GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 24 Sep 2018, 03:21

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 376

### Show Tags

Updated on: 04 Aug 2013, 23:05
8
63
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

66% (01:41) correct 34% (02:09) wrong based on 3014 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad economic recession has included a business downturn in the clothing trade, where sales are down by about 7 percent as compared to two years ago. Clothing wholesalers have found, however, that the proportion of credit extended to retailers that was paid off on time fell sharply in the first year of the recession but returned to its prerecession level in the second year.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the change between the first and the second year of the recession in the proportion of credit not paid off on time?

(A) The total amount of credit extended to retailers by clothing wholesalers increased between the first year of the recession and the second year.
(B) Between the first and second years of the recession, clothing retailers in Veltria saw many of their costs, rent and utilities in particular, increase.
(C) Of the considerable number of clothing retailers in Veltria who were having financial difficulties before the start of the recession, virtually all were forced to go out of business during its first year.
(D) Clothing retailers in Veltria attempted to stimulate sales in the second year of the recession by discounting merchandise.
(E) Relatively recession-proof segments of the clothing trade, such as work clothes, did not suffer any decrease in sales during the first year of the recession.

Originally posted by gurpreet07 on 02 Dec 2009, 12:03.
Last edited by Zarrolou on 04 Aug 2013, 23:05, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question.
Intern
Joined: 11 Oct 2009
Posts: 25
Schools: HEC,Paris
Re: In the country of Veltria  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Dec 2009, 10:02
29
3
ok,i must admit one thing, i have arrived at C purely on the basis of aggressive elimination strategy . so i am not really sure.

nevertheless i will try to explain my reasoning.

the premise is that there was a recession that affected sales. given timeline is 2 years. now there seems to be an ongoing tradition of credit between the wholesalers and retailers. this relationship suffered a bit in the first year but it was back on track in the second.
so on to the choices:

A: more credit extended between years 1 and 2 is irrelevant to the repayment. so OUT.
B:If costs for retailers increased during year 2, then how can they repay more? so OUT.
D: the retailers ATTEMPTED to increase sales by discounting. but were they any good at raising money to repay loans? not very clear ... so OUT.
E: if recession did not affect some divisions... er... so what? can't find any connection.. so out

last option: C..... bankruptcy for competitiors meant less competition. so the survivors found more customers who bought their stuff. hence they raised money and repaid in the 2nd year.

what is the OA?
Intern
Joined: 05 Jun 2013
Posts: 11
Schools: Sloan '16
GMAT Date: 08-31-2013
Re: In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2013, 08:37
14
1
I would confess this question stumped me initially but it's a sheer beauty how the question is crafted with creating substantial confusion (to process in less than 2 mins ). Explanation-

1st year of recession
100 units of credit was offered similar to 10 retailers (10 units each)
5 poor performers were able to pay back 5 unit each and
5 good performers returned 8 units each (its recession after all )
total credit recovered = 5 x 5 + 5 x 8 = 65
proportion = (total credit recovered) / (total credit given) = 65 / 100 = 0.65

2nd year of recession
Since only 5 players remain, credit extended this year itself will reduce (10 units each) = 50 units
5 good performers returned 7 units each (again considering scenario that even good performers had bad time)
total credit recovered = 5 x 7 = 35
proportion = (total credit recovered) / (total credit given) = 35 / 50 = 0.70

The point to be noted here is that choice C does the trick of reducing the denominator considerably (people are out of business) by stating the basis to be "proportion" instead of actual amount. So, even though the actual amount recovered 2nd year is far less due to recession (35 against 65) than the 1st year, the proportion recovered increases.

I hope this adds some value.

Thanks!
##### General Discussion
Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2009
Posts: 104
Location: United States
Re: In the country of Veltria  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2009, 12:33
1
The stimulus is a bit confusing but I think they're saying that people paid less debt in Year 1 than in Year 2. So the answer should be something about Year 2 being better economically than Year 1.

I don't see how extending more credit in Year 2 (A) would make retailers pay back more debt.

(B) means more expenses for retailers in Year 2, so this can't be right.

If they went bankrupt, why would they pay more debt back (C)?

(E) makes Year 1 seem better but less people paid debt then...

I'm going with (D) - they paid off debt in Year 2 by selling merchandise at a discount (dumping inventory).

Whatya all think?
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 376
Re: In the country of Veltria  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2009, 12:54
johnnymac wrote:
The stimulus is a bit confusing but I think they're saying that people paid less debt in Year 1 than in Year 2. So the answer should be something about Year 2 being better economically than Year 1.

I don't see how extending more credit in Year 2 (A) would make retailers pay back more debt.

(B) means more expenses for retailers in Year 2, so this can't be right.

