AVINASH77
The opposition has strongly criticized the government for opening up the airline sector to private players. It contends that since the privatization 10 years ago, safety of the air travel has dropped drastically, pointing out the number of airline accidents in the 10 years post-privatization is more than twice the number of accidents in the 10 years preceding privatization. Which of the following information is most important in evaluating the correctness of the claim made by the opposition?
(a) The increase in the total number of flights post-privatization.
(b) The major causes of airline accidents before and after privatization.
(c) The percentage change in the total number of flights post-privatization.
(d) The effectiveness of the regulatory authority in ensuring that safety standards are being maintained.
(e) The increase in the number of deaths in airline accidents post-privatization.
I have made a mistake here. But if to be more attentive, it may be seen that of course C is better than A.
For example there was 1000 flights before and 1100 after. And the number of accidents was 5 before and 10 after. Sure in this case the claim of opposition is true.
And if there were 1000 flights before and 5000 after. 5 vs 10. In this case we can see that the opposition is wrong.
So if we know the percentage change in number of flightsm we can evaluate the correctness of opposition's claim.
If it is less than 100%, the opposition is right, if it is more than 100%, the opposition is wrong.
It is option C. If we do not know the percentage, we can not evaluate the correctness of this claim.
Option A. Let the increase be 1000 flights. But what is the initial number of flights?
If it were less than 1000, the opposition would be wrong. Otherwise - right.