GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 18 Sep 2018, 19:10

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2012
Posts: 8
In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 13 Sep 2018, 23:37
2
4
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (01:22) correct 45% (01:29) wrong based on 683 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many coastal American cities that the waterfront was an undesirable location for residential buildings. As a result, much of the waterfront in these cities was never developed aesthetically and instead was left to industry and commerce. Today, however, waterfront properties are generally seen as prestigious, as evidenced by the large sums paid for homes along the beach front. A developer who wishes to make a large profit would be wise to buy urban waterfront lots and erect residential buildings on them.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim made about urban waterfront properties?

A. People today have more money, relatively speaking, to spend on real estate than they did in previous centuries.
B. Many coastal American cities are encouraging developers to rehabilitate the waterfront through tax incentives.
C. Homeowners will be willing to spend large sums on residential properties in traditionally industrial or commercial districts.
D. Many urban waterfront lots are available for purchase.
E. Properties in interior residential districts in coastal American cities are significantly more expensive than those along the waterfront.

How C can be the answer and D not?

OPEN DISCUSSION OF THIS QUESTION IS HERE: https://gmatclub.com/forum/in-the-18th- ... 91336.html

Originally posted by cangetgmat on 02 Apr 2012, 00:20.
Last edited by Bunuel on 13 Sep 2018, 23:37, edited 2 times in total.
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 281
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Apr 2012, 00:25
1
D is out of scope whether lots are available doesnt alters anything in the argument from the viewpoint of profits etc.

C is the clear winner.
_________________

Practice Practice and practice...!!

If there's a loophole in my analysis--> suggest measures to make it airtight.

Manager
Status: Bunuel's fan!
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 188
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2012, 10:56
Having lots available doesn't really contribute directly to the making a large profit.
Profit depends on the homeowners if they are willing to buy.
Manager
Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Posts: 103
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V23
GPA: 3.8
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 May 2012, 22:29
1
cangetgmat wrote:
In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many coastal American cities that the waterfront was an undesirable location for residential buildings. As a result, much of the waterfront in these cities was never developed aesthetically and instead was left to industry and commerce. Today, however, waterfront properties are generally seen as prestigious, as evidenced by the large sums paid for homes along the beach front. A developer who wishes to make a large profit would be wise to buy urban waterfront lots and erect residential buildings on them.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim made about urban waterfront properties?
A. People today have more money, relatively speaking, to spend on real estate than they did in previous centuries.
B. Many coastal American cities are encouraging developers to rehabilitate the waterfront through tax incentives.
C. Homeowners will be willing to spend large sums on residential properties in traditionally industrial or
commercial districts
D. Many urban waterfront lots are available for purchase--
E. Properties in interior residential districts in coastal American cities are significantly more expensive than those
along the waterfront.

How C can be the answer and D not?

If people are willing to purchase properties in those areas, only then it would be beneficial for the developers who would be building the residential buildings on those places where residential lots were there.

Reason--> Many urban waterfront lots are available for purchase. These properties are already available, so developer would not be benefitted in any way.And according to the stem the developers are to make profits. How could they make profits? Clearly if the People are willing to purchase properties in those areas, the developers would buy the lots and build buildings over those places and thus would earn huge profits.
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 131
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT Date: 07-23-2012
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 May 2012, 12:51
cangetgmat wrote:
In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many coastal American cities that the waterfront was an undesirable location for residential buildings. As a result, much of the waterfront in these cities was never developed aesthetically and instead was left to industry and commerce. Today, however, waterfront properties are generally seen as prestigious, as evidenced by the large sums paid for homes along the beach front. A developer who wishes to make a large profit would be wise to buy urban waterfront lots and erect residential buildings on them.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim made about urban waterfront properties?
A. People today have more money, relatively speaking, to spend on real estate than they did in previous centuries.
B. Many coastal American cities are encouraging developers to rehabilitate the waterfront through tax incentives.
C. Homeowners will be willing to spend large sums on residential properties in traditionally industrial or
commercial districts.
D. Many urban waterfront lots are available for purchase.
E. Properties in interior residential districts in coastal American cities are significantly more expensive than those
along the waterfront.