If they went bankrupt, why would they pay more debt back (C)?

(E) makes Year 1 seem better but less people paid debt then...

I'm going with (D) - they paid off debt in Year 2 by selling merchandise at a discount (dumping inventory).

Whatya all think?

I marked E... but its not the correct ans.. , even D is not the correct one
I am just waiting for some more responses and then will reveal the OA
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 376
Re: In the country of Veltria  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Dec 2009, 10:22
6
nitronori41 wrote:
ok,i must admit one thing, i have arrived at C purely on the basis of aggressive elimination strategy . so i am not really sure.

nevertheless i will try to explain my reasoning.

the premise is that there was a recession that affected sales. given timeline is 2 years. now there seems to be an ongoing tradition of credit between the wholesalers and retailers. this relationship suffered a bit in the first year but it was back on track in the second.
so on to the choices:

A: more credit extended between years 1 and 2 is irrelevant to the repayment. so OUT.
B:If costs for retailers increased during year 2, then how can they repay more? so OUT.
D: the retailers ATTEMPTED to increase sales by discounting. but were they any good at raising money to repay loans? not very clear ... so OUT.
E: if recession did not affect some divisions... er... so what? can't find any connection.. so out

last option: C..... bankruptcy for competitiors meant less competition. so the survivors found more customers who bought their stuff. hence they raised money and repaid in the 2nd year.

what is the OA?

nice explanation yes the OA is C
Manager
Joined: 13 Nov 2009
Posts: 56
Schools: Columbia(RD-ding w/o int),
Re: In the country of Veltria  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Dec 2009, 10:25
1

The only option that can solve the discrepancy of retailers were able to pay off the credit to the wholesalers.
Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2009
Posts: 104
Location: United States
Re: In the country of Veltria  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Dec 2009, 11:25
1
Looking at it now, C makes sense.

I guess I was overthinking and considering whether bankrupt companies would be considered defaulting on their debts. I understand your logi c to be: if a bunch of the companies don't exist anymore, the leftover companies are more likely to pay the money back - and that make sense.
Director
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 814
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Re: In the country of Veltria  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 May 2010, 01:48
I usually come up with 1-2 reasons to support my answer but for this question, I was really stumped. But, yes I was hovering over less available profits/finanaces for these defaulters.

As I am managing my retail business, thie helped me to reach C by PoE

I hope GMAT would be nice to me on D-day.
_________________

Tricky Quant problems: http://gmatclub.com/forum/50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: http://gmatclub.com/forum/key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Posts: 154
Re: In the country of Veltria  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 May 2010, 01:49
IMO C.

A) Credit extended to retailers increased. it doesn't say anything about how much the retailers returned.

B)if the prices increased, the retailers should have had difficulty returning the credit.

C)Correct. Since the retailers with financial difficulties are out of business, the remaining ones could easily pay off their debt. This explains why credit extended to retailers that was paid off on time fell in the first year of the recession but returned to its prerecession level in the second year.

D)Attempted: not sure if they could really do it.

E) out of scope.
Manager
Status: GMAT in 4 weeks
Joined: 28 Mar 2010
Posts: 164
GPA: 3.89
Re: In the country of Veltria  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2011, 07:57
I think the explanation give for answer choice C is far fetched. It says considerable number for vendor ran out of business. But that dose not give us the liberty to presume that remain did good business.
While choice D leaves no room for assumptions. Explains both part year one and year two
_________________

If you liked my post, please consider a Kudos for me. Thanks!

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 511
Re: In the country of Veltria  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2011, 07:02
4
Of the considerable number of clothing retailers
in Veltria who were having financial difficulties
before the start of the recession, virtually all
were forced to go out of business during its
first year.

these retailers who were having financial difficulties were more likely to default on credit. so they defaulted in first year of recession and went out of business. which also means credit in the second year was extended to only those remaining in business.
the remaining were not having financial difficulties so they stayed in business and managed to pay credit by the end of second year.
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Manager
Status: Dream big, work hard, and drink gallons of beer!
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 157
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT Date: 10-01-2011
WE: Web Development (Consulting)
Re: In the country of Veltria  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2011, 21:19
Stumped initially but somehow managed to select C.
_________________

If I look absent-minded or insane, I am just living a dream of being successful. If you still wonder why I am like this, you have no idea how success tastes like!

Intern
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2
Re: In the country of Veltria  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2011, 10:26
Can someone please explain why C is better than D?

C assumes that retailers will gain if competitors go out of business. Is this a valid assumption given the broad economic recession?

Also, C does not indicate the percentage of businessmen who had financial difficulties.

I am leaning more towards D, although it is not clear if the attempt made by retailers was fruitful.

