helps!
avatar
mansi1997
Joined: 29 Aug 2018
Last visit: 04 Mar 2022
Posts: 13
Given Kudos: 134
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Posts: 13
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone explain why option E is wrong in Question 54. Thanks!
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
8,945
 [3]
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mansi1999
Can someone explain why option E is wrong in Question 54. Thanks!

Hi Mansi

Let us examine what the relevant portion of the passage says about this topic. Lines 23-27 state: Another early chronicler noted in 1524 that Native Americans living along the coast of what is now New England had become selective about European trade goods: they accepted only knives, fishhooks, and sharp metal.

From this, all we can gather is that the Native Americans were selective about what European goods they were willing to accept. We do not know what the criteria for such selectiveness was - we cannot, for instance, assume that only goods which cost the most were accepted. While it is logical to assume that they would only accept the most valuable goods, we do not know what the Native Americans found value in, and hence, considered valuable.

So, when option (E) states "they demanded only the most prized European goods", it leaves a lot of ambiguity. "Prized" by whom, for example? Or, what is the measure of being "prized"?

Option (A), on the other hand, is easily verifiable from the lines above, and is hence a much better option.

Hope this helps.
avatar
tittoo
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Last visit: 09 Nov 2020
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 59
Posts: 62
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Does anyone have specific tips on how to deal with passages with such dense information efficiently?

I got most of the questions right (2 wrong) but this passage took me a long time (18 minutes) to complete.
I found all the timelines and the different groups involved in trading. Any particular tips on how to do such passages faster?

Thanks!
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,786
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,786
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tittoo
Does anyone have specific tips on how to deal with passages with such dense information efficiently?

I got most of the questions right (2 wrong) but this passage took me a long time (18 minutes) to complete.
I found all the timelines and the different groups involved in trading. Any particular tips on how to do such passages faster?

Thanks!
You might want to check out our RC guide for beginners, which talks about reading for structure and purpose instead of obsessing over the details. That might help you get through some of the denser passages more quickly.

You might also get something out of this video about common mistakes on CR and RC.

I hope that helps a bit!
User avatar
custodio
Joined: 25 Jun 2018
Last visit: 03 Feb 2023
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 46
Posts: 39
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

I am confused about one thing in the passage.

The second sentence of the first paragraph states that the crews left no written accounts of their trade with Native Americans.

Then, the first sentence of the second paragraph states that Europeans (aka crews) documented the fur trade.

Don't these two statements contradict with each other?
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
8,945
 [2]
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
custodio
Hi,

I am confused about one thing in the passage.

The second sentence of the first paragraph states that the crews left no written accounts of their trade with Native Americans.

Then, the first sentence of the second paragraph states that Europeans (aka crews) documented the fur trade.

Don't these two statements contradict with each other?

Hi

Let me try to address your query. Let us first examine the second sentence of the first paragraph, which states:

What is fairly certain, even though they left no written evidence of having done so, is that the first Europeans to conduct such trade during the modern period were fishing crews working the waters around Newfoundland.

Clearly, the appositive (which refers to "they" having left no written evidence) is applicable to the noun or noun idea closest to it, which are the "first Europeans", and the sentence goes on to identify these people as the "fishing crews working the waters around Newfoundland". Therefore, we can surmise that the fishing crews working the waters around Newfoundland did not leave any written evidence of having traded with Native Americans.

Now, moving on to the first sentence of the second paragraph:

By the time Europeans sailing the Atlantic coast of North America first documented the fur trade, it was apparently well underway.

This sentence talks about "Europeans" who were sailing the Atlantic coast of North America documenting the fur trade. This could, potentially, refer to any Europeans, the only condition being that they were the first to document the fur trade. Now, we take all information given in the passage to be true. Therefore, the only logical inference is that this mention of "Europeans" refers to a different set of Europeans than those mentioned earlier (who, it is clearly mentioned, left no written evidence of their trade with Native Americans).

Hope this helps to clarify.
User avatar
EatMyDosa
Joined: 06 Jan 2017
Last visit: 01 Dec 2022
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 283
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GPA: 3.33
Products:
Posts: 85
Kudos: 114
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
Shef08
I don't know option C is correct for this one. Can someone explain:


I marked D, but couldn't understand why C is correct.

The passage supports which of the following statements about sixteenth-century European fishing crews working the waters off Newfoundland?

A. They wrote no accounts of their fishing voyages.
B. They primarily sailed under the flag of Portugal.
C. They exchanged ship parts with Native Americans for furs.
D. They commonly traded jewelry with Native Americans for furs.
E. They carried surplus metal implements to trade with Native Americans for furs.
To answer this question, we need to know precisely what the passage says about sixteenth-century European fishing crews working the waters off Newfoundland.

Lines 4-9 tell us that "fishing crews working the waters around Newfoundland" were the first Europeans to trade European-made goods with modern era Native Americans. Lines 9-16 elaborate on this trading, by telling us:

    ...Archaeologists had
    noticed that sixteenth-century Native American
    (10)
    sites were strewn with iron bolts and metal
    pins. Only later, upon reading Nicolas Denys’s
    1672 account of seventeenth-century European
    settlements in North America, did archaeologists
    realize that sixteenth-century European fishing
    (15)
    crews had dismantled and exchanged parts of their
    ships for furs.

This is all the information we need to keep choice (C). Lines 14-16 explicitly matches what is stated by choice (C), while reading the paragraph as a whole confirms that that the "fishing crews" mentioned at the end of this paragraph are in fact the same ones that were mentioned "working the waters around Newfoundland" and trading with Native Americans.

Now let's take a look at choice (D):

Quote:
D. They commonly traded jewelry with Native Americans for furs.
Jewelry trading is never associated with the sixteenth-century European fishing crews that the question is asking us about. In fact, jewelry is not mentioned in the passage at all.

Choice (D) is not supported by anything in the passage, while (C) is explicitly supported by the passage.

I hope this helps!

Hi GMATNinja,

How did you arrive at the conclusion that "In fact, jewelry is not mentioned in the passage at all." . Lines 20-25 clearly mentions "Venetian silver earrings" ?


GMATNinja, CrackVerbalGMAT, egmat, gmatprep

(Book Question: 51), Question 6
Which of the following can be inferred from the passage about the Native Americans mentioned in line 25?

A. They had little use for decorative objects such as earrings.
B. They became increasingly dependent on fishing between 1501 and 1524.
C. By 1524, only certain groups of Europeans were willing to trade with them.
D. The selectivity of their trading choices made it difficult for them to engage in widespread trade with Europeans.
E. The selectivity of their trading choices indicates that they had been trading with Europeans for a significant period of time prior to 1524.


Why is option B wrong? According to me, as per line 25, if Native Americans became selective about exchanging only knives, fishhooks, and sharp metal, can't we infer that they became increasingly dependent of fishing? I acknowledge that "increasingly dependent" is bit of a stretch.

Line 25 (from passage)

" Another early chronicler noted in 1524 that Native Americans living along the coast of what is now
New England had become selective about European trade goods: they accepted only knives, fishhooks, and sharp metal.
"

Moreover, in the correct option E, how can we say based on selectivity of their trading choices that "they had been trading with Europeans for a significant period of time prior to 1524". We can certainly say this based on the overall information presented in the passage but can we really say this solely based on Native Americans' "selectivity of trading choices"?
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
17298 posts
189 posts