Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 02 Nov 2018, 02:42
10
84
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
55% (hard)
Question Stats:
64% (02:04) correct 36% (02:15) wrong based on 3597 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern nonforager societies.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists' strategy?
(A) All forager societies throughout history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other types of societies.
(B) Most ancient forager societies either dissolved or made a transition to another way of life.
(C) All anthropologists study one kind or another of modern-day society.
(D) Many anthropologists who study modern-day forager societies do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies.
(E) Even those modern-day forager societies that have not had significant contact with modern societies are importantly different from ancient forager societies.
Verbal Question of The Day: Day 79: Critical Reasoning
Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day:E-mail | RSS For All QOTD Questions Click Here
Re: Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Aug 2017, 11:06
9
3
4
The conclusion is that the strategy of studying modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors has a flaw -- and the flaw is that forager societies are extremely varied. Why is this a flaw?
If some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in order to learn about ancient foragers, this implies that those anthropologists believe that what is true of modern-day foragers is generally true of ancient foragers.
But what if forager societies are extremely varied? This might suggest that even if two groups are both forager societies, those groups might not actually share common characteristics.
This, in turn, calls into question the anthropologists' belief that what is true of one group of foragers is generally true of another group of foragers.
Quote:
(A) All forager societies throughout history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other types of societies.
Choice (A) reassures us that, even if forager societies are extremely varied, they are still likely to share a number of important features. This suggests that we can learn about ancient foragers by studying modern foragers, even if those two groups have many differences. Thus, the flaw presented in the conclusion is not actually a flaw, and the criticism is not valid. Keep choice (A).
Quote:
(B) Most ancient forager societies either dissolved or made a transition to another way of life.
We are trying to determine whether studying modern-day societies of foragers to learn about our ancient forager ancestors is a flawed strategy. The fact given in choice (B) neither supports nor weakens the author's argument. Thus, choice (B) can be eliminated.
Quote:
(C) All anthropologists study one kind or another of modern-day society.
Again, we are trying to determine if the author's criticism is valid. The fact that all anthropologists study modern-day societies has no impact on the author's argument, so choice (C) should be eliminated.
Quote:
(D) Many anthropologists who study modern-day forager societies do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies.
The argument criticizes the strategy employed by some anthropologists. It makes no difference how many anthropologists use that strategy. Choice (D) does not weaken the criticism.
Quote:
(E) Even those modern-day forager societies that have not had significant contact with modern societies are importantly different from ancient forager societies.
The argument is that modern-day forager societies and ancient forager societies are so different that anthropologists cannot learn about one by studying the other. This statement strengthens that criticism by stressing that modern-day forager societies--even those that have not had significant contact with modern societies--are importantly different from ancient forager societies.
So (E) is out, and (A) is the correct answer.
_________________
Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.
Re: Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jul 2004, 23:35
9
1
My ans is A. See, in the stem it said " A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied". So A "a number of important features in common" most weaken the argument.
_________________
"Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you'r gonna get"
Re: Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jul 2004, 23:54
6
2
E after spending 1 min 54s.
Now coming to the analysis:
Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern nonforager societies.
Argument: Anthropologists study modern-day forager societies to learn more abt. our ancestors.
Criticism: (i) Forager societies are extremely varied.
(ii) All the forager societies which anthropologists know about have contact with modern non-forager societies. Therefore, any conclusions made abt. our ancestors are bound to be wrong, as the behaviour of modern day foragers is affected by being in contact with non-foragers.
To weaken the criticism:
A--> states that Foragers throughout history have had features in common
This will for sure weaken (i)
B-->Strengthens (ii), therefore eliminate this option
C--> I don't see the relevance - IMO, this neither strengthens/weakens the criticisms
D--> Do not draw inferences - but the criticism is that the study in itself is useless - I eliminate this option too
Re: Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Jul 2013, 09:40
1
Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern, non-forager societies. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists' strategy? (A) All forager societies throughout history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other types of societies. (B) Most ancient forager societies either dissolved or made a transition to another way of life. (C) All anthropologists study one kind or another of modern-day society. (D) Many anthropologistswho study modern-day forager societies do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies. (E) Even those modern-day forager societies that have not had significant contact with modern societies are importantly different from ancient forager societies.
