GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Oct 2018, 22:49

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 291
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Oct 2018, 21:04
5
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

51% (01:45) correct 49% (01:48) wrong based on 310 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983, to be false and disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States would likely have entered a large-scale nuclear war.


A. Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983, to be false and disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States would likely have entered a large-scale nuclear war.


B. If Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov had not correctly judged the early warning system that reported an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983 to be false and then disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States likely would have entered a large-scale nuclear war.


C. Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov likely prevented a large-scale nuclear war between the United States and Russia on September 26, 1983 by correctly judging that the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile were false, disobeying orders from his superiors to retaliate.


D. On September 26, 1983, Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov correctly judged that the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile were false, disobeying orders from his superiors to retaliate and likely preventing the United States and Russia from entering a large-scale nuclear war.


E. On September 26, 1983, Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov likely prevented the United States and Russia from entering a large-scale nuclear war when he disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate and correctly judged that the early warning system’s reports that a nuclear missile was incoming were false.
Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 4100
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Oct 2018, 22:34
AdityaHongunti wrote:
Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983, to be false and disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States would likely have entered a large-scale nuclear war.


A. Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983, to be false and disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States would likely have entered a large-scale nuclear war.


B. If Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov had not correctly judged the early warning system that reported an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983 to be false and then disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States likely would have entered a large-scale nuclear war.


C. Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov likely prevented a large-scale nuclear war between the United States and Russia on September 26, 1983 by correctly judging that the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile were false, disobeying orders from his superiors to retaliate.


D. On September 26, 1983, Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov correctly judged that the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile were false, disobeying orders from his superiors to retaliate and likely preventing the United States and Russia from entering a large-scale nuclear war.


E. On September 26, 1983, Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov likely prevented the United States and Russia from entering a large-scale nuclear war when he disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate and correctly judged that the early warning system’s reports that a nuclear missile was incoming were false.


This is a hypothetical condition, nothing wrong with the Original sentence, correct Answer must be (A)
_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 389
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.76
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Oct 2018, 23:45
Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983, to be false and disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States would likely have entered a large-scale nuclear war.


A. Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983, to be false and disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States would likely have entered a large-scale nuclear war. (Had and would have is rightly used) no other error


B. If Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov had not correctly judged the early warning system that reported an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983 to be false and then disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States likely would have entered a large-scale nuclear war. (The bold part of sentence is worng)


C. Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov likely prevented a large-scale nuclear war between the United States and Russia on September 26, 1983 by correctly judging that the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile were false, disobeying orders from his superiors to retaliate. (likely prevented? the meaning if sentence is distorted)


D. On September 26, 1983, Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov correctly judged that the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile were false, disobeying orders from his superiors to retaliate and likely preventing the United States and Russia from entering a large-scale nuclear war. (the war was prevented because lieutenant judges the early warning system's report---its a cause and effect however; in this sentence disobeying and preventing are made parallel as the effects of correctly judging)


E. On September 26, 1983, Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov likely prevented the United States and Russia from entering a large-scale nuclear war when he disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate and correctly judged that the early warning system’s reports that a nuclear missile was incoming were false. (why likely prevented? When must specify some time and it seems that he prevented when he disobeyed and judged after that)
_________________

Push yourself again and again. Don't give an inch until the final buzzer sounds. -Larry Bird
Success isn't something that just happens - success is learned, success is practiced and then it is shared. -Sparky Anderson
-S

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Jan 2018
Posts: 43
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Oct 2018, 02:45
AdityaHongunti wrote:
Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983, to be false and disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States would likely have entered a large-scale nuclear war.


A. Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983, to be false and disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States would likely have entered a large-scale nuclear war.
( this format of the sentence feels a little awkward though )

B. If Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov had not correctly judged the early warning system that reported an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983 to be false and then disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States likely would have entered a large-scale nuclear war.
(If...............and............) wrong

C. Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov likely prevented a large-scale nuclear war between the United States and Russia on September 26, 1983 by correctly judging that the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile were false, disobeying orders from his superiors to retaliate.
(disobeying is placed very far from the Stanislav Petrov, which it modifies)


D. On September 26, 1983, Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov correctly judged that the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile were false, disobeying orders from his superiors to retaliate and likely preventing the United States and Russia from entering a large-scale nuclear war.
(same as option C)

E. On September 26, 1983, Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov likely prevented the United States and Russia from entering a large-scale nuclear war when he disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate and correctly judged that the early warning system’s reports that a nuclear missile was incoming were false.

