GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 20 Sep 2018, 06:03

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

QOTD #4 A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the s

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3463
QOTD #4 A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the s  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2016, 08:38
1
7
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

74% (01:20) correct 26% (01:49) wrong based on 492 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics



A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the strength of unions was declining. The article’s evidence was the decreasing number and size of strikes as though the reason for the unions’ existence was to organize strikes. Surely, in a modern industrial society, the calling of a strike is evidence that the negotiating position of the union was too weak. Strong unions do not need to call strikes. They can concentrate their efforts on working with others in the labor market to achieve common goals, such as profitable and humane working conditions.

The argument criticizing the newspaper article employs which one of the following strategies?

(A) Questioning the accuracy of the statistical evidence that the newspaper article uses
(B) Detailing historical changes that make the newspaper articles’ analysis outdated
(C) Reinterpreting evidence that the newspaper article uses as indicating the opposite of what the newspaper concludes
(D) Arguing that the newspaper article’s conclusion is motivated by a desire to change the role of unions
(E) Pointing to common interests among unions and management

_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS AND RESOURCES
Quant: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal 2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 4. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version 5. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
Verbal:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass 2. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Verbal Videos 3. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks 4. Sentence Correction_Oldy but goldy question banks 5. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 18 Aug 2013
Posts: 138
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V28
GPA: 3.92
WE: Operations (Transportation)
Re: QOTD #4 A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the s  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2016, 08:51
1
Its C for me.


(A) Questioning the accuracy of the statistical evidence that the newspaper article uses--Nothing questioned about the accuracy of statistics.
(B) Detailing historical changes that make the newspaper articles’ analysis outdated--No mention of historical changes.Out of scope.
© Reinterpreting evidence that the newspaper article uses as indicating the opposite of what the newspaper concludes--OK.
(D) Arguing that the newspaper article’s conclusion is motivated by a desire to change the role of unions--Very strong conclusion.Out
(E) Pointing to common interests among unions and management.--No help.
Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 20 Feb 2015
Posts: 728
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: QOTD #4 A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the s  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2016, 08:56
1
carcass wrote:
A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the strength of unions was declining. The article’s evidence was the decreasing number and size of strikes as though the reason for the unions’ existence was to organize strikes. Surely, in a modern industrial society, the calling of a strike is evidence that the negotiating position of the union was too weak. Strong unions do not need to call strikes. They can concentrate their efforts on working with others in the labor market to achieve common goals, such as profitable and humane working conditions.

The argument criticizing the newspaper article employs which one of the following strategies?

(A) Questioning the accuracy of the statistical evidence that the newspaper article uses
(B) Detailing historical changes that make the newspaper articles’ analysis outdated
(C) Reinterpreting evidence that the newspaper article uses as indicating the opposite of what the newspaper concludes
(D) Arguing that the newspaper article’s conclusion is motivated by a desire to change the role of unions
(E) Pointing to common interests among unions and management



C it is !!

(A) Questioning the accuracy of the statistical evidence that the newspaper article uses (Dont see any statistics uses here)
(B) Detailing historical changes that make the newspaper articles’ analysis outdated ( nothing related to history as well )
(C) Reinterpreting evidence that the newspaper article uses as indicating the opposite of what the newspaper concludes (Bingo !! author clearly mentions it in line 1 The article’s evidence was the decreasing number and size of strikes as though the reason for the unions’ existence was to organize strikes
(D) Arguing that the newspaper article’s conclusion is motivated by a desire to change the role of unions (nothing to do with the change of unions)
(E) Pointing to common interests among unions and management (- nope)
Current Student
avatar
B
Joined: 12 Jan 2016
Posts: 70
Location: United States
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.5
WE: Supply Chain Management (Consumer Electronics)
Re: QOTD #4 A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the s  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2016, 10:46
1
Only options B and C seem relevant to begin with. But the argument does not clearly state that historical changes. C looks like the better option.

C for me as well.
Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 4020
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: QOTD #4 A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the s  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2016, 11:37
1
carcass wrote:
A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the strength of unions was declining. The article’s evidence was the decreasing number and size of strikes as though the reason for the unions’ existence was to organize strikes. Surely, in a modern industrial society, the calling of a strike is evidence that the negotiating position of the union was too weak. Strong unions do not need to call strikes. They can concentrate their efforts on working with others in the labor market to achieve common goals, such as profitable and humane working conditions.

The argument criticizing the newspaper article employs which one of the followingstrategies?

(A) Questioning the accuracy of the statistical evidence that the newspaper article uses
(B) Detailing historical changes that make the newspaper articles’ analysis outdated
(C) Reinterpreting evidence that the newspaper article uses as indicating the opposite of what the newspaper concludes
(D) Arguing that the newspaper article’s conclusion is motivated by a desire to change the role of unions
(E) Pointing to common interests among unions and management


Newspaper Evidence : Decreasing number and size of strikes = Declining strength of unions
Author : Calling of a strike = Weak negotiating position of the union
Thus declining no and size of strikes = More time for achieve common goals ( Of Unions & Management )


IMHO also with (C) will look for the OE for this question....