[spoiler=][A]
Hi Chiranjeev,
This is a weakening question and i am confused between 2 choices A & D. To me both of them are weakening. A. It states that there are common characteristics among forager societies. So, it weakens the conclusion in a way by weakening the two criticism points - societies are varied and contact with other modern societies- stated to draw the conclusion that anthropologists should not study ancient forager socities from modern ones. Hence, it is a weakener D. It states that anthropologists do not take inferences from the studies. Again, this seems a valid weakener as it weakens the conclusion that anthropologists would not be taking any inferences as per the study in their understanding of Ancient forager societies and makes the criticism invalid. Can you please explain how D is incorrect and also if my explanation for A is fine ? Also, could you please state the conclusion for the argument. The conclusion i was able to draw is : The study by some anthropologists on modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors but this study is flawed.
Re: Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Aug 2013, 19:17
2
1
shlbatra wrote:
Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern, non-forager societies. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists' strategy? (A) All forager societies throughout history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other types of societies. (B) Most ancient forager societies either dissolved or made a transition to another way of life. (C) All anthropologists study one kind or another of modern-day society. (D) Many anthropologistswho study modern-day forager societies do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies. (E) Even those modern-day forager societies that have not had significant contact with modern societies are importantly different from ancient forager societies.
[spoiler=][A]
Hi Chiranjeev,
This is a weakening question and i am confused between 2 choices A & D. To me both of them are weakening. A. It states that there are common characteristics among forager societies. So, it weakens the conclusion in a way by weakening the two criticism points - societies are varied and contact with other modern societies- stated to draw the conclusion that anthropologists should not study ancient forager socities from modern ones. Hence, it is a weakener D. It states that anthropologists do not take inferences from the studies. Again, this seems a valid weakener as it weakens the conclusion that anthropologists would not be taking any inferences as per the study in their understanding of Ancient forager societies and makes the criticism invalid. Can you please explain how D is incorrect and also if my explanation for A is fine ? Also, could you please state the conclusion for the argument. The conclusion i was able to draw is : The study by some anthropologists on modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors but this study is flawed.
Hi,
Your explanation for A is correct.
First of all the conclusion of this passage is:
The strategy to study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers, is flawed.
In shortened form, the conclusion is: The given strategy used by anthropologists is flawed.
Now. coming to option D, there is a problem with option D: it either goes against the information presented in the passage or does not affect the conclusion.
Let's understand the two cases:
Case 1: When we say that drawing inferences about a population is same as learning about that population. This is most plausible understanding of "inferences" used in option D. IF you are studying modern societies and saying that you are learning about ancient ancestors, then in all probability, you are drawing inferences about ancestors based on your observation of modern societies. If we understand the meaning of "inferences" as such, then option D goes against the first statement of the passage: "Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers"
Since option D goes against the information presented in the passage, it is incorrect.
Case 2: when we say "drawing inferences" is different from learning In this case, what we are saying is that anthropologists are learning about ancient ancestors but they are not drawing inferences about them.
In such a case, option D does not affect the conclusion because the conclusion talks about a strategy to learn about ancient ancestors. The conclusion says that this strategy is flawed. Whether anthropologists draw inferences or not does not affect the conclusion as long as they learn about ancient ancestors from the study.
Re: Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Oct 2013, 04:42
1
Bhai wrote:
4. Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern nonforager societies.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists’ strategy?
(A) All forager societies throughout history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other types of societies. (B) Most ancient forager societies either dissolved or made a transition to another way of life. (C) All anthropologists study one kind or another of modern-day society. (D) Many anthropologists who study modern-day forager societies do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies. (E) Even those modern-day forager societies that have not had significant contact with modern societies are importantly different from ancient forager societies.
You know what is the toughest thing about this questions? To properly find the conclusion. The conclusion is that a flaw in this strategy is that they are extremely varied.
We want to weaken the criticism which is in fact the conclusion so we should keep focused here. Naturally, A does a great job and straightly attacks the conclusion by saying the opposite. Tears it apart totally
Re: Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Mar 2014, 21:21
Hi Chiranjeev,
Can you please help me understand why option E is wrong for this?
Option E says that modern day foragers who had contact with other societies are also not influenced. So it goes against the argument which says that we cannot learn about ancient foragers by studying modern foragers.
Re: Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Mar 2014, 21:46
1
deepak824 wrote:
Hi Chiranjeev,
Can you please help me understand why option E is wrong for this?
Option E says that modern day foragers who had contact with other societies are also not influenced. So it goes against the argument which says that we cannot learn about ancient foragers by studying modern foragers.
Please let me know where i have gone wrong.
Hi Deepak,
Thank you for your post.
Unfortunately, you have not understood choice E correctly.
Choice E talks about those modern-day forager societies that have NOT had much contact with modern societies. In your post, who have defined these societies in exactly the opposite terms. Another key thing that you have missed in choice E is that as per this option these modern-day forager societies, despite having had limited contact with other modern societies, are distinct from ancient forager societies.
In the light of the above analysis, do you think choice E strengthens the criticism noted in the argument or weakens the same?
Re: Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jan 2016, 08:28
1
Bhai wrote:
4. Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern nonforager societies.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists’ strategy?
(A) All forager societies throughout history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other types of societies. (B) Most ancient forager societies either dissolved or made a transition to another way of life. (C) All anthropologists study one kind or another of modern-day society. (D) Many anthropologists who study modern-day forager societies do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies. (E) Even those modern-day forager societies that have not had significant contact with modern societies are importantly different from ancient forager societies.
The key to the question is to understand what part of the argument is the 'criticism'. 'Societies are extremely varied' is the only critic part. Rest all are premises. Answer A
If one considers the 'any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern nonforager societies' as the criticism. He/She may go towards B. Incorrect. Tone/Construction is important to understand such questions.
Re: Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jun 2017, 03:43
Hi Gmatninja / Gmatninja2, Can you please explain conclusion and argument structure? In second sentence, it says F societies are different and in last sentence, author suggests that ancient F society are larger contacts on modern F society. Am bit stumped with language of stimuli if you could clarify. WR, Arpit.
_________________
It's the journey that brings us happiness not the destination.
Re: Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jun 2017, 15:31
1
adkikani wrote:
Hi Gmatninja / Gmatninja2, Can you please explain conclusion and argument structure? In second sentence, it says F societies are different and in last sentence, author suggests that ancient F society are larger contacts on modern F society. Am bit stumped with language of stimuli if you could clarify. WR, Arpit.
The conclusion is that the strategy of studying modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors has a flaw -- and the flaw is that forager societies are extremely varied. Why is this a flaw?
If some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in order to learn about ancient foragers, this implies that those anthropologists believe that what is true of modern-day foragers is generally true of ancient foragers.
But what if forager societies are extremely varied? This might suggest that even if two groups are both forager societies, those groups might not actually share common characteristics.
This, in turn, calls into question the anthropologists' belief that what is true of one group of foragers is generally true of another group of foragers.
Quote:
(A) All forager societies throughout history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other types of societies.
Choice (A) reassures us that, even if forager societies are extremely varied, they are still likely to share a number of important features. This suggests that we can learn about ancient foragers by studying modern foragers, even if those two groups have many differences. Thus, the flaw presented in the conclusion is not actually a flaw, and the criticism is not valid.
Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.
Re: Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jun 2017, 22:23
Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern nonforager societies.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists' strategy?
(A) All forager societies throughout history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other types of societies.
(B) Most ancient forager societies either dissolved or made a transition to another way of life.
