Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 05:27 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 05:27
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,385
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,385
Kudos: 778,206
 [14]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,344
Own Kudos:
3,796
 [5]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,344
Kudos: 3,796
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
Ted2007
Joined: 02 Jul 2018
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 31
Posts: 8
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C.
In other to evaluate the officials' claim that the increased tax on luxary item can increase, it is important to evaluate his assumption.

The increased tax can increase the income can be hold only if it won't be offset by decreased sales in luxary item, therefore, c is crucial for evaluating the assumption.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
bidskamikaze
Joined: 07 Jan 2018
Last visit: 29 Oct 2022
Posts: 261
Own Kudos:
295
 [1]
Given Kudos: 160
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Posts: 261
Kudos: 295
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Raising the tax rate on essential goods—a traditional means of increasing government revenues—invariably turns low- and middle-income taxpayers against the government. Hence government officials have proposed adding a new tax on purchases of luxury items such as yachts, private planes, jewels, and furs. The officials claim that this tax will result in a substantial increase in government revenues while affecting only the wealthy individuals and corporations who can afford to purchase such items.

The answer to which one of the following questions would be most relevant in evaluating the accuracy of the government officials’ prediction?


(A) Will luxury goods be taxed at a higher rate than that at which essential goods are currently taxed?

(B) Will the revenues generated by the proposed tax be comparable to those that are currently being generated by taxes on essential goods?

(C) Will sales of the luxury items subject to the proposed tax occur at current rates once the proposed tax on luxury items has been passed?

(D) Will the proposed tax on luxury items win support for the government in the eyes of low- and middle-income taxpayers?

(E) Will purchases of luxury items by corporations account for more of the revenue generated by the proposed tax than will purchases of luxury items by wealthy individuals?

Even though I marked option B, I now understand why option C is correct after giving some careful thought.

(B) Will the revenues generated by the proposed tax be comparable to those that are currently being generated by taxes on essential goods?
Even though this option seems very tempting, notice that revenues generated by the proposed tax might be very much higher than the current revenue.
This option says questions whether revenues will be COMPARABLE, but the revenues might not be comparable, yet sufficiently high. That is the reason this choice is incorrect.

(C) Will sales of the luxury items subject to the proposed tax occur at current rates once the proposed tax on luxury items has been passed?
One may question whether we can apply a similar logic, as we did for option B, on this option.
However, notice that the sales cannot increase BECAUSE of the tax increase. It might increase because of some other external factors, but not because of tax INCREASE.
So, it is reasonable to think that if the the sales do not decline then, most probably, the tax revenues will increase.

Option C is therefore correct. :)
avatar
shrgmat
Joined: 11 Nov 2020
Last visit: 25 Dec 2021
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
18
 [1]
Given Kudos: 82
Posts: 44
Kudos: 18
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATGuruNY
Plan:
Rather than raising the tax rate on essential goods, government officials have proposed adding a new tax on purchases of luxury items.

(B) Will the revenues generated by the proposed tax be comparable to those that are currently being generated by taxes on essential goods?

Note the difference between the blue portion in the passage and the red portion in B.
Since the conclusion is that adding a new tax on luxury items is preferable to RAISING THE TAX RATE ON ESSENTIAL GOODS, the portion in red -- which refers to the CURRENT tax rate -- is irrelevant.

Eliminate B.

Sorry; there is no conclusion in the argument. They don’t even use the word ‘preferable’. We have to evaluate a claim. Claim is that the govt revenue will substantially increase. B - what does comparable revenue mean? Higher, lower, equal - we don’t know.
Only C can result in substantial increase as the claim says. So, question C is the most relevant.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
TheGraceful
Joined: 10 Apr 2018
Last visit: 28 Jan 2024
Posts: 333
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 217
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V28
GPA: 3.56
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Products:
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V28
Posts: 333
Kudos: 216
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ted2007
C.
In other to evaluate the officials' claim that the increased tax on luxary item can increase, it is important to evaluate his assumption.

The increased tax can increase the income can be hold only if it won't be offset by decreased sales in luxary item, therefore, c is crucial for evaluating the assumption.

Posted from my mobile device

Took a little time to understand. However, the explanation made sense to me.
Thanks.
User avatar
8Harshitsharma
Joined: 25 Oct 2017
Last visit: 06 Jul 2025
Posts: 133
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 723
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q87 V80 DI80
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GRE 1: Q165 V160
GRE 2: Q170 V162
GPA: 9.25
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q87 V80 DI80
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GRE 1: Q165 V160
GRE 2: Q170 V162
Posts: 133
Kudos: 142
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option C asks whether sales will occur at current rates after tax imposition; however, if the sales INCREASE then also the outcome of the plan will hold.

So since we can't get clear contrasting answers when asking Yes/No to option C, how is it correct?
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,832
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,832
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
188 posts