( Can someone please explain how Option- E is wrong ? how the usage of the word " LIKELY" changes the meaning ? )
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 291
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Oct 2018, 02:56
1
shiva007 wrote:
AdityaHongunti wrote:
Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983, to be false and disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States would likely have entered a large-scale nuclear war.


A. Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983, to be false and disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States would likely have entered a large-scale nuclear war.
( this format of the sentence feels a little awkward though )

B. If Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov had not correctly judged the early warning system that reported an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983 to be false and then disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States likely would have entered a large-scale nuclear war.
(If...............and............) wrong

C. Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov likely prevented a large-scale nuclear war between the United States and Russia on September 26, 1983 by correctly judging that the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile were false, disobeying orders from his superiors to retaliate.
(disobeying is placed very far from the Stanislav Petrov, which it modifies)


D. On September 26, 1983, Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov correctly judged that the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile were false, disobeying orders from his superiors to retaliate and likely preventing the United States and Russia from entering a large-scale nuclear war.
(same as option C)

E. On September 26, 1983, Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov likely prevented the United States and Russia from entering a large-scale nuclear war when he disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate and correctly judged that the early warning system’s reports that a nuclear missile was incoming were false.

( Can someone please explain how Option- E is wrong ? how the usage of the word " LIKELY" changes the meaning ? )



There is a subtle tense error in option E. If you understand the meaning then you'll know that the judgement happened earlier than the disobedience.. hence the placement of disobedience should be later than judgement.

The placement in option E makes the ans choice as if both the verbs are independent,making the answer choice incorrect.

We have to place the verb in such a way that there is clear sequencing

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 28 Jun 2018
Posts: 21
Re: Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Oct 2018, 06:51
Can someone please break this down more clearly? Isn't the correct expression"would have likely"?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 291
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Oct 2018, 07:03
1
1) Take a First Glance (5 seconds)

The underline encompasses the entire long sentence, so pay careful attention to the Sentence Structure and watch out for any misplaced Modifiers. Had and if indicate a hypothetical, so make sure that the Verbs match.



(2) Read for Meaning

The sentence theorizes that when Stanislav Petrov decided that Russia’s early warning system’s reports of an incoming missile were incorrect and therefore disobeyed his superiors’ orders to retaliate, he likely prevented a nuclear war between Russia and the United States. Would likely have is the correct construction for this hypothetical. If you can’t spot a mistake in the original sentence, reserve judgment on answer choice (A). Since the entire sentence is underlined, it will be difficult to compare answers vertically to find splits. Read each answer on its own, and when you spot an error, investigate the remaining answers and eliminate any that make the same mistake.



(3) Find a Starting Point

Start with any difference that seems easiest to you, then move to the next easiest issue, and so on. Stop when you have one answer or you aren’t sure how to address the remaining differences. All errors for each choice are detailed in the next section.



(4) Eliminate (and Repeat)

(A) CORRECT. This sentence correctly says that Petrov judged the early warning system’s reports (rather than the system itself) to be false. The sequence of events is in the correct order.

(B) In the original sentence, Petrov judged the early warning system’s reports … to be false. This answer, however, says that Petrov judged the early warning system … to be false. The reports were false, not the system itself.

(C) A comma –ing modifier modifies the main subject and verb, so in this choice, disobeying is modifying Petrov likely prevented. However, it is not the case that the fact that Petrov prevented the war resulted in his decision to disobey his superiors. The reverse construction would make sense: Petrov disobeyed orders from his superiors, likely preventing a nuclear war.

(D) A comma –ing modifier modifies the main subject and verb, Petrov correctly judged. However, disobeying does not describe how Petrov correctly judged … the reports … to be false. In addition, the modifier preventing also points back to Petrov correctly judged, but judging the reports to be incorrect isn’t what prevented nuclear war; rather, disobeying orders from his superiors to retaliate is what prevented nuclear war, so preventing ought to modify disobeying.

