abhimahna
aveek86
It is always better to reward those who are helpful for the forum. But if you are rewarding “ONLY those" then by definition you are discouraging the “rest”, who are not helpful for the forum and does mostly the
GMAT Timer, clicks all the links appear every time the page refreshes and goes for various offers and discounts.
I understand your logic from your stand as an entrepreneur and creator of the group, but I doubt whether you understand the logic of ours, “who are not helpful for the forum” but here to study and make the forum popular.
Anyways I think I should end the discussion here and go by the Kudos rule.
Thanks for your reply.
Hi
aveek86 ,
Reward system started just a few months ago. People have been using this forum for almost 15 years now. So, your point in completely invalid.
This forum is mainly meant for us(GMAT Takers).
You should visit,utilize what all has been provided to you for free, seek help from anyone and prepare for GMAT. That's the beauty of this forum.
Reward system is meant only for those who are contributors. It's again another way to bring more and more people contribute/help others and make this forum more helpful for other test takers.
Your point is completely invalid as you are not visiting here to get rewarded with these stuffs. My friend, you are here for yourself. You are aiming to score a good score and thus seeking help from people around the world during your preparation.
Hi abhimanha,
I think you should know the history first before giving comments on why they are here for.
Reward system first introduced for everyone, but there were some point cheaters "fake contributors" who were posting useless posts for getting rewarded and to stop them the new kudos system has been implemented. The priority was to stop those fake contributors from getting rewarded, but due to the software implementation, us, the GMAT Takers and
GMAT Timer users get victimised.
So the issue was, is and will always be to stop those point cheaters without discouraging the
GMAT Timer users. So dear friend no one's point is invalid here.
Anyways I got what bb wanted to say so no further clarification required.