_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3463
Re: QOTD #4 A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the s  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jun 2016, 04:13
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 Mar 2016
Posts: 396
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.8
WE: Operations (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: QOTD #4 A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the s  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jun 2016, 03:00
1
Premise : A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the strength of unions was declining. The article’s evidence was the decreasing number and size of strikes as though the reason for the unions’ existence was to organize strikes.
Counter-Premise: Surely, in a modern industrial society, the calling of a strike is evidence that the negotiating position of the union was too weak. They can concentrate their efforts on working with others in the labor market to achieve common goals, such as profitable and humane working conditions
Conclusion : Strong unions do not need to call strikes.
.
We are asked to find the method of reasoning by the critique of the news paper article. Hence this is a Method of Reasoning Question and information must flow from the stimuli only no new information allowed.

(A) Questioning the accuracy of the statistical evidence that the newspaper article uses - The counter premise does not question the accuracy of the statistical evidence at all rather it uses the same statistics to argue that it is a positive development. This choice is incorrect.
(B) Detailing historical changes that make the newspaper articles’ analysis outdated - There is no reference to history here. Do not be confused by the words "Modern Days" that does not have any historical context in this passage. Incorrect.
(C) Reinterpreting evidence that the newspaper article uses as indicating the opposite of what the newspaper concludes - Correct! Th conclusion is based on a counter premise that re-interprets the same evidenc of decreasing strikes provided by the newspaper in a positive manner that is how the conclusion is reasoned by the counter premise. Hence this is the right answer.
(D) Arguing that the newspaper article’s conclusion is motivated by a desire to change the role of unions - There is no such argument. There is merely a statement made by the stimulus author in a sarcastic manner. Incorrect.
(E) Pointing to common interests among unions and management - broadens the scope of the argument hence incorrect.
.
Correct Answer choice is (C)
Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1322
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
QOTD #4 A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the s  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Apr 2017, 17:32
carcass wrote:


A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the strength of unions was declining. The article’s evidence was the decreasing number and size of strikes as though the reason for the unions’ existence was to organize strikes. Surely, in a modern industrial society, the calling of a strike is evidence that the negotiating position of the union was too weak. Strong unions do not need to call strikes. They can concentrate their efforts on working with others in the labor market to achieve common goals, such as profitable and humane working conditions.

The argument criticizing the newspaper article employs which one of the following strategies?

(A) Questioning the accuracy of the statistical evidence that the newspaper article uses
(B) Detailing historical changes that make the newspaper articles’ analysis outdated
(C) Reinterpreting evidence that the newspaper article uses as indicating the opposite of what the newspaper concludes
(D) Arguing that the newspaper article’s conclusion is motivated by a desire to change the role of unions
(E) Pointing to common interests among unions and management


Source : LSAT PrepTest36 Q24

A newspaper article on Britain’s unions argued that their strength was declining. The article’s evidence was the decreasing number and size of strikes, as if the reason for the unions’ existence was to organize strikes. Surely, in a modern industrial society, the calling of a strike is evidence that the negotiating position of the union was too weak. Strong unions do not need to call strikes. They can concentrate their efforts on working with others in the labor market to achieve common goals, such as profitable and humane working conditions.

24. The argument criticizing the newspaper article employs which one of the following strategies?

(A) questioning the accuracy of the statistical evidence that the newspaper article uses
(B) detailing historical changes that make the newspaper article’s analysis outdated
(C) reinterpreting evidence that the newspaper article uses as indicating the opposite of what the newspaper concludes
(D) arguing that the newspaper article’s conclusion is motivated by a desire to change the role of unions
(E) pointing to common interests among unions and management which the newspaper article ignores

Quote:
The newspaper concludes that unions are declining in strength. The evidence put forward by the newspaper is the declining number and size of strikes. The author takes this same piece of evidence and twists it around to imply the denial of the conclusion. The author uses the fact that there are fewer and smaller strikes to suggest that the unions are not weaker and may in fact be stronger. This is perfectly summarized in answer choice (C).

(A) is not true. The author doesn't question the evidence, just the conclusion reached from it.
(B) states something that never happened. It's not that the evidence the newspaper used is outdated, rather, the author states that it leads to a different conclusion.
(C) is correct for the reasons above.
(D) states something that never happened. The author does not question the motivations of the newspaper article's conclusion.
(E) mentions common interests between unions and management. The author mentions common interests between unions and others. Not exactly the same thing!


OFFICIAL EXPLANATION FROM KAPLAN


Method of Argument

Come up with your own prediction of a method of argument answer before you get bogged down in the choices.

(C) has it right: The author takes the very evidence (few and tiny strikes) used by the paper to belittle unions, and shows that it can speak to unions’ strength.

Far from questioning the evidence’s accuracy (A) the author accepts it and uses it to his own ends. The author’s evidence is interpretive rather than historical (B) and no hint of “outdatedness” appears. In questioning the article’s conclusion the author does not impugn its writer’s motives (D) nor does he need to; (E) seems to put its toe in the water of impugning motives as well.
_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advanced-search/

SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1794
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: QOTD #4 A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the s  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Nov 2017, 23:45
At first, the question looks like an application question. The question actually is a responding question.
Re: QOTD #4 A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the s &nbs [#permalink] 03 Nov 2017, 23:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

QOTD #4 A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the s

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.