Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 19

Is ab > ab? [#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Oct 2013, 14:46
2
This post received KUDOS
8
This post was BOOKMARKED
Question Stats:
47% (01:37) correct 53% (01:20) wrong based on 293 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Is ab > ab? 1) a > 1/b 2) a + b > 0
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.



Intern
Joined: 08 Aug 2011
Posts: 22

Re: Is ab > ab? [#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Oct 2013, 15:36
5
This post received KUDOS
1
This post was BOOKMARKED
Is ab > ab?
> Is ab + ab > 0 ?
Notice that this is true only when the product ab is positive. (If ab is negative, ab + ab = 0, which is not greater than 0. If ab is equal to zero, ab + ab = 0, which is not greater than 0.)
Thus, what we really want to know...
Is ab > 0 ?
1) a > 1/b If a = 2 and b = 1, the answer is YES. If a = 2 and b = 1, the answer is NO. > Insufficient.
2) a + b > 0 This can be shown to be insufficient in the same manner; indeed, with the very same numbers. If a = 2 and b = 1, the answer is YES. If a = 2 and b = 1, the answer is NO. > Insufficient.
Thus, even combined the statements are insufficient. Answer E.
Last edited by Reinfrank2011 on 27 Oct 2013, 15:54, edited 1 time in total.



Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 19

Re: Is ab > ab? [#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Oct 2013, 15:44
Awesome, thanks for that explanation, it makes a lot more sense now



Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Posts: 75
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
WE: Analyst (Transportation)

Re: Is ab > ab? [#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Oct 2013, 08:33
Reinfrank2011 wrote: Is ab > ab?
> Is ab + ab > 0 ?
Notice that this is true only when the product ab is positive. (If ab is negative, ab + ab = 0, which is not greater than 0. If ab is equal to zero, ab + ab = 0, which is not greater than 0.)
Thus, what we really want to know...
Is ab > 0 ?
1) a > 1/b If a = 2 and b = 1, the answer is YES. If a = 2 and b = 1, the answer is NO. > Insufficient.
2) a + b > 0 This can be shown to be insufficient in the same manner; indeed, with the very same numbers. If a = 2 and b = 1, the answer is YES. If a = 2 and b = 1, the answer is NO. > Insufficient.
Thus, even combined the statements are insufficient. Answer E. Based on statement 1 however, can't you convert the equation a > 1/ b to a* b>1? Thanks in advance.
Last edited by TheKraken on 31 Oct 2013, 09:20, edited 1 time in total.



Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 19

Re: Is ab > ab? [#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Oct 2013, 09:13
but if b < 0 then that inequality won't hold as the inequality sign will flip



Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Posts: 75
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
WE: Analyst (Transportation)

Re: Is ab > ab? [#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Oct 2013, 09:21
1
This post received KUDOS
SleeB wrote: but if b < 0 then that inequality won't hold as the inequality sign will flip The sign flip is only upon multiplying and dividing by a negative number. Therefore I think OA should be A. Is ab > ab? 1) a > 1/b ** ab>1 both AB has to positive or AB is two negative (3 negatives = Negative). Therefore, AB 2) a + b > 0 Not sufficient as we don't know what values A or B are.
Last edited by TheKraken on 31 Oct 2013, 09:31, edited 1 time in total.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 43892

Re: Is ab > ab? [#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Oct 2013, 09:29
4
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was BOOKMARKED



Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Posts: 75
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
WE: Analyst (Transportation)

Re: Is ab > ab? [#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Oct 2013, 09:33
Bunuel wrote: TheKraken wrote: SleeB wrote: Is ab > ab?
1) a > 1/b
2) a + b > 0
but if b < 0 then that inequality won't hold as the inequality sign will flip The sign flip is only upon multiplying and dividing by a negative number. That's the point. Do you know whether b is negative or positive? Do you know whether you should flip the sign of the inequality when multiplying by b? Never multiply or reduce inequality by an unknown (a variable) unless you are sure of its sign.So you CANNOT multiply a>1/b by b since you don't know the sign of b: if b>0, then you'll have ab>1 but if b<0, then you'll have ab<1 (flip the sign when multiplying by negative value). Hope it's clear. Thanks, Bunuel! The helps a lot.