How C can be the answer and D not?

My Explanation:
Money power doesn't make anyone buy the properties which was considered undesirable earlier so A is out.
B doesn't make any sense.
E is opposite of the of is stated in the paragraph.
D is not correct choice as people are willing to buy waterfront sited because they are prestigious and willing to pay higher price for the same and not because lots of it are available.
C supports the argument that people are willing to spend large sums in industrial or commercial districts which are not in waterfront.
_________________

FOCUS..this is all I need!

Ku-Do!

Manager
Affiliations: Project Management Professional (PMP)
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Posts: 163
Location: New Delhi, India
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jun 2012, 08:31
dexerash wrote:
cangetgmat wrote:
In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many coastal American cities that the waterfront was an undesirable location for residential buildings. As a result, much of the waterfront in these cities was never developed aesthetically and instead was left to industry and commerce. Today, however, waterfront properties are generally seen as prestigious, as evidenced by the large sums paid for homes along the beach front. A developer who wishes to make a large profit would be wise to buy urban waterfront lots and erect residential buildings on them.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim made about urban waterfront properties?
A. People today have more money, relatively speaking, to spend on real estate than they did in previous centuries.
B. Many coastal American cities are encouraging developers to rehabilitate the waterfront through tax incentives.
C. Homeowners will be willing to spend large sums on residential properties in traditionally industrial or
commercial districts.
D. Many urban waterfront lots are available for purchase.
E. Properties in interior residential districts in coastal American cities are significantly more expensive than those
along the waterfront.

How C can be the answer and D not?

My Explanation:
Money power doesn't make anyone buy the properties which was considered undesirable earlier so A is out.
B doesn't make any sense.
E is opposite of the of is stated in the paragraph.
D is not correct choice as people are willing to buy waterfront sited because they are prestigious and willing to pay higher price for the same and not because lots of it are available.
C supports the argument that people are willing to spend large sums in industrial or commercial districts which are not in waterfront.

Can you please explain why option B doesn't makes sense.. Thanks
_________________

Best
Vaibhav

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, Thanks

Retired Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 731
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jun 2012, 02:57
1
Conclusion = A developer who wishes to make a large profit would be wise to buy urban waterfront lots and erect residential buildings on them.

B. Many coastal American cities are encouraging developers to rehabilitate the waterfront through tax incentives. => This is clearly out of scope because it does not relate to the developer's profits. This is only about the policy of the Coastal city in order to develop their own cities.
C. Homeowners will be willing to spend large sums on residential properties in traditionally industrial or commercial districts. => If homeowners are ready to spend large sums on residential properties in traditionally industrial or commercial districts (this is belong to the waterfront) => strengthen the argument
D. Many urban waterfront lots are available for purchase. => the developer will not profit from the waterfront.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Intern
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 14
Location: New York
Schools: Booth, Columbia, Ross, Kellogg
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2012, 10:14
1
If you rephrase C it will be read as "home owners willing to spend on beach front properties". We know that beach front properties are traditionally for industrial or commercial districts.
If anyone wants to make large profit, one of the assumption is there are enough buyers for the property. C supports that.
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 640
Location: Cambridge, MA
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jun 2012, 12:17
1
1
narangvaibhav wrote:
cangetgmat wrote:
In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many coastal American cities that the waterfront was an undesirable location for residential buildings. As a result, much of the waterfront in these cities was never developed aesthetically and instead was left to industry and commerce. Today, however, waterfront properties are generally seen as prestigious, as evidenced by the large sums paid for homes along the beach front. A developer who wishes to make a large profit would be wise to buy urban waterfront lots and erect residential buildings on them.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim made about urban waterfront properties?
A. People today have more money, relatively speaking, to spend on real estate than they did in previous centuries.
B. Many coastal American cities are encouraging developers to rehabilitate the waterfront through tax incentives.
C. Homeowners will be willing to spend large sums on residential properties in traditionally industrial or
commercial districts.
D. Many urban waterfront lots are available for purchase.
E. Properties in interior residential districts in coastal American cities are significantly more expensive than those
along the waterfront.

