Last visit was: 14 Dec 2024, 22:40 It is currently 14 Dec 2024, 22:40
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,877
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88,271
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,877
Kudos: 685,932
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
eakabuah
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 May 2019
Last visit: 15 Jun 2022
Posts: 782
Own Kudos:
1,078
 []
Given Kudos: 101
Posts: 782
Kudos: 1,078
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
madgmat2019
Joined: 01 Mar 2019
Last visit: 17 Sep 2021
Posts: 588
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 207
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V21
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V21
Posts: 588
Kudos: 557
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
nishthagupta
Joined: 14 May 2018
Last visit: 28 Sep 2019
Posts: 73
Own Kudos:
69
 []
Given Kudos: 100
Posts: 73
Kudos: 69
 []
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The best answer is B.
Concepts tested:
1) Conditional Results
In sentences expressing a conditional result (X will happen if Y happens), the verb of the main clause should be in the future tense and the verb of the if clause should be in the present indicative. Thus, is backed (in B) is consistent with will take.

2) will vs would
We already know that we need future tense here. One must note that, would is used to indicate a future with reference to something someone said in the past.
Will is for something someone said in the present in relation to the future.

Option A,D ,E eliminated
Here we need will.

3) meaning:
Option b vs c.
C distorts the meaning by suggesting that the only way germans will comply is through sanctions.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
shridhar786
Joined: 31 May 2018
Last visit: 08 Feb 2022
Posts: 325
Own Kudos:
1,638
 []
Given Kudos: 132
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Posts: 325
Kudos: 1,638
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. only if it would be backed by sanctions.
use of would in if clause is incorrect (incorrect)

B. only if it is backed by sanctions.

if present, then future ---this is correct
placement of only is correct here and thus express the intended meaning that---only if it is backed by sanction, it will take the warning seriously (correct)

C. if it is backed only by sanctions.
placement of only is wrong here -it changes the intended meaning of the sentence and says that, if backed only by sanctions (means that there are several ways but only sanctions are helpful) german will take the warning seriously --this is not the case (incorrect)

D. if it was only backed by sanctions.
-- the use of the past tense verb(was) is incorrect ---since in non underlined part future tense is used (others say that Germany will take the warning seriously)--if we are talking of future in past would --is correct (incorrect)

E. if it would only be backed by sanctions.
use of would in if clause is incorrect (incorrect)
User avatar
sampriya
User avatar
ISB School Moderator
Joined: 23 Nov 2018
Last visit: 25 Nov 2022
Posts: 302
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 358
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
GPA: 2.88
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
this is a question thats testing conditional i.e. if..then statements

"Germany will take the warning seriously" this is the then statement which is not underlined and is in simple future tense therefore "if" statement should be in present tense

therefore we are down to the options B and C
B. only if it is backed by sanctions.
C. if it is backed only by sanctions.

now notice the meaning change between only backed by sanctions and backed only by sanctions

therefore "B" is the correct option!
User avatar
Doer01
Joined: 19 Sep 2017
Last visit: 28 Oct 2021
Posts: 216
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 160
Location: United Kingdom
GPA: 3.9
WE:Account Management (Other)
Posts: 216
Kudos: 157
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,
IMO B.

Two things to note here:
If simple present, then simple future- Only B & C follow this construction. So rest, A,D ,& E, are out.
use of adjective ONLY- it should modify the whole IF clause. In C only modifies by sanction which changes the meaning. Hence B is the only grammatical and logical correct answer choice.
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 2,741
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 764
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,741
Kudos: 2,011
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
While some economists believe that Germany should be warned by the European Commission that it could face the imposition of radical restrictions on its domestic fiscal policymaking as early as the beginning of next year, others say that Germany will take the warning seriously only if it would be backed by sanctions.

The sentence provides a contrasting situation where one group of economists says that Germany should be warned by EC whereas the other group says Germany will not take the warning seriously for which the warning must have support from various sanctions.

The second part of the original sentence is a conditional verb formation(if .. then clause) i.e. if sanctions back warning then Germany will take it seriously. Going by that non-underlined part of the second part of sentence uses simple future form of verb – will so the underlined part must have simple present form of verb. Also, pronoun ‘it’ properly refers to warning without any ambiguity.

Thus we can easily eliminate A, D and E. Since C slightly changes the meaning of the sentence by shifting the place of ‘only’ i.e. something other than sanctions can also back warning which is not the case. Hence B is the right correct answer.

A. only if it would be backed by sanctions. – WRONG. As discussed above.
B. only if it is backed by sanctions. – CORRECT.
C. if it is backed only by sanctions. - WRONG. As discussed above.
D. if it was only backed by sanctions. - WRONG. As discussed above.
E. if it would only be backed by sanctions. - WRONG. As discussed above.

Answer (B).
User avatar
LoneSurvivor
Joined: 23 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Jul 2021
Posts: 308
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 156
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
Posts: 308
Kudos: 723
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
While some economists believe that Germany should be warned by the European Commission that it could face the imposition of radical restrictions on its domestic fiscal policymaking as early as the beginning of next year, others say that Germany will take the warning seriously only if it would be backed by sanctions.

A. only if it would be backed by sanctions.
if must be followed by present tense

B. only if it is backed by sanctions.
Correct

C. if it is backed only by sanctions.
Only has been misplaced,hence change the meaning

D. if it was only backed by sanctions.
Tense error

E. if it would only be backed by sanctions.
Tense error
User avatar
Rachna23
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Last visit: 21 Jan 2020
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
GMAT 1: 670 Q46 V36
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
Posts: 16
Kudos: 42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The sentence intends to say that some economists believe that Germany should be warned by Europe, while others believe that Germany might not take the warning seriously unless the warning is backed by sanctions.

C, D & E place the word 'only' incorrectly to change the meaning.

C. if it is backed only by sanctions - implies that nothing else backs the warning except the sanctions.
D. if it was only backed by sanctions - implies that sanctions should do nothing to the warning except back it. Further, use of 'was' is incorrect.
E. if it would only be backed by sanctions - implies that sanctions should do nothing to the warning except back it

A and B place the 'only if' correctly after 'take the warning seriously'. However, since the non-underlined portion uses simple present and future tense, the use of 'would' is not appropriate. Would is used to predict future from the point of view of past

others say that Germany will take the warning seriously


B is the answer
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,877
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88,271
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,877
Kudos: 685,932
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

Competition Mode Question



While some economists believe that Germany should be warned by the European Commission that it could face the imposition of radical restrictions on its domestic fiscal policymaking as early as the beginning of next year, others say that Germany will take the warning seriously only if it would be backed by sanctions.

A. only if it would be backed by sanctions.
B. only if it is backed by sanctions.
C. if it is backed only by sanctions.
D. if it was only backed by sanctions.
E. if it would only be backed by sanctions.

Official Explanation



Correct Answer: B

The best answer is B. In sentences expressing a conditional result (X will happen if Y happens), the verb of the main clause should be in the future tense and the verb of the if clause should be in the present indicative. Thus, is backed (in B) is consistent with will take.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7163 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts