Language acquisition has long been thought of as a process of imitatio

Question

Language acquisition has long been thought of as a process of imitation and reinforcement. Children learn to speak, in the popular view, by copying the utterances heard around them, and by having their response strengthened by the repetitions, corrections, and other reactions that adults provide. In recent years, it has become clear that this principle will not explain all the facts of language development. Children do imitate a great deal, especially in learning sounds and vocabulary; but little of their grammatical ability can be explained in this way. Two kinds of evidence are commonly used in support of this criticism–one based on the kind of language children produce, the other on what they do not produce.

The first piece of evidence derives from the way children handle irregular grammatical patterns. When they encounter such irregular past-tense forms as went and took or such plural forms as mice and sheep, there is a stage when they replace these by forms based on the regular patterns of the language. They say such things as wented, taked, mices, mouses, and sheeps. Evidently, children assume that grammatical usage is regular, and try to work out for themselves what the forms ‘ought’ to be–a reasoning process known as analogy. They could not have learned these forms by a process of imitation. The other kind of evidence is based on the way children seem unable to imitate adult grammatical constructions exactly, even when invited to do so.   1 
 1. By saying, “they could not have learned these forms by a process of imitation” the author is implying that

A some children struggle to learn to use proper syntactical structures
B those who rely on analogously deriving grammatical patterns tend to learn irregular patterns with greater ease
C imitation is not the only means by which children acquire knowledge
D not all children will use the correct grammatical pattern when prompted by adults
E certain grammatical forms used by children, while analogous to regular grammatical structures, are not the same as those employed by adults

2 
 2. The primary purpose of the passage is to

A discuss how a common misconception has affected the development of a school of thought
B call into question the findings of a study and describe ways to improve the study
C describe how an explanation does not adequately account for an observed phenomenon
D introduce two theories and illustrate how neither is able to fully explain an occurrence
E reveal the inconsistencies in two theories and propose a new theory to account for an aptitude

3 
 3. According to the passage, the idea that children learn language only through a process of imitation has been called into question because

A some children learn language at an earlier age than do others
B children form grammatical endings that, while consistent with rules of grammar, are not accepted forms
C adults often speak to children by employing grammatical patterns that are different from the ones they would employ when speaking to other adults
D most children have difficulty imitating complex vocabulary even if their caregivers use such words
E only a few children are capable of imitating irregular grammatical patterns

RC Butler 2021  -  Practice Two RC Questions Everyday.   
Passage # 56 Date: 09-Feb-2021
 This question is a part of RC Butler 2021 .  Click here for Details

MinHuiii · Answer

can somebody help me the question 3?

abhi88 · Answer

C,C,B
3/ According to the passage, the idea that children learn language only through a process of imitation has been called into question because

A Some children learn language at an earlier age than do others- Out 
B children form grammatical endings that, while consistent with rules of grammar, are not accepted forms- 
“They say such things as wented, taked, mices, mouses, and sheeps. Evidently, children assume that grammatical usage is regular, and try to work out for themselves what the forms ‘ought’ to be–a reasoning process known as analogy.” - Correct

C adults often speak to children by employing grammatical patterns that are different from the ones they would employ when speaking  to other adults 
D  Most children  have difficulty imitating complex vocabulary even if their caregivers use such words
E  Only a few children  are capable of imitating irregular grammatical patterns

aragonn · Answer

The idea that children learn by imitation has been called into question by the fact that they do not imitate adults when the latter use irregular grammatical patterns. Instead, children reason via analogy. For instance, if they hear that past tense verbs are formed by adding –ed, they add an –ed to all past tense verbs, thereby coming up with non-accepted forms. (even the ones with irregular endings). Therefore the answer is (B).

(A) is a statement that is true in the real world, but it is not mentioned in the passage.

(B) The answer.

(C) is incorrect, though tempting because it mentions how adults use grammatical patterns that are different. But not different compared to the patterns children use. Rather, (C) is saying that adults speak differently to adults than they do to children. True in the real world, perhaps. But not supported by the passage.

(D) is wrong because the focus on the passage is grammatical forms not complex vocabulary.

(E) is wrong because the passage says children do learn by analogy. That’s why they add –ed to all past tense verbs

aragonn · Answer

The first sentence describes a common interpretation: language is learned through imitation. The rest of the passage describes how, “Children do imitate…but little of their grammatical ability can be explained in this way.” Therefore, this explanation cannot account for the way children learn languages. Therefore (C).

(A) is incorrect. While the passage does describe a common misconception (language is learned via imitation), the passage never talks about how this misconception actually affected the development of any one school of thought.

(B) is incorrect because no specific study is mentioned in the passage.

(C) The answer. The "explanation" is the popular view, which cannot adequately explain the two pieces of evidence discussed in the second paragraph.

(D) is incorrect. Sure the passage mentions two theories. But one of them, according to the passage, fully explains language acquisition.

(E) is incorrect because no third theory is proposed.

Foreheadson · Answer

The word "consistent" is not analogous to the word "regular" for me. This why I did not choose B. how can "sheeps", "mouses" can be called consistent with grammar rules? it means that the above mentioned are correct. They definitely are not. so thry are incosistent with grammar rules. if it was like, "regular forms", I would choose B.

Posted from my mobile device

BenjaminS · Answer

Can you provide the OE on Question 1?
Many people choose the answer E (including me). How you can eliminate answer E?

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

Language acquisition has long been thought of as a process of imitatio

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC) Questions

Language acquisition has long been thought of as a process of imitatio

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards