Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 09:12 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 09:12
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,283
 [127]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
118
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
43,703
 [50]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,703
 [50]
32
Kudos
Add Kudos
18
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
JeffTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Last visit: 05 Jan 2024
Posts: 2,977
Own Kudos:
8,389
 [38]
Given Kudos: 1,646
Status:Head GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 2,977
Kudos: 8,389
 [38]
21
Kudos
Add Kudos
17
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
sobby
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Last visit: 24 Jan 2022
Posts: 444
Own Kudos:
391
 [1]
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 444
Kudos: 391
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
For how many integer values of x, is |x – 6| > |3x + 6|?

(A) 1

(B) 3

(C) 5

(D) 7

(E) Infinite


by substituting values i can see 5 as answer ...
No positive value for x can satisfy the equation...------------1
x=0 can equalize the equation-----------2
-1 to -5 will satisfy the equation...and -6 will equalize the condition-----3
so the answer is c - --5 ..

is there any other way to solve i'e without doing actual substitution ...
Thanks..
User avatar
sobby
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Last visit: 24 Jan 2022
Posts: 444
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 444
Kudos: 391
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sobby
Bunuel
For how many integer values of x, is |x – 6| > |3x + 6|?

(A) 1

(B) 3

(C) 5

(D) 7

(E) Infinite


by substituting values i can see 5 as answer ...
No positive value for x can satisfy the equation...------------1
x=0 can equalize the equation-----------2
-1 to -5 will satisfy the equation...and -6 will equalize the condition-----3
so the answer is c - --5 ..

is there any other way to solve i'e without doing actual substitution ...
Thanks..

2nd approach.......

we can do it by squaring both side and using number line to solve it ...
we will get the roots as 0 and -6 and using this we can deduce only number between 0 and -6 will satisfy the actual solution..

Bunuel : Is this approach correct

I have one doubt ---while squaring in absolute ....what necessary condition we need to consider....
User avatar
broall
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Last visit: 07 Apr 2021
Posts: 1,138
Own Kudos:
7,149
 [18]
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Long way to go!
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 1,138
Kudos: 7,149
 [18]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
For how many integer values of x, is |x – 6| > |3x + 6|?

(A) 1

(B) 3

(C) 5

(D) 7

(E) Infinite

In this question, in my opinion, there are 2 possible solutions.

Solution 1.

\(|x – 6| > |3x + 6| \implies |x – 6| - |3x + 6|>0\)

If \(x<-2\) we have \((6-x)-(-3x-6)=6-x+3x+6=2x+12 > 0 \implies x >-6\). Hence \(-6 <x <-2\)

If \(-2 \leq x < 6\) we have \((6-x)-(3x+6)=-4x>0 \implies x<0\). Hence \(-2 \leq x < 0\)

If \(x \geq 6\) we have \((x-6)-(3x+6)=-2x-12>0 \implies x<-6\). There is no satisfied value of \(x\) in this case.

Combine all cases we have \(-6 < x < 0\).

Thus, \(x\) could receive 5 integer value \(\{-5;-4;-3;-2;-1\}\)

The answer is C.

Solution 2.

\(|x – 6| > |3x + 6| \implies (x-6)^2 > (3x+6)^2\)

\(\implies x^2-12x+36 > 9x^2+36x+36 \implies 8x^2+48x<0\)

\(\implies 8x(x+6)<0 \implies -6<x<0\).
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
778,283
 [8]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,283
 [8]
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sobby
sobby
Bunuel
For how many integer values of x, is |x – 6| > |3x + 6|?

(A) 1

(B) 3

(C) 5

(D) 7

(E) Infinite


by substituting values i can see 5 as answer ...
No positive value for x can satisfy the equation...------------1
x=0 can equalize the equation-----------2
-1 to -5 will satisfy the equation...and -6 will equalize the condition-----3
so the answer is c - --5 ..

is there any other way to solve i'e without doing actual substitution ...
Thanks..

2nd approach.......

we can do it by squaring both side and using number line to solve it ...
we will get the roots as 0 and -6 and using this we can deduce only number between 0 and -6 will satisfy the actual solution..

