Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 10:46 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 10:46
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Gladiator59
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 841
Own Kudos:
2,613
 [57]
Given Kudos: 260
Status:It always seems impossible until it's done.
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Products:
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Posts: 841
Kudos: 2,613
 [57]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
51
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,996
 [11]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,996
 [11]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
nightblade354
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,781
Own Kudos:
6,822
 [10]
Given Kudos: 3,304
Status:He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Going to Business School -- Corruptus in Extremis
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,781
Kudos: 6,822
 [10]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
yash312
Joined: 28 Aug 2018
Last visit: 24 Feb 2025
Posts: 160
Own Kudos:
175
 [1]
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 160
Kudos: 175
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO C

Moderate exercise lowers the risk of blockage of the arteries due to blood clots, since anything that lowers blood cholesterol levels also lowers the risk of hardening of the arteries, which in turn lowers the risk of arterial blockage due to blood clots; and, if the data reported in a recent study are correct, moderate exercise lowers blood cholesterol levels.

MC--> lower risk of artery blod clot -.................low Blood cholot-->low hard of arte -> low artey blood clot
MC--> blod cholo level

prethink : Option C fits correctly

Gladiator59
...please suggest as the OA marked is D
User avatar
rish2708
Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Last visit: 15 Sep 2022
Posts: 187
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 442
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 1: 570 Q43 V26
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.8
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V32
Posts: 187
Kudos: 241
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Seems to be an indigestable OA.

The statement mentions that the data given is correct. I chose E.

Mod E (moderate exercises) -> lowers risk of artery blockage due to blood clots.

Anything (x ) -> lowers hardening of artiries -> lowers artery blockage because of blood clots
-> lowers cholestrol levels.
Conclusion: Mod E lowers Cholestrol levels
Meaning X is Moderate Exercises.

Though I was not sure about E too, but it seems to attack one part of causation. But I thought that the option E somehow strengthens the causation in bold and hence it gives support. If we negate it :
"Hardening of the arteries DOES NOT increase the risk of blockage of the arteries due to blood clots." -> then the causation fails but again I agree, this is the premise and not the conclusion I am attacking.

Can anyone please shed some light by sharing OE ?

Regards,
Rishav
User avatar
Arro44
Joined: 04 Jun 2018
Last visit: 14 Aug 2022
Posts: 659
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 362
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q47 V44
GPA: 3.4
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q47 V44
Posts: 659
Kudos: 749
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nightblade354

Could you give this one a shot? The current answer split looks like the community is having quite a bit of struggle with this one.
User avatar
redskull1
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Last visit: 25 Sep 2022
Posts: 294
Own Kudos:
213
 [4]
Given Kudos: 115
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
Products:
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D is wrong.Definitely.100%.

"If the data represented is correct" in the question obviously makes D wrong.
User avatar
Gladiator59
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 841
Own Kudos:
2,613
 [2]
Given Kudos: 260
Status:It always seems impossible until it's done.
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Products:
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Posts: 841
Kudos: 2,613
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Moderate exercise lowers the risk of blockage of the arteries due to blood clots, since anything that lowers blood cholesterol levels also lowers the risk of hardening of the arteries, which in turn lowers the risk of arterial blockage due to blood clots; and, if the data reported in a recent study are correct, moderate exercise lowers blood cholesterol levels.

The conclusion drawn above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

(A) The recent study investigated the relationship between exercise and blood cholesterol levels.
(B) Blockage of the arteries due to blood clots can be prevented.
(C) Lowering blood cholesterol levels lowers the risk of blockage of the arteries.
(D) The data reported in the recent study are correct.
(E) Hardening of the arteries increases the risk of blockage of the arteries due to blood clots.


Official Explanation by Kaplan


Assumption
“Since” signals evidence, and “…, since” signals that the conclusion preceded the comma.

You have to shuffle the clauses around a bit to see it, but the logic is tight as a drum if the study
data are correct. If they are, then moderate exercise lowers blood cholesterol, which lowers the risk of
hardened arteries, which lowers the risk of blood clots causing arterial blockage. Again, that’s all
speculative based on the “if,” But since the conclusion (clause #1) definitively asserts that last lowered
risk, the author must be assuming (D) that the “if” is true and that the data are correct.

(A) doesn’t meet the definition of an assumption (“unstated evidence the author takes for
granted”), because the nature of the study is asserted explicitly in the final sentence. Prevention of arterial
blockage (B) isn’t necessarily the same as “lowered risk,” and even if it is, (B) is stated in the opening
sentence, not implicit. (C) is stated, too, in the second clause of the stimulus. And the author need not
be taking for granted what hardened arteries do (E) since every fact cited is about lowering risks, not
raising them.

I think (C) cannot be the answer because it is already mentioned in the argument. This is a common trap in the "find assumption" type questions. One of the premises in the argument is re-worded to form an option and the trap is that since it is already a premise it cannot be the assumption. (which is an unstated premise that is essential for the sanctity of the argument)

Hope it helps.
avatar
ArupRS
Joined: 23 Jan 2018
Last visit: 02 Jul 2025
Posts: 254
Own Kudos:
248
 [1]
Given Kudos: 358
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V36 (Online)
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V36 (Online)
Posts: 254
Kudos: 248
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma
Gladiator59
Moderate exercise lowers the risk of blockage of the arteries due to blood clots, since anything that lowers blood cholesterol levels also lowers the risk of hardening of the arteries, which in turn lowers the risk of arterial blockage due to blood clots; and, if the data reported in a recent study are correct, moderate exercise lowers blood cholesterol levels.

