It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 00:20

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The seventeenth-century physicist Sir Isaac Newton is

Author Message
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 851

Kudos [?]: 143 [1], given: 0

The seventeenth-century physicist Sir Isaac Newton is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2006, 03:27
1
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

72% (01:34) correct 28% (01:42) wrong based on 233 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The seventeenth-century physicist Sir Isaac Newton is remembered chiefly for his treaties on motion and gravity. But Newton also conducted experiments secretly for many years based on the arcane theories of alchemy, trying unsuccessfully to transmute common metals into gold and produce rejuvenating elixirs. If the alchemists of the seventeenth century had published the results of their experiments, chemistry in the eighteenth century would have been more advanced than it actually was.

Which one of the following assumptions would allow the conclusion concerning eighteenth-century chemistry to be properly drawn?
(A) Scientific progress is retarded by the reluctance of historians to acknowledge the failures of some of the great scientists.
(B) Advances in science are hastened when reports of experiments, whether successful or not, are available for review by other scientists.
(C) Newton's work on motion and gravity would not have gained wide acceptance if the results of his work in alchemy had also been make public.
(D) Increasing specialization within the sciences makes it difficult for scientists in one field to understand the principles of other fields.
(E) The seventeenth-century alchemists could have achieved their goals only if their experiments had been subjected to public scrutiny.

Kudos [?]: 143 [1], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Posts: 150

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2006, 04:13
Between B and E

I choose B
_________________

livin in a prison island...

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 915

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2006, 05:49
I will also go with B. The conclusion of science would have been more advanced is only true if B is true.

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 700

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2006, 07:37
I'm for B

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Director
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 726

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 4

Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2006, 09:36
B is the only possible answer.

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 4

SVP
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 1552

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 1

Location: Ann Arbor
Schools: Ross '10

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2006, 10:43
B...........

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Nov 2006
Posts: 349

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2006, 16:08
Yep. B. It's just the missing link btw the conclusion and the premises.

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1283

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

10 May 2011, 02:01
B clearly by negating it.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 10

Manager
Status: what we want to do, do it as soon as possible
Joined: 24 May 2010
Posts: 107

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 315

Location: Vietnam
WE 1: 5.0

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2011, 21:08
I narrow down to A and B. Why A is wrong, plz kindly help me to explain
_________________

Consider giving me kudos if you find my explanations helpful so i can learn how to express ideas to people more understandable.

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 315

Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 240

Kudos [?]: 52 [1], given: 4

Schools: UNC Duke Kellogg

### Show Tags

20 Jun 2011, 05:03
1
KUDOS
MICKEYXITIN wrote:
I narrow down to A and B. Why A is wrong, plz kindly help me to explain

Choice A: The "reluctance of historians" is irrelevant to whether Chemistry in the 18th century would have been more advanced...

Choice A would be correct if the stimulus states something along these lines:

"If the historians of the eighteenth century had exposed the failures of the scientists, chemistry in the eighteenth century would have been more advanced than it actually was".

Kudos [?]: 52 [1], given: 4

Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1965

Kudos [?]: 2089 [1], given: 376

### Show Tags

20 Jun 2011, 05:13
1
KUDOS
MICKEYXITIN wrote:
I narrow down to A and B. Why A is wrong, plz kindly help me to explain

Yes, even I spent good 20 secs to analyze that.

(A) Scientific progress is retarded by the reluctance of historians to acknowledge the failures of some of the great scientists.

"Retarded by" seems like saying the progress is neutralized. Pretty strong. Author says that advancement or the progress was indeed present(not neutral) but it'd have been more intense if historians had revealed the failures. Subtle difference.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 2089 [1], given: 376

Manager
Status: what we want to do, do it as soon as possible
Joined: 24 May 2010
Posts: 107

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 315

Location: Vietnam
WE 1: 5.0

### Show Tags

20 Jun 2011, 23:40
thank you for your time helping me both your sayings are valuable for me. it is more clear now bw A and B
_________________

Consider giving me kudos if you find my explanations helpful so i can learn how to express ideas to people more understandable.

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 315

Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 58

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Jun 2011, 01:43
B

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1965

Kudos [?]: 2089 [1], given: 376

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2011, 08:21
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
vineetgupta wrote:
The seventeenth-century physicist Sir Isaac Newton is remembered chiefly for his treaties on motion and gravity. But Newton also conducted experiments secretly for many years based on the arcane theories of alchemy, trying unsuccessfully to transmute common metals into gold and produce rejuvenating elixirs. If the alchemists of the seventeenth century had published the results of their experiments, chemistry in the eighteenth century would have been more advanced than it actually was.

Premise:
Newton is remembered for his theories about motion and general physics.
Newton also conducted some experiments in alchemy, a field in chemistry that deals with metals.

Conclusion:
If Newton had published the results of alchemy related experiments, the chemistry would have been advanced at a later time.

Possible Assumption:
The results of experiment that Newton conducted must have been of some use for the advancements of chemistry later.

Which one of the following assumptions would allow the conclusion concerning eighteenth-century chemistry to be properly drawn?

(A) Scientific progress is retarded by the reluctance of historians to acknowledge the failures of some of the great scientists.

This is a fact that's somewhat related to the argument, but doesn't help the argument.

As I earlier explained, "retarded by" tells us that the reluctance causes negative impact on the progress.
We don't really know whether Newton's experiments were failures or success.

If absence of something results into something doesn't mean that presence of it would have an exactly opposite consequence.

In simple terms,
Historians not acknowledging the failures retards the progress DOES NOT NECESSARILY mean that acknowledging it would cause progress OR advancement.

(B) Advances in science are hastened when reports of experiments, whether successful or not, are available for review by other scientists.

This is precisely what we wanted. The results from Newton's experiments would have been either successful or unsuccessful. Either way, the process of REPORTING does have a positive impact on the advancement of science.

Really helps the argument.

Correct.

(C) Newton's work on motion and gravity would not have gained wide acceptance if the results of his work in alchemy had also been make public.
This is tangential to the argument. We are not concerned with whether Newton's work or which of his works gains popularity. We are just concerned about the non-reporting of experiments AND advancements in science, none of which is mentioned here.

(D) Increasing specialization within the sciences makes it difficult for scientists in one field to understand the principles of other fields.
Doesn't talk about the argument. Moreover, it is more like a fact about present days sciences. No mention of Newton's work and reporting.

(E) The seventeenth-century alchemists could have achieved their goals only if their experiments had been subjected to public scrutiny.
This is another drawback of not reporting the results, but doesn't tell us anything how the non-reporting caused the sluggishness in a later century.

A causes B.
Yeah; A also causes Z.
I am not interested in know whether A causes Z. I am more interested in knowing how A causes B, that's it.

_________________

Kudos [?]: 2089 [1], given: 376

Intern
Joined: 24 May 2011
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 10

Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.53
WE: Other (Accounting)

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2011, 02:32
B!

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 10

Manager
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Posts: 193

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 19

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2011, 05:46
B clearly stands out
_________________

Looking for Kudos

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 19

Manager
Joined: 25 Sep 2010
Posts: 83

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 15

Schools: HBS, LBS, Wharton, Kelloggs, Booth
Re: The seventeenth-century physicist Sir Isaac Newton is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jan 2012, 07:13
IMO A is wrong because it mentions historians, who are not there anywhere in the stimulus.

reluctance of historians to acknowledge the failures of some of the great scientists is Irrelevant.
The passage says that if alchemists published those findings, unsuccessful or not, chemistry in the 18th century would have been more advanced than it actually was.

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 15

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 274

Kudos [?]: 381 [0], given: 51

Schools: Booth,NUS,St.Gallon
Re: The seventeenth-century physicist Sir Isaac Newton is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2012, 10:02
There is close contention only between B and E .
E can be eliminated based on the simple logic that we do not know what are the goals of the scientists .Are their goals really to make a breakthorugh in inventing something new ? We dont know for sure .Hence eliminate E.
_________________

+1 if you like my explanation .Thanks

Kudos [?]: 381 [0], given: 51

Director
Status: Enjoying the GMAT journey....
Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Posts: 713

Kudos [?]: 588 [0], given: 264

Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V24
Re: The seventeenth-century physicist Sir Isaac Newton is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2012, 10:30
B it is.
_________________

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.

A WAY TO INCREASE FROM QUANT 35-40 TO 47 : http://gmatclub.com/forum/a-way-to-increase-from-q35-40-to-q-138750.html

Q 47/48 To Q 50 + http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-final-climb-quest-for-q-50-from-q47-129441.html#p1064367

Three good RC strategies http://gmatclub.com/forum/three-different-strategies-for-attacking-rc-127287.html

Kudos [?]: 588 [0], given: 264

Senior Manager
Status: May The Force Be With Me (D-DAY 15 May 2012)
Joined: 06 Jan 2012
Posts: 271

Kudos [?]: 328 [0], given: 16

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
Re: The seventeenth-century physicist Sir Isaac Newton is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2012, 04:20
+1 B
_________________

Giving +1 kudos is a better way of saying 'Thank You'.

Kudos [?]: 328 [0], given: 16

Re: The seventeenth-century physicist Sir Isaac Newton is   [#permalink] 03 Feb 2012, 04:20

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The seventeenth-century physicist Sir Isaac Newton is

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.