Thanks!
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 62
Re: In the country of Veltria  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2011, 19:59
3
gmat1112 wrote:
Can someone please explain why C is better than D?

C assumes that retailers will gain if competitors go out of business. Is this a valid assumption given the broad economic recession?

I don't see the above assumption in C. All C tries to say is that a large proportion of retailers were having financial difficulties before the start of recession; these retailers went out of business in the first year. Now, the assumption that I do see is, these people who had financial difficulties before the start of recession are likely to have missed their dues to the creditors during the first year. Thus, those who had financial difficulties ( further burdened by the recession ) during the first year could have been the reason for the unusual percentage of credit defaults. Once they were out of business, the proportion of debts that were payed off returned to prerecession levels.

gmat1112 wrote:
Also, C does not indicate the percentage of businessmen who had financial difficulties.

C does indicate the percentage of businessmen who had financial difficulties before recession. The lines "Of the considerable number of clothing retailers in Veltria who were having financial difficulties before the start of the recession, virtually all were forced" indicate a relatively large proportion.

gmat1112 wrote:
I am leaning more towards D, although it is not clear if the attempt made by retailers was fruitful.

Even if the retailer's efforts as described by D were to be successful, considering the recession, there is no reason to think that their profit margins will be enough to payback the creditors. This further weakens D.
Manager
Status: Next engagement on Nov-19-2011
Joined: 12 Jan 2011
Posts: 66
Location: New Delhi, India
Schools: IIM, ISB, & XLRI
WE 1: B.Tech (Information Technology)
Re: In the country of Veltria  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2011, 10:36
1
"C"

After elemination left with C
_________________

Preparation for final battel:
GMAT PREP-1 750 Q50 V41 - Oct 16 2011
GMAT PREP-2 710 Q50 V36 - Oct 22 2011 ==> Scored 50 in Quant second time in a row
MGMAT---- -1 560 Q28 V39 - Oct 29 2011 ==> Left Quant half done and continued with Verbal. Happy to see Q39

My ongoing plan: http://gmatclub.com/forum/550-to-630-need-more-to-achieve-my-dream-121613.html#p989311

Appreciate by kudos !!

Director
Joined: 28 Jun 2011
Posts: 829
Re: In the country of Veltria  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2011, 14:31
2
c
Intern
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 49

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2012, 10:55
In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad economic recession has included a business downturn in the clothing trade, where sales are down by about 7 percent as compared to two years ago. Clothing wholesalers have found, however, that the proportion of credit extended to retailers that was paid off on time fell sharply in the first year of the recession but returned to its prerecession level in the second year.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the change between the first and the second year of the recession in the proportion of credit not paid off on time?

(A) The total amount of credit extended to retailers by clothing wholesalers increased between the first year of the recession and the second year.
(B) Between the first and second years of the recession, clothing retailers in Veltria saw many of their costs, rent and utilities in particular, increase.
(C) Of the considerable number of clothing retailers in Veltria who were having financial difficulties before the start of the recession, virtually all were forced to go out of business during its first year.
(D) Clothing retailers in Veltria attempted to stimulate sales in the second year of the recession by discounting merchandise.
(E) Relatively recession-proof segments of the clothing trade, such as work clothes, did not suffer any decrease in sales during the first year of the recession.
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2011
Posts: 342
Re: In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2012, 16:29
1
7
betterscore wrote:
In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad economic recession has included a business downturn in the clothing trade, where sales are down by about 7 percent as compared to two years ago. Clothing wholesalers have found, however, that the proportion of credit extended to retailers that was paid off on time fell sharply in the first year of the recession but returned to its prerecession level in the second year.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the change between the first and the second year of the recession in the proportion of credit not paid off on time?

(A) The total amount of credit extended to retailers by clothing wholesalers increased between the first year of the recession and the second year.
(B) Between the first and second years of the recession, clothing retailers in Veltria saw many of their costs, rent and utilities in particular, increase.
(C) Of the considerable number of clothing retailers in Veltria who were having financial difficulties before the start of the recession, virtually all were forced to go out of business during its first year.
(D) Clothing retailers in Veltria attempted to stimulate sales in the second year of the recession by discounting merchandise.
(E) Relatively recession-proof segments of the clothing trade, such as work clothes, did not suffer any decrease in sales during the first year of the recession.

Pls check the detail discussion in below link -
_________________

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What you do TODAY is important because you're exchanging a day of your life for it!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2012
Posts: 18
Re: In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2012, 02:02
what about A? the argument is on proportion. Retired/total credit: If total increased between year one year two, the ratio would decrease in the first year. Infact, donot know about the second year. Need help on this
Re: In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad &nbs [#permalink] 15 Sep 2012, 02:02

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 40 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad

## Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.