hotshot02
anje29
Hi Mike,
IMO In option A 'they' is ambiguous . Please correct If I am wrong .
Yeah, even i think so.
In C, it should be "...had already discovered" since we are talking about two events of the past.
In D and E, "...publishing" doesn't make sense.
Dear
anje29 &
hotshot02,
I'm the author of this question and I'm happy to respond.
First of all, let's be perfectly clear. Choice (A) in this problem is a complete train wreck. Even with no pronoun mistake, it would be an irredeemable abomination of an answer choice.
Given that, I would say that the "
they" is
probably ambiguous, at least by GMAT standards. You see, the pronoun-antecedent relationship is complicated, depending on grammar & logic & rhetoric. The grammar question we ask is: what plural nouns precede the pronoun? The two plural-noun candidate are "
the principles of genetics" and "
famous pea plant experiments." But the first is rhetorically elevated because it is part of the focus of the sentence, whereas the second appears in a parenthetical statement, and thus is deemphasized. These two plural nouns are not symmetrical in their weight. This gives the pronoun "
they" more of a link to the first noun. Of course, this is all in a gray area, and in a correct answer on the GMAT, everything about pronoun-antecedent relationship is crystal clear. In real life, the pronoun "they" would probably pass as unambiguous, but it's not up to the GMAT standards.
Two things you should appreciate:
1) There is always a great deal going on, at several different levels, with the pronoun-antecedent relationship. This will help you to appreciate what masterpieces the OAs are on official questions.
2) Even if (A) in this question had no pronoun problem, it would still be very wrong. My advice is to ignore the pronoun problem and focus on everything else that's wrong with (A).
Does all this make sense?
Mike