Bunuel : Is this approach correct

I have one doubt ---while squaring in absolute ....what necessary condition we need to consider....

We can raise both parts of an inequality to an even power if we know that both parts of an inequality are non-negative (the same for taking an even root of both sides of an inequality). So, if you have absolute values on both sides of the inequality then you can safely square.

Check for more the following topics:
Inequalities Made Easy!

Solving Quadratic Inequalities - Graphic Approach
Inequality tips

DS Inequalities Problems
PS Inequalities Problems

700+ Inequalities problems

Hope it helps.
User avatar
RMD007
Joined: 03 Jul 2016
Last visit: 08 Jun 2019
Posts: 236
Own Kudos:
201
 [2]
Given Kudos: 80
Status:Countdown Begins...
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V22
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V22
Posts: 236
Kudos: 201
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u
Bunuel
For how many integer values of x, is |x – 6| > |3x + 6|?

(A) 1

(B) 3

(C) 5

(D) 7

(E) Infinite


Hi sobby,
The actual way would be...

Since both sides are positive, square both sides
\((x-6)^2>(3x+6)^2..........x^2-12x+36>9x^2+36x+36.........8x^2+36x<0\)
8x(x+6)<0.....
For 8x(x+6) to be NEGATIVE, one of 8x and x+6 will be negative and other positive..
If x is positive, 8x will be positive and x+6 will also be positive..
So x should be NEGATIVE..
Then 8x will be negative, and thus x+6 should be positive ..
For that x+6>0.....X>-6.... But x<0.
So range becomes 0>x>-6...
Values are -1,-2,-3,-4,-5
5 value
C

Attachments

File comment: Here is another graphical approach.

The blue graph represents |x-6| and red graph represents |3x+6| and these two graphs meet each other at x=0 and x=-6
For |x-6| to be greater than |3x+6| the blue graph should be above red graph. So our solution should be -6<x<0 i.e. -1,-2,-3,-4,-5.

Experts please comment if this approach is correct. Also I tried applying the same approach to 3 modulus equations but it is not so handy as it is here.. Please suggest some method for 3 modulus problems as |x – 8| + |5 – x| > |x + 7|

Graph1.PNG
Graph1.PNG [ 34.52 KiB | Viewed 36836 times ]

User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,994
 [6]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,994
 [6]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
For how many integer values of x, is |x – 6| > |3x + 6|?

(A) 1

(B) 3

(C) 5

(D) 7

(E) Infinite

Think in terms of the definition of absolute values:

|x - 6| > 3*|x + 2|

Distance from 6 is greater than 3 times the distance from -2

-------- (-2) -------- (0) ------------------------------ (6) -------------

At point 0, the distance from 6 will be equal to 3 times the distance from -2. So on the left of 0, the distance from 6 will be greater.

The distance between -2 and 6 is 8. Distance from 6 will be equal to 3 times the distance from -2 at a point 4 units to the left of -2 i.e. -6. To its left, distance from 6 will be less. So between -6 to 0, distance from 6 is greater than 3 times the distance from -2. We have 5 integer values lying between these two.

Answer (C)
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,994
 [5]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,994
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepKarishma
Bunuel
For how many integer values of x, is |x – 6| > |3x + 6|?

(A) 1

(B) 3

(C) 5

(D) 7

(E) Infinite

Think in terms of the definition of absolute values:

|x - 6| > 3*|x + 2|

Distance from 6 is greater than 3 times the distance from -2

-------- (-2) -------- (0) ------------------------------ (6) -------------

At point 0, the distance from 6 will be equal to 3 times the distance from -2. So on the left of 0, the distance from 6 will be greater.

The distance between -2 and 6 is 8. Distance from 6 will be equal to 3 times the distance from -2 at a point 4 units to the left of -2 i.e. -6. To its left, distance from 6 will be less. So between -6 to 0, distance from 6 is greater than 3 times the distance from -2. We have 5 integer values lying between these two.

Answer (C)
Responding to a pm:
Quote:

I know very well that if |x - 3| < 6

Distance of x from 3 is less than 6 so -3 < x < 9.

with this understood, Can you please elaborate your answer?

First consider the equation: |x - 6| = 3*|x + 2|
That is, the point where distance from 6 is equal to three times the distance from -2. There is such a point between 6 and -2. That point is x = 0. Here the distance from 6 is 6 which is equal to three times 2, the distance of 0 from -2.
How do we get x = 0?
Distance from 6 should be thrice the distance from -2
Distance from 6 : Distance from -2 = 3:1
Split the distance between 6 and -2 into the ratio 3:1. Since there are 8 units between 6 and -2, you get that x is 6 units away from 6 and hence at 0.

For the inequality, we want the distance from 6 to be greater than the distance from -2 so we move to the left (closer to -2). The distance from 6 will keep increasing till we reach -2 when the distance from 6 is 8. Note that now also distance from 6 is greater than 3 times the distance from -2.

Now as we go further to the left, the distance from 6 keeps increasing but so does the distance from -2. There will be some point again where distance from 6 will be equal to 3 times the distance from -2. At this point, the distance of 8 units between 6 and -2 will make up twice the distance of x from -2


(x)......................(-2).................(0)...................................................(6)...................

< Distance from -2>

<-------------------Distance from 6 ----------------------->

So x must be 4 units to the left of -2. So at x = -6, again, distance from 6 will be three times the distance from -2.

Hence, for our inequality, x can take values between -6 and 0. This gives us 5 integer values.
User avatar
RMD007
Joined: 03 Jul 2016
Last visit: 08 Jun 2019
Posts: 236
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 80
Status:Countdown Begins...
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V22
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V22
Posts: 236
Kudos: 201
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepKarishma

Responding to a pm:
Quote:

I know very well that if |x - 3| < 6

Distance of x from 3 is less than 6 so -3 < x < 9.

with this understood, Can you please elaborate your answer?

First consider the equation: |x - 6| = 3*|x + 2|
That is, the point where distance from 6 is equal to three times the distance from -2. There is such a point between 6 and -2. That point is x = 0. Here the distance from 6 is 6 which is equal to three times 2, the distance of 0 from -2.
How do we get x = 0?
Distance from 6 should be thrice the distance from -2
Distance from 6 : Distance from -2 = 3:1
Split the distance between 6 and -2 into the ratio 3:1. Since there are 8 units between 6 and -2, you get that x is 6 units away from 6 and hence at 0.

For the inequality, we want the distance from 6 to be greater than the distance from -2 so we move to the left (closer to -2). The distance from 6 will keep increasing till we reach -2 when the distance from 6 is 8. Note that now also distance from 6 is greater than 3 times the distance from -2.

Now as we go further to the left, the distance from 6 keeps increasing but so does the distance from -2. There will be some point again where distance from 6 will be equal to 3 times the distance from -2. At this point, the distance of 8 units between 6 and -2 will make up twice the distance of x from -2


(x)......................(-2).................(0)...................................................(6)...................

< Distance from -2>

<-------------------Distance from 6 ----------------------->

So x must be 4 units to the left of -2. So at x = -6, again, distance from 6 will be three times the distance from -2.

Hence, for our inequality, x can take values between -6 and 0. This gives us 5 integer values.

Thank you so much VeritasPrepKarishma for the explanation. +1

A good thoughtful explanation. It took a little time for me to understand but I guess I need to practice more to internalize it.

Just one question here, for the below inequality -
|x-6| > |x+2|
can we say that the solution for this is x<2?
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,994
 [4]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,994
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RMD007
VeritasPrepKarishma

Responding to a pm:
Quote:

I know very well that if |x - 3| < 6

Distance of x from 3 is less than 6 so -3 < x < 9.

with this understood, Can you please elaborate your answer?

First consider the equation: |x - 6| = 3*|x + 2|
That is, the point where distance from 6 is equal to three times the distance from -2. There is such a point between 6 and -2. That point is x = 0. Here the distance from 6 is 6 which is equal to three times 2, the distance of 0 from -2.
How do we get x = 0?
Distance from 6 should be thrice the distance from -2
Distance from 6 : Distance from -2 = 3:1
Split the distance between 6 and -2 into the ratio 3:1. Since there are 8 units between 6 and -2, you get that x is 6 units away from 6 and hence at 0.

