GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 23 Oct 2018, 07:02

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Is x > 0 ? (1) |x+3| < 4 (2) |x-3| < 4 Please assist with above prob

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Sep 2016
Posts: 120
Is x > 0 ? (1) |x+3| < 4 (2) |x-3| < 4 Please assist with above prob  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Sep 2016, 20:03
1
1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

74% (00:54) correct 26% (00:59) wrong based on 184 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Is x > 0 ?

(1) |x+3| < 4
(2) |x-3| < 4

Please assist with above problem
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 50058
Re: Is x > 0 ? (1) |x+3| < 4 (2) |x-3| < 4 Please assist with above prob  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Sep 2016, 21:32
1
DS Forum Moderator
avatar
P
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 1348
Location: India
Premium Member
Re: Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| < 4 (2) |x – 3| < 4  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2018, 23:04
DHINGRACHIRAG24 wrote:
Is x > 0?

(1) |x + 3| < 4
(2) |x – 3| < 4


_________________

Encourage me by pressing the KUDOS if you find my post to be helpful.


(1) |x-(-3)| < 4
This also means that distance of 'x' from '-3' on the number line is within 4 steps. So x is within 4 steps to right and left of -3. 4 steps to right of -3 is 1 and 4 steps to the left of -3 is -7. Thus x lies between -7 and 1. So x could be either positive or negative. Not sufficient.

(2) |x - 3| < 4
This also means that distance of 'x' from '3' on the number line is within 4 steps. So x is within 4 steps to right and left of 3. 4 steps to right of 3 is 7 and 4 steps to the left of 3 is -1. Thus x lies between -1 and 7. So x could be either positive or negative. Not sufficient.

After combining the two statements, x could lie between -1 and 1 (this is the only area on the number line which x can take if it has to satisfy both statement 1 and statement 2 conditions).
But still between -1 and 1, x could be negative or 0 or positive. So not sufficient.

Hence E answer
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 18 Nov 2017
Posts: 44
Re: Is x > 0 ? (1) |x+3| < 4 (2) |x-3| < 4 Please assist with above prob  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2018, 02:52
Hi Bunuel,

I have a very basic doubt here.

On combining the statements 1 & 2, how did you get the range of x as -1 < x < 1 ? Why can't the range of x be -7 < x < 7 ?

Bunuel wrote:
Is x > 0 ?

(1) |x+3| < 4
-4 < x + 3 < 4
-7 < x < 1.

Not sufficient.

(2) |x-3| < 4
-4 < x - 3 < 4
-1 < x < 7.

Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) -1 < x < 1. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.
DS Forum Moderator
avatar
P
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 1348
Location: India
Premium Member
Re: Is x > 0 ? (1) |x+3| < 4 (2) |x-3| < 4 Please assist with above prob  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2018, 03:10
1
101mba101 wrote:
Hi Bunuel,

I have a very basic doubt here.

On combining the statements 1 & 2, how did you get the range of x as -1 < x < 1 ? Why can't the range of x be -7 < x < 7 ?

Bunuel wrote:
Is x > 0 ?

(1) |x+3| < 4
-4 < x + 3 < 4
-7 < x < 1.

Not sufficient.

(2) |x-3| < 4
-4 < x - 3 < 4
-1 < x < 7.

Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) -1 < x < 1. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.



HEllo

First statement concludes that -7 < x < 1. It means 'x' is a number which is greater than -7 but less than 1.
Second statement concludes that -1 < x < 7. This means that 'x' is a number which is greater than -1 but less than 7.

Now, combining the two statements. what is common about x? From first, x should be greater than -7 and from second x should be greater than -1. So if a number is both greater than -7 as well as greater than -1, then it has to be greater than -1 (which is the common part).
Similarly, from first x is less than 1 and from second x is less than 7. So if a number is lesser than 1 as well as lesser than 7, then it must be lesser than 1 (which is the common part).
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 18 Nov 2017
Posts: 44
Is x > 0 ? (1) |x+3| < 4 (2) |x-3| < 4 Please assist with above prob  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2018, 03:37
Hey amanvermagmat,

Your explanation solved my doubt immediately. You kept it super simple. Thanks a lot!

Cheers!

amanvermagmat wrote:
HEllo

First statement concludes that -7 < x < 1. It means 'x' is a number which is greater than -7 but less than 1.
Second statement concludes that -1 < x < 7. This means that 'x' is a number which is greater than -1 but less than 7.

Now, combining the two statements. what is common about x? From first, x should be greater than -7 and from second x should be greater than -1. So if a number is both greater than -7 as well as greater than -1, then it has to be greater than -1 (which is the common part).
Similarly, from first x is less than 1 and from second x is less than 7. So if a number is lesser than 1 as well as lesser than 7, then it must be lesser than 1 (which is the common part).
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Jan 2016
Posts: 102
Reviews Badge
Re: Is x > 0 ? (1) |x+3| < 4 (2) |x-3| < 4 Please assist with above prob  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2018, 15:59
Hi Bunuel,

When statements (1)+(2) -1 < x < 1. that means x has to be "0", however it is not mentioned in the question that "X" is a Integer, so this is insufficient correct ?
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 50058
Re: Is x > 0 ? (1) |x+3| < 4 (2) |x-3| < 4 Please assist with above prob  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2018, 21:37
hero_with_1000_faces wrote:
Hi Bunuel,

When statements (1)+(2) -1 < x < 1. that means x has to be "0", however it is not mentioned in the question that "X" is a Integer, so this is insufficient correct ?


-1 < x < 1 means that x is any number from -1 and 1, not inclusive, not necessarily 0. For example, -3/100, -4/11, -0.000012, 0, 1/2, ... So, x can take infinitely many values, included 0. Hence we cannot say whether x is more than 0.
_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 09 Apr 2018
Posts: 3
Re: Is x > 0 ? (1) |x+3| < 4 (2) |x-3| < 4 Please assist with above prob  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Oct 2018, 03:29
(1) INSUFFICIENT: We can solve this absolute value inequality by considering both the positive and negative scenarios for the absolute value expression |x + 3|.
If x > -3, making (x + 3) positive, we can rewrite |x + 3| as x + 3:
x + 3 < 4
x < 1
If x < -3, making (x + 3) negative, we can rewrite |x + 3| as -(x + 3):
-(x + 3) < 4
x + 3 > -4
x > -7
If we combine these two solutions we get -7 < x < 1, which means we can’t tell whether x is positive.

(2) INSUFFICIENT: We can solve this absolute value inequality by considering both the positive and negative scenarios for the absolute value expression |x – 3|.
If x > 3, making (x – 3) positive, we can rewrite |x – 3| as x – 3:
x – 3 < 4
x < 7
If x < 3, making (x – 3) negative, we can rewrite |x – 3| as -(x – 3) OR 3 – x
3 – x < 4
x > -1
If we combine these two solutions we get -1 < x < 7, which means we can’t tell whether x is positive.

(1) AND (2) INSUFFICIENT: If we combine the solutions from statements (1) and (2) we get an overlapping range of -1 < x < 1. We still can’t tell whether x is positive.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Is x > 0 ? (1) |x+3| < 4 (2) |x-3| < 4 Please assist with above prob &nbs [#permalink] 05 Oct 2018, 03:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Is x > 0 ? (1) |x+3| < 4 (2) |x-3| < 4 Please assist with above prob

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.