The conclusion drawn above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

(A) The recent study investigated the relationship between exercise and blood cholesterol levels.
(B) Blockage of the arteries due to blood clots can be prevented.
(C) Lowering blood cholesterol levels lowers the risk of blockage of the arteries.
(D) The data reported in the recent study are correct.
(E) Hardening of the arteries increases the risk of blockage of the arteries due to blood clots.

Premises:
if the data reported in a recent study are correct, moderate exercise lowers blood cholesterol levels.
anything that lowers blood cholesterol levels also lowers the risk of hardening of the arteries,
Lower risk of hardening of the arteries lowers the risk of arterial blockage due to blood clots;

Conclusion: Moderate exercise lowers the risk of blockage of the arteries due to blood clots

Note the leap we have made. The premise says that "if the data reported are correct", moderate exercise lowers cholesterol. But we have concluded that moderate exercise does lower the risk of blockage.

The argument goes like this:
If A, B lowers C,
C lowers D.
D lowers E.

Hence, B lowers E.

But hey, the argument says "if A, then B lowers C"
But we are concluding that B does lower E. Hence we are assuming that A is correct.
So we are assuming that the data reported are correct.

If data reported are not correct (negate the assumption), then B doesn't necessarily lower C. Then can we say B lowers E? No. It may or may lower E. So our conclusion fails.

VeritasKarishma,

Happy new year.

In the argument, it is already mentioned that "if the data reported in a recent study are correct". Shouldn't we go by the rule that an assumption is an unstated part of the argument, which binds the premise and conclusion?

Please advise.

Regards,
Arup
User avatar
cledgard
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 160
Own Kudos:
356
 [1]
Given Kudos: 71
Status:GMAT Coach
Location: Peru
GPA: 3.98
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 160
Kudos: 356
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ArupRS
VeritasKarishma
Gladiator59
Moderate exercise lowers the risk of blockage of the arteries due to blood clots, since anything that lowers blood cholesterol levels also lowers the risk of hardening of the arteries, which in turn lowers the risk of arterial blockage due to blood clots; and, if the data reported in a recent study are correct, moderate exercise lowers blood cholesterol levels.

The conclusion drawn above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

(A) The recent study investigated the relationship between exercise and blood cholesterol levels.
(B) Blockage of the arteries due to blood clots can be prevented.
(C) Lowering blood cholesterol levels lowers the risk of blockage of the arteries.
(D) The data reported in the recent study are correct.
(E) Hardening of the arteries increases the risk of blockage of the arteries due to blood clots.

Premises:
if the data reported in a recent study are correct, moderate exercise lowers blood cholesterol levels.
anything that lowers blood cholesterol levels also lowers the risk of hardening of the arteries,
Lower risk of hardening of the arteries lowers the risk of arterial blockage due to blood clots;

Conclusion: Moderate exercise lowers the risk of blockage of the arteries due to blood clots

Note the leap we have made. The premise says that "if the data reported are correct", moderate exercise lowers cholesterol. But we have concluded that moderate exercise does lower the risk of blockage.

The argument goes like this:
If A, B lowers C,
C lowers D.
D lowers E.

Hence, B lowers E.

But hey, the argument says "if A, then B lowers C"
But we are concluding that B does lower E. Hence we are assuming that A is correct.
So we are assuming that the data reported are correct.

If data reported are not correct (negate the assumption), then B doesn't necessarily lower C. Then can we say B lowers E? No. It may or may lower E. So our conclusion fails.

VeritasKarishma,

Happy new year.

In the argument, it is already mentioned that "if the data reported in a recent study are correct". Shouldn't we go by the rule that an assumption is an unstated part of the argument, which binds the premise and conclusion?

Please advise.

Regards,
Arup


I believe you are right. The argument is already logical. If... Lowers, else we do not know. So this is already stated in the argument.

Let's make it simple

If Mary loves me, she has good taste.

the assumption cannot be "Mary loves me" because it is already in the argument.

If we negate the assumption, the argument is still true.

She does not love me - The argument "If Mary loves me, she has good taste" is still true.
User avatar
redskull1
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Last visit: 25 Sep 2022
Posts: 294
Own Kudos:
213
 [1]
Given Kudos: 115
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We shldnt waste our time a lot on this question i think.As @nightblade rightly said,this type of question surely wont come in the GMAT..!!!!

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
dcummins
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Last visit: 08 Oct 2025
Posts: 1,064
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
no point in justifying this question
User avatar
Raman109
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 28 Jul 2025
Posts: 805
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 805
Kudos: 170
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Understanding the argument - ­
Moderate exercise lowers the risk of blockage of the arteries due to blood clots (Conclusion - Exercise (E) lowers blockage (B)) since anything that lowers blood cholesterol levels also lowers the risk of hardening of the arteries (Blood cholesterol (BC) lowers the risk of hardening (H)), which in turn lowers the risk of arterial blockage due to blood clots (H reduces B); and if the data reported in a recent study are correct, moderate exercise lowers blood cholesterol levels. - If the data is correct, E lowers BC

So, the sequence is
If the data is correct, E lowers BC
BC lowers H
H lowers B

So, E lowers B. What if the data isn't correct? The conclusion shatters.

The conclusion drawn above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

(A) The recent study investigated the relationship between exercise and blood cholesterol levels. - If we miss what the conclusion is, then it's a trap. Out of scope.

(B) Blockage of the arteries due to blood clots can be prevented. - claim. Not a premise or missing assumption. Out of scope.

(C) Lowering blood cholesterol levels lowers the risk of blockage of the arteries. - We already know from the passage.

(D) The data reported in the recent study are correct. - Yes. Negate this, and the conclusion shatters.

(E) Hardening of the arteries increases the risk of blockage of the arteries due to blood clots. - out of scope.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,829
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,829
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts