GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 21 Jul 2018, 00:28

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# In response to persistent accusations of producing a low

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 277
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Other
GPA: 2.44
WE: Project Management (Telecommunications)
In response to persistent accusations of producing a low  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 08 Jun 2013, 08:20
2
2
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

69% (01:12) correct 31% (01:09) wrong based on 328 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In response to persistent accusations of producing a low quality product that is unusable within only a few years, a rim company claims that rapid deterioration of their rims is not the result of poor quality but of misuse; knowing that the rims are designed for sports cars, some purchasers nonetheless use them on SUVs and minivans.

Knowing which of the following would best help to evaluate the rim company’s claim?

(A)Do the rims come with a warranty?

(B)What percentage of rims produced by the company is used on vehicles other than sports cars?

(C)Do rims produced by the company’s main rival have a longer useful life than rims produced by the company?

(D)Do rims produced by the company deteriorate faster when they are used on SUVs or when they are used on minivans?

(E)Did customers who have complained about rim quality use them on sports cars or on other types of vehicles?

Originally posted by guerrero25 on 08 Jun 2013, 04:19.
Last edited by guerrero25 on 08 Jun 2013, 08:20, edited 1 time in total.
VP
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1098
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Re: In response to persistent accusations of producing a low  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2013, 04:53
6
The company states that the deterioration is caused by misuse: the product is made for sport cars but is used improperly, so it brokes and consumers complain.

Knowing which of the following would best help to evaluate the rim company’s claim?

(A)Do the rims come with a warranty?
Out of scope.
(B)What percentage of rims produced by the company is used on vehicles other than sports cars?
This might sounds tempting. However we can rewrite this as "what percentage of rims is used improperly", and this info will not help us to evaluate weather the rims are poorly made.
(C)Do rims produced by the company’s main rival have a longer useful life than rims produced by the company?
We are looking the evaluate the company’s claim, and info about its rival does not help us.
(D)Do rims produced by the company deteriorate faster when they are used on SUVs or when they are used on minivans?
Since both SUVs and minivans are in the "misuse" area, this does not help us.
(E)Did customers who have complained about rim quality use them on sports cars or on other types of vehicles?
CORRECT. If we know the answer to this question we can easily see weather what causes deterioration is misuse or poor quality.
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

##### General Discussion
Intern
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 19
Re: In response to persistent accusations of producing a low  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2013, 06:31
E is the correct answer since the question in E answer choice helps to evaluate the validity of the argument. If the answer is that customers who complaint used rim in sport cars, it weaken the argument. But if the customers who complaint used rim in minivans or SUVs, then the argument is strenghten.
Intern
Joined: 25 Nov 2012
Posts: 6
Re: In response to persistent accusations of producing a low  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2013, 12:09
E is best choice.

If the customers who are complaining of poor quality of RIMS are using them in sports cars then argument of author is weakened.
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Mar 2016
Posts: 400
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.8
WE: Operations (Commercial Banking)
Re: In response to persistent accusations of producing a low  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2016, 11:27
The source of the argument is about "complaints" about longevity that is coming from some unknown source probably the customer. So the most accurate answer is E as knowing exactly if such complainants complied with the actual directions given by the manufacturer. Option E is the right answer.

Note : B is a tempting trap but E is the apt choice
Manager
Joined: 03 May 2015
Posts: 232
Location: South Africa
GPA: 3.49
WE: Web Development (Insurance)
Re: In response to persistent accusations of producing a low  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2016, 05:45
guerrero25 wrote:
In response to persistent accusations of producing a low quality product that is unusable within only a few years, a rim company claims that rapid deterioration of their rims is not the result of poor quality but of misuse; knowing that the rims are designed for sports cars, some purchasers nonetheless use them on SUVs and minivans.

Knowing which of the following would best help to evaluate the rim company’s claim?

(A)Do the rims come with a warranty?

(B)What percentage of rims produced by the company is used on vehicles other than sports cars?

(C)Do rims produced by the company’s main rival have a longer useful life than rims produced by the company?

(D)Do rims produced by the company deteriorate faster when they are used on SUVs or when they are used on minivans?

(E)Did customers who have complained about rim quality use them on sports cars or on other types of vehicles?

I will quickly differentiate between the two tempting choices :

We are evaluating : Deterioration of rim due to misuse or poor quality

B) What percentage of rims produced by the company is used on vehicles other than sports cars

Here nothing is said about deterioration. Say 90% of people use it in places other than sports car. But only 10% are complaining. How do we know whether the people complaining are misusing them? Could be that the 10% complaining are using them in sports car.

Whereas E clarifies it. If we find that the people are using them in sports cars, the CEO is correct. If not, he stands corrected

_________________

Kudos if I helped

SVP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1868
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Re: In response to persistent accusations of producing a low  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2017, 22:53
boiled down to B and E.
E is better than B b/c B does not link with the misuse with the deterioration.

More importantly, what is the source of this question?
Re: In response to persistent accusations of producing a low &nbs [#permalink] 18 Nov 2017, 22:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.