Current Student
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1954
Concentration: Finance

Re: Is ab > ab? [#permalink]
Show Tags
28 May 2014, 11:51
I think that tough part is to be able to rephrase the question asked
Is ab > ab = ab+ab > 0
Is ab<0?
We need to know if a,b have different signs
1) a>1/b, Insufficient
2) a>b, Again could be either positive or negative
Both together, Still insufficient
Answer: E



Intern
Joined: 08 Aug 2011
Posts: 22

Re: Is ab > ab? [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 May 2014, 04:04
jlgdr wrote: I think that tough part is to be able to rephrase the question asked It is almost always easier to evaluate the behavior of an inequality or equation when everything is moved to one side of the arrow or equal sign. When in doubt, get it all on one side, especially when you're dealing with inequalities in DS. There are exceptions, of course, but as a rule of thumb it is useful. Posted from my mobile device



Intern
Joined: 18 Mar 2014
Posts: 35

Is ab > ab? [#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Aug 2014, 10:17
SleeB wrote: Is ab > ab?
1) a > 1/b
2) a + b > 0 What is the flaw in my approach ? Experts kindly assist. The question is transformed to (ab)^2+ab>0 => ab ( ab+1) > 0 Hence i need to find if ab is +ve or ab > 0
case 1: Now with a> 1/b ...By cross multiplying, this is transformed to ab > 1 (Cross Multiply) Hence this is sufficient case 2: a+b > 0 means ab is necessarily > 0.Hence this is sufficient
Hence i selected option D, which is not the answer.
_________________
[color=#007ec6]Would love to get kudos whenever it is due.. Though the mountain is steep, nevertheless once i reach the finishing point, i would enjoy the view [/color]....



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 43892

Re: Is ab > ab? [#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Aug 2014, 10:20



Intern
Joined: 18 Mar 2014
Posts: 35

Is ab > ab? [#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Aug 2014, 13:16
Bunuel wrote: dshuvendu wrote: SleeB wrote: Is ab > ab?
1) a > 1/b
2) a + b > 0 What is the flaw in my approach ? Experts kindly assist. The question is transformed to (ab)^2+ab>0 => ab ( ab+1) > 0 Hence i need to find if ab is +ve or ab > 0
case 1: Now with a> 1/b ...By cross multiplying, this is transformed to ab > 1 (Cross Multiply) Hence this is sufficient case 2: a+b > 0 means ab is necessarily > 0.Hence this is sufficient
Hence i selected option D, which is not the answer. How did you get (ab)^2+ab>0 ? I have committed a crime now.I missed the square root. I am in a deadlock after the correction, cannot proceed with the transformation As always thanks for the poke .
_________________
[color=#007ec6]Would love to get kudos whenever it is due.. Though the mountain is steep, nevertheless once i reach the finishing point, i would enjoy the view [/color]....



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 13788

Re: Is ab > ab? [#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Apr 2017, 00:26
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Books  GMAT Club Tests  Best Prices on GMAT Courses  GMAT Mobile App  Math Resources  Verbal Resources



Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2015
Posts: 74
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 520 Q44 V17 GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20 GMAT 3: 710 Q48 V40
GPA: 3.45
WE: Research (Energy and Utilities)

Is ab > ab? [#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Apr 2017, 07:00
When we combine both equations :
a>(1/b) > a(1/b) > 0 (1)
a+b>0 (2)
subracting 1 and 2
a(1/b)>0  a+ b>0 ___________ b(1/b)>0 (1+b^2)/(b) >0
(1+b^2)/(b)<0 (3)
From equation 3 we can say that b is negative since numerator is +ve
hence b<0
in order to equation 1 and 2 to be valid ; a should be positive and greater than b
hence we can say a>0
so a>0 and b<0 ; now we know a and b have opposite signs. Hence C should be sufficient.
Please correct where I am going wrong....










