Quote:
Two family farms, run by Sandens and Brooks, use veterinary services provided by Walcor Insurance. One of Walcor`s services is the early detection in young cattle of a certain parasite that does not pose a threat to the animals` health but makes their meat unsuitable for consumption once they are full grown. If the parasite is first detected later, the insurance company has to cover the expense of rejecting the infected animal. Walcor offers a discount for the early detection procedure to Sandens, since they breed animals for meat and grow them to adulthood. However, since Brooks keep most of their cattle for only one season, from the point of view of financial logic, it makes no sense for Walcor to provide a similar discount to Brooks.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A) Detecting a parasite in a young animal does not necessarily mean that its meat will be of bad quality later.
B) Some animals have natural resistance to the parasite.
C) Sandens buy large numbers of half-grown cattle from Brooks.
D) The two farms are of approximately the same size.
E) Animals owned by the two farms graze in different pastures.
Sandens has the discount because he grows the animals until adulthood, while Brooks doesn't because he keep the animals for only a season.
Argument:
Offering the procedure's discount to Brooks serves no purpose since the insurance won't have to pay if his cattle is infected, considering the costs only become evident when the animals become ready for consumption. This doesn't happen on Brooks' farm because he sells his cattle after a season, meaning they don't become fully adult on his farm.A) Irrelevant and goes against the facts stated -> if so Sandens' discount should be revised
B) Again it's irrelevant. We must weaken the argument that Brooks doesn't deserve the discount, not whether some of the cattle have resistance.
C) If Sandens buys the half-grown cattle from Brooks the costs of not doing the early detection become a possibility again. This answer is a good candidate.
D) Off scope. Why would size matter?
E) Off scope. We have no information on the spread of the parasite or why it would matter if the cattle graze in different pastures.
C would be my choice! Feel free to correct me if necessary