(E) This sentence says that Petrov did two things: disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate and correctly judged the reports to be false. The second action (judging the reports to be false) necessarily occurred before the first (disobeying orders from his superiors to retaliate) Since judging the reports to be false led directly to disobeying Petrov’s superiors’ orders, the order of these two clauses should be reversed.

hibobotamuss if you need more thorough explanation then lemme know
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Oct 2018
Posts: 1
Re: Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Oct 2018, 07:32
AdityaHongunti wrote:
Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983, to be false and disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States would likely have entered a large-scale nuclear war.


A. Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983, to be false and disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States would likely have entered a large-scale nuclear war.


B. If Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov had not correctly judged the early warning system that reported an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983 to be false and then disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States likely would have entered a large-scale nuclear war.


C. Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov likely prevented a large-scale nuclear war between the United States and Russia on September 26, 1983 by correctly judging that the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile were false, disobeying orders from his superiors to retaliate.


D. On September 26, 1983, Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov correctly judged that the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile were false, disobeying orders from his superiors to retaliate and likely preventing the United States and Russia from entering a large-scale nuclear war.


E. On September 26, 1983, Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov likely prevented the United States and Russia from entering a large-scale nuclear war when he disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate and correctly judged that the early warning system’s reports that a nuclear missile was incoming were false.
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Posts: 991
Re: Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Oct 2018, 08:26
san22 wrote:
AdityaHongunti wrote:
Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983, to be false and disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States would likely have entered a large-scale nuclear war.


A. Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983, to be false and disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States would likely have entered a large-scale nuclear war.


B. If Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov had not correctly judged the early warning system that reported an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983 to be false and then disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States likely would have entered a large-scale nuclear war.


C. Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov likely prevented a large-scale nuclear war between the United States and Russia on September 26, 1983 by correctly judging that the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile were false, disobeying orders from his superiors to retaliate.


D. On September 26, 1983, Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov correctly judged that the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile were false, disobeying orders from his superiors to retaliate and likely preventing the United States and Russia from entering a large-scale nuclear war.


E. On September 26, 1983, Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov likely prevented the United States and Russia from entering a large-scale nuclear war when he disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate and correctly judged that the early warning system’s reports that a nuclear missile was incoming were false.



san22

seems its your first post...u can mention your doubt after quoting the question :)

Option A presents a reason to conclude something ie war between US and Russia.
and is correct structurally as well grammatically.

Ans A
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 19 Sep 2017
Posts: 36
WE: Account Management (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Oct 2018, 05:52
Hi Folks,
Its the sequence of events in the statement that requires such sentence construction. Option A is the only option that maintains its integrity and thats more important.
Not only rest of the options have additional errors but also have lost the meaning.

Thanks.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 19 Sep 2017
Posts: 36
WE: Account Management (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Oct 2018, 05:57
hibobotamuss wrote:
Can someone please break this down more clearly? Isn't the correct expression"would have likely"?


Hi,
If we use "would have likely", it would modify entered. So it'd read would have likely entered. This is not what author intends to say at all. This whole statement is hypothetical, and we only want to modify "have" part.

Hope it helps.
Thanks.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 28 Jul 2018
Posts: 4
Re: Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2018, 14:05
we need an expert view on this question, especially to explain this unusual form of making conditions that begin with a verb "Had Russian lieutenan colonnel..." instead of makin an if-clause or even attack the probleme as in choice C that appears to be the best
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 09 Aug 2017
Posts: 211
Re: Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2018, 17:37
A. Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983, to be false and disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States would likely have entered a large-scale nuclear war.

Please explain the position of phrase-in-bold to understand the construction of sentence.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 291
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2018, 18:48
gvij2017 wrote:
A. Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged the early warning system’s reports of an incoming nuclear missile on September 26, 1983, to be false and disobeyed orders from his superiors to retaliate, Russia and the United States would likely have entered a large-scale nuclear war.

Please explain the position of phrase-in-bold to understand the construction of sentence.



See you have to understand that the author is trying to show a hypothetical condition...

He means to say that "had X not done something , Y would happen"

"Had stanislov not correct judged to be false ( this is the beginning of hypothetical condition- if something wouldn't have happened) and (had he not )disobeyed the orders.... A war WOULD happen ( Y would happen).

Posted from my mobile device
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged &nbs [#permalink] 10 Oct 2018, 18:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Had Russian lieutenant colonel Stanislav Petrov not correctly judged

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.