GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 19 Aug 2018, 06:26

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Typically during thunderstorms most lightning strikes carry a negative

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1322
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Typically during thunderstorms most lightning strikes carry a negative  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 May 2017, 22:34
3
21
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

70% (01:45) correct 30% (01:52) wrong based on 1160 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review 2018

Practice Question
Question No.: CR 179
Page:

Typically during thunderstorms most lightning strikes carry a negative electric charge; only a few carry a positive charge. Thunderstorms with unusually high proportions of positive-charge strikes tend to occur in smoky areas near forest fires. The fact that smoke carries positively charged smoke particles into the air above a fire suggests the hypothesis that the extra positive strikes occur because of the presence of such particles in the storm clouds.

Which of the following, if discovered to be true, most seriously undermines the hypothesis?

(A) Other kinds of rare lightning also occur with unusually high frequency in the vicinity of forest fires.
(B) The positive-charge strikes that occur near forest fires tend to be no more powerful than positive strikes normally are.
(C) A positive-charge strike is as likely to start a forest fire as a negative charge strike is.
(D) Thunderstorms that occur in drifting clouds of smoke have extra positive-charge strikes weeks after the charge of the smoke particles has dissipated.
(E) The total number of lightning strikes during a thunderstorm is usually within the normal range in the vicinity of a forest fire.

_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advanced-search/

Most Helpful Expert Reply
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1909
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: Typically during thunderstorms most lightning strikes carry a negative  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Nov 2017, 23:25
4
2
Quote:
Typically during thunderstorms most lightning strikes carry a negative electric charge; only a few carry a positive charge. Thunderstorms with unusually high proportions of positive-charge strikes tend to occur in smoky areas near forest fires. The fact that smoke carries positively charged smoke particles into the air above a fire suggests the hypothesis that the extra positive strikes occur because of the presence of such particles in the storm clouds.

Which of the following, if discovered to be true, most seriously undermines the hypothesis?

(A) Other kinds of rare lightning also occur with unusually high frequency in the vicinity of forest fires.
(B) The positive-charge strikes that occur near forest fires tend to be no more powerful than positive strikes normally are.
(C) A positive-charge strike is as likely to start a forest fire as a negative charge strike is.
(D) Thunderstorms that occur in drifting clouds of smoke have extra positive-charge strikes weeks after the charge of the smoke particles has dissipated.
(E) The total number of lightning strikes during a thunderstorm is usually within the normal range in the vicinity of a forest fire.

kunal1608 wrote:
GMATNinja, Experts,

Please Explain , Totally Stumped by this one

According to the author, smoky areas near forest fires probably have extra positive strikes because the smoke carries positively charged smoke particles into the air above a fire. So we need an answer choice that would undermine that hypothesis:

Quote:
(A) Other kinds of rare lightning also occur with unusually high frequency in the vicinity of forest fires.

We are trying to explain positive strikes, and we don't care about other kinds of rare lightning. Choice (A) does not impact the hypothesis, so it can be eliminated.

Quote:
(B) The positive-charge strikes that occur near forest fires tend to be no more powerful than positive strikes normally are.

We are trying to explain why there are more positive strikes in smoky areas near forest fires. The hypothesis in question has nothing to do with how powerful the strikes are, so (B) can be eliminated.

Quote:
(C) A positive-charge strike is as likely to start a forest fire as a negative charge strike is.

Again, we are trying to explain WHY there are more positive strikes in smoky areas near forest fires. The likelihood of starting a forest fire has nothing to do with the hypothesis in question, so eliminate (C).

Quote:
(D) Thunderstorms that occur in drifting clouds of smoke have extra positive-charge strikes weeks after the charge of the smoke particles has dissipated.

According to the hypothesis described by the author, smoky areas near forest fires probably have extra positive strikes because the smoke carries positively charged smoke particles into the air. In other words, the presence of extra positively charged particles (from the smoke) causes extra positive strikes. But choice (D) tells us that extra positive strikes still occur weeks after the charge of the smoke particles has dissipated. If the charge of the smoke particles has dissipated and we are still seeing extra positive strikes, then how can we blame the extra strikes on the smoke particles? Choice (D) undermines the hypothesis, so keep this one.

Quote:
(E) The total number of lightning strikes during a thunderstorm is usually within the normal range in the vicinity of a forest fire.

This tells us that the TOTAL number of strikes is normal when there is a thunderstorm near a forest fire. However, this does not say anything about WHY there are more positive strikes near a forest fire. Choice (E) is not relevant to the hypothesis and can be eliminated.

So (D) is the best of the bunch.

I hope this helps!
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

General Discussion
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2110
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Typically during thunderstorms most lightning strikes carry a negative  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2017, 02:24
Typically during thunderstorms most lightning strikes carry a negative electric charge; only a few carry a positive charge. Thunderstorms with unusually high proportions of positive-charge strikes tend to occur in smoky areas near forest fires. The fact that smoke carries positively charged smoke particles into the air above a fire suggests the hypothesis that the extra positive strikes occur because of the presence of such particles in the storm clouds.

Type – weaken
Boil it down – Presence of positively charged smoke particles in storm causes extra positive strikes occur

(A) Other kinds of rare lightning also occur with unusually high frequency in the vicinity of forest fires.- irrelevant
(B) The positive-charge strikes that occur near forest fires tend to be no more powerful than positive strikes normally are. – the power of strikes is irrelevant
(C) A positive-charge strike is as likely to start a forest fire as a negative charge strike is. – Irrelevant – likelihood of starting a forest fire is not a concern
(D) Thunderstorms that occur in drifting clouds of smoke have extra positive-charge strikes weeks after the charge of the smoke particles has dissipated. – Correct – Although the smoke particles have dissipated , the extra positive-charge strikes are still present
(E) The total number of lightning strikes during a thunderstorm is usually within the normal range in the vicinity of a forest fire. – Irrelevant
Answer D
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 21 Jul 2015
Posts: 15
Reviews Badge
Re: Typically during thunderstorms most lightning strikes carry a negative  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2017, 02:59
D. When smoke particles dissipates then there are thunderstorms with extra positive charge.

Sent from my XT1585 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
_________________

NOW OR NEVER

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Sep 2017
Posts: 1
Re: Typically during thunderstorms most lightning strikes carry a negative  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2017, 04:02
Thank you so much for your useful explanation.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Jun 2016
Posts: 75
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.4
Re: Typically during thunderstorms most lightning strikes carry a negative  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Oct 2017, 12:18
@Gmatninja, Experts,

Please Explain , Totally Stumped by this one
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Jun 2016
Posts: 75
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.4
Re: Typically during thunderstorms most lightning strikes carry a negative  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Oct 2017, 12:20
hazelnut wrote:
The Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review 2018

Practice Question
Question No.: CR 179
Page:

Typically during thunderstorms most lightning strikes carry a negative electric charge; only a few carry a positive charge. Thunderstorms with unusually high proportions of positive-charge strikes tend to occur in smoky areas near forest fires. The fact that smoke carries positively charged smoke particles into the air above a fire suggests the hypothesis that the extra positive strikes occur because of the presence of such particles in the storm clouds.

Which of the following, if discovered to be true, most seriously undermines the hypothesis?

(A) Other kinds of rare lightning also occur with unusually high frequency in the vicinity of forest fires.
(B) The positive-charge strikes that occur near forest fires tend to be no more powerful than positive strikes normally are.
(C) A positive-charge strike is as likely to start a forest fire as a negative charge strike is.
(D) Thunderstorms that occur in drifting clouds of smoke have extra positive-charge strikes weeks after the charge of the smoke particles has dissipated.
(E) The total number of lightning strikes during a thunderstorm is usually within the normal range in the vicinity of a forest fire.


I chose A as it suggests that there is some alternate cause for the lightning near the fires
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Jun 2016
Posts: 75
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.4
Re: Typically during thunderstorms most lightning strikes carry a negative  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Nov 2017, 03:58
GMATNinja wrote:
Quote:
Typically during thunderstorms most lightning strikes carry a negative electric charge; only a few carry a positive charge. Thunderstorms with unusually high proportions of positive-charge strikes tend to occur in smoky areas near forest fires. The fact that smoke carries positively charged smoke particles into the air above a fire suggests the hypothesis that the extra positive strikes occur because of the presence of such particles in the storm clouds.

Which of the following, if discovered to be true, most seriously undermines the hypothesis?

(A) Other kinds of rare lightning also occur with unusually high frequency in the vicinity of forest fires.
(B) The positive-charge strikes that occur near forest fires tend to be no more powerful than positive strikes normally are.
(C) A positive-charge strike is as likely to start a forest fire as a negative charge strike is.
(D) Thunderstorms that occur in drifting clouds of smoke have extra positive-charge strikes weeks after the charge of the smoke particles has dissipated.
(E) The total number of lightning strikes during a thunderstorm is usually within the normal range in the vicinity of a forest fire.

kunal1608 wrote:
GMATNinja, Experts,

Please Explain , Totally Stumped by this one


So (D) is the best of the bunch.

I hope this helps!


Thankyou GMATNinja

Retrospectively, the only thing i think confused me is the reasoning given for the high occurrence of positive charge strikes. I got to thinking how can +ve attract +ve.

One more question, Do you recommend reading the question stem first for CR questions or do you think it hinders the ability to read/comprehend the details.
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 26 Dec 2017
Posts: 138
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Typically during thunderstorms most lightning strikes carry a negative  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 May 2018, 08:46
Here I was confused with Cause - effect in conclusion pls correct me if I am wrong.

The fact that smoke carries positively charged smoke particles into the air above a fire suggests the hypothesis that the extra positive strikes occur because of the presence of such particles in the storm clouds.


Cause-+ve particles in clouds(presence of such particles in the storm clouds)
Effect-extra +ve particles in smoke( the extra positive strikes occur)
_________________

--If you like my post pls give kudos

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 08 May 2018
Posts: 30
Re: Typically during thunderstorms most lightning strikes carry a negative  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jul 2018, 10:49
GMATNinja wrote:
Quote:
Typically during thunderstorms most lightning strikes carry a negative electric charge; only a few carry a positive charge. Thunderstorms with unusually high proportions of positive-charge strikes tend to occur in smoky areas near forest fires. The fact that smoke carries positively charged smoke particles into the air above a fire suggests the hypothesis that the extra positive strikes occur because of the presence of such particles in the storm clouds.

Which of the following, if discovered to be true, most seriously undermines the hypothesis?

(A) Other kinds of rare lightning also occur with unusually high frequency in the vicinity of forest fires.
(B) The positive-charge strikes that occur near forest fires tend to be no more powerful than positive strikes normally are.
(C) A positive-charge strike is as likely to start a forest fire as a negative charge strike is.
(D) Thunderstorms that occur in drifting clouds of smoke have extra positive-charge strikes weeks after the charge of the smoke particles has dissipated.
(E) The total number of lightning strikes during a thunderstorm is usually within the normal range in the vicinity of a forest fire.

kunal1608 wrote:
GMATNinja, Experts,

Please Explain , Totally Stumped by this one

According to the author, smoky areas near forest fires probably have extra positive strikes because the smoke carries positively charged smoke particles into the air above a fire. So we need an answer choice that would undermine that hypothesis:

Quote:
(A) Other kinds of rare lightning also occur with unusually high frequency in the vicinity of forest fires.

We are trying to explain positive strikes, and we don't care about other kinds of rare lightning. Choice (A) does not impact the hypothesis, so it can be eliminated.

Quote:
(B) The positive-charge strikes that occur near forest fires tend to be no more powerful than positive strikes normally are.

We are trying to explain why there are more positive strikes in smoky areas near forest fires. The hypothesis in question has nothing to do with how powerful the strikes are, so (B) can be eliminated.

Quote:
(C) A positive-charge strike is as likely to start a forest fire as a negative charge strike is.

Again, we are trying to explain WHY there are more positive strikes in smoky areas near forest fires. The likelihood of starting a forest fire has nothing to do with the hypothesis in question, so eliminate (C).

Quote:
(D) Thunderstorms that occur in drifting clouds of smoke have extra positive-charge strikes weeks after the charge of the smoke particles has dissipated.

According to the hypothesis described by the author, smoky areas near forest fires probably have extra positive strikes because the smoke carries positively charged smoke particles into the air. In other words, the presence of extra positively charged particles (from the smoke) causes extra positive strikes. But choice (D) tells us that extra positive strikes still occur weeks after the charge of the smoke particles has dissipated. If the charge of the smoke particles has dissipated and we are still seeing extra positive strikes, then how can we blame the extra strikes on the smoke particles? Choice (D) undermines the hypothesis, so keep this one.

Quote:
(E) The total number of lightning strikes during a thunderstorm is usually within the normal range in the vicinity of a forest fire.

This tells us that the TOTAL number of strikes is normal when there is a thunderstorm near a forest fire. However, this does not say anything about WHY there are more positive strikes near a forest fire. Choice (E) is not relevant to the hypothesis and can be eliminated.

So (D) is the best of the bunch.

I hope this helps!


Hi GMATNinja

Statement given in the stimulus - "Thunderstorms with unusually high proportions of positive-charge strikes tend to occur in smoky areas near forest fires."

My inference - High proportions of positive-charge strikes are more powerful than otherwise positive charge strikes.

Based on this inference, I chose answer B.

Is my inference absolutely wrong? Shouldn't extra positive charge strike be more powerful than normal positive strike?

Please resolve. Thanks in advance.
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1909
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: Typically during thunderstorms most lightning strikes carry a negative  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Aug 2018, 08:00
I'm seeing confusion over the phrases "positive charge" and "positive particles" in this argument. The key to clearing up this confusion is to recognize that this argument basically has nothing to do with positives or negatives.

The author argues that smoky areas near forest fires probably have extra positive strikes because the smoke carries positively charged smoke particles into the air. In other words, the presence of positively charged particles (from the smoke) causes extra positive strikes.

Let me put this another way: The author argues that smoky areas near forest fires probably have extra goldfish strikes because the smoke carries groovy smoke particles into the air. In other words, the presence of groovy particles (from the smoke) causes extra goldfish strikes.

I've just substituted complete nonsense into the argument, but the logic is exactly the same: more of a certain kind of particle leads to more of a certain kind of strike. In this case, they happen to be called "positively charged" particles and "positive" strikes. But the argument essentially says that if you add more of X, then you get more of Y.

KGump wrote:
Retrospectively, the only thing i think confused me is the reasoning given for the high occurrence of positive charge strikes. I got to thinking how can +ve attract +ve

We don't care about how the actual science of electricity works, and GMAT questions will NEVER test you on your science knowledge. In this case, you only care about undermining the hypothesis that "the extra positive strikes occur because of the presence of such particles in the storm clouds."

KGump wrote:
One more question, Do you recommend reading the question stem first for CR questions or do you think it hinders the ability to read/comprehend the details.

I don't feel strongly about this, one way or another. Historically, large test-prep companies have often made a big deal out of this ("read the question first, it's magical!!!"), and I think that's misguided -- if reading the question first helps, it won't help much, and it can't do anything for you on RC, since you can't even see all of the questions.

Personally, I don't read the question first, because I'll ultimately need to have a flawless understanding of both the structure of the passage and the author's language choices. When you read the question first, there's some risk that you'll be so hyped up about looking for something specific (an assumption or a way to strengthen something, or whatever) that you won't read with as much precision as you would otherwise. I don't think that the risk is huge, though. So do whatever works best for you, as long as you're breaking down the structure of the argument with precision.

XYZABCABC wrote:
HiGMATNinja
Statement given in the stimulus - "Thunderstorms with unusually high proportions of positive-charge strikes tend to occur in smoky areas near forest fires."

My inference - High proportions of positive-charge strikes are more powerful than otherwise positive charge strikes.

Based on this inference, I chose answer B.

Is my inference absolutely wrong? Shouldn't extra positive charge strike be more powerful than normal positive strike?

Please resolve. Thanks in advance.

Remember to stay focused on the exact question we have been asked.

This question asks us to undermine the hypothesis. The hypothesis is that "positively charged smoke particles in an area lead to extra positive lightning strikes in that area." This hypothesis has nothing to do with how powerful a positive lightning strike is. It has to do with how many positive lightning strikes there are.

To clarify the language: if I say that cities have an unusually high proportion of car accidents in August, I don't mean that the car accidents are especially severe in August. I'm just saying that there's a greater number of car accidents in August.

I hope this helps!
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

Re: Typically during thunderstorms most lightning strikes carry a negative &nbs [#permalink] 17 Aug 2018, 08:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Typically during thunderstorms most lightning strikes carry a negative

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.