Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
ydmuley
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2019
Posts: 807
Given Kudos: 199
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Haas '20 HBS '20 CBS '20 Wharton '20 Stanford '20 Kellogg '20
GPA: 3.5
21 Oct 2017, 14:42
Kudos
Bookmarks
BinhFantasia
Hello BinhFantasia - Lets first understand what 'it' in this case refers to? And as you might have guessed the pronoun 'it' is referring to 'work' here.
Now lets replace the underlined portion with the option C
With Pronoun 'it'
In 1713, Alexander Pope began his translation of the Illiad, a work that had taken seven years to complete and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced it is the greatest translation in any language.
Replacing pronoun 'it' with a noun
In 1713, Alexander Pope began his translation of the Illiad, a work that had taken seven years to complete and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced work is the greatest translation in any language.
If you replace 'it' with 'work' you can see that we are unnecessarily repeating or rather referencing the word 'work' here - the word 'that' already refers to 'work' and hence the usage of 'it' is redundant here.
Hope this helps!
gmatexam439
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Posts: 1,054
08 Dec 2017, 03:58
Kudos
Bookmarks
In 1713, Alexander Pope began his translation of the Illiad, a work that, taking him seven years until completion, and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced the greatest translation in any language.
A. his translation of the Illiad, a work that, taking him seven years until completion, and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced
1. Not a complete sentence 2. taking should be parallel to pronounced
B. his translation of the Illiad, a work that took him seven years to complete and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced
Correct
C. his translation of the Illiad, a work that had taken seven years to complete and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced it is
1. past perfect is not required 2."pronounced it is" --> it is not required (breaks parallelism)
D. translating the Illiad, a work that took seven years until completion and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced it as
1. "pronounced it is" --> it is not required (breaks parallelism) 2. I am not really sure about the usage of until completion; it is making the sentence convoluted unnecessarily
E. translating the Illiad, a work that had taken seven years to complete and literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced it
1. past perfect is not required 2."pronounced it" --> it is not required (breaks parallelism)
A. his translation of the Illiad, a work that, taking him seven years until completion, and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced
1. Not a complete sentence 2. taking should be parallel to pronounced
B. his translation of the Illiad, a work that took him seven years to complete and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced
Correct
C. his translation of the Illiad, a work that had taken seven years to complete and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced it is
1. past perfect is not required 2."pronounced it is" --> it is not required (breaks parallelism)
D. translating the Illiad, a work that took seven years until completion and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced it as
1. "pronounced it is" --> it is not required (breaks parallelism) 2. I am not really sure about the usage of until completion; it is making the sentence convoluted unnecessarily
E. translating the Illiad, a work that had taken seven years to complete and literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced it
1. past perfect is not required 2."pronounced it" --> it is not required (breaks parallelism)
13 Nov 2018, 11:06
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hello Everyone!
This is an incredibly difficult GMAT question, so let's figure out the best way to attack it. To get started, we'll take a quick look over the original question and highlight any major differences between the options in orange:
In 1713, Alexander Pope began his translation of the Illiad, a work that, taking him seven years until completion, and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced the greatest translation in any language.
A. his translation of the Illiad, a work that, taking him seven years until completion, and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced
B. his translation of the Illiad, a work that took him seven years to complete and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced
C. his translation of the Illiad, a work that had taken seven years to complete and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced it is
D. translating the Illiad, a work that took seven years until completion and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced it as
E. translating the Illiad, a work that had taken seven years to complete and literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced it
After a quick glance over the options, we have a LOT of things we can focus on:
1. "his translation of" vs. "translating"
2. "taking" / "took" / "had taken"
3. "until completion" / "to complete"
4. "pronounced" / "pronounced it is" / "pronounced it as" / "pronounced it"
Whenever we have this many things to focus on, it's best to start with things that are "either A or B" situations because they will likely remove 2-3 options right away.
Let's start with #1 on our list: "his translation of" vs. "translating" because no matter which one we choose, it will eliminate a lot of choices!
While it may seem like both phrases are interchangeable, they do mean slightly different things:
In 1713, Alexander Pope began his translation of the Iliad... = His translation isn't the first one. It also suggests he took a different approach to his translation than others who translated it before.
In 1713, Alexander Pope began translating the Iliad... = His translation may or may not be the first one. It also doesn't clearly show that his translation is any different than others who translated it before.
Since the focus of the sentence is that Samuel Johnson pronounced it the best translation ever done, it makes more sense to also clearly show that Pope's translation was different or unique. Therefore, using the phrase "his translation of" is the better choice here. We can eliminate options D & E because the word "translating" doesn't provide the same clarity and emphasis as "his translation of."
There you go - 2 options down! Now, let's take a look at #2 on the list: taking / took / had taken.
