It is currently 10 Sep 2026, 08:57
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
rajathpanta
User avatar
Joined: 13 Feb 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2015
Posts: 142
Status:Prevent and prepare. Not repent and repair!!
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Schools: AGSM '15 YLP '16 IIMC (PGPEX) Melbourne '15
GPA: 3.75
WE:Sales (Telecommunications)
Schools: AGSM '15 YLP '16 IIMC (PGPEX) Melbourne '15
Posts: 142
In the early 20th century,ivory poaching led
Post URL
 Updated on: 06 Sep 2017, 06:44
Originally posted by rajathpanta on 11 Jan 2013, 10:02.
Last edited by broall on 06 Sep 2017, 06:44, edited 1 time in total.
Reformatted question
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/Login.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

79% (01:36) correct 21% (02:01) wrong based on 477 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
In the early 20th century,ivory poaching led to near extinction of the black Rhino and the African elephant.As a result, numerous African nations supported a complete ban on all ivory sales. This ban has been in effect since 1989. The governments of South Africa,Botswana and Namibia have recently put up for auction thousands of tons of confiscated Ivory horns and tusks, in spite of the continued moratorium. However, the three governments have the support of the same conversationalists who help impose the 1989 ban on the ivory sales.

Which of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of why conversationalists support SA's, Botswana's and Namibia's auction of ivory?

a. The international demand for ivory has decreased since 1989.
b. Most wild elephants and rhinos live outside SA,Botswana and Namibia.
c. Once the tons of confiscated ivory are auctioned, the market will be flooded with ivory making poaching economically impractical.
d. If it were not for the auction, the confiscated ivory could never be used and would have to remain in govt warehouses.
e. Due to major conservation efforts, black rhino and african elephant populations have slowly but steadily increased in the last few years.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/Login.
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 10 Sep 2026
Posts: 4,741
Posts: 4,741
In the early 20th century,ivory poaching led
Post URL
11 Jan 2013, 11:08
C for me is the only answer makes sense

_________________
Free Materials for the GRE General Exam - Where to get it!!

GMAT FE - COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS AND RESOURCES

QUANT: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal-2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation-3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS
4. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
VERBAL:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass-2. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks-3. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks
Signature Read More
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
BangOn
User avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2012
Last visit: 22 Mar 2019
Posts: 94
Posts: 94
In the early 20th century,ivory poaching led
Post URL
11 Jan 2013, 15:22
Quote:
In the early 20th century,ivory poaching led to near extinction of the black Rhino and the African elephant.As a result, numerous African nations supported a complete ban on all ivory sales. This ban has been in effect since 1989. The governments of South Africa,Botswana and Namibia have recently put up for auction thousands of tons of confiscated Ivory horns and tusks, in spite of the continued moratorium. However, the three governments have the support of the same conversationalists who help impose the 1989 ban on the ivory sales.


Which of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of why conversationalists support SA's, Botswana's and Namibia's auction of ivory?

a. The international demand for ivory has decreased since 1989.
b. Most wild elephants and rhinos live outside SA,Botswana and Namibia.
c. Once the tons of confiscated ivory are auctioned, the market will be flooded with ivory making poaching economically impractical.
d. If it were not for the auction, the confiscated ivory could never be used and would have to remain in govt warehouses.
e. Due to major conservation efforts, black rhino and african elephant populations have slowly but steadily increased in the last few years.

OA later...
Show more


I will go for C.
If something is available legally, people will avoid buying illegal thing.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jlgdr
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Last visit: 24 Jul 2015
Posts: 1,296
Concentration: Finance
Schools: Wharton '17 (A) HBS '17 (WA$)
Schools: Wharton '17 (A) HBS '17 (WA$)
Posts: 1,296
In the early 20th century,ivory poaching led
Post URL
04 Oct 2013, 09:47
rajathpanta
In the early 20th century,ivory poaching led to near extinction of the black Rhino and the African elephant.As a result, numerous African nations supported a complete ban on all ivory sales. This ban has been in effect since 1989. The governments of South Africa,Botswana and Namibia have recently put up for auction thousands of tons of confiscated Ivory horns and tusks, in spite of the continued moratorium. However, the three governments have the support of the same conversationalists who help impose the 1989 ban on the ivory sales.


Which of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of why conversationalists support SA's, Botswana's and Namibia's auction of ivory?

a. The international demand for ivory has decreased since 1989.
b. Most wild elephants and rhinos live outside SA,Botswana and Namibia.
c. Once the tons of confiscated ivory are auctioned, the market will be flooded with ivory making poaching economically impractical.
d. If it were not for the auction, the confiscated ivory could never be used and would have to remain in govt warehouses.
e. Due to major conservation efforts, black rhino and african elephant populations have slowly but steadily increased in the last few years.

OA later...
Show more

This has to be (D), which means that the horns and tusks are not from killing new animals but from past ones that were already killed and that these remain in gvmnt warehouses, therefore no damage is done, since it is a sunk cost and furthermore, the increase in supply could decrease efforts to continue endangering the species to a minor extent. Although this last part is not really the most important part in explaining to why the correct answer is (D)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
nechets
User avatar
Joined: 04 Oct 2013
Last visit: 17 Jul 2016
Posts: 62
Location: Brazil
Schools: INSEAD Jan '17 (A)
GMAT 1: 660 Q45 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V38
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: INSEAD Jan '17 (A)
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V38
Posts: 62
In the early 20th century,ivory poaching led
Post URL
20 Nov 2013, 13:51
RESOLVE THE PARADOX: The conversationalists are supporting three governments in Africa to auction thousands of tons of ivory, despite the efforts to ban poaching.

PRE-PHRASE AN ANSWER: I have to think an answer that benefits both sides and controversionalists are assured that poaching will be ceased.

Wait! D can't be a good answer - because it only shows the advantage to the government. How about the the controversionalists? When are they benefited? Oh, I see that C shows this so-callled benefit and, therefore, is a better answer.


rajathpanta
In the early 20th century,ivory poaching led to near extinction of the black Rhino and the African elephant.As a result, numerous African nations supported a complete ban on all ivory sales. This ban has been in effect since 1989. The governments of South Africa,Botswana and Namibia have recently put up for auction thousands of tons of confiscated Ivory horns and tusks, in spite of the continued moratorium. However, the three governments have the support of the same conversationalists who help impose the 1989 ban on the ivory sales.


Which of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of why conversationalists support SA's, Botswana's and Namibia's auction of ivory?

a. The international demand for ivory has decreased since 1989.
b. Most wild elephants and rhinos live outside SA,Botswana and Namibia.
c. Once the tons of confiscated ivory are auctioned, the market will be flooded with ivory making poaching economically impractical.
d. If it were not for the auction, the confiscated ivory could never be used and would have to remain in govt warehouses.
e. Due to major conservation efforts, black rhino and african elephant populations have slowly but steadily increased in the last few years.

OA later...
Show more
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
rango
User avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2013
Last visit: 19 Jul 2014
Posts: 97
Location: India
Schools: Kellogg 1YR '16 Tuck '16 HKU'16 HKUST '16 Tsinghua '16 IIMA Guanghua '16 Haas '16 Darden '16
GPA: 4
WE:Medicine and Health (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Schools: Kellogg 1YR '16 Tuck '16 HKU'16 HKUST '16 Tsinghua '16 IIMA Guanghua '16 Haas '16 Darden '16
Posts: 97
In the early 20th century,ivory poaching led
Post URL
21 Nov 2013, 20:46
rajathpanta
In the early 20th century,ivory poaching led to near extinction of the black Rhino and the African elephant.As a result, numerous African nations supported a complete ban on all ivory sales. This ban has been in effect since 1989. The governments of South Africa,Botswana and Namibia have recently put up for auction thousands of tons of confiscated Ivory horns and tusks, in spite of the continued moratorium. However, the three governments have the support of the same conversationalists who help impose the 1989 ban on the ivory sales.


Which of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of why conversationalists support SA's, Botswana's and Namibia's auction of ivory?

a. The international demand for ivory has decreased since 1989.
b. Most wild elephants and rhinos live outside SA,Botswana and Namibia.
c. Once the tons of confiscated ivory are auctioned, the market will be flooded with ivory making poaching economically impractical.
d. If it were not for the auction, the confiscated ivory could never be used and would have to remain in govt warehouses.
e. Due to major conservation efforts, black rhino and african elephant populations have slowly but steadily increased in the last few years.

OA later...
Show more

Good one;
Conversationalist pressurised for ban ; now support the auction of confiscated Ivory. Hmm……………….
Its means that they have some motto of doing which has to be linked with ban.
I would have gone with C; seems that the fall in prices of ivory in market will force the poaching to stop. good.

:banana
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
JusTLucK04
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Last visit: 26 Jul 2017
Posts: 270
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Kelley '18 (M) Mendoza '18 (WL) Duke '18 (D) Goizueta '18 (D) ISB '17 (D) Owen '17 (I)
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V38
WE:Analyst (Consulting)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Kelley '18 (M) Mendoza '18 (WL) Duke '18 (D) Goizueta '18 (D) ISB '17 (D) Owen '17 (I)
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V38
Posts: 270
In the early 20th century,ivory poaching led
Post URL
18 Mar 2014, 23:38
In the early 20th century,ivory poaching led to near extinction of the black Rhino and the African elephant.As a result, numerous African nations supported a complete ban on all ivory sales. This ban has been in effect since 1989. The governments of South Africa,Botswana and Namibia have recently put up for auction thousands of tons of confiscated Ivory horns and tusks, in spite of the continued moratorium. However, the three governments have the support of the same conversationalists who help impose the 1989 ban on the ivory sales.


Which of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of why conversationalists support SA's, Botswana's and Namibia's auction of ivory?

a. The international demand for ivory has decreased since 1989.
b. Most wild elephants and rhinos live outside SA,Botswana and Namibia.
c. Once the tons of confiscated ivory are auctioned, the market will be flooded with ivory making poaching economically impractical.
d. If it were not for the auction, the confiscated ivory could never be used and would have to remain in govt warehouses.
e. Due to major conservation efforts, black rhino and african elephant populations have slowly but steadily increased in the last few years.

I would go with C...D is kind of irrelevant

1. If the ivory were to stay in the warehouses..why should it be an issue...& specifically why should the conversationalists support it based on this factor.
2. With poaching economically impractical..Poachers too will cease to exist..

C nicely fills in the gap & resolves the paradox..

BTW..OA is C
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jlgdr
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Last visit: 24 Jul 2015
Posts: 1,296
Concentration: Finance
Schools: Wharton '17 (A) HBS '17 (WA$)
Schools: Wharton '17 (A) HBS '17 (WA$)
Posts: 1,296
In the early 20th century,ivory poaching led
Post URL
25 Apr 2014, 15:00
JusTLucK04
In the early 20th century,ivory poaching led to near extinction of the black Rhino and the African elephant.As a result, numerous African nations supported a complete ban on all ivory sales. This ban has been in effect since 1989. The governments of South Africa,Botswana and Namibia have recently put up for auction thousands of tons of confiscated Ivory horns and tusks, in spite of the continued moratorium. However, the three governments have the support of the same conversationalists who help impose the 1989 ban on the ivory sales.


Which of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of why conversationalists support SA's, Botswana's and Namibia's auction of ivory?

a. The international demand for ivory has decreased since 1989.
b. Most wild elephants and rhinos live outside SA,Botswana and Namibia.
c. Once the tons of confiscated ivory are auctioned, the market will be flooded with ivory making poaching economically impractical.
d. If it were not for the auction, the confiscated ivory could never be used and would have to remain in govt warehouses.
e. Due to major conservation efforts, black rhino and african elephant populations have slowly but steadily increased in the last few years.

I would go with C...D is kind of irrelevant

1. If the ivory were to stay in the warehouses..why should it be an issue...& specifically why should the conversationalists support it based on this factor.
2. With poaching economically impractical..Poachers too will cease to exist..

C nicely fills in the gap & resolves the paradox..

BTW..OA is C
Show more

Agree with you buddy, I must have been drunk when I was doing this CR

C is correct answer choice

Hope it helps!
Cheers
J :)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 06 Jun 2026
Posts: 1,134
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Sloan '23 (D) Tuck '23 (D) Darden '23 (D) Ross '23 (D) Kellogg '23 (D) Wharton '23 (D) Booth '23 (D) Fuqua '24 (A) Harvard '24 (D) Stanford '24 (D)
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Sloan '23 (D) Tuck '23 (D) Darden '23 (D) Ross '23 (D) Kellogg '23 (D) Wharton '23 (D) Booth '23 (D) Fuqua '24 (A) Harvard '24 (D) Stanford '24 (D)
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
Posts: 1,134
In the early 20th century,ivory poaching led
Post URL
11 Apr 2017, 16:45
rajathpanta
In the early 20th century,ivory poaching led to near extinction of the black Rhino and the African elephant.As a result, numerous African nations supported a complete ban on all ivory sales. This ban has been in effect since 1989. The governments of South Africa,Botswana and Namibia have recently put up for auction thousands of tons of confiscated Ivory horns and tusks, in spite of the continued moratorium. However, the three governments have the support of the same conversationalists who help impose the 1989 ban on the ivory sales.


Which of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of why conversationalists support SA's, Botswana's and Namibia's auction of ivory?

a. The international demand for ivory has decreased since 1989.
b. Most wild elephants and rhinos live outside SA,Botswana and Namibia.
c. Once the tons of confiscated ivory are auctioned, the market will be flooded with ivory making poaching economically impractical.
d. If it were not for the auction, the confiscated ivory could never be used and would have to remain in govt warehouses.
e. Due to major conservation efforts, black rhino and african elephant populations have slowly but steadily increased in the last few years.
Show more

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION


This type of question is what’s known as Explain the Paradox, a subcategory of Method of Reasoning questions. Something in the conclusion seems diametrically opposed to the evidence presented, and yet it is correct. Generally, some new piece of information in one of the answer choices will reconcile the seemingly opposing viewpoints. Let’s go through the choices and see which solves our dilemma.

Answer choice A indicates that the international demand for ivory has dropped significantly. If this were true, would it help explain why these governments have full support in selling excess ivory (like overstock.com)? Not really. If anything, the demand going down should dissuade anyone from trying to increase the supply of ivory as the price will drop dramatically. There’s no upside to selling ivory in this scenario.

Answer choice B indicates that most of the affected animals live outside of these three countries (although they may be expatriates). Regardless of where the animals are located, the ivory can always be shipped to South Africa or Botswana, so their initial location will not factor into the decision in any way. B is incorrect.

C indicates that flooding the market with ivory will dissuade future poaching, which is a logical and credible line of reasoning that would help reconcile both points made in the original statement. Poachers will not stop their practice just because it’s illegal if there is enough money to be made. If ivory can be freely and cheaply purchased elsewhere, then there is no need to risk legal ramifications by plying a trade that has been banned. C is a perfect solution to our paradox. For competition’s sake, we can look at D and E, although on the actual GMAT you should stop whenever you find the correct answer.

Answer choice D discusses what would happen to the ivory were it not used, inferring that there may be some cost or security concern involved in not selling the ivory. This is out of scope of the question, as selling ivory because upkeep costs are inconvenient would violate the entire purpose of the ivory moratorium. There may be some financial upside in selling the ivory, but it would not explain why the governments would have international support.

Answer choice E is somewhat tempting as it indicates that the rhinos and elephants may no longer be in danger of extinction. Logically, the animals need to be protected when they’re endangered, but when they’re running rampant then the conservation becomes unnecessary. However, had the number of animals climbed dramatically, a more logical reaction would be the removal of the moratorium, not the clandestine sale of some confiscated ivory. Answer choice E does not reconcile the paradox.
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,649
Posts: 19,649
In the early 20th century,ivory poaching led
Post URL
01 Jul 2025, 03:03
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.

_________________

Solving this question helps. Taking a timed set of similar questions in GMAT Club Forum Quiz → is even better.

Signature Read More
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NEW TOPIC
POST REPLY
Downloads
My Bookmarks
Reviews
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
AbhishekP220108
Verbal Forum Moderator
704 posts