Last visit was: 26 Mar 2025, 07:52 It is currently 26 Mar 2025, 07:52
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
shorteverything
Joined: 11 Jul 2010
Last visit: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
488
 [460]
Given Kudos: 2
Concentration: Finance
 Q44  V41
Posts: 27
Kudos: 488
 [460]
40
Kudos
Add Kudos
418
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 26 March 2025
Posts: 100,089
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 92,710
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 100,089
Kudos: 711,026
 [367]
174
Kudos
Add Kudos
193
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
subhashghosh
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Last visit: 25 Jun 2024
Posts: 902
Own Kudos:
1,235
 [36]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Products:
Posts: 902
Kudos: 1,235
 [36]
24
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
chaoswithin
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Last visit: 03 Apr 2012
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
21
 [4]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.29
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Posts: 23
Kudos: 21
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Well this is how I would solve this.

Original statement:

What is x?

Without jumping into statements, we can clearly see that x = 180 - ARSQ - ATSU.

Statement 1:

Statement 1 says that triangle QRS is isosceles. with ARSQ = ARQS

therefore we know that ARSQ = (180 - ASRQ)/2.

However, without information about triangle TSU cannot solve the above equation about x.

Insufficient

Statement 2:

Statement 2 says that triangle TSU is isosceles with ATSU = (180 - ASTU)/2.
Similar to statement 1, not enough information about triangle RSQ to find x.

Insufficient.

Statement 1 + 2:

From statement 1: we know that ARSQ = (180-ASRQ)/2
From statement 2: we know that ATSU = (180-ASTU)/2

Plugging these information into the x = 180 - ARSQ - ATSU we see that

x = 180 - (180-ASRQ)/2 - (180-ASTU)/2 = 180 - (360/2) + (ASRQ + ASTU)/2 = (ASRQ + ASTU)/2

Since we know points RTP makes a right triangle, we know that ASRQ + ASTU = 90.

x = 45.

Sufficient.

My answer would be C.
avatar
Petermeterdeter
Joined: 13 Mar 2015
Last visit: 17 Mar 2015
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Posts: 2
Kudos: 1
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How do I know it is not actually equilateral?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 26 March 2025
Posts: 100,089
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 92,710
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 100,089
Kudos: 711,026
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Petermeterdeter
How do I know it is not actually equilateral?

All angles in equilateral triangle are 60 degrees, thus a right triangle (a triangle with one 90-degree angle) cannot be equilateral.

Does this make sense?
avatar
Petermeterdeter
Joined: 13 Mar 2015
Last visit: 17 Mar 2015
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ok. Here is what I don't get.
To solve this question it is assumed that the two triangles RQS and SUT are isosceles triangles. This assumption is based on the condition QS=QR. My problem however is that an equilateral triangle QS=QR=SR would also satisfy the condition QS=QR. In that way the angles could be either 45-45-90 or 60-60-60. So what am I missing that gives proof that these triangles are Isosceles? As far as I know one should never make assumptions based on the graphs in the GMAT.

thanks for quick response
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 26 March 2025
Posts: 100,089
Own Kudos:
711,026
 [2]
Given Kudos: 92,710
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 100,089
Kudos: 711,026
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Petermeterdeter
Ok. Here is what I don't get.
To solve this question it is assumed that the two triangles RQS and SUT are isosceles triangles. This assumption is based on the condition QS=QR. My problem however is that an equilateral triangle QS=QR=SR would also satisfy the condition QS=QR. In that way the angles could be either 45-45-90 or 60-60-60. So what am I missing that gives proof that these triangles are Isosceles? As far as I know one should never make assumptions based on the graphs in the GMAT.

thanks for quick response


Two notes on this:
1. An isosceles triangle has at least two sides of the same length, which means that if a triangle is equilateral it could still be considered as isosceles.

2. Triangle QSR is not necessarily 45-45-90 or 60-60-60. Why cannot it be say, 15-15-150?
User avatar
shasadou
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Last visit: 24 Nov 2022
Posts: 220
Own Kudos:
2,952
 [8]
Given Kudos: 1,477
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 640 Q40 V37
GMAT 2: 650 Q43 V36
GMAT 3: 600 Q47 V27
GPA: 3.3
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT 3: 600 Q47 V27
Posts: 220
Kudos: 2,952
 [8]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi

for geom it is often more convenient to name angles your own way to avoid excessive abstraction: a, b, c, d (please the attached file) - because many of the angles get cancelled out during calculations and overall the less astractive the more comprehensible.