A. his translation of the Illiad, a work that, taking him seven years until completion, and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced
This option is INCORRECT because changing the phrase into an -ing modifier doesn't really work here. First off, it's not necessary - you can just say "took" and it's much easier to understand. Second, it's not clear what parts of this mess of modifiers actually refers back to the Iliad. The only thing we have to go off of is "a work that." A work that what??? When using modifiers, it's best to include all the information you want to attach to the antecedent (the Iliad) directly before or after it. In this case, it's just too confusing.
B. his translation of the Illiad, a work that took him seven years to complete and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced
This is CORRECT! The past tense "took" makes sense here because we're talking about past tense events that happened at the same time. It's also clear what information is modifying the Iliad, and it's not confusing at all for readers to follow.
C. his translation of the Illiad, a work that had taken seven years to complete and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced it is
This is INCORRECT because it uses the past perfect "had taken" to say that Pope translated the Iliad in seven years BEFORE he began translating it. Doesn't really make sense, does it? How did he finish the translation before he began? This is the wrong verb tense to use here, so let's toss it out. There is also an issue with the phrase "pronounced it is" because the pronoun "it" is vague - is "it" referring to the Iliad or the translation? I know you could INFER that it's the Iliad, but it's not 100% clear - and if a pronoun is not 100% clear on the GMAT, it's likely wrong.
There you have it - option B is the correct choice! It's clear, to the point, and uses the right verb tenses throughout!
Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
This is an incredibly difficult GMAT question, so let's figure out the best way to attack it. To get started, we'll take a quick look over the original question and highlight any major differences between the options in orange:
In 1713, Alexander Pope began his translation of the Illiad, a work that, taking him seven years until completion, and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced the greatest translation in any language.
A. his translation of the Illiad, a work that, taking him seven years until completion, and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced
B. his translation of the Illiad, a work that took him seven years to complete and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced
C. his translation of the Illiad, a work that had taken seven years to complete and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced it is
D. translating the Illiad, a work that took seven years until completion and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced it as
E. translating the Illiad, a work that had taken seven years to complete and literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced it
After a quick glance over the options, we have a LOT of things we can focus on:
1. "his translation of" vs. "translating"
2. "taking" / "took" / "had taken"
3. "until completion" / "to complete"
4. "pronounced" / "pronounced it is" / "pronounced it as" / "pronounced it"
Whenever we have this many things to focus on, it's best to start with things that are "either A or B" situations because they will likely remove 2-3 options right away.
Let's start with #1 on our list: "his translation of" vs. "translating" because no matter which one we choose, it will eliminate a lot of choices!
While it may seem like both phrases are interchangeable, they do mean slightly different things:
In 1713, Alexander Pope began his translation of the Iliad... = His translation isn't the first one. It also suggests he took a different approach to his translation than others who translated it before.
In 1713, Alexander Pope began translating the Iliad... = His translation may or may not be the first one. It also doesn't clearly show that his translation is any different than others who translated it before.
Since the focus of the sentence is that Samuel Johnson pronounced it the best translation ever done, it makes more sense to also clearly show that Pope's translation was different or unique. Therefore, using the phrase "his translation of" is the better choice here. We can eliminate options D & E because the word "translating" doesn't provide the same clarity and emphasis as "his translation of."
There you go - 2 options down! Now, let's take a look at #2 on the list: taking / took / had taken.
A. his translation of the Illiad, a work that, taking him seven years until completion, and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced
This option is INCORRECT because changing the phrase into an -ing modifier doesn't really work here. First off, it's not necessary - you can just say "took" and it's much easier to understand. Second, it's not clear what parts of this mess of modifiers actually refers back to the Iliad. The only thing we have to go off of is "a work that." A work that what??? When using modifiers, it's best to include all the information you want to attach to the antecedent (the Iliad) directly before or after it. In this case, it's just too confusing.
B. his translation of the Illiad, a work that took him seven years to complete and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced
This is CORRECT! The past tense "took" makes sense here because we're talking about past tense events that happened at the same time. It's also clear what information is modifying the Iliad, and it's not confusing at all for readers to follow.
C. his translation of the Illiad, a work that had taken seven years to complete and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced it is
This is INCORRECT because it uses the past perfect "had taken" to say that Pope translated the Iliad in seven years BEFORE he began translating it. Doesn't really make sense, does it? How did he finish the translation before he began? This is the wrong verb tense to use here, so let's toss it out. There is also an issue with the phrase "pronounced it is" because the pronoun "it" is vague - is "it" referring to the Iliad or the translation? I know you could INFER that it's the Iliad, but it's not 100% clear - and if a pronoun is not 100% clear on the GMAT, it's likely wrong.
There you have it - option B is the correct choice! It's clear, to the point, and uses the right verb tenses throughout!
Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