How C can be the answer and D not?

Can you please explain why option B doesn't makes sense.. Thanks
On the GMAT, "Many" means "More than one." It's entirely possible that many--or even most--cities are not offering such discounts! Regardless, the conclusion in the prompt doesn't make any qualifications about when or where it is wise to buy such properties, just that it is wise to do so; tax incentives, especially tax incentives limited in location to who-knows-how-few cities, are out of scope.
_________________

Eli Meyer
Kaplan Teacher
http://www.kaptest.com/GMAT

Prepare with Kaplan and save \$150 on a course!

Kaplan Reviews

Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 226
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jun 2012, 09:57
Straight C.

If possible are willing to buy houses in former industrial and commercial locations, the plan will succeed.
_________________

+1 Kudos me - I'm half Irish, half Prussian.

Intern
Joined: 19 Feb 2012
Posts: 11
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2012, 20:12
tuanquang269 wrote:
Conclusion = A developer who wishes to make a large profit would be wise to buy urban waterfront lots and erect residential buildings on them.

B. Many coastal American cities are encouraging developers to rehabilitate the waterfront through tax incentives. => This is clearly out of scope because it does not relate to the developer's profits. This is only about the policy of the Coastal city in order to develop their own cities.
C. Homeowners will be willing to spend large sums on residential properties in traditionally industrial or commercial districts. => If homeowners are ready to spend large sums on residential properties in traditionally industrial or commercial districts (this is belong to the waterfront) => strengthen the argument
D. Many urban waterfront lots are available for purchase. => the developer will not profit from the waterfront.

Hi but aren't you making a logical fallacy in choosing E. if all A( water front properties) is B(industrial zones) then all B is A. Although a buyer is interested in industrial properties, it may be so that he does not want it next to any body of water.

Although B is fishy, it shows that developers can make large profits by cutting tax costs. On the other hand, the passage also states the premise that people are interested in buying shore front properties.

I think the OA is debatable

Posted from GMAT ToolKit
VP
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1005
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2012, 01:54
A. People today have more money, relatively speaking, to spend on real estate than they did in previous centuries.

I strongly feel that correct answer is A, Conclusion says the developers are going to make profit of the tower, which if they erect near to beach.

We need to strengthen the fact that if the tower is erected it will be bought by people and Option states that people now have more money to spend on real estate.

It is aslo assumed in the passage that People tend to like real estate project which has aesthetic value, the passage than states that these beach front projects will have more aesthetic.

Hence if people have more money they are going to spend whatever asked by the developer, which will accrue profit to the developers.

Only gap here is " How much money will these developers charge?"
Intern
Joined: 25 Oct 2014
Posts: 11
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Healthcare
GMAT Date: 12-17-2014
GPA: 3.7
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2014, 00:22
developer wishes to develop residential buildings in urban waterfront lots..
if buyers/home owners are willing to spend large sum on the above properties the developer can make lot of profit.

Current Student
Joined: 06 Mar 2014
Posts: 254
Location: India
GMAT Date: 04-30-2015
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2014, 11:10
1
cangetgmat wrote:
In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many coastal American cities that the waterfront was an undesirable location for residential buildings. As a result, much of the waterfront in these cities was never developed aesthetically and instead was left to industry and commerce. Today, however, waterfront properties are generally seen as prestigious, as evidenced by the large sums paid for homes along the beach front. A developer who wishes to make a large profit would be wise to buy urban waterfront lots and erect residential buildings on them.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim made about urban waterfront properties?
A. People today have more money, relatively speaking, to spend on real estate than they did in previous centuries.
B. Many coastal American cities are encouraging developers to rehabilitate the waterfront through tax incentives.
C. Homeowners will be willing to spend large sums on residential properties in traditionally industrial or
commercial districts.