(C) All anthropologists study one kind or another of modern-day society.
(D) Many anthropologists who study modern-day forager societies do NOT draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies.
(E) Even those modern-day forager societies that have NOT had significant contact with modern societies are importantly different from ancient forager societies.
GMATNinja, Could you help to explain why (D) and (E) are incorrect?
_________________
"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."
“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”
"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."
Re: Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Jun 2017, 13:07
hazelnut wrote:
Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern nonforager societies.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists' strategy?
(A) All forager societies throughout history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other types of societies.
(B) Most ancient forager societies either dissolved or made a transition to another way of life.
(C) All anthropologists study one kind or another of modern-day society.
(D) Many anthropologists who study modern-day forager societies do NOT draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies.
(E) Even those modern-day forager societies that have NOT had significant contact with modern societies are importantly different from ancient forager societies.
GMATNinja, Could you help to explain why (D) and (E) are incorrect?
First, refer to my last post to help understand the passage.
Quote:
(D) Many anthropologists who study modern-day forager societies do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies.
The argument criticizes the strategy employed by some anthropologists. It makes no difference how many anthropologists use that strategy. Choice (D) does not weaken the criticism.
Quote:
(E) Even those modern-day forager societies that have not had significant contact with modern societies are importantly different from ancient forager societies.
The argument is that modern-day forager societies and ancient forager societies are so different that anthropologists cannot learn about one by studying the other. This statement strengthens that criticism by stressing that modern-day forager societies--even those that have not had significant contact with modern societies--are importantly different from ancient forager societies.
_________________
Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.
Re: Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Aug 2017, 12:22
souvik101990 wrote:
Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern nonforager societies.
SOME AP's study m-day society of foragers to learn about our ancient ancestors. FLAW is forager societies are extremely varied. Forager society AP's are familiar with has had sig. contact with modern non forager societies. (The author thinks this has changed the characteristics of our hunter ancestors, and there would be no commonality between them in the past, and them now)
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists' strategy?
Quote:
(A) All forager societies throughout history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other types of societies.
I like this option. This tells me that there are a NUMBER of important features that are common in all forager societies, and these would help AP's study modern day forager societies to figure out the evolution, etc. Keep!
Quote:
(B) Most ancient forager societies either dissolved or made a transition to another way of life.
The flaw in the argument is that forager societies are extremely varied, and this statement doesn't help me in anyway to weaken or strengthen the argument. OUT!
Quote:
(C) All anthropologists study one kind or another of modern-day society.
Ok, and how's this helping? It's not. OUT!
Quote:
(D) Many anthropologists who study modern-day forager societies do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies.
Many might not draw inferences, but some do as stated in the passage i.e. SOME AP's study modern day forager societies to learn more about ancient forager societies. OUT!
Quote:
(E) Even those modern-day forager societies that have not had significant contact with modern societies are importantly different from ancient forager societies.
This is telling me that modern-day forager societies that haven't had significant contact with modern societies are different from ancient forager societies. Hmm.. so basically even with little to no contact with modern societies, the forager societies now are different than before => modern societies have had little impact on the evolution of some modern forager societies.
One-on-One fight between A & E A tells me that there are important characteristics common in all forager societies ; This commonality would be good to study to learn more about our ancestors. E tells me that modern societies have basically had negligible impact on some modern forager societies, but I really don't see how this helps me weaken the criticism as it's talking about a subset of modern day forager societies.
A is the answer for me and it's 4 am, so I hope I'm right. If it's not, then I'm complete off on this CR question _________________
Re: Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Aug 2017, 12:26
Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern nonforager societies.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists' strategy?
(A) All forager societies throughout history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other types of societies. CORRECT
(B) Most ancient forager societies either dissolved or made a transition to another way of life.
(C) All anthropologists study one kind or another of modern-day society.
(D) Many anthropologists who study modern-day forager societies do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies.
(E) Even those modern-day forager societies that have not had significant contact with modern societies are importantly different from ancient forager societies.