We are given that angle RPT=90. We derive that QSTU is a rectangle where one of the angles = x = 360 - 90 - c - d. We also understand that x = 180 - a - b.

ANSWER C:

ST 1: QR=RS hence a=a=angle RQS=angle RSQ - insufficient, because we do not know how other angles relate to each other and to x. At this point we understand that knowing b would suffice the question.

ST 2: ST=UT hence b=b - insufficient for the same reasons stated above. Clearly this statement gives just the same piece of information as the statement 1 does. We also understand it is a good thing to combine both statements.

ST 2 + ST 1: at this point we can stop and choose C because the stimulus gives you a bold hint that one of the angles of the triangle equals 90, x is within the rectangle where one of the angles is 90, 2 of the smaller triangles are isosceles, those base angles in the triangles are adjacent to x - having taken a short glimpse of all those factors you could figure out halfway that this is pretty much enough for a geom question like that to avoid answer E and choose C.

However, this is the solution for C:

1. x=180-(a+b) and x=360-(90+c+d)
2. a=180-c and b=180-d
3. combine (1) and (2): 360-90-c-d = 180 - (180-c) - (180-d)
4. c+d=225
5. x=360-(90+225)=45
Attachments

File comment: visualization
Capture.JPG
Capture.JPG [ 20.69 KiB | Viewed 148101 times ]

User avatar
Resad95
Joined: 11 Sep 2016
Last visit: 05 Jan 2025
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
47
 [3]
Given Kudos: 128
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 570 Q44 V27
GPA: 3.11
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
GMAT 1: 570 Q44 V27
Posts: 40
Kudos: 47
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
blazov
In the figure shown , what is the value of x?

(1) The length of segment QR is equal to the length of line segment RS

(2) The length of segment ST is Equal to the length of line segment TU

Statement 1: Gives us nothing , since we don't know any other angles or property to compute other angles

Statement 2: Gives us nothing , since we don't know any other angles or property to compute other angles

Combined: We know that \(\angle\)RQS and \(\angle\)RSQ are same, since have also equal sides RS=RQ. Also angles \(\angle\)TSU and \(\angle\)TUS are same since ST=TU

We will name angles as below for simplicity;

\(\angle\) RQS=Z, \(\angle\)RSQ=Z, \(\angle\)QRS=B

\(\angle\)TSU=W, \(\angle\)TUS=W, \(\angle\)STU=C

So, we know that: \(90^{\circ}\)+B+C=180 meaning, B+C=\(90^{\circ}\)

I we add up angles of both triangles of QRS and STU: \(\angle\)B+2 *\(\angle\)Z+\(\angle\)C+2 *\(\angle\)W=\(360^{\circ}\)

Since we know \(\angle\)B+\(\angle\)C=\(90^{\circ}\), we subtract it: 2 *\(\angle\)Z+2 *\(\angle\)W=\(270^{\circ}\)

We can divide both sides by 2 and get : \(\angle\)Z+\(\angle\)W=\(135^{\circ}\)

To find \(\angle\)SQP and \(\angle\)SUP
360-\(\angle\)(Z+W)=\(225^{\circ}\)

\(\angle\)SQPU=\(360^{\circ}\)
90+225+x=\(360^{\circ}\)

X=\(45^{\circ}\)

Both statements together are enough. Answer C
Attachments

File comment: Explanation
GMAT triangle.png
GMAT triangle.png [ 87.14 KiB | Viewed 147085 times ]

User avatar
Cez005
Joined: 13 Dec 2013
Last visit: 11 Feb 2020
Posts: 97
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 122
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT 1: 710 Q46 V41
GMAT 2: 720 Q48 V40
GPA: 4
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT 2: 720 Q48 V40
Posts: 97
Kudos: 141
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

In the figure shown, what is the value of x?

\(x+\angle{QSR}+\angle{UST}=180\) (straight line =180) and \(\angle{R}+\angle{T}=90\) (as PRT is right angle)


(1) The length of line segment QR is equal to the length of line segment RS --> triangle QRS is isosceles --> \(\angle{RQS}=\angle{QSR}=\frac{180-\angle{R}}{2}\) (as \(\angle{RQS}+\angle{QSR}+\angle{R}=180\) --> \(2*\angle{QSR}+\angle{R}=180\) --> \(\angle{QSR}=\frac{180-\angle{R}}{2}\)). Not sufficient.


(2) The length of line segment ST is equal to the length of line segment TU --> triangle UST is isosceles --> \(\angle{SUT}=\angle{UST}=\frac{180-\angle{T}}{2}\). Not sufficient.