For the inequality, we want the distance from 6 to be greater than the distance from -2 so we move to the left (closer to -2). The distance from 6 will keep increasing till we reach -2 when the distance from 6 is 8. Note that now also distance from 6 is greater than 3 times the distance from -2.

Now as we go further to the left, the distance from 6 keeps increasing but so does the distance from -2. There will be some point again where distance from 6 will be equal to 3 times the distance from -2. At this point, the distance of 8 units between 6 and -2 will make up twice the distance of x from -2


(x)......................(-2).................(0)...................................................(6)...................

< Distance from -2>

<-------------------Distance from 6 ----------------------->

So x must be 4 units to the left of -2. So at x = -6, again, distance from 6 will be three times the distance from -2.

Hence, for our inequality, x can take values between -6 and 0. This gives us 5 integer values.

Thank you so much VeritasPrepKarishma for the explanation. +1

A good thoughtful explanation. It took a little time for me to understand but I guess I need to practice more to internalize it.

Just one question here, for the below inequality -
|x-6| > |x+2|
can we say that the solution for this is x<2?

Yes, that is correct.

|x-6| > |x+2|

The distance of x from 6 is more than the distance of x from -2.

The two distances will be equal at the mid point that is at x = 2. As you move the left, the distance of x from 6 will keep increasing. To the left of -2 too, the distance from 6 will always be more than the distance from -2.

Hence answer will be x < 2.
avatar
manojhanagandi
Joined: 22 Nov 2016
Last visit: 04 Nov 2018
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 9
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In this question, in my opinion, there are 2 possible solutions.

Solution 1.

|x–6|>|3x+6|⟹|x–6|−|3x+6|>0|x–6|>|3x+6|⟹|x–6|−|3x+6|>0

If x<−2x<−2 we have (6−x)−(−3x−6)=6−x+3x+6=2x+12>0⟹x>−6(6−x)−(−3x−6)=6−x+3x+6=2x+12>0⟹x>−6. Hence −6<x<−2−6<x<−2

If −2≤x<6−2≤x<6 we have (6−x)−(3x+6)=−4x>0⟹x<0(6−x)−(3x+6)=−4x>0⟹x<0. Hence −2≤x<0−2≤x<0

If x≥6x≥6 we have (x−6)−(3x+6)=−2x−12>0⟹x<−6(x−6)−(3x+6)=−2x−12>0⟹x<−6. There is no satisfied value of xx in this case.

Combine all cases we have −6<x<0−6<x<0.

Thus, xx could receive 5 integer value {−5;−4;−3;−2;−1}{−5;−4;−3;−2;−1}

The answer is C.

Solution 2.

|x–6|>|3x+6|⟹(x−6)2>(3x+6)2|x–6|>|3x+6|⟹(x−6)2>(3x+6)2

⟹x2−12x+36>9x2+36x+36⟹8x2+48x<0⟹x2−12x+36>9x2+36x+36⟹8x2+48x<0

⟹8x(x+6)<0⟹−6<x<0⟹8x(x+6)<0⟹−6<x<0.


hi nguyendinhtuong .
could u please explain why x<-6 has no satisfied values in solution 1.

thank you..
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,784
Own Kudos:
12,806
 [3]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,784
Kudos: 12,806
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi All,

One of the great 'design aspects' of most GMAT questions is that they can be approached in a variety of ways. As such, just because you got a question correct doesn't necessarily mean that you solved it in the fastest/easiest way possible (and if you're doing a lot of complex math to get to the solution, then you are likely NOT using the fastest approach). Sometimes the simplest approach to certain questions is just 'brute force' arithmetic - plow through the basic math necessary to prove the solution.

Here, we're asked for the number of INTEGER solutions to |X - 6| > |3X + 6|.

