Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 13:45 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 13:45

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92948
Own Kudos [?]: 619230 [33]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
SVP
SVP
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2362
Own Kudos [?]: 3626 [20]
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 May 2012
Posts: 15
Own Kudos [?]: 23 [0]
Given Kudos: 189
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2014
Posts: 269
Own Kudos [?]: 318 [1]
Given Kudos: 132
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Send PM
Re: a, b, and c are three integers such that a and b are less than 100, an [#permalink]
1
Kudos
First term in a sequence is a, and each term thereafter is k/11 greater than the term before it. If a and k are both positive integers but only one of them is a prime number, what is the sum of the first 100 terms in the sequence?
a + a + 99 (k/11)
= 2a + 9k

100×(2a + 9k )/2
=50 (2a+9k)

(1) 2a + 11k = 46
We have 2 equations in which we can solve for each variable
sufficient

(2) 3k = 14 - 2/3*a
We have 2 equations in which we can solve for each variable
sufficient

Answer:
D
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 10161
Own Kudos [?]: 16600 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Send PM
Re: a, b, and c are three integers such that a and b are less than 100, an [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and equations ensures a solution.


The first term in a sequence is a, and each term thereafter is k/11 greater than the term before it. If a and k are both positive integers but only one of them is a prime number, what is the sum of the first 100 terms in the sequence?

(1) 2a + 11k = 46
(2) 3k = 14 - 2/3*a

==> In the original condition, there are 2 variables (a,k) and we need 2 equations to match the number of variables and equations. Since there is 1 each in 1) and 2), C is likely the answer. Using 1) & 2) together, 1)=2) k=2, a=12 thus it is sufficient. Therefore the answer is D.

Originally posted by MathRevolution on 31 Aug 2015, 07:26.
Last edited by MathRevolution on 06 Sep 2015, 20:53, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2015
Posts: 261
Own Kudos [?]: 88 [0]
Given Kudos: 233
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 2.8
Send PM
Re: a, b, and c are three integers such that a and b are less than 100, an [#permalink]
Using 1 is not sufficient
Since we have s100= 50*46-2k
Using 2 we have
S100=50*42
So B?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Nov 2014
Posts: 34
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 105
GMAT 1: 590 Q42 V29
GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
Send PM
Re: a, b, and c are three integers such that a and b are less than 100, an [#permalink]
Ans should be C,
Unless we get values of a and k we cannot calculate sum,
to get values we need both the statements
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 165 [0]
Given Kudos: 207
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.99
Send PM
Re: a, b, and c are three integers such that a and b are less than 100, an [#permalink]
Wow, the question is really nasty. Rearanging 2 we get 2a+9k= 42. Both (12,2) and (3,4) satisfy the equation. However, if you rearrange condition given in the question using arithmetic progression formula, as Engr2012 did, you will see that 2 is sufficient.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Apr 2015
Posts: 84
Own Kudos [?]: 252 [0]
Given Kudos: 3989
Send PM
Re: a, b, and c are three integers such that a and b are less than 100, an [#permalink]
I believe answer should be A

If you evaluate the 2nd statement you get two sets of values for A and K i.e (a=3 and k=4 or a=12 and k=2) in this both solution leads to a single prime value but statement 1 there is only one possible solution with one prime number.

Bunuel plz comment

Thanks
Varun
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Aug 2015
Posts: 64
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 24
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
Send PM
Re: a, b, and c are three integers such that a and b are less than 100, an [#permalink]
I myself marked A initially.

Condition 1 is sufficient
Condition 2, we get 2 answers a=3,k=4 or a= 12,k=2 so I don't think it is sufficient,initially but I think there is alternative for 2nd condition, Sum of AP comes out to be 50*(2a+9k), value of 2a+9k is given as 42 as per second condition so it is also sufficient
hence D
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Nov 2016
Posts: 26
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 351
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V33
Send PM
Re: a, b, and c are three integers such that a and b are less than 100, an [#permalink]
Bunuel, Could you please tell me how (i) is sufficient to solve this.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Jan 2014
Posts: 132
Own Kudos [?]: 244 [0]
Given Kudos: 212
WE:Project Management (Computer Hardware)
Send PM
Re: a, b, and c are three integers such that a and b are less than 100, an [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
The first term in a sequence is a, and each term thereafter is k/11 greater than the term before it. If a and k are both positive integers but only one of them is a prime number, what is the sum of the first 100 terms in the sequence?

(1) 2a + 11k = 46
(2) 3k = 14 - 2/3*a


Kudos for a correct solution.


Shouldn't it be A?

Since stmt. 2 has two valid solutions of (a,k), i.e. (a,k) = (3,4) or (2,12)

From stmt.1 we can make sure (a,k) = (2,12)

how is this wrong?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Dec 2017
Posts: 302
Own Kudos [?]: 307 [0]
Given Kudos: 273
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT 1: 630 Q44 V33
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 3: 710 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.25
WE:Marketing (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Re: a, b, and c are three integers such that a and b are less than 100, an [#permalink]
thefibonacci wrote:
(2) 3k = 14 - 2/3*a
Shouldn't it be A?
Since stmt. 2 has two valid solutions of (a,k), i.e. (a,k) = (3,4) or (2,12)
From stmt.1 we can make sure (a,k) = (2,12)
how is this wrong?