_________________
Re: Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Aug 2017, 07:53
souvik101990 wrote:
Verbal Question of The Day: Day 79: Critical Reasoning
Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day:E-mail | RSS For All QOTD Questions Click Here
Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern nonforager societies.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists' strategy?
(A) All forager societies throughout history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other types of societies.
(B) Most ancient forager societies either dissolved or made a transition to another way of life.
(C) All anthropologists study one kind or another of modern-day society.
(D) Many anthropologists who study modern-day forager societies do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies.
(E) Even those modern-day forager societies that have not had significant contact with modern societies are importantly different from ancient forager societies.
Every question of the day will be followed by an expert reply by GMATNinja in 12-15 hours. Stay tuned! Post your answers and explanations to earn kudos.
Premise 1: Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. Premise 2: A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied.
Conclusion :Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern nonforager societies.
The basic flaw that the anthropologist cite is that these modern forager society has had considerable contact with non forager societies.Therefore they will not help in knowing ancient forager societies. If this is indeed true then the characteristics of the forager societies will not remain pure and these societies will take some things from non foragers societies.
A is the only option which casts doubt on the reasoning of the anthropologist. It says that that all forager societies have unique features thus this will help determine characteristics of ancient forager societies , because even after it has come into contact with modern non forager societies,forager societies will keep their uniqueness.
Re: Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Aug 2017, 10:05
souvik101990 wrote:
Verbal Question of The Day: Day 79: Critical Reasoning
Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day:E-mail | RSS For All QOTD Questions Click Here
Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern nonforager societies.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists' strategy?
(A) All forager societies throughout history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other types of societies.
(B) Most ancient forager societies either dissolved or made a transition to another way of life.
(C) All anthropologists study one kind or another of modern-day society.
(D) Many anthropologists who study modern-day forager societies do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies.
(E) Even those modern-day forager societies that have not had significant contact with modern societies are importantly different from ancient forager societies.
Every question of the day will be followed by an expert reply by GMATNinja in 12-15 hours. Stay tuned! Post your answers and explanations to earn kudos.
Argument: Anthropologists study modern-day forager societies to learn about ancient foragers. But modern-day forager societies are varied and have had considerable contact with non-forager societies.
Prethinking Assumptions for argument to hold: The variance in modern-day forager societies does not allow significant inferences to be drawn about the ancient foragers. Possible weakener: Despite the variation, enough common things exist between these societies. We need to weaken the argument. That is we are looking for a choice that says despite the variance, it still makes sense to study forager societies.
(A) All forager societies throughout history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other types of societies. CORRECT. SO it still makes sense to study them. In line with our pre-thinking.
(B) Most ancient forager societies either dissolved or made a transition to another way of life. That does not provide any reason why the anthropologists should study them. Does not weaken the argument
(C) All anthropologists study one kind or another of modern-day society. Okay so what? Does it make sense to study despite the overlap
(D) Many anthropologists who study modern-day forager societies do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies. That's all the more saying that there is no use studying modern-day forager societies. If anything, it strengthens the conclusion
(E) Even those modern-day forager societies that have not had significant contact with modern societies are importantly different from ancient forager societies. We are talking about studying modern-day forager societies that HAVE had significant contact with modern societies
Re: Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Nov 2017, 03:42
some questions have option choices that seem fine at the first glance. This question is an example. Clearly, only A is not out of scope; nevertheless, if a test taker does not practice daily, he or she hardly recognizes that all other 4 options are out of scope.
Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern nonforager societies.
Had this been a bold face question: I understood the main conclusion of the argument is: A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied.
What is the strategy: Strategy used by some anthropologists to study modern-day societies of foragers ; the study in turn shall help them learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers.
I would like to know the context of the last sentence in the relationship to main conclusion.
_________________
It's the journey that brings us happiness not the destination.
gmatclubot
Re: Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effo
[#permalink]
06 May 2018, 05:31
close
64% (02:04) correct 