From the answer choices, it seems clear that there aren't that many possibilities (and it's unlikely that there's an 'unlimited' number of solutions), so we just have to find the 1, 3, 5 or 7 options that 'fit' this inequality.

To start, let's TEST a couple of simple values for X: 0 and 1....

IF...
X = 0, then we end up with...
|-6| > |6| ..... 6 > 6.... which is NOT correct - so X=0 is NOT a solution

IF...
X = 1, then we end up with...
|-5| > |9| ..... 5 > 9.... which is NOT correct - so X=1 is NOT a solution

Increasing the value of X will just make the "right side' absolute value a lot bigger, so there's no point in raising X. Thus, let's decrease it and see what happens....

IF...
X = -1, then we end up with...
|-7| > |3| ..... 7 > 3.... which IS correct - so X=-1 IS a solution

At this point, how long would it take you to TEST -2, -3, -4, -5 and -6? What happens when you try -6 though? And what about -7? Notice how you would stop working for the same reason why you wouldn't both trying 2, 3, 4, etc... Now, how many total solutions do you have?

Final Answer:
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 03 May 2025
Posts: 1,143
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
For how many integer values of x, is \(|x – 6| > |3x + 6|\) ?

(A) 1

(B) 3

(C) 5

(D) 7

(E) Infinite

Bunuel Why my solution is incorrect?

(1) Take positive

\(|x – 6|=x - 6\)
\(|3x + 6|=3x + 6\)

\(x-6>3x+6\)
\(x<-6\)

(2) Take negative

\(|x-6| = -x+6\)
\(|3x+6| = -3x-6\)

\(-x+6>-3x-6\)
\(x>-6\)

Does this approach correct? https://gmatclub.com/forum/for-how-many ... l#p1804531
User avatar
stonecold
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Last visit: 09 Apr 2024
Posts: 2,244
Own Kudos:
3,549
 [1]
Given Kudos: 893
GRE 1: Q169 V154
GRE 1: Q169 V154
Posts: 2,244
Kudos: 3,549
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ziyuen
Bunuel
For how many integer values of x, is \(|x – 6| > |3x + 6|\) ?

(A) 1

(B) 3

(C) 5

(D) 7

(E) Infinite

Bunuel Why my solution is incorrect?

(1) Take positive

\(|x – 6|=x - 6\)
\(|3x + 6|=3x + 6\)

\(x-6>3x+6\)
\(x<-6\)

(2) Take negative

\(|x-6| = -x+6\)
\(|3x+6| = -3x-6\)

\(-x+6>-3x-6\)
\(x>-6\)

Does this approach correct? https://gmatclub.com/forum/for-how-many ... l#p1804531

Hi ziyuen
It is not that easy.
This is an extremely difficult problem.
You highlighted part is incorrect.


Here is what did =>

Firstly the definition of |x| -->
|x|= x for x>0
= -x for x<0
=0 for x=0


Now lets look at the two modulus equations -->
|x-6| = x-6 for x>6
=-(x-6)=-x+6 for x<6
=0 for x=6

Similarly
|3x+6| => 3x+6 for x>-2
=> -3x-6 for x<-2
=> 0 for x=-2

Hence the three boundaries are => (-∞,-2] , [-2,6]and [6,∞)


For x>6 ==>

x-6>3x+6
x<-6

REJECTED as x cannot be x>6 and x<-6 simultaneously.
((Also x≠6 as modulus is always positive))

For x=> [-2,6)
-x+6>3x+6
4x4x<0
x<0

Hence x can be -2 or -1


Finally when x<-2 ==>
-x+6 >-3x-6
2x>-12
x>-6

Hence x can be -5,-4,-3


Final conclusion --> x can be -5,-4,-3,-2,-1

FIVE VALUES.

SMASH THAT C.


P.S-> It took me about 3 minutes and 32 seconds to get to the correct answer.
This question is extremely helpful to clear basics.


Also you can go through
chetan2u 's blog here --> https://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modu ... l#p1622372

That would surely help you out to clear the Modulus basics.