(1)+(2) \(x+\angle{QSR}+\angle{UST}=180\) --> \(x+\frac{180-\angle{R}}{2}+\frac{180-\angle{T}}{2}=180\) --> \(x+\frac{360-(\angle{R}+\angle{T})}{2}=180\) --> since \(\angle{R}+\angle{T}=90\) --> \(x+\frac{360-90}{2}=180\) --> \(x=45\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hi Bunuel, I'm trying to understand the working after \(x+\angle{QSR}+\angle{UST}=180\) but I can't see how you reach the answer. Can you help clarify for me?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 26 March 2025
Posts: 100,089
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 92,710
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 100,089
Kudos: 711,026
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Cez005
Bunuel

In the figure shown, what is the value of x?

\(x+\angle{QSR}+\angle{UST}=180\) (straight line =180) and \(\angle{R}+\angle{T}=90\) (as PRT is right angle)


(1) The length of line segment QR is equal to the length of line segment RS --> triangle QRS is isosceles --> \(\angle{RQS}=\angle{QSR}=\frac{180-\angle{R}}{2}\) (as \(\angle{RQS}+\angle{QSR}+\angle{R}=180\) --> \(2*\angle{QSR}+\angle{R}=180\) --> \(\angle{QSR}=\frac{180-\angle{R}}{2}\)). Not sufficient.


(2) The length of line segment ST is equal to the length of line segment TU --> triangle UST is isosceles --> \(\angle{SUT}=\angle{UST}=\frac{180-\angle{T}}{2}\). Not sufficient.


(1)+(2) \(x+\angle{QSR}+\angle{UST}=180\) --> \(x+\frac{180-\angle{R}}{2}+\frac{180-\angle{T}}{2}=180\) --> \(x+\frac{360-(\angle{R}+\angle{T})}{2}=180\) --> since \(\angle{R}+\angle{T}=90\) --> \(x+\frac{360-90}{2}=180\) --> \(x=45\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hi Bunuel, I'm trying to understand the working after \(x+\angle{QSR}+\angle{UST}=180\) but I can't see how you reach the answer. Can you help clarify for me?

For (1)+(2) we have \(x+\angle{QSR}+\angle{UST}=180\).

From (1): \(\angle{QSR}=\frac{180-\angle{R}}{2}\).

From (2): \(\angle{UST}=\frac{180-\angle{T}}{2}\).

Substitute these into \(x+\angle{QSR}+\angle{UST}=180\) to get \(x+\frac{180-\angle{R}}{2}+\frac{180-\angle{T}}{2}=180\). This leads to \(x+\frac{360-(\angle{R}+\angle{T})}{2}=180\). Since \(\angle{R}+\angle{T}=90\), then \(x+\frac{360-90}{2}=180\) --> \(x=45\).

Hope it helps.
User avatar
ravikumarmishra
Joined: 10 Aug 2009
Last visit: 11 Apr 2019
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 89
Products:
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V31
Posts: 51
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

In the figure shown, what is the value of x?

\(x+\angle{QSR}+\angle{UST}=180\) (straight line =180) and \(\angle{R}+\angle{T}=90\) (as PRT is right angle)


(1) The length of line segment QR is equal to the length of line segment RS --> triangle QRS is isosceles --> \(\angle{RQS}=\angle{QSR}=\frac{180-\angle{R}}{2}\) (as \(\angle{RQS}+\angle{QSR}+\angle{R}=180\) --> \(2*\angle{QSR}+\angle{R}=180\) --> \(\angle{QSR}=\frac{180-\angle{R}}{2}\)). Not sufficient.


(2) The length of line segment ST is equal to the length of line segment TU --> triangle UST is isosceles --> \(\angle{SUT}=\angle{UST}=\frac{180-\angle{T}}{2}\). Not sufficient.


(1)+(2) \(x+\angle{QSR}+\angle{UST}=180\) --> \(x+\frac{180-\angle{R}}{2}+\frac{180-\angle{T}}{2}=180\) --> \(x+\frac{360-(\angle{R}+\angle{T})}{2}=180\) --> since \(\angle{R}+\angle{T}=90\) --> \(x+\frac{360-90}{2}=180\) --> \(x=45\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Thanks Bunuel, perfect solution. For more practice, can you please provide links for similar problems, thanks.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 26 March 2025
Posts: 100,089
Own Kudos:
711,026
 [4]
Given Kudos: 92,710
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 100,089
Kudos: 711,026
 [4]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ravikumarmishra
Bunuel

In the figure shown, what is the value of x?