D. Many urban waterfront lots are available for purchase.
E. Properties in interior residential districts in coastal American cities are significantly more expensive than those
along the waterfront.

How C can be the answer and D not?

Two stops solution to the query.
Link the two highlighted portions: it is evident that they are made for each other as far as the Question Stem goes.
Current Student
Status: Birds fly because they have wings, not because they have sky.
Joined: 21 Sep 2014
Posts: 214
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.65
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Apr 2015, 10:16
IMO C.

Profit for developers is assured if and only if people are ready to pay large sums on residential property.
_________________

Regards,
J

--------------------------------------------------
Consider Kudos if I helped in some way!!!

Perseverance is the hard work you do after you get tired of doing the hard work you already did.

Intern
Joined: 11 Nov 2013
Posts: 21
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 May 2016, 12:23
I think if the word "many" was not there in option D) then D) becomes an assumption and by default a strengthener.It might have been the second choice.Experts help!!
Intern
Joined: 24 Sep 2015
Posts: 4
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Mar 2017, 00:12
jugglerG2 wrote:
IMO C.

Profit for developers is assured if and only if people are ready to pay large sums on residential property.

Option C says traditional commercial areas..but those areas need not be near to beach side for which customers will pay amount.
Please elaborate on the approach to solve this moderators...
Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Posts: 245
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: Q167 V147
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Mar 2017, 06:34
Hi experts,
I get stuck between (B) and (C).
(C) tells us that people are will to spend money on urban waterfront.However,this doesn't mean the developers will reap profit as it may cost a lot to improve such areas.
Whereas (B) says something about the tax incentives.Such benefits may reduce the cost of development but still,these benefits don't ensure the profit.
Did I miss anything?

Thanks
Senior Manager
Status: Active
Affiliations: NA
Joined: 24 Oct 2012
Posts: 294
GMAT 1: 590 Q50 V21
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V37
GPA: 3.5
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Apr 2017, 04:27
sleepynut wrote:
Hi experts,
I get stuck between (B) and (C).
(C) tells us that people are will to spend money on urban waterfront.However,this doesn't mean the developers will reap profit as it may cost a lot to improve such areas.
Whereas (B) says something about the tax incentives.Such benefits may reduce the cost of development but still,these benefits don't ensure the profit.
Did I miss anything?

Thanks

Hi,
Yes you are correct .

Conclusion : A developer who wishes to make a large profit would be wise to buy urban waterfront lots and erect residential.

Option B doesn't confirm that people are interested to buy those properties whereas Option A does.
_________________

#If you like my post , please encourage me by giving Kudos

Director
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 513
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Apr 2017, 09:00
In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many coastal American cities that the waterfront was an undesirable location for residential buildings. As a result, much of the waterfront in these cities was never developed aesthetically and instead was left to industry and commerce. Today, however, waterfront properties are generally seen as prestigious, as evidenced by the large sums paid for homes along the beach front. A developer who wishes to make a large profit would be wise to buy urban waterfront lots and erect residential
buildings on them.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim made about urban waterfront properties?

A. People today have more money, relatively speaking, to spend on real estate than they did in previous centuries.
The spending capacity of the people is not impacting anything for the given argument.

B. Many coastal American cities are encouraging developers to rehabilitate the waterfront through tax incentives.
This is weakner because the city municipals are giving tax incentives and that means that not many people are buying.

C. Homeowners will be willing to spend large sums on residential properties in traditionally industrial or commercial districts.
The Argument clearly mentions that the waterfronts were having industrial and commercial.

D. Many urban waterfront lots are available for purchase.
This means that there are not as many buyers as sellers.Not supporting.

E. Properties in interior residential districts in coastal American cities are significantly more expensive than those along the waterfront.
Weakens.
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many &nbs [#permalink] 07 Apr 2017, 09:00

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 24 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many

Moderators: GMATNinja, GMATNinjaTwo

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.