Regards
Stone Cold
avatar
Ravindra.here
Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Last visit: 08 May 2020
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 334
Location: India
Schools: LBS '18 ISB '19
GMAT 1: 610 Q48 V26
GPA: 3.21
Schools: LBS '18 ISB '19
GMAT 1: 610 Q48 V26
Posts: 36
Kudos: 48
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
For how many integer values of x, is |x – 6| > |3x + 6|?

(A) 1

(B) 3

(C) 5

(D) 7

(E) Infinite

MY way simple and sober and within a minute you get the answer

equate x – 6 = 3x + 6
we get x=-6
Now if you will decrease x let's say
Quote:
-7 ((try it)
then |x – 6| > |3x + 6| wil not hold ((LHS WILL BE LESS THAN RHS

However if you DECREASE X
Quote:
say -5
then |x – 6| > |3x + 6| holds
this continues till -1 and then again fails
therefore -5.-4,-3,-2,-1 check for 0
Ans =5
User avatar
danielarasan
Joined: 15 Sep 2017
Last visit: 22 Feb 2019
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.5
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
Posts: 19
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
|x-6| > |3x + 6|?

(X - 6)^2 > (3x + 6)^2
x^2 - 12x + 36 > 9x^2 + 36x + 36
8x^2 + 48x < 0
8x ( x + 6) < 0

Now, for it to be negative, either 1) 8x is positive and (x+6) is negative or 2) 8x is negative and (x+6) is positive. Both cannot be positive and both cannot be negative

1) For 8x to be positive and x+6 to be negative is impossible. As you cannot have a positive number x that when multiplied by 8 is positive and when added to 6 is negative, then no results here.
2) For 8x is negative and (x+6) is positive: Any negative number multiplied by 8 is negative, but not any negative number added to 6 is positive.
The only negative integers that when added to 6 become positive are -1, -2, -3, -4 and -5

Therefore, answer C, 5 integers
User avatar
SchruteDwight
Joined: 03 Sep 2018
Last visit: 30 Mar 2023
Posts: 167
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 923
Location: Netherlands
GPA: 4
Products:
Posts: 167
Kudos: 113
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
By far the easiest approach to these super rare, super hard inequality problems is number plugging

0: NO
1: NO
2: NO
.
.
.
100000:NO

-1: YES
-2: YES
-3: YES
-4: YES
-5: YES
-6: NO
.
.
.
-100000: NO

done (t=45sec)
User avatar
Kritisood
Joined: 21 Feb 2017
Last visit: 19 Jul 2023
Posts: 492
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,090
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Products:
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Posts: 492
Kudos: 1,272
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma
Bunuel
For how many integer values of x, is |x – 6| > |3x + 6|?

(A) 1

(B) 3

(C) 5

(D) 7

(E) Infinite

Think in terms of the definition of absolute values:

|x - 6| > 3*|x + 2|

Distance from 6 is greater than 3 times the distance from -2

-------- (-2) -------- (0) ------------------------------ (6) -------------

At point 0, the distance from 6 will be equal to 3 times the distance from -2. So on the left of 0, the distance from 6 will be greater.

The distance between -2 and 6 is 8. Distance from 6 will be equal to 3 times the distance from -2 at a point 4 units to the left of -2 i.e. -6. To its left, distance from 6 will be less. So between -6 to 0, distance from 6 is greater than 3 times the distance from -2. We have 5 integer values lying between these two.

Answer (C)

Hi VeritasKarishma i was trying to solve this problem by finding the critical points. the critical points I arrived at are -2 and 6. and I'm not able to find the answer through this. the critical points as mentioned by JeffTargetTestPrep are -6 and 0.

could you help me in where I am going wrong in deducing the critical points?

-- to elaborate how I got the critical points
x-6=0
x=6

and 3x+6=0
x=-2

https://gmatclub.com/forum/is-x-1-1-x-1 ... 82478.html
in this question the statement was |x + 1| = 2|x - 1| hence critical points mentioned are -1 and 1; using the same logic i arrived at the critical points here.

JeffTargetTestPrep VeritasKarishma i am really confused about this. could you please assist?
 1   2   
Moderators:
Math Expert
105389 posts
Tuck School Moderator
805 posts