Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49431

Question Stats:
39% (01:21) correct 61% (01:28) wrong based on 59 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49431

Re M2853
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Sep 2014, 01:44
Official Solution: (1) The product of any three integers in the set is negative. If the set consists of only 3 terms, then the set could be either \(\{negative, \ negative, \ negative\}\) or \(\{negative, \ positive, \ positive\}\). If the set consists of more than 3 terms, then the set can only have negative numbers. Not sufficient. (2) The product of the smallest and largest integers in the set is a prime number. Since only positive numbers can be primes, then the smallest and largest integers in the set must be of the same sign. Thus the set consists of only negative or only positive integers. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) Since the second statement rules out \(\{negative, \ positive, \ positive\}\) case which we had from (1), then we have that the set must have only negative integers. Sufficient. Answer: C
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Intern
Joined: 30 Jun 2014
Posts: 2

Re: M2853
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 May 2015, 09:55
"2. The product of the smallest and largest integers in the set is a prime number. Since only positive numbers can be primes, then the smallest and largest integers in the set must be of the same sign. Thus the set consists of only negative or only positive integers. Not sufficient."
why does the set consist of only negative or only positive integers? It could be that only the smallest and the largest have the same sign and not the rest. It doesnt say the other numbers are also primes.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49431

Re: M2853
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 May 2015, 10:06
shly wrote: "2. The product of the smallest and largest integers in the set is a prime number. Since only positive numbers can be primes, then the smallest and largest integers in the set must be of the same sign. Thus the set consists of only negative or only positive integers. Not sufficient."
why does the set consist of only negative or only positive integers? It could be that only the smallest and the largest have the same sign and not the rest. It doesnt say the other numbers are also primes. (2) says: The product of the smallest and largest integers in the set is a prime number. Since only positive numbers can be primes, then the smallest and largest integers in the set must be of the same sign. So either: smallest * greatest = negative * negative and in this case as both the smallest and the greatest are negative then ALL integers in the list are negative OR smallest * greatest = positive * positive and in this case as both the smallest and the greatest are positive then ALL integers in the list are positive. Hope it's clear.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Manager
Joined: 19 Jul 2015
Posts: 63
Location: India
GPA: 3.69

Re: M2853
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Jul 2016, 11:20
It says the product of any three integers in set is Negative. So, even if there are two positive numbers this is not possible. Because what if we choose of the positives and rest two negatives. And the statement says that product is always negative. So I think A is sufficient because all should be negatives



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49431

Re: M2853
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Jul 2016, 12:47
Navinder wrote: It says the product of any three integers in set is Negative. So, even if there are two positive numbers this is not possible. Because what if we choose of the positives and rest two negatives. And the statement says that product is always negative. So I think A is sufficient because all should be negatives Please reread the solution for (1): (1) The product of any three integers in the set is negative. If the set consists of only 3 terms, then the set could be either \(\{negative, \ negative, \ negative\}\) or \(\{negative, \ positive, \ positive\}\). If the set consists of more than 3 terms, then the set can only have negative numbers. Not sufficient.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Intern
Joined: 05 Jun 2014
Posts: 1

Re M2853
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jul 2016, 10:40
I don't agree with the explanation. If the set consists of only 3 integers, then A+B could give two possibilities:
(negative,negative,negative) or (positive, negative,positive)
Both the cases satisfy the two conditions. So the answer should be E



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49431

Re: M2853
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jul 2016, 10:42



Retired Moderator
Joined: 03 Aug 2016
Posts: 354
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V38 GMAT 2: 690 Q46 V40
GPA: 3.9
WE: Information Technology (Consumer Products)

Re: M2853
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Jun 2017, 19:34
Bunuel wrote: So either: smallest * greatest = negative * negative and in this case as both the smallest and the greatest are negative then ALL integers in the list are negative OR smallest * greatest = positive * positive and in this case as both the smallest and the greatest are positive then ALL integers in the list are positive.
Hope it's clear.
Bunuel , if both are negative then middle number is negative as well (so all are negative) If both are positive then middle number is positive and all are positive. Doesn't that mean it satisfies both conditions and hence its not sufficient. Or am i completely wrong about DS criteria ?
_________________
My MBA Journey  https://smalldoubledouble.com



Intern
Joined: 29 Jul 2017
Posts: 1

Re: M2853
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Nov 2017, 22:29
So either: smallest * greatest = negative * negative and in this case as both the smallest and the greatest are negative then ALL integers in the list are negative OR smallest * greatest = positive * positive and in this case as both the smallest and the greatest are positive then ALL integers in the list are positive.
Hope it's clear.
Hi Bunuel, Is there any compulsion that a set should be arranged in either ascending order or descending order(even if not mentioned in Q specifically). Like 1st and last terms negative means in between all terms should be less the highest and more than the lowest. If yes I agree with your above explanation. If not, why cant we consider the case {+ve ve +ve}. Can you pls clarify my doubt.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49431

Re: M2853
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Nov 2017, 02:05
venkys1 wrote: So either: smallest * greatest = negative * negative and in this case as both the smallest and the greatest are negative then ALL integers in the list are negative OR smallest * greatest = positive * positive and in this case as both the smallest and the greatest are positive then ALL integers in the list are positive.
Hope it's clear.
Hi Bunuel, Is there any compulsion that a set should be arranged in either ascending order or descending order(even if not mentioned in Q specifically). Like 1st and last terms negative means in between all terms should be less the highest and more than the lowest. If yes I agree with your above explanation. If not, why cant we consider the case {+ve ve +ve}. Can you pls clarify my doubt. My friend you did not read carefully enough. First of all, a set is a collection of elements without any order, while for example a sequence is ordered. Next, (2) says: The product of the smallest and largest integers in the set is a prime number. Does it say first and last? NO.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Intern
Joined: 06 Feb 2018
Posts: 16

BunuelHi, I am still getting E as the answer. Lets say the set has three integers: x, y and z. (1) xyz = negative This means {positive, positive, negative} or {negative, negative, negative}. Therefore, INSUFF. (2) Assuming x is the smallest integer and z the largest integer: xz= prime since prime cannot be negative xz= positive This means {positive, positive} or {negative, negative}. Therefore, INSUFF. (1) and (2) Together, xyz can be {positive, negative, positive} or {negative, negative, negative}. Therefore, C. Why does (2) mean ALL integers in the set are either positive or negative? Isn't it only saying the smallest and largest are either both positive or both negative?Thanks! Nevermind, just got it. Since (2) indicates that if the smallest and largest are both positive then all numbers in the middle must be positive and if the smallest and largest are both negative then all numbers in the middle must be negative. I just hope I do not overlook such details during the actual test.










