GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 24 May 2019, 12:17

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

GMATPrep: Citizens of Parktown - are you serious?

Author Message
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 820
GMATPrep: Citizens of Parktown - are you serious?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Dec 2008, 10:57
2
I think the answer is an unfair one. Wouldn't you need to start assuming for B to be correct?

Attachment:

parktown.JPG [ 88.81 KiB | Viewed 7407 times ]
SVP
Status: Burning mid-night oil....daily
Joined: 07 Nov 2008
Posts: 2399
Schools: Yale SOM 2011 Alum, Kellogg, Booth, Tuck
WE 1: IB - Restructuring & Distressed M&A
Re: GMATPrep: Citizens of Parktown - are you serious?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Dec 2008, 11:15
The argument here is:
Plan will "unlikely affect the problem that concerns citizens."

Premise (main): make kids stay at home in the evening.

To weaken this argument, one would have to support the premise that crime level will decrease if the kids indeed stay at home more often.

Answer choice B does not weaken the main argument. Whether the crime is petty or not, crime is still a crime.

However, if one argues that (and if it is true) regardless of when the kids stay at home, kids are less likely to commit crime if at home (rather than outside), then this does weaken the main argument. Main argument depends on the time frame of when most crimes occur. But that becomes irrelevant or weaker if forcing kids to stay inside do affect the crime rate.
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2008
Posts: 351
Re: GMATPrep: Citizens of Parktown - are you serious?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Dec 2008, 11:28
Yeah ridiculus question.

Its like saying a jug of water is only a little bit poisonous.

All this torture (GMAT) to get into a freakin business school...ah..
_________________
The one who flies is worthy. The one who is worthy flies. The one who doesn't fly isn't worthy
Director
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 668
Re: GMATPrep: Citizens of Parktown - are you serious?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Dec 2008, 12:11
1
C doesnt weaken the argument. Parktown wants to keep teenagers at home late at night and C says that if they stay home late at night they wont be committing crimes. But the problem is from 3pm-6pm when the laws have no effect. B weakens because it says that from 3 to 6 the crimes are petty, not serious

tough one, probably would have got it wrong under pressure
Manager
Joined: 12 Sep 2014
Posts: 142
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V41
GPA: 3.94
Re: GMATPrep: Citizens of Parktown - are you serious?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Nov 2014, 14:30
Can you argue for D?

The conclusion is saying that even if the measures work, the main crime time is before the evening. So, D says that any decrease in the need for police patrols (less teen crime) means more patrols in the afternoon? Or am I wrong because to get to this, we're assuming the heavy need for police patrols is mostly due to teen crime and not much other crime?
Intern
Joined: 07 Aug 2017
Posts: 2
Re: GMATPrep: Citizens of Parktown - are you serious?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Aug 2017, 00:14
It talks about prevention of serious crimes. If crimes between 3-6 are petty, the residents don't seem to quite have an issue.
Re: GMATPrep: Citizens of Parktown - are you serious?   [#permalink] 28 Aug 2017, 00:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by