First of all not (2,12), but (12,2). You are asked to find the sum of 100 numbers of the set, which = 50*(2a+9k)

In both cases (3,4) or (12,2), the Sum = 50*42. So B is sufficient too.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2017
Posts: 75
Own Kudos [?]: 38 [1]
Given Kudos: 180
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 500 Q39 V20
GPA: 3.82
Send PM
Re: a, b, and c are three integers such that a and b are less than 100, an [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
ENGRTOMBA2018 wrote:
dav90 wrote:
Ans should be C,
Unless we get values of a and k we cannot calculate sum,
to get values we need both the statements


Not really. Look below. In DS questions, you need to absolutely sure that you will not get an answer by using the statements alone.

Sum of n terms of an arithmetic progression (a sequence in which each term after the 1st one is related to the previous term by a constant, k/11 in this case) =\(\frac{n*[2*a+(n-1)*d]}{2}\)

where, n =100, d = k/11

Substituting, we get,

Sum of 100 terms = 50* [2a+9k]

Per statement 2, after rearranging the terms, we get 2a+9k = 46. Thus this statement is sufficient to give the sum of 100 terms = 50*46 = a unique value.

Per statement 1, 2a+11k = 46 ---> a = (46-11k)/2 and as 'a' is a positive integer (>0), the only possible values of k to give integer value of 'a' are k = 4 or k =2

Thus we get , a=12 when k =2 or a=1 when k=4.

Case 2: a=1 when k=4 , NOT possible as we are told that 1 of 'a' and 'k' is a prime number and as both 1 and 4 are NOT primes, this case is discarded.

Case 1: a=12 when k =2 , possible as 2 is a prime number. Thus this is the only case possible and hence statement 1 is sufficient as well.

Thus both statements are sufficient on their own.

D is the correct answer.



Good explanation

is there any short simple explanation anybody can share
VP
VP
Joined: 20 Jul 2017
Posts: 1300
Own Kudos [?]: 3451 [1]
Given Kudos: 162
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
GMAT 1: 690 Q51 V30
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: a, b, and c are three integers such that a and b are less than 100, an [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Bunuel wrote:
The first term in a sequence is a, and each term thereafter is k/11 greater than the term before it. If a and k are both positive integers but only one of them is a prime number, what is the sum of the first 100 terms in the sequence?

(1) 2a + 11k = 46
(2) 3k = 14 - (2/3)*a


Kudos for a correct solution.


Series is in AP.
d = k/11
—> Sum of n terms = n/2*[2a + (n - 1)d]
—> Sum of 100 terms = 100/2*[2a + 99*k/11]
= 59*[2a + 9k]

Only one of a and k is prime

(1) 2a + 11k = 46
If k = 1, a = 17.5 (Not possible)
k = 2, a = 12 (Possible)
k = 3, a = 6.5 (Not Possible)
k = 4, a = 1 (Not Possible)

We get unique value of a & k.
—> we can calculate sum of 100 terms value

Sufficient

(2) 3k = 14 - (2/3)*a
—> 3k = (42 - 2*a)/3
—> 9k = 42 - 2a
—> 2a + 9k = 42

So, Sum of 100 terms = 50*42

Sufficient

IMO Option D

Pls Hit kudos if you like the solution

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Jul 2020
Posts: 49
Own Kudos [?]: 28 [0]
Given Kudos: 340
Location: India
GRE 1: Q169 V152
GPA: 3.94
WE:Research (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: a, b, and c are three integers such that a and b are less than 100, an [#permalink]
Instead of going by the conventional method i.e. identifying this question to be Arithmetic progression and solving. I suggest to solve by plugging in numbers.
It is fairly simple considering the fact that both a and k are positive integers and only one of them is prime.


For Statement-1: Focus on setting k and see what value of k gives an integer for a
Upon one-two iterations we get (a,k) = {(1,4), (12,2)}
and only (a,k)=(12,2) satisfies prime condition given in problem

Similarly, try to plug in for Statement-2

We identify that 2 statement independently can be used to answer the question. Hence Option D is the answer

This process took me 1min 58secs
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Jun 2022
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: a, b, and c are three integers such that a and b are less than 100, an [#permalink]
no necessary to calculate the sum if we know value of a and k.


based on that a or k is a prime (but not both of them are prime figures)

for (1) 2a + 11k = 46, we know it's a=12, k =2, sufficient

for (2) 3k = 14 - (2/3)*a, we know it's a=3, k=4, suffienct
GMAT Club Bot
Re: a, b, and c are three integers such that a and b are less than 100, an [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92948 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne