Chinmay1998
Hello,
Thank you so much for the reply. Sorry for the delayed response. I had done this and practiced on my weaknesses. But to my surprise my scores in the G-Prep dropped suddenly from 720 to 670 with V-31 and Q-49. I had solved 26/36 questions correct still the score was pretty less. I know that the scoring algorithm takes many factors into account but still its quite low. I had got many of the 700-800 level questions correct but made mistakes in 3-4 sub 600 level questions. Its really disappointing since most of the silly mistakes i make are in the easy questions. My GMAT is on the coming Saturday and there is not much i can think of to improve this.
Posted from my mobile device
No worries about the delay in response,
Chinmay1998. I would assume you would have better ways to spend your time, such as actually studying, than to be a diligent keyboard pen-pal. Although the number of correct responses can weigh somewhat into your eventual score--you cannot hit a perfect Q51 by missing a handful of problems, for example--by far, more important considerations include the following:
1) What level of questions--Easy, Medium, Hard--do you tend to miss?
Dropping points on the two easier categories will really hurt your eventual score. I was able to observe this firsthand in the past month when by chance, I had two clients take different official practice tests, miss the
same number of questions, and walk away with a Quant score
6 points apart. The difference? The one who scored lower had pursued each question in the beginning with a dogged determination to crack it, and by the time she had slogged through a dozen or so Hard questions, her mental state was in a shambles. She blindly clicked through several questions toward the end of the test just to finish in time. Many of those missed questions ended up being Medium and then, later, Easy. Meanwhile, the one who scored higher had just gone through and taken a stab at everything, but had never really reached into the upper levels of what the test had to offer. Her accuracy across Easy questions was 100 percent, Medium was in the 90s. So basically, the test kept trying to push her into harder questions, she would get some right, some wrong, and kind of bounce back and forth around the same upper level until she reached the end. I was surprised myself by the marked difference in their scores.
2) When are you missing questions, and are they here and there, or back to back?
Despite what GMAC™ claims in the
OG, the test really does place more emphasis on the earlier portion than the latter portion. See, for instance, the following Mythbusters article by
Bunuel:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-software-analysis-and-what-if-scenarios-146146.html#p1171760I have observed similar trends in the ESRs my clients have asked me to look over. So yes, make those earlier questions count, but as per 1) above, do not obsess so much over the earlier portion of the test that you shoot yourself in the foot when it comes to the rest.
3) Do your careless errors come on PS or DS questions?
PS questions seem to swing the eventual score more than DS questions, perhaps because most people find DS questions trickier. This is not a license to treat each DS question as a bonus, but it should make you focus a little more on PS questions and getting them right.
I suspect that the above will give you some food for thought. If you need further suggestions, keep bouncing ideas off us right here in this forum. Good luck. (There is still time to refine your thinking.)
- Andrew