\(x+\angle{QSR}+\angle{UST}=180\) (straight line =180) and \(\angle{R}+\angle{T}=90\) (as PRT is right angle)


(1) The length of line segment QR is equal to the length of line segment RS --> triangle QRS is isosceles --> \(\angle{RQS}=\angle{QSR}=\frac{180-\angle{R}}{2}\) (as \(\angle{RQS}+\angle{QSR}+\angle{R}=180\) --> \(2*\angle{QSR}+\angle{R}=180\) --> \(\angle{QSR}=\frac{180-\angle{R}}{2}\)). Not sufficient.


(2) The length of line segment ST is equal to the length of line segment TU --> triangle UST is isosceles --> \(\angle{SUT}=\angle{UST}=\frac{180-\angle{T}}{2}\). Not sufficient.


(1)+(2) \(x+\angle{QSR}+\angle{UST}=180\) --> \(x+\frac{180-\angle{R}}{2}+\frac{180-\angle{T}}{2}=180\) --> \(x+\frac{360-(\angle{R}+\angle{T})}{2}=180\) --> since \(\angle{R}+\angle{T}=90\) --> \(x+\frac{360-90}{2}=180\) --> \(x=45\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Thanks Bunuel, perfect solution. For more practice, can you please provide links for similar problems, thanks.




23. Geometry




24. Coordinate Geometry




25. Triangles




26. Polygons




27. Circles




28. Rectangular Solids and Cylinders




29. Graphs and Illustrations



For other subjects:
ALL YOU NEED FOR QUANT ! ! !
Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread
User avatar
avigutman
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 03 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,296
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1,296
Kudos: 1,859
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Video solution from Quant Reasoning starts at 0:26
Subscribe for more: https://www.youtube.com/QuantReasoning? ... irmation=1
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 26 Mar 2025
Posts: 4,862
Own Kudos:
8,385
 [1]
Given Kudos: 226
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,862
Kudos: 8,385
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The biggest difficulty that one may face on this question is to stop oneself from thinking about complex ideas to solve the question. Once we get to the answer, you will realize that even 700 level questions on the GMAT test basic concepts very often.

From the diagram, we recognize that triangle PRT is a right-angled triangle, right-angled at P. Therefore, angles R and T should add up to 90 degrees.

From statement I alone, length of QR = length of RS. Therefore, angle RQS = angle RSQ = y (say)
There is no information about the other angles or the other line segments. Statement I alone is insufficient. Answer options A and D can be eliminated. Possible answer options are B, C or E.

From statement II alone, length of ST = length of TU. Therefore, angle TSU = angle TUS = z (say).
There is no information about the other angles or the other line segments. Statement II alone is insufficient. Answer option B can be eliminated. Possible answer options are C or E.

Combining statements I and II, we have the following:

From statement I alone, angle RQS = angle RSQ = y. Therefore, angle QRS = 180 – 2y (from the interior angle property of a triangle).
From statement II alone, angle TSU = angle TUS = z. Therefore, angle STU = 180 – 2z (from the interior angle property of a triangle).

IN triangle PRT, angle PRT + angle PTR = 90 degrees (angle TPR = 90 degrees).

Since angle PRT = angle QRS and angle PTR = angle STU, we can substitute the magnitudes of these angles in the equation above.
Therefore, 180 – 2y + 180 – 2z = 90. Simplifying, we obtain y+z = 135.

In the given diagram, angle RSQ + angle QSU + angle TSU = 180 (linearly adjacent angles add up to 180 degrees)
Substituting the values, we have y + x + z = 180. Since y + z = 135, x = 45 degrees.

The combination of statements is sufficient to answer the question. Answer option E can be eliminated.

The correct answer option is C.

If the diagram appears complex, it is not necessary that the solution should consist of complex concepts. That's the learning from this 700 level Geometry question.

Hope that helps!
Aravind B T
Attachments

09th June 2021 - Reply 1.JPG
09th June 2021 - Reply 1.JPG [ 63.21 KiB | Viewed 57773 times ]

User avatar
Thelegend2631
Joined: 04 May 2020
Last visit: 23 Mar 2025
Posts: 373
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 309
Status:What goes round comes around, so does Kudos.
Location: India
GPA: 3
WE:Business Development (Retail Banking)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel VeritasKarishma chetan2u IanStewart

Experts..

Looking at statements 1 and 2 , I could immediately figure out there's an incentre with s,q and u as its tangents.

But i could not get into calculations and deduce Angle (Qst)

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 36,708
Own Kudos:
Posts: 36,708
Kudos: 963
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderator:
Math Expert
100089 posts